Performance of the unilateral AV/IVC index in primary hyperaldosteronism subtype prediction: A validation study in a single tertiary centre

A clinical decision model for failed adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism

Objective

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common cause of secondary hypertension with unilateral and bilateral subtypes requiring different treatments. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for subtype differentiation but can be unsuccessful by challenging right adrenal vein anatomy. This study aimed to develop a clinical decision model using only measurements from the left adrenal vein (LAV) and peripheral blood (IVC) to differentiate between PA subtypes.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study included 54 PA patients who underwent bilaterally successful AVS. The main objective was to determine optimal cut-off values for the LAV/IVC index, using ROC analysis for subtype prediction. The predictive value of this index was assessed with the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The Youden index calculated cut-off values, targeting a specificity >90% for PA subtype differentiation.

Results

The cohort, averaging 48.5 ± 9.5 years in age, comprised 21 women and 33 men, among whom 26 presented with unilateral and 28 with bilateral disease. LAV/IVC values <1.2 indicated unilateral right-sided disease (specificity 91%, sensitivity 96%, AUC 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.0), values 1.2-2.4 suggested bilateral disease (sensitivity 93%, specificity 64%, AUC 0.85, CI 0.73-0.96), whereas values ≥4.4 predicted unilateral left-sided disease (specificity 93%, sensitivity 60%, AUC 0.85, CI 0.73-0.96). Published literature aligns with our results on cut-off values.

Conclusions

Utilizing the LAV/IVC index, over 70% of unsuccessful AVS procedures due to failed right adrenal cannulation could be interpreted with over 90% certainty regarding the PA subtype, preventing unnecessary resampling and aiding in determining the preferred treatment.

Calculated Right Adrenal Vein Aldosterone Levels in Patients Undergoing Adrenal Vein Sampling: The Potential to Lateralize Despite Unsuccessful Selection of the Right Adrenal Vein

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to use calculated aldosterone level in the right adrenal vein (RAV) (cAldoRAV) rather than measured level for identifying the dominant side of aldosterone secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism undergoing adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated adrenal venous sampling (AVS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary aldosteronism who had successful AVS (selectivity index, >3) were studied. Based on the assumption that cortisol production from both adrenal glands is equal, aldosterone level in the RAV was calculated using the data from the left adrenal vein and inferior vena cava. The aldosterone level in the left adrenal vein (AldoLAV) compared with the cAldoRAV (AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio) was then used to determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion compared with standard AVS interpretation using lateralization index (LI). LI ≥4 indicated unilateral disease, and LI ≤3 indicated bilateral disease. The LI between 3 and 4 was diagnosed as indeterminate.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with concordant results between AVS and adrenal imaging study (32 were left-sided, 22 were right-sided, and 14 were bilateral) were selected for studying diagnostic performance. The AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio with the cutoff values of ≥3 and ≤0.33 could identify unilateral diseases (left-sided and right-sided disease, respectively) with 92.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculated AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio can determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion with high sensitivity and specificity when compared with standard AVS interpretation of measured levels. It provides an option for identification of unilateral and bilateral disease in select patients in whom right adrenal vein selection is unsuccessful.

Contralateral Suppression in Adrenal Venous Sampling Predicts Clinical and Biochemical Outcome in Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT

The role of hormone parameters at adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in predicting clinical and biochemical outcomes remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of hormone parameters at AVS under cosyntropin stimulation on lateralization and on complete biochemical and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 150 sequential AVS under cosyntropin infusion. The bilateral successful cannulation rate was 83.3% (n = 140), 47.9% bilateral and 52.1% unilateral. The lateralization index, aldosterone/cortisol ratio (A/C) in the dominant adrenal vein (AV), and relative aldosterone secretion index (RASI = A/C in AV divided by A/C in inferior vena cava) were assessed. The contralateral suppression (CS) percentage was defined by (1 - nondominant RASI) * 100.

RESULTS

A nondominant RASI <0.5 (CS >50%) had 86.84% sensitivity and 92.96% specificity to predict contralateral lateralization. An A/C ratio in dominant AV >5.9 (74.67% sensitivity and 80% specificity) and dominant RASI >4.7 (35.21% sensitivity and 88.06% specificity) had the worst performance to predict ipsilateral lateralization. Complete biochemical and clinical cure was significantly more frequent in the patients with CS >50% [98.41% vs 42.86% (P < .001) and 41.94% vs 0% (P < .001)]. CS correlated with high aldosterone at diagnosis (P < .001) and low postoperative aldosterone levels at 1 month (P = .019). Postoperative biochemical hypoaldosteronism was more frequent in patients with CS >50% (70% vs 16.67%, P = .014). In multivariable analysis, a CS >50% was associated with complete biochemical cure [odds ratio (OR) 125, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.904-5000; P = .001] and hypertension remission (OR 12.19, 95% CI 2.074-250; P = .023).

CONCLUSION

A CS >50% was an independent predictor of complete clinical and biochemical cure. Moreover, it can predict unilateral primary aldosteronism and postoperative biochemical hypoaldosteronism. Our findings underscore the usefulness of CS for clinical decision-making.

Treatment decision based on unilateral index from nonadrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated and adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for identifying the subtype of primary aldosteronism before making a surgical treatment decision, but failed cannulation of one adrenal vein is common. To evaluate whether using results of one adrenal vein during AVS could accurately predict unilateral primary aldosteronism.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in primary aldosteronism patients receiving bilaterally or unilaterally successful AVS. The aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the adrenal vein divided by the aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the inferior vena cava (IVC) was calculated as the AV/IVC index.

RESULTS

The study examined 455 patients with primary aldosteronism, including 347 patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. Among them, 250 and 125 patients received non- adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and ACTH-stimulated AVS, respectively, and 80 patients received both forms of AVS. Under non-ACTH-stimulated AVS, AUC of the AV/IVC index to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism were 0.778 and 0.924, respectively. The specificity was 100% for both, with sensitivities of 5 and 26%, respectively, when using cutoffs of 17.05 to diagnose ipsilateral primary aldosteronism and 0.15 to diagnose contralateral primary aldosteronism. When using cutoffs of 3.60 and 0.70, the specificity decreased, but if combined with CT results (ipsilateral or contralateral adrenal nodules larger than 10 mm), the specificity could be maintained at 99%, with sensitivities of 33 and 45%, respectively. Under ACTH-stimulated AVS, the AV/IVC index showed similar accuracy to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism.

CONCLUSION

The unilateral AV/IVC index can be used to diagnose unilateral primary aldosteronism during AVS. Combining CT results can increase the accuracy further.

Diagnostic performance of the adrenal vein to inferior vena cava aldosterone ratio in classifying the subtype of primary aldosteronism

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the standard procedure for distinguishing unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) from bilateral PA. In cases where only one adrenal vein is successfully cannulated, it has been suggested that subtype classification can be determined based on the ratio of the concentration of aldosterone between the adrenal vein and the inferior vena cava (AV/IVC index). However, diagnostic performance of the ipsilateral versus contralateral AV/IVC index in predicting lateralization has not been directly compared. In a retrospective cohort of 133 patients with confirmed PA who underwent successful AVS, the performance of the AV/IVC index to predict laterality was evaluated and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves was calculated. In detecting left unilateral PA (n = 47), the AUROC of the right AV/IVC index (RAV/IVC) was significantly higher than the AUROC of the left AV/IVC (LAV/IVC) index (0.967 vs. 0.871, p = 0.008). In detecting right unilateral PA (n = 30), the AUROC of the LAV/IVC index tended to be higher than that of the RAV/IVC index, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (0.966 vs. 0.906, p = 0.08). In detecting left unilateral PA, the sensitivities of the RAV/IVC and LAV/IVC indices were 83% and 46%, respectively, while the specificities of both were above 90%. In detecting right unilateral PA, the sensitivities of the LAV/IVC and RAV/IVC indices were 80% and 43%, respectively, while the specificities of both were above 90%. The AV/IVC index has superior diagnostic performance in detecting contralateral unilateral PA compared to ipsilateral unilateral PA.

Optimizing adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism subtyping through LC-MS/MS and secretion ratios of aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for identifying curable unilateral aldosterone excess in primary aldosteronism (PA). Studies have demonstrated the value of steroid profiling through liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in AVS interpretation. First, the performance of LC-MS/MS and immunoassay in assessing selectivity and lateralization was compared. Second, the utility of the proportion of individual steroids in adrenal veins in subtyping PA was analyzed. We enrolled 75 consecutive patients with PA who underwent AVS between 2020 and 2021. Fifteen adrenal steroids were analyzed in peripheral and adrenal veins through LC-MS/MS before and after adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation. Through selectivity index that was based on cortisol and alternative steroids, LC-MS/MS rescued 45% and 66% of failed cases judged by immunoassay in unstimulated and stimulated AVS, respectively. LC-MS/MS identified more unilateral diseases than did immunoassay (76% vs. 45%, P < 0.05) and provided adrenalectomy opportunities to 69% of patients judged through immunoassay to have bilateral disease. The secretion ratios (individual steroid concentration/total steroid concentration) of aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol were novel indicators for identifying unilateral PA. The 18-oxocortisol secretion ratio of ≥0.785‰ (sensitivity/specificity: 0.90/0.77) at pre-ACTH and aldosterone secretion ratio of ≤0.637‰ (sensitivity/specificity: 0.88/0.85) at post-ACTH enabled optimal accuracy for predicting ipsilateral and contralateral disease, respectively, in robust unilateral PA. LC-MS/MS improved the success rate of AVS and identified more unilateral diseases than immunoassay. The secretion ratios of steroids can be used to discriminate the broad PA spectrum.

Subtyping primary aldosteronism by inconclusive adrenal vein sampling: A derivation and validation study in a tertiary centre

OBJECTIVE

Indices based on aldosterone/cortisol (A/C) concentration in the successfully cannulated adrenal vein (AV) and in the inferior vena cava (IVC) (AV/IVC) appear to be possible markers to verify the subtype of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the case of inconclusive results of adrenal vein sampling (AVS). The variability of results in previous studies encouraged us to calculate AV/IVC and adrenal A/C cutoff values that could predict the aetiology of PA.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent AVS due to PA between 2015 and 2020. The derivation cohort ultimately consisted of 60 patients with bilaterally successful AVS and a clear diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral disease. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to find the optimal A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values predicting the subtype of PA. The validation cohort consisted of 11 patients with either unsuccessful cannulation or a borderline lateralization index (LI), those patients underwent adrenalectomy because their indices were suggestive of unilateral disease based on the derivation cohort data.

RESULTS

The cutoff values of A/C ≤ 0.63 or AV/IVC ≤ 0.37 identified unaffected glands with a sensitivity of 91.2% and 97.1%, respectively, and a specificity of 90.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Unilateral ipsilateral gland involvement was characterized by A/C ≥ 3.5 or AV/IVC ≥ 3.4 with a corresponding specificity of 100%. All patients in the validation cohort achieved biochemical remission postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values could be a useful tool to determine the subtype of PA in patients with unilateral successful AVS as well as in patients with a borderline LI.

The Entity of Connshing Syndrome: Primary Aldosteronism with Autonomous Cortisol Secretion

Connshing syndrome (CoSh) (adrenal-related synchronous aldosterone (A) and cortisol (C) excess) represents a distinct entity among PA (primary hyperaldosteronisms) named by W. Arlt et al. in 2017, but the condition has been studied for more than 4 decades. Within the last few years, this is one of the most dynamic topics in hormonally active adrenal lesions due to massive advances in steroids metabolomics, molecular genetics from CYP11B1/B2 immunostaining to genes constellations, as well as newly designated pathological categories according to the 2022 WHO classification. In gross, PA causes 4-10% of all high blood pressure (HBP) cases, and 20% of resistant HBP; subclinical Cushing syndrome (SCS) is identified in one-third of adrenal incidentalomas (AI), while CoSh accounts for 20-30% to 77% of PA subjects, depending on the tests used to confirm autonomous C secretion (ACS). The clinical picture overlaps with PA, hypercortisolemia being mild. ACS is suspected in PA if a more severe glucose and cardiovascular profile is identified, or there are larger tumours, ACS being an independent factor risk for kidney damage, and probably also for depression/anxiety and osteoporotic fractures. It seems that one-third of the PA-ACS group harbours mutations of C-related lines like PRKACA and GNAS. A novel approach means we should perform CYP11B2/CYP11B1 immunostaining; sometimes negative aldosteronoma for CYP11B1 is surrounded by micronodules or cell clusters with positive CYP11B1 to sustain the C excess. Pitfalls of hormonal assessments in CoSh include the index of suspicion (check for ACS in PA patients) and the interpretation of A/C ratio during adrenal venous sample. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice. Post-operative clinical remission rate is lower in CoSh than PA. The risk of clinically manifested adrenal insufficiency is low, but a synthetic ACTH stimulating testing might help to avoid unnecessary exposure to glucocorticoids therapy. Finally, postponing the choice of surgery may impair the outcome, having noted that long-term therapy with mineralocorticoids receptors antagonists might not act against excessive amounts of C. Awareness of CoSh improves management and overall prognosis.