FDG PET-CT imaging in head and neck paragangliomas: A centre experience

Succinate dehydrogenase mutations in head and neck paragangliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patients' data

BACKGROUND

Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) have been associated with gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex, but the clinical significance remains unclear. We sought to explore the demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and outcomes of SDH-mutated HNPs.

METHODS

Databases were systematically searched. Pooled event ratio and relative 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Meta-regression was performed. Cochran's Q test and I2 test assessed heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Egger's regression test assessed publication bias.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies with 8849 patients were included. Meta-regression revealed a significant correlation between multifocality and SDHD mutations (0.03 ± 0.006, p < 0.0001) and between distant metastases and SDHB mutations (0.06 ± 0.023, p = 0.008). There was no correlation between sex, age, tumor size, or familial occurrences and SDH-related mutations.

CONCLUSION

Multifocality of HNPs correlates with the SDHD mutational subtype, and metastases correlate with the SDHB subtype. Knowledge of HNP phenotypes associated with SDH-related mutations has the potential to influence the management approach to such HNPs.

Local Tumor Behavior Associated With Survival Among Patients With Paraganglioma of the Head and Neck

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of ICD-O-3–classified local tumor behavior as a prognosticator of head and neck paraganglioma (HNP) outcomes.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016.

Methods

This study included patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with HNP. Clinical outcomes and clinicopathologic features were compared with regard to local tumor behavior.

Results

Our study included 525 patients, of which the majority had HNP classified as locally invasive (45.9%) or borderline (37.9%). The most common anatomic sites involved were the carotid body (33.7%), intracranial regions (29.0%), or cranial nerves (25.5%). Carotid body tumors were exclusively locally invasive, whereas intracranial and cranial nerve HNP were overwhelmingly benign or borderline (94% and 91%, respectively). One-fourth of patients underwent pathologic analysis of regional lymph nodes, of which the majority were positive for metastasis (80.6%). Metastasis to distant organs was twice as common in patients with locally invasive tumors vs benign (15% vs 7.1). For benign disease, surgery with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 40.45; P = .006) and active surveillance (aHR, 24.23; P = .008) were associated with worse survival when compared with surgery alone. For locally invasive tumors, greater age (aHR, 1.07; P < .0001) and positive surgical margins (aHR, 4.13; P = .010) were predictors of worse survival, while combined surgery and radiotherapy were predictors of improved survival vs surgery alone (aHR, 0.31; P = .027).

Conclusion

While criteria for tumor behavior could not be defined, our results suggest that such a classification system could be used to enhance HNP risk stratification and guide clinical management decisions.