Effect of pretreatment with antifungal agents on clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis

In situ forming and mucoadhesive ophthalmic voriconazole/HPβCD hydrogels for the treatment of fungal keratitis

Fungal keratitis is a severe infectious corneal disease. At present, no voriconazole ophthalmic formulations are approved by the FDA or EMA. This lack of therapeutic options leads to the reformulation of intravenous voriconazole preparations (VFEND®) by the hospital pharmacy departments to prepare the appropriate ophthalmic formulations (pharmacy compounding). However, the limited residence time of these formulations leads to an intensive treatment posology that may increase the occurrence of side effects. In the present study, two different hydrogels were developed and characterized in order to improve the voriconazole's ophthalmic solubility, permanence, and security. Voriconazole-cyclodextrin (HPβCD or HPɣCD) inclusion complexes in aqueous solutions were characterized by NMR and molecular modeling. Complexes were formed by encapsulation of voriconazole into the cyclodextrin's internal cavity which considerably increases its water solubility. Ocular safety was proven by ocular irritation studies. Permeability studies suggest both hydrogels have good corneal permeability. Furthermore, in vivo ocular permanence study by PET/CT showed a longer permanence time on the ocular surface (t_1/2 = 58.91 ± 13.4 min and 96.28 ± 49.11 min for VZHAH and VZISH 0.65 respectively) compared to the voriconazole control formulation (VFEND® t_1/2 = 32.27 ± 15.56 min). Results suggest these formulations are a good alternative for the treatment of fungal keratitis.

[Fungal keratitis]

Fungal keratitis, or keratomycoses, are corneal infections which must be considered in cases of corneal trauma, prior corneal surgery, chronic ocular surface disease, topical corticosteroids or contact lens wear. Filamentous fungi or yeasts may be involved. Presenting clinical features such as corneal infiltrates with feathery edges and/or raised surface, intact epithelium with deep stromal involvement, satellite lesions, endothelial plaques, lack of improvement with antibiotics and worsening with steroids are suggestive of fungal keratitis. Corneal scraping for laboratory examination is mandatory. Medical management with antifungal eye drops and systemic agents should be started as soon as possible. Surgical interventions are required in a significant number of cases to control the infection. The prognosis of fungal keratitis is worse than that of bacterial keratitis.

Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

To compare oral voriconazole with placebo in addition to topical antifungals in the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II), a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, was conducted in India and Nepal, with 2133 individuals screened for inclusion. Patients with smear-positive filamentous fungal ulcers and visual acuity of 20/400 (logMAR 1.3) or worse were randomized to receive oral voriconazole vs oral placebo; all participants received topical antifungal eyedrops. The study was conducted from May 24, 2010, to November 23, 2015. All trial end points were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Study participants were randomized to receive oral voriconazole vs oral placebo; a voriconazole loading dose of 400 mg was administered twice daily for 24 hours, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg twice daily for 20 days, with dosing altered to weight based during the trial. All participants received topical voriconazole, 1%, and natamycin, 5%.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome of the trial was rate of corneal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) within 3 months. Secondary outcomes included microbiologic cure at 6 days, rate of re-epithelialization, best-corrected visual acuity and infiltrate and/or scar size at 3 weeks and 3 months, and complication rates associated with voriconazole use.

Results

A total of 2133 patients in India and Nepal with smear-positive ulcers were screened; of the 787 who were eligible, 240 (30.5%) were enrolled. Of the 119 patients (49.6%) in the oral voriconazole treatment group, 65 were male (54.6%), and the median age was 54 years (interquartile range, 42-62 years). Overall, no difference in the rate of corneal perforation or the need for TPK was determined for oral voriconazole vs placebo (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57-1.18; P = .29). In prespecified subgroup analyses comparing treatment effects among organism subgroups, there was some suggestion that Fusarium species might have a decreased rate of perforation or TPK in the oral voriconazole-treated arm; however, this was not a statistically significant finding after Holms-Šidák correction for multiple comparisons (effect coefficient, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; P = .03). Patients receiving oral voriconazole experienced a total of 58 adverse events (48.7%) compared with 28 adverse events (23.1%) in the placebo group (P < .001 after Holms-Šidák correction for multiple comparisons).

Conclusions and Relevance

There appears to be no benefit to adding oral voriconazole to topical antifungal agents in the treatment of severe filamentous fungal ulcers. All patients in this study were enrolled in India and Nepal; therefore, it is possible that organisms in this region may exhibit characteristics different from those in other regions of the world.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00996736.