The effect of the use of proton pump inhibitors, serotonin uptake inhibitors, anti-hypertensive, and anti-inflammatory drugs on clinical outcomes of functional dental implants: a retrospective study

Is there any relation between proton pump inhibitors and risk of dental implant failure? A large-scale retrospective study using the BigMouth repository

The aim of this retrospective large-scale study was to investigate long-term the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and risk of dental implant failure. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients rehabilitated with dental implants in the dental clinics of the universities that contribute data to the BigMouth network. Patients' characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, race, tobacco use, systemic medical conditions, and intake of PPIs were analysed. Implant failure was defined as the removal of a dental implant for any reason. A total of 20,274 patients who received a total of 50,333 dental implants over a 12-year period were included. At the patient level, omeprazole users exhibited 1.77 (95% CI: 1.30 to 2.42) odds of experiencing implant loss compared with non-users. The use of PPIs was significantly associated with implant loss, with PPI users demonstrating 1.40 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.88) odds of implant failure. At the implant level, implants placed in pantoprazole users showed a significant protection against implant loss, while implants in omeprazole users demonstrated a significantly lower survival time compared with those in non-users. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that implants placed in omeprazole users exhibited a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.96) compared with those placed in non-users. Within the limitations of this study, omeprazole was significantly associated with implant failure both at a patient and implant level. At patient level, PPI users demonstrated a significantly higher risk of dental implant failure.

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Severity of Periodontal Disease and Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review

This systematic review investigates the probable effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on the severity of periodontal disease and peri-implantitis and implant survival. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Library up to April 2024. Two review authors independently screened the title and abstracts and then the full texts of retrieved studies. Observational and clinical trial studies that assessed the association between PPI use and periodontal disease severity and peri-implantitis or implant survival were included. Data extraction from the included studies was done by 2 reviewers independently. Of 940 studies initially retrieved from online searching, 7 met the inclusion criteria. Three studies examined periodontitis, whereas 4 focused on peri-implantitis and implant longevity. On the contrary, evidence regarding the impact of PPI use on peri-implantitis and implant survival is conflicting. Therefore, more well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted to come to a definite conclusion. Because PPIs alter the gut microbiome and affect bone, plus that the pathogenesis and etiology of periodontal disease are affected by bacteria within the periodontal pocket, it is hypothesized that they may affect periodontal pathogenesis.

Medications Affecting Treatment Outcomes in Dentistry: Part 2

Today, it is common for medically complex patients who are receiving multiple medications, to seek routine and emergent dental care. It is essential for the practitioner to recognize and comprehend the impact of such medications on the patient's ability to tolerate the planned dental treatment and on dental treatment outcomes. An active appraisal of current literature is essential to stay abreast of emerging findings and understand their treatment implications. This article outlines the process of such active critical appraisal, illustrating key paradigms of the models that describe the impact of medications on treatment outcomes.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on periodontal health - A systematic review

Introduction

In recent times, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently prescribed to manage acid reflux and to aid in completion of course of medication, which cause gastric irritation. Although this practice may minimize compliance to drug therapies and probably prevent development of drug resistance, the adverse effects of chronic PPI use have to be assessed. Inadvertent chronic use of PPIs has been found to inhibit normal gastrointestinal microbiome and even bone metabolism. The current study aimed to review available evidence based literature to understand the beneficial effects of PPIs weighed against their adversities with respect to periodontal and peri-implant health.

Materials and Methods

The search strategy was followed according to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Proton pump inhibitors, periodontal disease, dental implant (DI) and bone osseointegration were used as key MESH terms to search and select the required articles for review. While primary inclusion criteria were original researches, published in English, between 2014 to till-date, case reports, reviews and editorial communications were excluded.

Results

The overall search strategy resulted in 445 articles. Applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria 37 articles were selected. Scrutinizing the abstracts for relevance, 17 publications were finally selected for review. This included three in vivo animal studies evaluating DI osseointegration and 14 retrospective clinical studies (nine in patients with dental implants, four in patients with periodontitis and one evaluating bone quality using panoramic radiographs).

Conclusion

Findings from this systematic review revealed a plausible relationship between chronic PPI use and poor peri-implant bone health leading to early DI failure, and mandibular osteoporotic changes. On the contrary, use of PPI among patients with periodontitis, resulted in an improvement in periodontal health and reduction in periodontal disease severity.

Emerging factors affecting peri-implant bone metabolism

Implant dentistry has evolved to the point that standard implant osseointegration is predictable. This is attributed in part to the advancements in material sciences that have led toward improvements in implant surface technology and characteristics. Nonetheless, there remain several cases where implant therapy fails (specifically at early time points), most commonly attributed to factors affecting bone metabolism. Among these patients, smokers are known to have impaired bone metabolism and thus be subject to higher risks of early implant failure and/or late complications related to the stability of the peri-implant bone and mucosal tissues. Notably, however, emerging data have unveiled other critical factors affecting osseointegration, namely, those related to the metabolism of bone tissues. The aim of this review is to shed light on the effects of implant-related factors, like implant surface or titanium particle release; surgical-related factors, like osseodensification or implanted biomaterials; various drugs, like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, anti-hypertensives, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and statins, and host-related factors, like smoking, diet, and metabolic syndrome on bone metabolism, and aseptic peri-implant bone loss. Despite the infectious nature of peri-implant biological complications, these factors must be surveyed for the effective prevention and management of peri-implantitis.

Dental Implant Placement in Medically Compromised Patients: A Literature Review

As a discipline of dentistry, oral implantology deals with the diagnosis, design, insertion, restoration, and/or management of alloplastic or autogenous oral structures for the purpose of regaining contour, function, aesthetics, and speech in a partially or completely edentulous patient. The present review aims to provide the currently available knowledge about the impact of certain systemic disorders and the usage of some medications on the survival rate of dental implant therapy and to highlight the importance of patient management under these conditions. Diabetes, osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, and the intake of some medications can increase the risk of the failure of a dental implant. Even though there are relatively few medical contraindications to dental implant treatment, certain conditions may increase the risk of failure or complications.

The influence of implant position and of prosthetic characteristics on the occurrence of peri-implantitis: a retrospective study on periapical radiographs

OBJECTIVE

The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the influence of malposition on the occurrence of peri-implantitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included clinical records of systemically healthy patients with single and partial implant-supported rehabilitations and at least 1-year post-loading follow-up. The parameters collected included implant-related factors, patient-related factors, site-related factors, and prosthesis-related factors. The radiographic measurements were taken by using a dedicated software and the diagnosis of peri-implantitis was made based on all the available clinical and radiographic data. Descriptive statistics were provided for all variables. Following an exploratory approach, an implant-level analysis of factors influencing the occurrence of peri-implantitis was done through a multilevel multivariate logistic regression (mixed).

RESULTS

A total of 180 implants belonging to 90 subjects were randomly selected. Malposition showed no statistically significant association with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. According to the multi-level analysis, the parameters that were significantly associated with peri-implantitis included presence / history of periodontitis (OR = 5.945, 95% CI: 1.093 - 32.334, P = 0.039) and presence of an emergence profile angle ≥ 45° (OR = 9.094, 95% CI: 2.017 - 40.995, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant malposition, as defined following Buser's criteria (2004), did not influence the occurrence of peri-implantitis in the selected cohort. Conversely, history of periodontitis and presence of a prosthetic emergence profile with an angle ≥ 45° were correlated to an increased risk of peri-implantitis.

The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Early Implant Failure A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background and Objectives: Maintenance of a firm and long-term stable osseointegration is the primary goal of implant dentistry. Time is used to define implant failure characteristics. Early implant failure (EIF) occurs up to one year after loading. Recent studies indicated an association between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy and failure of osseointegration. The present study assessed whether the use of PPIs is a risk factor to EIF. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study including 687 patients and 2971 dental implants. The study group (PPIs users) comprised 17.3% (119) individuals and 18.7% (555) implants. The remaining cohort (82.7% (568) individuals and 81.3% (2416) implants) served as control. The information was taken from the patients' files. The following information was collected: age, gender, physical status, systemic diseases, HbA1C values before and after implant-supported prosthesis delivery in cases of diabetes mellitus, smoking, implant location, number of implants per individual, bone augmentation, implant brand, length and width, and EIF. EIF was defined as implant removal within a period of up to 12 months from loading. Results: EIF in PPIs vs. non-PPIs users was 19.3% vs. 14.3% (p = 0.16) at patient level and 5.4% vs. 3.5% at implant level (p = 0.03). Univariate analysis yielded factors significantly associated with PPIs use, including older age, physical status of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 3, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, cardiovascular accident (CVA), location (anterior mandible), shorter and narrower implants, and higher number of implants per individual. Multivariate analysis yielded statistically significant OR of 1.91; p = 0.01 for EIF following PPIs use and 2.3; p < 0.001 for location in anterior mandible. Conclusions: Patients and their healthcare providers are advised to carefully consider the potential risks of taking PPIs prior to dental implant surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these risks and elucidate systemic and local factors that may be involved in such outcomes.