Aspiration versus stent retriever for posterior circulation stroke: A meta-analysis

Aspiration only versus stent retriever only thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of the German Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment has become the standard care for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Uncertainty persists about the optimal thrombectomy technique.

OBJECTIVE

To compare aspiration thrombectomy with stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with BAO in a multicenter real-world patient population.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET). Patients with isolated BAO who underwent either aspiration or stent retriever thrombectomy were compared, including propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale shift analysis at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), procedure complications, and metrics.

RESULTS

Of 13 082 patients in the GSR-ET, 387 patients (mean age 72.0±13.1 years; 45.0% female) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The thrombectomy technique was aspiration only in 195 (50.4%) and stent retriever only in 192 (49.6%) patients. Functional outcome did not differ between the groups, either before (common OR (cOR) 0.94; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.38) or after PSM (cOR=1.37; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.09). There was no significant difference in sICH (2.6 vs 5.5%; P=0.231; OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.47), but aspiration thrombectomy demonstrated fewer procedure-related complications (4.6% vs 12.5%; P=0.017), a shorter procedure duration (24 vs 48 min; P<0.001), and higher first pass recanalization rates (75.1% vs 44.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study both aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy showed equal efficacy in terms of functional outcome in patients with BAO. However, procedure complications and metrics might favor aspiration over stent retriever thrombectomy.

Contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion safely reduces the puncture-to-recanalization time

OBJECTIVE

Effective thrombectomies in the posterior circulation remain controversial. Previous reports have demonstrated the superiority of contact aspiration in anterior circulation. Aspiration catheters and stent retrievers are often used alone on a global scale, while combined techniques are commonly used in Japan. This study evaluated the effect of first-line contact aspiration with other strategies for the treatment of basilar artery occlusion.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the frequency of the first-pass effect, and the secondary outcome was the time from puncture to the first-pass effect. A multicenter observational registry including 16 Japanese stroke centers was used. Between December 2013 and February 2021, enrolled patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion. The efficacy of contact aspiration compared to other methods (including stent retrievers and combined techniques) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included, all of whom had achieved effective recanalization. Twenty-six patients were treated with contact aspiration, 13 with combined technique, and 45 with stent retrievers. The two groups: contact aspiration and non-contact aspiration, had different backgrounds. Both had similar frequencies of effective recanalization and first-pass effects. The contact aspiration group experienced better functional outcomes without statistical significance, while this strategy was significantly associated with a shorter puncture-to-recanalization time (38 vs. 55 minutes, P=0.036). In particular, in the 55 patients with the first-pass effect, multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that contact aspiration was significantly associated with a shorter time from puncture to first-pass effect, independent of age and etiology of large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence intervals 1.10-3.69, P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion may shorten the puncture-to-first-pass effect, compared to stent retrievers and combined techniques.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Direct-Aspiration First-Pass Technique versus Stent Retriever in Mechanical Thrombectomy

OBJECTIVE

A direct-aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) in mechanical thrombectomy has been described in recent studies as an efficacious strategy compared with using a stent retriever (SR). We sought to evaluate for cost differences of ADAPT technique versus SR as an initial approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with mechanical thrombectomy at our institution between 2022 and 2023. Patients were grouped into ADAPT with/without SR as a rescue strategy and SR as an initial approach with allowance of concomitant aspiration. Direct cost data (consumables) were obtained. Baseline demographics, stroke metrics, procedure outcomes and cost, and last follow-up outcomes in modified Rankin Scale were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included. Thirty-seven (66.1%) underwent ADAPT, with 11 (29.7%) eventually requiring an SR. Mean age was 64.8 years. The average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 13.2 in the ADAPT group and 14.0 in the SR group (P = 0.68), with a similar proportion of tissue plasminogen activator (P = 0.53), site of occlusion (P = 0.66), and tandem occlusion (P = 0.69) between the groups. Recanalization was achieved in 94.6% of all patients, with an average of 1.9 passes, 89.3% being TICI 2B or above, with no differences between the 2 groups. Significantly lower cost (P < 0.01) was observed in ADAPT ($14,243.4) compared with SR ($19,003.6). Average follow-up duration was 180.2 days, with mortality of 23.2%. At last follow-up, 55.4% remained functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale score <3) with no difference (P = 0.56) between the ADAPT (59.5%) and SR (47.4%) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were comparable between the ADAPT and SR groups. ADAPT reduced procedural consumables cost by approximately $5000 (25%), even if stent retrievers were allowed to be used for rescue. Establishing ADPAT as initial approach may bring significant direct cost savings while obtaining similar outcomes.

Endovascular therapy versus best medical management for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusions (iPCAO) were underrepresented in pivotal randomized clinical trial (RCTs) of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in ischemic stroke, and the benefit of EVT in this population is still indeterminate. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of EVT compared to best medical management (BMM) in patients with iPCAO.

METHODS

We searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases up to May 2023 for eligible studies reporting outcomes of patients with iPCAO treated with EVT or BMM. We pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 2560 patients were included. EVT was associated with significantly higher likelihood of early neurological improvement (OR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.38-2.91]; p < 0.00001) and visual field normalization (OR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.76-5.38]; p < 0.0001) compared to BMM. Rates of good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) were comparable between the two arms (OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]; p = 0.26). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was comparable between the two groups (OR, 1.94 [95% CI, 0.96-3.93]; p = 0.07). Mortality was also similar between the two groups (OR, 1.36; [95% CI, 0.77-2.42]; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with iPCAO, EVT was associated with visual and early neurological improvement but with a strong trend toward increased sICH. Survival and functional outcomes may be slightly poorer. The role of EVT in iPCAO remains uncertain.

Bridging therapy improves functional outcomes and reduces 90-day mortality compared with direct endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute posterior ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether bridging therapy can achieve better neurologic outcomes than direct endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with posterior ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with posterior artery occlusion treated with bridging therapy vs. EVT. Efficacy was assessed based on functional independence at 90 days and successful recanalization, whereas safety was assessed by mortality, rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of any hemorrhage. All data were analyzed with Review Manager software v5.3 and the risk of bias was determined using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies with a total of 3278 patients (1211 in the bridging therapy group and 2067 in the EVT group). Patients in the bridging group had a better functional outcome at 90 days, as evidenced by a higher proportion with a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 compared with the EVT group (odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54-2.19, P < 0.01), while no difference in mRS score of 0-3 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.96-1.45, P = 0.11). Patients in the bridging therapy group also had lower 90-day mortality rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.95, P = 0.02). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of successful recanalization (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.74-1.25, P = 0.77), sICH (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.86-1.89, P = 0.24), and hemorrhage (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.60-2.50, P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with posterior ischemic stroke, bridging therapy may be superior to EVT in achieving a good functional outcome and lowering the mortality without increasing the risks of hemorrhage.

Network meta-analysis of first-line thrombectomy strategy for acute posterior circulation strokes: a preliminary evaluation for combined approach

Objective

Thrombectomy may provide superior results compared to best medical care for acute posterior circulation strokes (PCS). Contact aspiration (CA), stent retriever (SR), and combined SR + CA (SRA) are commonly employed as first-line techniques. However, the optimal strategy and the role of SRA remain uncertain.

Methods

Systematic searching was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane). Network meta-analyzes were performed using random-effects models. The reperfusion and clinical outcomes were compared. Pooled outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rankograms with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated.

Results

Seventeen studies were included, involving a total of 645 patients who received first-line CA, 850 patients who received SR, and 166 patients who received SRA. Regarding final recanalization outcomes, both first-line SRA (OR = 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-11.0) and CA (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.7) demonstrated superiority over SR in achieving successful reperfusion [modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3], with values of SUCRA 91.1, 58.5, and 0.4%, respectively. In addition, first-line SRA showed an advantage in achieving final mTICI 2c/3 compared to CA (OR = 3.6, 95%CI 0.99-16.0) and SR (OR = 6.4, 95%CI 1.3-35.0), with SUCRA value of 98.0, 44.7, and 7.2%, respectively. Regarding reperfusion outcome after the first pass, SRA also achieved a higher rate of mTICI 3 than SR (OR = 4.1, 95%CI 1.3-14.0), while CA did not (SUCRA 97.4, 4.6, 48.0%). In terms of safety outcomes, first-line CA was associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to SR (OR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.1-1.0), whereas the SRA technique did not (SUCRA 15.6, 78.6, 55.9%). Regarding clinical prognosis, first-line CA achieved a higher proportion of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 90 days than SR (OR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9), whereas SRA did not (SUCRA 90.5, 17.4, 42.1%).

Conclusion

For acute PCS, a first-line CA strategy yielded better results in terms of final successful reperfusion and 90-day functional independence compared to SR. As the combined technique, first-line SRA was associated with superior first-pass and final reperfusion outcomes compared to SR. However, no significant difference was observed in functional independence achieved by first-line SRA compared to the other two strategies. Further high-quality studies are warranted.

Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line stent retriever versus direct aspiration

BACKGROUND

The best choice between first-line aspiration and stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion remains controversial. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the stent retriever and direct aspiration about reported recanalization rates and periprocedural complications.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials were searched for the studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line aspiration versus stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion. A standard software program (Stata Corporation) was used for end-point analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value less than .05.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were involved in the current study, including 1014 patients. Regarding postoperative recanalization, the pooled analysis identified a significant difference in successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR] = 1.642; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.099-2.453; p = .015) and complete recanalization (OR = 3.525; 95% CI: 1.306-2.872; p = .001) between the two groups in favor of the first-line aspiration. Concerning the complications, the first-line aspiration could achieve a lower rate of total complication (OR = .359; 95% CI: .229-.563; p < .001) and hemorrhagic complication (OR = .446, 95% CI: .259-.769; p = .004) than stent retriever. No significant difference was observed in postoperative mortality (OR = .966; p = .880), subarachnoid hematoma (OR = .171; p = .094), and parenchymal hematoma (OR = .799; p = .720). In addition, the pooled results revealed a significant difference in procedure duration between the two groups in favor of aspiration (WMD = -27.630, 95% CI: -50.958 to -4.302; p = .020). However, there was no significant difference in favorable outcome (OR = 1.149; p = .352) and rescue therapy (OR = 1.440; p = .409) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Given that the first-line aspiration was associated with a higher rate of postoperative recanalization, a lower risk of postoperative complication, and a faster duration of the procedure, these findings support the aspiration may be more secure than a stent retriever.