Long‐term evaluation of sound localisation in single‐sided deaf adults fitted with a BAHA device

High-Frequency Gain and Maximum Output Effects on Speech Recognition in Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices: Blinded Study

INTRODUCTION

Bone-conduction hearing device (BCHD) uses natural sound transmission through bone and soft tissue, directly to the cochlea, via an external processor that captures and processes sound, which is converted into mechanical vibrations. Key parameters, as maximum power output (MPO) and broader frequency range (FR), must be considered when indicating a BCHD because they can be decisive for speech recognition, especially under listening challenge conditions.

OBJECTIVES

Compare hearing performance and speech recognition in noise of two sound processors (SPs), with different features of MPO and FR, among BCHD users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-blinded, comparative, observational study evaluated 21 individuals Baha 4 system users with conductive or mixed hearing impairment. The free-field audiometry and speech recognition results were blindly collected under the following conditions: unaided, with Baha 5, and with Baha 6 Max SP.

RESULTS

In free-field audiometry, significant differences were observed between the SP at 0.25, 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz, with Baha 6 Max outperforming Baha 5. The Baha 6 Max provided significantly better speech recognition than Baha 5 under all the speech in noise conditions evaluated. Separating the transcutaneous from the percutaneous users, Baha 6 Max Attract SP provided the best results and significantly lowered the free-field thresholds than Baha 5 Attract. The Baha 6 Max also significantly improved speech recognition in noise, among both Attract and Connect users.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that the greater MPO and broader FR of the Baha 6 Max device helped increase high-frequency gain and improved speech recognition in BCHD-experimented users.

The Role of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices and Remote Microphones in Children with Congenital Unilateral Hearing Loss

Congenital unilateral hearing loss (UHL) represents a contemporary audiologic challenge. Children with UHL can struggle with understanding speech in noise, localizing sounds, developing language, and maintaining academic performance, leading to low self-esteem, anxiety, and decreased social support. Two specific conditions related to UHL in children are single-sided deafness (SSD) and unilateral auris atresia (UAA). This was a retrospective observational study on a group of children with UHL. The Simplified Italian Matrix Sentence Test was used for the assessment of speech reception threshold (SRT) in different conditions: speech and noise from the front (S0N0), speech at 45° from the side of the better ear and noise at 45° from the opposite side (SbNw), and vice versa (SwNb). Each test was conducted unaided, with a bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD), and with a remote microphone (RM) system. The use of a BAHD and RM led to an improvement in SRT in S0N0 and SwNb conditions. The SSD subgroup demonstrated significant benefits with both devices in SwNb, and the UAA subgroup from the use of BAHD in S0N0. In conclusion, the study underscores the potential benefits of both devices in enhancing speech perception for UHL children, providing insights into effective intervention strategies for these challenging cases.

Long-term Outcome of Sound Localization with Baha® Attract System

BACKGROUND

Spatial hearing is a critical feature in daily life. However, there is quite a range in hearing loss patients regarding the effect of bone conduction device on localization performance.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the localization performance in patients with bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss fitted with one Baha® Attract system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 12 patients who had followed up for more than one year. The parameters analyzed included (1) audiological results: sound field threshold, speech discrimination scores (SDSs), and sound localization test, and (2) functional results: scores for the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Chinese translation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (C-SHQ).

RESULTS

The audiological assessments showed a reduction of 28.5 dB in the mean sound field thresholds and improvements of 61.7% in the SDSs for disyllabic words. The root mean square error improved slightly with the Baha® Attract system. Patients showed promising results in the functional questionnaire assessments, with significant improvements in the SSQ and C-SHQ scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients were not able to localize sound accurately after surgery, the change in the scores of the SSQ and C-SHQ indicated that the Baha® Attract system could improve spatial hearing.

Increased maximum power output may improve speech recognition with bone conduction hearing devices

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of maximum power output of bone conduction hearing devices on speech recognition in quiet and in noise in experienced users of bone conduction hearing devices.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised cross-over investigation comparing speech recognition performance, subjective sound quality, and device preference between two bone conduction hearing devices with different maximum power outputs.

STUDY SAMPLE

Sixteen adult subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss.

RESULTS

Both speech recognition in quiet and speech recognition in noise improved significantly when using the device with high vs. lower maximum power output. Mean improvement in word recognition score in quiet was 10.5% and the mean speech reception threshold in noise improved by 0.9 dB SNR. Compared to the device with lower maximum power output, the sound quality was rated significantly higher with the device with high maximum power output, which was also the device of preference for 81% of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

Bone conduction hearing devices with higher maximum power output have the potential to improve speech recognition in both quiet and noisy listening environments.

Horizontal sound localisation and speech perception in Bonebridge-implanted single-sided deafness patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the benefit of Bonebridge devices in patients with single-sided deafness.

METHOD

Five patients with single-sided deafness who were implanted with Bonebridge devices were recruited in a single-centre study. Participants' speech perception and horizontal sound localisation abilities were assessed at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments was measured in three different testing conditions (speech and noise presented from the front, speech and noise presented from the front and contralateral (normal ear) side separately, and speech presented from the ipsilateral (implanted Bonebridge) side and noise from the contralateral side). Sound localisation was evaluated in Bonebridge-aided and Bonebridge-unaided conditions at different stimuli levels (65, 70 and 75 dB SPL).

RESULTS

All participants showed a better capacity for speech intelligibility in quiet environments with the Bonebridge device. The speech recognition threshold with the Bonebridge device was significantly decreased at both short- and long-term follow up in the speech presented from the ipsilateral (implanted Bonebridge) side and noise from the contralateral side condition (p < 0.05). Additionally, participants maintained similar levels of sound localisation between the Bonebridge-aided and unaided conditions (p > 0.05). However, the accuracy of localisation showed some improvement at 70 dB SPL and 75 dB SPL post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

The Bonebridge device provides the benefit of improved speech perception performance in patients with single-sided deafness. Sound localisation abilities were neither improved nor worsened with Bonebridge implantation at the follow-up assessments.