Delayed failure in tympanoplasty: A 20‐year study of the incidence and reasons for re‐perforation in 359 patients

General anaesthetic vs local anaesthetic myringoplasties: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To assess all available data and determine the success rates and tolerability of local anaesthetic myringoplasty in comparison with those undertaken under general anaesthetic myringoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was designed following a PRISMA-P protocol and registered with the PROSPERO database. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (CDSR/Central), EMBASE and CINHAL-were directly searched for studies, which met the inclusion criteria.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective was to compare perforation closure rates between patients undergoing myringoplasty under local anaesthetic and those under general anaesthetic from all available published data. Secondary outcomes include complications, such as 'any minor complications', infection rates in the first 6 month post-op, facial nerve weakness, dysgeusia and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

27 studies were included in the final analysis and found that myringoplasty had an overall perforation closure rate of 89%. The pooled proportion of closures after myringoplasty under local anesthesia was 87% and for myringoplasties under general anesthesia was 91%. Analysis of myringoplasty under local anaesthesia focusing on 'in-office' performed procedures only, found a closure rate of 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in the success rate of myringoplasty surgery when performed under local or general anaesthetic as measured by perforation closure rates. However, there are other factors, which can drive choosing local anaesthetic surgery, such as minimising anaesthetic risks, reducing costs and reducing environmental impact.

Endoscopic inlay cartilage and perichondrium myringoplasty for repairing large perforations in teenagers

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the long-term graft success rates and hearing outcomes of overlay-underlay and underly cartilage myringoplasty for repairing large perforations in Teenagers.

STUDY DESIGN

prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Pediatric patients older than 12 years with chronic perforations were randomly divided into two groups:intervention group (n = 39) and control group (n = 41). The graft success rate, hearing improvement, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included in this study. The graft success rate was 100% in the intervention group and 95.1% in the control group at postoperative 3 months, the difference wasn't significant (P = 0.496). Also, the graft success rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (100.0% vs 87.8%, p = 0.073). However, the difference of graft success rate was significant between the two groups at 24 months postoperatively (97.4% vs 75.6%, p = 0.012). CT examination revealed well-pneumatized middle ears 24 months after surgery in both group. However, epithelial pearls near the umbo were seen at 31 months postoperatively in one patient in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the endoscopic cartilage with perichondrium composite graft underlay technique, endoscopic perichondrial graft overlay and cartilage underlay had a better long-term graft success rate and lower rate of long-term re-perforation in teenagers. However, the graft technique had no effect on hearing outcome.

The effect of concurrent nasal surgery on the eustachian tube function and myringoplasty outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the Effect of concurrent nasal surgery on the eustachian tube function (ETF) and myringoplasty outcomes for the chronic perforations with coexistent nasal pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 93 patients with perforations who underwent same-day myringoplasty and nasal-septal surgery. Group A exhibited septal deviations (n = 34) and Group B inflammatory sinus disease (n = 59). Groups were compared with respect to pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs), graft success rates and ETF (Eustachian tube score [ETS] and seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire [ETDQ-7]) at 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

Graft success rates were 100.0% in Group A and 98.3% in Group B at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.445). Graft success rates were 85.3% in Group A and 96.6% in Group B at 24 months postoperatively (P = 0.046), the re-perforation rate was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (P = 0.015). Although the preoperative ETS was similar between two groups, the postoperative ETS in the Group B was significantly higher compared with Group A regardless of at postoperative 6th and 24th months. In addition, difference was significant for the patients with positive Valsalva maneuver among two groups at postoperative 24th months. Also, the improvement in the ETDQ-7 score in the B group was significantly higher than that in the A group at postoperative 6th and 24th months.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent nasal surgery and myringoplasty is feasible. In addition, ESS improves ETF and thus long-term outcomes of myringoplasty for the chronic perforations with inflammatory sinus disease.