Pre-clinical evaluation of a novel robotic system for transoral robotic surgery

Pre-clinical training, technical adjustment and human case experience of transoral robotic surgery using Versius System☆

•Transoral Robotic Surgery is well-established using the DaVinci system. •Transoral robotic surgery with the Versius System is currently in its initial stage. •A mannequin model was effective for training and setup configuration. •The first human case demonstrated feasibility and excellent results. •In our preliminary experience, Versius proved to be a promising robotic system.

Objective

This study describes the training experience with the Versius Robotic System (CMR Surgical) for Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS), the setup of the robot and its applicability in a human case.

Methods

A model mannequin with anatomical characteristics simulating the TORS working space was used for training purposes. Optimal docking, positioning of robotic arms and placement of instruments were defined using the mannequin. A human patient was selected based on the inclusion criteria, and a standardized protocol for robotic techniques was developed. The surgical procedure was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines.

Results

The synthetic polymer mannequin mimicking human tissues and anatomy was used to define the robot set up for TORS. The patient was indicated for bilateral tonsillectomy due to recurrent episodes of tonsillitis. Bipolar Maryland and monopolar scissors were used. The procedure was uneventful. The patient remained hospitalized for 1 day and returned to work activities within 6-days, with no complications.

Conclusion

The specialized mannequin proved to be effective in the simulation, training proposal and set up standardization. Furthermore, the Versius robot was found to be safe and achieved excellent results during surgery. Despite being very promising, the Versius system is still in its developmental phase and requires larger-scale samples for a more comprehensive evaluation.

Level of evidence

4.

Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Tumors: What are the Current Applications?

BACKGROUND

The journey from radical treatments to the precision of robotic surgery underscores a commitment to innovation and patient-centered care in the field of head and neck oncology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides a comprehensive overview that not only informs but also stimulates ongoing discourse and investigation into the optimization of patient care through robotic surgery. The literature on current robotic applications within head and neck region was systematically reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-four studies with a total of 1835 patients undergoing robotic surgery in head and neck region were included. Clinical staging, histological types, operative duration, postoperative complications, functional recovery and survival outcomes were compared and evaluated. Clinical outcomes have shown promising results and thus the indication on the robotic usage has no longer been limited to oropharyngeal region but from skull base to neck dissection. The latest advancement in robotic surgery further refines the capabilities of surgeons into previously difficult-to-access head and neck regions and heralds a new era of surgical treatment for head and neck oncology.

Prospective development study of the Versius Surgical System for use in transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 1/2a first in human and initial case series experience

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery is well established in the treatment paradigm of oropharyngeal pathology. The Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical) is a robotic platform in clinical use in multiple specialities but is currently untested in the head and neck. This study utilises the IDEAL framework of surgical innovation to prospectively evaluate and report a first in human clinical experience and single centre case series of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with Versius.

METHODS

Following IDEAL framework stages 1 and 2a, the study evaluated Versius to perform first in human TORS before transitioning from benign to malignant cases. Iterative adjustments were made to system setup, instrumentation, and technique, recorded in accordance with IDEAL recommendations. Evaluation criteria included successful procedure completion, setup time, operative time, complications, and subjective impressions. Further evaluation of the system to perform four-arm surgery was conducted.

RESULTS

30 TORS procedures were successfully completed (15 benign, 15 malignant) without intraoperative complication or conversion to open surgery. Setup time significantly decreased over the study period. Instrumentation challenges were identified, urging the need for TORS-specific instruments. The study introduced four-arm surgery, showcasing Versius' unique capabilities, although limitations in distal access were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS is feasible with the Versius Surgical System. The development of TORS-specific instruments would benefit performance and wider adoption of the system. 4-arm surgery is possible however further evaluation is required. Multicentre evaluation (IDEAL stage 2b) is recommended.

New robotic platform for transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 0 study

Objectives

This study aims to assess the feasibility to perform transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with a new robotic platform, the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, UK) in a preclinical cadaveric setting in accordance to stage 0 of the IDEAL-D framework.

Design

IDEAL stage 0 preclinical assessment of the Versius Robotic System in TORS in human cadavers.

Setting

All procedures were performed in a simulated operating theatre environment at a UK surgical training centre.

Participants

11 consultant head and neck surgeons from the UK, mainland Europe and the USA took part in TORS procedures on six human cadavers.

Interventions

3 key index procedures were assessed that represent the core surgical workload of TORS: lateral oropharyngectomy, tongue base resection and partial supraglottic laryngectomy.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the successful completion of each surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included the optimisation of system setup, instrumentation and surgeon-reported outcomes for feasibility of each component procedural step.

Results

33 cadaveric procedures were performed and 32 were successfully completed. One supraglottic laryngectomy was not fully completed due to issues dividing the epiglottic cartilage with available instrumentation. Surgeon-reported outcomes met the minimal level of feasibility in all procedures and a consensus that it is feasible to perform TORS with Versius was reached. Available instrumentation was not representative of other robotic platforms used in TORS and further instrument optimisation is recommended before wider dissemination.

Conclusions

It is feasible to perform TORS with the Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical) within a pre-clinical cadaveric setting. Clinical evaluation is needed and appropriate with the system. Further instrument development and optimisation is desirable.