1
|
Scrimgeour DSG, Allan M, Knight SR, East B, Blackwell S, Dames N, Laidlaw L, Light D, Horgan L, Smart NJ, de Beaux A, Wilson MSJ. A modified Delphi process to establish research priorities in hernia surgery. Hernia 2022; 26:751-759. [PMID: 34718903 PMCID: PMC8557712 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02519-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal wall hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet despite this, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence to support best management. The aim of the study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine future research priorities in this field. METHODS Stakeholders were invited by email, using British Hernia Society membership details or Twitter, to submit individual research questions via an online survey. In addition, questions obtained from a patient focus group (PFG) were collated to form Phase I. Two rounds of prioritization by stakeholders (phases II and III) were then completed to determine a final list of research questions. All questions were analyzed on an anonymized basis. RESULTS A total of 266 questions, 19 from the PFG, were submitted by 113 stakeholders in Phase I. Of these, 64 questions were taken forward for prioritization in Phase II, which was completed by 107 stakeholders. Following Phase II analysis, 97 stakeholders prioritized 36 questions in Phase III. This resulted in a final list of 14 research questions, 3 of which were from the PFG. Stakeholders included patients and healthcare professionals (consultant surgeons, trainee surgeons and other multidisciplinary members) from over 27 countries during the 3 phases. CONCLUSION The study has identified 14 key research priorities pertaining to abdominal wall hernia surgery. Uniquely, these priorities have been determined from participation by both healthcare professionals and patients. These priorities should now be addressed by well-designed, high-quality international collaborative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S G Scrimgeour
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, Scotland.
| | - M Allan
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland
| | - S R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland
| | - B East
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK
| | | | - N Dames
- Patient Representative, Glasgow, UK
| | - L Laidlaw
- Patient Representative, Edinburgh, UK
| | - D Light
- Department of UGI Surgery, Northumbria Healthcare NHSFT, Rake Ln, Tyne and Wear, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK
| | - L Horgan
- Department of UGI Surgery, Northumbria Healthcare NHSFT, Rake Ln, Tyne and Wear, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK
| | - N J Smart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX25DW, Devon, UK
| | - A de Beaux
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland
| | - M S J Wilson
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reproductive outcomes after bariatric surgery in women. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2021; 134:56-62. [PMID: 34878586 PMCID: PMC8813708 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-021-01986-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The presence of obesity may significantly influence female fertility through various mechanisms. Impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in obese women may induce anovulation and infertility. Obesity may have an effect on women’s spontaneous and assisted conception rates, increased miscarriage rates, premature labor, stillbirth and perinatal risks, and menstrual irregularity. It has been suggested that weight loss improves reproductive outcomes due to fertility amelioration and an improvement in menstrual irregularity and ovulation. It is still not known which weight reduction procedures (changes in lifestyle, pharmacological management or bariatric intervention) result in optimal outcome on infertility. Currently, bariatric surgery is defined as the best available method for the management of obesity and its associated diseases. We have analyzed literature facts about effects of bariatric surgery on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and sexual dysfunction in obesity and pregnancy in obesity. Immediate positive effects of bariatric surgery are evident at the moment, while for long-term outcomes more prolonged follow-up investigations should be done.
Collapse
|
3
|
McElroy L, Robinson L, Battle C, Laidlaw L, Teager A, de Bernard L, McGillivray J, Tsang K, Bell S, Leech C, Marsden M, Carden R, Challen K, Peck G, Hancorn K, Davenport R, Brohi K, Wilson MSJ. Use of a modified Delphi process to develop research priorities in major trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 48:1453-1461. [PMID: 34132821 PMCID: PMC8208060 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01722-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The burden of major trauma within the UK is ever increasing. There is a need to establish research priorities within the field. Delphi methodology can be used to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of stakeholders. This can be used to prioritise clinically relevant, patient-centred research questions to guide future funding allocations. The aim of our study was to identify key future research priorities pertaining to the management of major trauma in the UK. Methods A three-phased modified Delphi process was undertaken. Phase 1 involved the submission of research questions by members of the trauma community using an online survey (Phase 1). Phases 2 and 3 involved two consecutive rounds of prioritisation after questions were subdivided into 6 subcategories: Brain Injury, Rehabilitation, Trauma in Older People, Pre-hospital, Interventional, and Miscellaneous (Phases 2 and 3). Cut-off points were agreed by consensus amongst the steering subcommittees. This established a final prioritised list of research questions. Results In phase 1, 201 questions were submitted by 65 stakeholders. After analysis and with consensus achieved, 186 questions were taken forward for prioritisation in phase 2 with 114 included in phase 3. 56 prioritised major trauma research questions across the 6 categories were identified with a clear focus on long-term patient outcomes. Research priorities across the patient pathway from roadside to rehabilitation were deemed of importance. Conclusions Consensus within the major trauma community has identified 56 key research questions across 6 categories. Dissemination of these questions to funding bodies to allow for the development of high-quality research is now required. There is a clear indication for targeted multi-centre multi-disciplinary research in major trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke McElroy
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK.
| | - Lisa Robinson
- Rehabilitation Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Ceri Battle
- Physiotherapy Department, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Tsang
- Division of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Steve Bell
- Medical Directorate, North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Bolton, BL1 5DD, UK
| | - Caroline Leech
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Walsgrave, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Max Marsden
- Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Richard Carden
- Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kirsty Challen
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK
| | - George Peck
- Division of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Kate Hancorn
- Trauma Service, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, UK
| | - Ross Davenport
- Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Karim Brohi
- Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael S J Wilson
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilson MSJ, Vaughan-Shaw P, Boyle C, Yong GL, Oglesby S, Skipworth R, Lamb P, Griffiths EAT, Attwood SEA. A Modified AUGIS Delphi Process to Establish Future Research Priorities in Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery. World J Surg 2020; 44:1216-1222. [PMID: 31788725 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities amongst benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons in the United Kingdom. METHODS Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high-priority research questions. RESULTS Four hundred and twenty-seven questions were submitted in phase I, and 51 with a benign UGI focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Twenty-eight questions were ranked in phase III. A final list of 11 high-priority questions had an emphasis on acute pancreatitis, Barrett's oesophagus and benign biliary disease. CONCLUSION A modified Delphi process has produced a list of 11 high-priority research questions in benign UGI surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S J Wilson
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK.
| | - P Vaughan-Shaw
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, E4 2XU, UK
| | - C Boyle
- Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - G L Yong
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, E16 4SA, UK
| | - S Oglesby
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, D2 1SY, UK
| | - R Skipworth
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, E16 4SA, UK
| | - P Lamb
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, E16 4SA, UK
| | - E A T Griffiths
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - S E A Attwood
- Department of Health Services Research, Durham University, Durham, D1 3RW, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yong GL, Weir-McCall J, Wilson M, Roditi GH, Bull R, Williams MC, Schmitt M. Research priorities in cardiovascular imaging. Open Heart 2020; 7:openhrt-2020-001389. [PMID: 33046593 PMCID: PMC7552921 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim A modified Delphi approach was used to develop consensus opinion among British Society for Cardiac Imaging/British Society of Cardiac CT (BSCI/BSCCT) members in order to prioritise research questions in cardiovascular imaging. Methods All members of the BSCI/BSCCT were invited to submit research questions that they considered to be of the highest clinical and/or academic priority in the field of cardiovascular imaging (phase 1). Subsequently a steering committee removed duplicate questions and combined questions of a similar theme by consensus agreement where appropriate. BSCI/BSCCT members were invited to rank the resulting research questions in two further iterative rounds (phases 2 and 3) to determine a final list of high-priority research questions. Results A total of 111 research questions were submitted in phase 1 by 30 BSCI/BSCCT members. While there was a broad range of topics, from determining the optimal features/markers of the vulnerable plaque to investigating how cardiac imaging can best be used to maximise clinical outcomes and economic costs, multimodality imaging-related (n=44, 40%) questions dominated the categories and coronary artery imaging (n=40, 36%) was the most common topic. Over two iterative rounds of prioritisation of these research questions, the original 111 were reduced to 75 questions in round 2, and 25 in round 3. From these 25 a final Top 10 list was distilled by consensus grouping. Conclusion This study has identified and ranked the top research priorities in cardiovascular imaging, as identified by the BSCI/BSCCT membership. This is a first step towards identifying the cardiovascular imaging research priorities within the UK and may assist researchers and funding bodies alike in setting priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Liang Yong
- Clinical Radiology, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Michael Wilson
- General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Falkirk, UK
| | | | - Russell Bull
- Clinical Radiology Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK
| | | | - Matthias Schmitt
- North West Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|