Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone and topical clotrimazole with subsequent generalized exanthem triggered by oral fluconazole

Clinicopathologic Overlap of Vulvar Psoriasis and Candidiasis

OBJECTIVES

The study's aim is to assess if vulvar psoriasis and candidiasis may be distinguished by clinical presentation and histopathologic appearance.

METHODS

The pathology database identified biopsies with corneal or subcorneal neutrophils, acanthosis, and dermal lymphocytic infiltrate. Exclusions were age younger than 18 years and unavailable or uninterpretable slides. Clinical data included demographics, comorbid conditions, symptoms, examination, microbiology, treatment, and response. Histopathologic review documented site, thickness, and characteristics of stratum corneum and epidermis, distribution of neutrophils, and infiltrate. Cases were stratified by microbiologic presence or absence of Candida albicans.

RESULTS

Biopsies from 62 women with median age of 60 years were associated with C. albicans on vulvovaginal culture in 28 (45%), whereas 26 (42%) were negative, and 8 (13%) lacked microbiologic assessment. Swab-positive women were more likely to have diabetes, receive prereferral estrogen, and report vulvar pain. Specialist clinical impression was candidiasis in 33 (53%), psoriasis in 11 (18%), comorbid candidiasis and psoriasis in 7 (11%), dermatitis in 10 (16%), and unknown in 2 (3%). Visible fungal organisms occurred in 16 (26%) cases and were associated with diabetes and satellite lesions. Other than presence of organisms, there were no histopathologic differences stratified by microbiologic result.

CONCLUSIONS

The histopathologic triad of corneal/subcorneal neutrophils, acanthosis, and dermal lymphocytic infiltrate is common to vulvar psoriasis and candidiasis, and clinical features do not reliably distinguish between them. Microbiologic assessment and single-agent treatment are useful strategies to clarify the diagnosis.

Advancing the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that, especially when the condition becomes chronic, has a high impact on the quality of life and represents a significant disease burden. ACD represents a type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction that is triggered by contact with an allergen in previously sensitized individuals through the activation of allergen-specific T cells. In the acute phase, it is characterized by eczematous dermatitis, which presents with erythema, edema, vesicles, scaling, and intense itch. Non-eczematous clinical forms are also described (lichenoid, bullous, and lymphomatosis). Lichenification is the most common clinical picture in the chronic phase if the culprit allergen is not found or eliminated. ACD can be associated with both occupational and non-occupational exposure to allergens, representing approximately 90% of occupational skin disorders along with irritant contact dermatitis. Patch testing with suspected allergens is required for a diagnosis. Metals, especially nickel, fragrance mix, isothiazolinones, and para-phenylenediamine, are the most commonly positive allergens in patients patch tested for suspected ACD. The treatment goal is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and use topical and/or systemic corticosteroid therapy.

Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS

Background

Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungal activity; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).

Methods

Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2021 were selected for disproportionality analysis to assess the connection between antifungal triazoles, and AEs and important medical events (IMEs).

Results

A total of 22,566 records associated with triazole antifungals were identified, with 9584 triazole antifungal-IME pairs. The following system organ classes (SOCs) appeared as significant signals: 'Endocrine disorders' [reported odds ratio (ROR) = 167.94], 'Metabolism and nutrition disorders' (ROR = 46.30), and 'Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (ROR = 21.37). Strong signals were observed with respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. Uncommon security signals included a change in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.

Conclusion

Various triazole antifungals cause AEs of different types and intensities of association. Our results are broadly consistent with prescribing information and previous studies; however, additional pharmacoepidemiological studies are required to verify AEs with modest incidence but high signal.

Plain Language Summary

A study on the adverse effects of triazole antifungals Introduction: The triazole antifungals we studied include fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungals; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).Materials and Methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database contains AEs reported to the FDA by different countries regarding post-marketing drugs. Through the FAERS database, we retrieved a total of 22,566 AE reports related to triazole antifungals. We not only counted information about patients' gender, age, weight, reporting country, outcome indicators, and indications but also analyzed the system organ classes (SOCs) of AEs, and the number of reported drug-related AEs and the degree of relevance.Results: We found a total of 22,566 records related to triazole antifungal agents, of which 9584 reports made important medical events (IMEs) about triazole antifungal agents, which are serious AEs. The following SOCs appear as important signals: 'endocrine disorders', 'metabolic and nutritional disorders', and 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders'. Triazole antifungals produce AEs, such as respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. They also produce uncommon AEs, including changes in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.Conclusion: By analyzing data from the FAERS database, we identified more AEs associated with these five triazole antifungals than were indicated in the instructions and our findings provide additional insight into triazole-related AEs to inform clinicians before and during treatment.

Isothiazolinone Biocides: Chemistry, Biological, and Toxicity Profiles

The importance of isothiazole and of compounds containing the isothiazole nucleus has been growing over the last few years. Isothiazolinones are used in cosmetic and as chemical additives for occupational and industrial usage due to their bacteriostatic and fungiostatic activity. Despite their effectiveness as biocides, isothiazolinones are strong sensitizers, producing skin irritations and allergies and may pose ecotoxicological hazards. Therefore, their use is restricted by EU legislation. Considering the relevance and importance of isothiazolinone biocides, the present review describes the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding their synthesis, antibacterial components, toxicity (including structure–activity–toxicity relationships) outlines, and (photo)chemical stability. Due to the increasing prevalence and impact of isothiazolinones in consumer’s health, analytical methods for the identification and determination of this type of biocides were also discussed.

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Contact allergy is common, affecting 27% of the general population in Europe. Original publications, including case reports, published since 2016 (inclusive) were identified with the aim of collating a full review of current problems in the field. To this end, a literature search employing methods of systematic reviewing was performed in the Medline^® and Web of Science™ databases on 28 January 2018, using the search terms (“contact sensitization” or “contact allergy”). Of 446 non-duplicate publications identified by above search, 147 were excluded based on scrutiny of title, abstract and key words. Of the remaining 299 examined in full text, 291 were deemed appropriate for inclusion, and main findings were summarised in topic sections. In conclusion, diverse sources of exposures to chemicals of widely-differing types and structures, continue to induce sensitisation in man and may result in allergic contact dermatitis. Many of the chemicals are “evergreen” but others are “newcomers”. Vigilance and proper investigation (patch testing) are required to detect and inform of the presence of these haptens to which our populations remain exposed.