Results of patch testing in Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): a literature review

Diagnosis and selection of alternative antibiotics in beta-lactams hypersensitivity reactions: Current recommendations and challenges

Beta-lactam (BLM) antibiotics, including amino-penicillin and cephalosporins, are typically the first-choice treatment for bacterial infections. However, adverse reactions to these antibiotics are frequently reported, causing non-allergist physicians to select alternative broad-spectrum antibiotics that can have harmful consequences. Patients with unclear histories of hypersensitivity reactions to BLMs should undergo an allergy workup to establish a firm diagnosis, particularly when different drugs are prescribed simultaneously. However, finding the safest, most precise, and cost-effective methods for confirming BLMs hypersensitivity and selecting the most appropriate alternative BLM is uncertain, particularly in severe delayed reactions. This review aims to provide data and recommendations on the availability and validity of skin tests (STs), drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, based on the latest published literature and guideline. To make the process more practical, we focused on cross-reactivity between BLMs and diagnostic tests. There are two main novel aspects of this document: 1) For T-cell-mediated reactions, patient stratification into high, moderate, and low-risk groups based on the mortality and morbidity of adverse drug reactions. 2) For IgE-mediated reactions, stratification of individuals with isolated limited urticarial without anaphylaxis in a low-risk group and removal of the extensive limitation.

Athena: Speciality Certificate Examination case for general dermatology and dermatology in primary health care

A 62-year-old man was referred to the emergency department with a 6-day history of a progressive pustular eruption; he had commenced ceftriaxone to treat suspected facial cellulitis 2 days prior. He had no significant past medical or dermatological history. This is a case of a rare severe cutaneous adverse reaction to a prescribed drug.

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: Clinical Features, Differential Diagnosis, and Management

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, acute, severe cutaneous adverse reaction mainly attributed to drugs, although other triggers, including infections, vaccinations, ingestion of various substances, and spider bites, have also been described. AGEP is characterized by the development of edema and erythema followed by the eruption of multiple punctate, non-follicular, sterile pustules and subsequent desquamation. AGEP typically has a rapid onset and prompt resolution within a few weeks. The differential diagnoses for AGEP are broad and include infectious, inflammatory, and drug-induced etiologies. Diagnosis of AGEP depends on both clinical and histologic criteria, as cases of overlap with other disease processes have been reported. Management includes removal of the offending drug or treatment of the underlying cause, if necessary, and supportive care, as AGEP is a self-limited disease. This review aims to provide an overview and update on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, reported precipitating factors, differentials, diagnosis, and management of AGEP.

Clinical Manifestations and Management of Terbinafine-Induced Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis

Background. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare and serious adverse reaction of terbinafine. Understanding AGEP and terbinafine is primarily based on case reports. The purpose is to explore the clinical characteristics of terbinafine-induced AGEP, and to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods. Case reports and original studies of terbinafine-induced AGEP were retrieved by searching Chinese and English databases from January, 1991, to May 31, 2022. Results. The median age of the 32 patients (17 males and 15 females) was 55 years (range: 6–84). The median time to onset of AGEP is 8 days (range: 1–77) and is usually accompanied by fever (>38°C) and elevated neutrophil levels (>8000/mm3). Four patients (12.5%) had oral mucosal involvement, and 10 patients (31.3%) developed postpustular desquamation. The lesions were mainly distributed in the trunk (43.8%), the whole body (34.4%), and the extremities (53.1%). Skin biopsy revealed subcorneal pustules (65.6%), intraepidermal cavernous pustules (43.8%), necrotic keratinocytes (15.6%), spongy hyperplasia (25.0%), neutrophil exocytosis (34.4%), and papillary dermal edema (40.6%). AGEP resolved completely in all patients at a median time of 12 days (range: 2–90) after discontinuation of terbinafine and symptomatic therapy. Conclusion. Clinicians should be aware that terbinafine-induced AGEP is a rare cutaneous adverse reaction. AGEP usually occurs within 2 weeks after administration and has a good prognosis after discontinuation.