Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract plus a bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-Plug): a new technique for fistula-in-ano

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

DESIGN

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) with or Without Injection of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in the Treatment of Trans-sphincteric Anal Fistula: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-saving procedure used for treatment of complex anal fistula. The current study aimed to assess the outcome of local injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) in conjunction with LIFT as compared to LIFT alone in regards to healing rate, time to healing, and ultimate success rate.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial on patients with trans-sphincteric anal fistula. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups: LIFT and LIFT with BM-MNC injection. The main outcome measures were healing at 10 weeks of follow-up, recurrence after healing, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (48 male and 22 female) of a mean age of 37.9 ± 10.4 years were included. The mean time to complete healing after LIFT + BM-MNCs was significantly shorter than after LIFT alone (20.5 ± 5.2 vs 28.04 ± 5.8 days; P < 0.0001). The ultimate success rates of both groups were similar (LIFT = 60% vs LIFT with BM-MNCs = 68.6%, P = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the mean operation time or complication rate between the two groups. Secondary extension and previous anal surgery were significant independent predictors of failure of healing.

CONCLUSION

LIFT combined with BM-MNC injection was associated with a shorter time to complete healing than LIFT alone. However, BM-MNC injection did not have a significant impact on the overall healing and ultimate success rate.

A pilot randomized controlled trial on ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) versus modified parks technique and two-stage seton in treatment of complex anal fistula

Complex anal fistula (CAF) is a challenging condition for surgeons. This randomized trial aimed to compare ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), modified Parks technique, and two-stage seton in the treatment of complex anal fistula in terms of the success of treatment and complications. This was a pilot randomized trial conducted in the period of January 2019 to December 2019 on adult patients with CAF who were allocated to one of three groups: LIFT, modified Parks technique, and two-stage seton. The main outcome measures were healing rates, time to healing, complications, operation time, and quality of life. Sixty-six patients (75.7% males) of a mean age of 45.2 years were included. Mean operation time of LIFT was significantly shorter than the other two procedures (p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the three groups in terms of success rate (p = 0.04) but not in regard to complications (p = 0.59). The modified Parks technique had a significantly higher success rate than LIFT (95.2% vs 68.1%, p = 0.045) whereas the success rates of two-stage seton and LIFT were not significantly different (86.9% vs 68.1%, p = 0.16). The average time to healing after LIFT was significantly shorter than the other two procedures. The quality-of-life scores were comparable among the three groups. There was a significant difference in healing rates after the three procedures as the modified Parks technique achieved the highest success rate followed by two-stage seton and then the LIFT procedure. Time to complete healing after LIFT was significantly shorter than the other two procedures. The three procedures achieved similar quality of life and complication rates.

Efficacy and Safety of Sphincter-Preserving Surgery in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

There are many surgical methods of sphincter preservation in treating complex anal fistula, but the therapeutic effects of each operation are different. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the impact of other treatment methods through a network meta-analysis to evaluate the best sphincter preservation method for treating complex anal fistula.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Journal Database, and the Wanfang Database to collate randomized controlled trials on sphincter-preserving surgery for complex anal fistula.

Results

A total of 29 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The cure rates showed no statistically significant differences between any two interventions (P > 0.05). The recurrence rate results showed that the rate of patients after Fistulectomy was higher than others (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of complications showed that the incidence rate after fistulectomy treatment was higher than that of others (P < 0.05). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to arrange their advantages and disadvantages, and a larger SUCRA value indicates that the intervention may be more effective. The results showed that TROPIS may have the highest cure rate (SUCRA = 78.6%), stem cell transplantation (SCT) may have the lowest recurrence rate (SUCRA = 85.5%), and imLIFT may have the least complications (SUCRA = 88.2%).

Conclusion

According to the existing literature data, for patients with complex anal fistula, TROPIS may be the surgical method with the highest cure rate, SCT may be the treatment method with the lowest recurrence rate, and imLIFT may be the surgical method with the lowest incidence of postoperative complications.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020221907.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with anal fistula plug for treatment of horseshoe anal fistula

Objective

Horseshoe anal fistula is a common anorectal disease, and there is no standard procedure for its treatment. In this study, we performed a modified surgical procedure for the treatment of horseshoe anal fistula and investigated its efficacy and adverse effects.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with an anal fistula plug (VAAFT-Plug) in 26 patients with a horseshoe anal fistula. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected to analyze the cure rate, anal sphincter function, and incidence of complications.

Results

The surgeries were successfully performed in all patients, 23 of whom were cured (effective cure rate of 88.46%). Three patients developed recurrence and were cured after traditional surgery. No patients developed severe complications or postoperative anal incontinence. The VAAFT-Plug protocol was performed with a small incision in the fistula that subsequently promoted fistula healing and preserved sphincter function.

Conclusion

Although randomized controlled trials will be needed to fully validate these findings, our results suggest that VAAFT-Plug represents a promising treatment strategy for horseshoe anal fistulas. This technique preserves normal anal function and achieves satisfactory outcomes in most patients.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications

Purpose Treatment of anal fistulae is regarded as a challenge due to the diverse nature of this disease and its countless complications. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications have been popularized among many surgeons worldwide due to their simplicity and promising outcomes. The main purpose of this article was to conduct a comprehensives review of the published literature on ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications.

Method PubMed, the Cochrane database and Ovid were searched from January 2007 to June 2017. Fully published peer-reviewed studies which applied ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications for the treatment of anal fistulae of cryptogenic origin with follow-up of median 12 months were eligible. Uncompleted studies, case reports, reviews, abstracts, letters, short communication, comments, and studies which did not fulfill inclusion criteria were excluded. The primary outcome was to measure primary healing, overall healing, failure, and recurrence of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications.

Results Twenty-two studies were identified with only ten studies meeting criteria of inclusion. Original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was performed in five studies with a population of 199 patients while the remaining five studies showed four different modifications of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with a total number of 147 patients. Both original LIFT and its modifications have promising as well as potentially similar outcomes; primary healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (73.95%) (95% CI 60.3–85.6) performed less than the modifications (82.3%) (95% CI 64.8–94.7). Overall healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (78.9%) (95% CI 58.5–93.7) performed relatively less than in the modifications (93.6%) (95% CI 81.4–99.6). Failure in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (17.9%) (95% CI 4.9–36.5) performed almost the same as the modifications (17.7%) (95% CI 5.3–35.2). Recurrence in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was 9.7% (95% CI 1.7–23.2). However, there was no recurrence in the modifications.

Conclusion Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract and its modifications are effective and simple procedures in treating simple anal fistulae, especially high transsphincteric ones. However, more trials should be performed to evaluate its effectiveness regarding complex fistulae.

Systematic review of efficacy of LIFT procedure in crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano

Background fistula-in-ano is a common problem. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a new addition to the list of operations available to deal with complex fistula-in-ano.

Objective we sought to qualitatively analyze studies describing LIFT for crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano and determine its efficacy.

Data sources MEDLINE (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched.

Study selection all clinical trials which studied LIFT or compared LIFT with other methods of treatment for anal fistulae, prospective observational studies, clinical registry data and retrospective case series which reported clinical healing of the fistula as the outcome were included. Case reports, studies reporting a combination with other technique, modified technique, abstracts, letters and comments were excluded.

Intervention the intervention was ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano.

Main outcome measure primary outcome measured was success rate (fistula healing rate) and length of follow-up.

LIFT and BioLIFT: a 10-Year Single-Centre Experience of Treating Complex Fistula-In-Ano With Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Procedure With or Without Bio-prosthetic Reinforcement (BioLIFT)

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and bioprosthetic graft (BioLIFT) in the management of transsphincteric perianal fistula.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing LIFT and BioLIFT from January 2009 to June 2018 was performed. Only patients who had LIFTs and BioLIFT performed as their primary sphincter-preserving procedure was included. Primary outcome measured was primary healing. Secondary outcomes measured were secondary healing, morbidity, time to recurrence, and pre- and post-operative anorectal manometry. Chi-square analysis was used to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were identified. One hundred five had LIFT and 11 had BioLIFT. The total primary healing rate was 60.3% (62.9% and 34.9% for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). The overall secondary healing rate was 80.2% (80.0% and 81.9% for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). There was no inpatient morbidity or post-procedural faecal incontinence reported. There was no significant change in the pre- and post-operative manometries in either group (P = 0.417 and P = 0.834 for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). The only predictor for primary failure identified was anteriorly located fistula.

CONCLUSION

LIFT and BioLIFT compare favourably with other sphincter-preserving procedures. LIFT and BioLIFT can be performed safely, with minimal morbidity and with no reported loss of sphincteric function.

Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for High Transsphincteric Fistula Yields Moderate Results at Best: Is the Tide Turning?

BACKGROUND

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract is a well-accepted and often used surgical procedure for perianal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to confirm results of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in a specialized colorectal center.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study took place in a large colorectal surgical department with a tertiary referral center for perianal fistulas.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients were operated on with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for a transsphincteric perianal fistula between 2012 and December 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the healing rate. The secondary outcomes measured were conversion into an intersphincteric perianal fistula, risk of recurrence, complications, and postoperative continence status.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were treated with a ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. All patients (100%) had preoperative imaging in their workup. Forty patients (87%) had a high transsphincteric fistula. The primary healing rate was a disappointing 17 of 46 patients (37%). The median time until failure was 4.2 months (interquartile range, 3.5-6.5). Of the failures, 16 converted to an intersphincteric fistula (55% of failures and 35% of all patients). The mean duration of follow-up in patients without a recurrence was 9.5 months (SD 11.9). Four patients (9%) were lost to follow-up. The mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index postoperatively was only 2.35 (SD 5.7; range, 0-30). This resulted in 9 patients (20%) having a newly impaired continence status postoperatively. Continence impairment was mild in all these patients. The risk of developing a recurrence 1 year after surgery is 64.2% (95% CI, 49%-80%).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective design and the small numbers with possible selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Results with the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were not as good as hoped. The effect on fecal continence, however, was minimal. The procedure might be more suitable for low transsphincteric fistulas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A992. LA LIGADURA DEL TRACTO DE LA FÍSTULA INTERESFINTÉRICA PARA UNA FÍSTULA TRANSESFINTÉRICA ALTA, PRODUCE RESULTADOS MODERADOS EN EL MEJOR DE LOS CASOS: ¿ESTÁ CAMBIANDO LA MAREA?: La ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica es un procedimiento quirúrgico bien aceptado y de uso frecuente para las fístulas perianales.

OBJETIVO

Confirmar los resultados de la ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica en un centro colorrectal especializado. DISEÑO:: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.

AJUSTE

Gran departamento de cirugía colorrectal y con centro de referencia terciaria para fístulas perianales.

PACIENTES

Pacientes consecutivos operados con ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica para una fístula perianal transesfintérica, entre 2012 y diciembre de 2018.

INTERVENCIONES

Ligadura del tracto de fístula interesfintérica.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO

Tasa de cicatrización, resultados secundarios: conversión a una fístula perianal interesfintérica, riesgo de recurrencia, complicaciones y estado de continencia postoperatoria.

RESULTADOS

Cuarenta y seis pacientes fueron tratados con una ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica. Todos los pacientes (100 por ciento) tenían imagenología en su preparación preoperatoria. Cuarenta pacientes (87 por ciento) tenían una fístula transesfintérica alta. La tasa de cicatrización primaria fue decepcionante en 17 de 46 pacientes (37 por ciento). El tiempo medio hasta el fracaso fue de 4.2 meses (rango intercuartil 3.5-6.5). De los fracasos, 16 se convirtieron en una fístula interesfintérica (55 por ciento de los fracasos y 35 por ciento de todos los pacientes). La duración media del seguimiento en pacientes sin recurrencia fue de 9.5 meses (desviación estándar de 11.9). Se perdieron durante el seguimiento a cuatro pacientes (9 por ciento). Después de la operación, el promedio del índice de severidad de incontinencia fecal fue de solo 2.35 (desviación estándar de 5.7, rango 0-30). Esto resultó en que 9 pacientes (20 por ciento) tuvieran una continencia deteriorada postoperatoria. El deterioro de la continencia fue leve en todos estos pacientes. El riesgo de desarrollar una recurrencia a un año después de la cirugía es del 64.2 por ciento (intervalo de confianza del 95 por ciento: 49-80 por ciento).

LIMITACIONES

Diseño retrospectivo, números pequeños con posible sesgo de selección.

CONCLUSIONES

Los resultados del procedimiento con la ligadura del tracto de fístula interesfintérica no fueron tan buenos como se esperaba. El efecto sobre la continencia fecal, sin embargo, fue mínimo. El procedimiento podría ser más adecuado para las fístulas transesfintéricas bajas. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A992.

Long-Term Outcomes of Ligation of the Inter-Sphincteric Fistula Tract Plus Bioprosthetic Anal Fistula Plug (LIFT-Plug) in the Treatment of Trans-Sphincteric Perianal Fistula

BACKGROUND The ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-plug) is a new procedure in the treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas. The aim of this study was to evaluate its long-term outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data of 78 patients with trans-sphincteric perianal fistula who were managed by the LIFT-plug technique between March 2014 to October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The operation time, healing rate, postoperative complications, recurrences, and length of stay were reviewed. RESULTS No serious complications occurred during the operation in all patients. The median follow-up was 30 months (16 to 47 months), clinical healing of the anal fistula occurred in 75 patients (96.2%). The median operative time was 25 minutes (18 to 45 minutes). The mean complete healing time was 16 days (9 to 46 days). The median healing time for the external anal fistula opening was 2 weeks (range, 2 to 3 weeks), and the inter-sphincteric groove incision healing time was 4 weeks (range, 3 to 7 weeks). The median hospital stay after operation was 5 days. Fistula recurred in 2 patients because of spontaneous expulsion of the plug at 7 days post-surgery; perianal abscess occurred in 1 patient. The anal function was evaluated in 70 patients of the 78 patients. Perfect control of continence was recorded for 97.1% of the patients (68 out of 70 patients). Two patients were identified to a rare complication of gas incontinence (Wexner score 1). CONCLUSIONS LIFT-plug procedure for the treatment of trans-sphincteric fistulas is a simple procedure with a high healing rate, minimal invasiveness, quick healing, and without disturbance to anal function. LIFT-plug is an ideal procedure for trans-sphincteric fistula.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF LIGATION OF INTERSPHINCTERIC FISTULA TRACT FOR COMPLEX FISTULA-IN-ANO: MODIFIED OPERATIVE PROCEDURE EXPERIENCE

Background:

It is important but difficult to treat complex fistula-in-ano due to the high recurrent rate and following incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57-94.4 %.

Aim:

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of modified LIFT operative procedure - ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract - to treat complex fistula-in-ano.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of complex fistula-in-ano. The group was treated with the modified approach of LIFT (curved incision was made in the anal canal skin; purse-string suture was performed around the fistula; the residual fistulas were removed in a tunnel-based way) and had a follow-up time of more than one year. Patient´s preoperative general condition, postoperative efficacy and their anal function were compared.

Results:

The median age of the participants was 34, and 43 (69.4%) cases were male. Forty-one (66.1%) cases were of high transsphincteric fistula, four (6.5%) cases of high intrasphincter fistula, and 17 (27.4%) cases of anterior anal fistula in female. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 (range, 12-51) months. The success rate in the end of follow-up was 83.9% (52/62). The anorectal pressure and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) evaluated three months before and after the operation did not find apparent changes.

Conclusions:

Compared with LIFT, the modified LIFT remarkably reduces postoperative failure and the recurrence rate of complex fistula with acceptable long-term outcomes.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Fistula in Ano: Lessons Learned From a Decade of Experience

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is a well-described sphincter-preserving technique for the management of fistula in ano. In 2007, we reported our early experience demonstrating a primary success rate of 94.4%. These findings have since been supported by several short-term studies, but long-term results and secondary cure rates after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract failure remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to report a 10-year experience of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract with extended long-term follow-up.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of single-center data from May 2006 to October 2010 was performed.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.

PATIENTS

All patients with primary or recurrent fistula in ano who underwent a ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were included. Patients with malignancy, incontinent patients, and patients with rectovaginal fistula were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healing as defined by the absence of symptoms with no visible external opening on clinical examination. Follow-up was continued until May 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 251 patients were identified, with a primary healing rate of 87.65% at a median follow-up of 71 months. The healing rates for low transsphincteric, intersphincteric, high transsphincteric, semihorseshoe, and horseshoe fistulas were 92.1%, 85.2%, 60.0%, 89.0%, and 40.0%. Of the 42 patients who had an unhealed fistula after previous non-ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract surgery, 38 (90.48%) healed after the first attempt at ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. There were 31 patients with unhealed fistulas after the first ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Of these, 3 healed spontaneously, and the rest underwent either repeat ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, fistulotomy (if the recurrence was intersphincteric), or simple curettage (if no internal opening was found). Ultimately, only 2 of the original 251 patients remained unhealed, and there was no change in subjective continence status after surgery.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is an effective technique for the treatment of fistula in ano, including recurrent or unhealed fistula after other procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A387.

Time trends in the epidemiology and outcome of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease in a population-based cohort

OBJECTIVE

Perianal disease is a debilitating condition that frequently occurs in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. It is currently unknown whether its incidence has changed in the era of frequent immunomodulator use and biological availability. We studied the incidence and outcome of perianal and rectovaginal fistulas over the past two decades in our population-based Inflammatory Bowel Disease South-Limburg cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 1162 CD patients registered in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease South-Limburg registry were included. The cumulative probabilities of developing a perianal and rectovaginal fistula were compared between three eras distinguished by the year of CD diagnosis: 1991-1998, 1999-2005 and 2006-2011. Second, clinical risk factors and the risk of fistula recurrence were determined.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year perianal fistula rate was 14.1% in the 1991-1998 era, 10.4% in the 1999-2005 era and 10.3% in the 2006-2011 era, P=0.70. Colonic disease was associated with an increased risk of developing perianal disease, whereas older age was associated with a decreased risk (both P<0.01). Over time, more patients were exposed to immunomodulators or biologicals before fistula diagnosis (18.5 vs. 32.1 vs. 52.1%, respectively, P=0.02) and started biological therapy thereafter (18.6 vs. 34.1 vs. 54.0%, respectively, P<0.01). The cumulative 5-year perianal fistula recurrence rate was not significantly different between eras (19.5 vs. 25.5 vs. 33.1%, P=0.28). In contrast, the cumulative 5-year rectovaginal rate attenuated from 5.7% (the 1991-2005 era) to 1.7% (the 2006-2011 era), P=0.01.

CONCLUSION

Over the past two decades, the risk of developing a perianal fistula was stable, as well as its recurrence rate, underlining the lasting need for improving treatment strategies for this invalidating condition.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Is Suitable for Recurrent Anal Fistulas from Follow-Up of 16 Months

Since 2007, ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for the management of anal fistula was all introduced with initial success and excitement. It remains controversial which surgical procedure is suitable for transsphincteric fistula, especially to complex anal fistula. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the results in patients with recurrent anal fistula by LIFT. A retrospective study of 55 complex fistula patients who underwent LIFT procedure in a single medical center was analyzed. Patients and fistula characteristics, complications, and recurrences were reviewed. All 55 patients underwent the procedure with a median follow-up of 16 months. Median operative time was 44 (range 23–88) minutes. Of the 55 patients, 33 (60%) healed completely and did not require any further surgical treatment at end of follow-up. Twenty-two (40%) recurrences and six complications were observed. Compared with patients who had undergone more than two surgical procedures, LIFT was more suitable for patients who had undergone one to two surgical procedures, and significant difference was observed in number of operations before LIFT (p = 0.002). Clinicians can consider the use of LIFT for the treatment of recurrent anal fistulas. A larger number of patients and prospective study are needed to be performed.

Management of Complex Perineal Fistula Disease

Management of complex perineal fistulas such as high perianal, rectovaginal, pouch-vaginal, rectourethral, or pouch-urethral fistulas requires a systematic approach. The first step is to control any sepsis with drainage of abscess and/or seton placement. Patients with large, recurrent, irradiated fistulas benefit from stoma diversion. In patients with Crohn's disease, it is essential to induce remission prior to any repair. There are different approaches to repair complex fistulas, from local repairs to transperineal and transabdominal approaches. Simpler fistulas are amenable to local repair. More complex fistulas, such as those secondary to irradiation, require interposition of healthy, well-vascularized tissue. The most common flap used for this treatment is the gracilis muscle with good outcomes reported. Once healing is confirmed by imaging and endoscopy, the stoma is reversed.

A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano

AIM

In 2007 the ACPGBI published a position statement on the management of cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Over the last seven years a number of new treatments have been developed and the aim of this systematic review was to assess their effectiveness.

METHOD

A systematic review of all English language literature relevant to novel treatment strategies for cryptoglandular fistula in ano, published between 1 January 2007 and 31 Dec 2014 was carried out using MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews/Controlled Trials for relevant literature. Technical notes, commentaries, letters and meeting abstracts were excluded. The different treatments were assessed with regards to fistula closure rate in relation to length of follow up and reported complications.

RESULTS

Seventy potential articles published between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014 were identified from the initial literature search. Twenty-one articles were included for final analysis although only two were randomized controlled trials, the remainder being retrospective or prospective series.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review has demonstrated that whilst there have been technological advances to treat complex cryptoglandular fistula in ano, these are in an early stage of evolution and although early results were promising they are difficult to reproduce. Longer follow up data is not currently available and these treatments should not be introduced without further evidence.

Management of Complex Anal Fistulas

Complex anal fistulas require careful evaluation. Prior to any attempts at definitive repair, the anatomy must be well defined and the sepsis resolved. Several muscle-sparing approaches to anal fistula are appropriate, and are often catered to the patient based on their presentation and previous repairs. Emerging technologies show promise for fistula repair, but lack long-term data.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract: a Sphincter-Sparing Option for Complex Fistula-in-Ano

Fistulae-in-ano represent one of the more challenging anorectal diseases faced by surgeons, as appropriate management requires careful balance between the need for local sepsis control and patients' desire to maintain fecal continence. The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure, first described by Rojanasakul and colleagues in 2007, represents a sphincter-sparing technique for fistula management which has become our method of choice for transsphincteric fistulas. With this technique, patients frequently enjoy successful fistula healing., or, at worst, conversion to a less complex fistula tract. Here, we describe and illustrate our surgical approach and review success and recurrence rates presented in the published literature.

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure for anal fistula: a mixed bag of results

BACKGROUND

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure, a sphincter-preserving technique, aims to obtain complete, durable healing, while preserving fecal continence in the treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE

This was a systematic review to evaluate the outcomes of the originally described (classic) ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and the identified technical variations of the procedure.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and the archive of Diseases of the Colon & Rectum were searched with the terms "ligation of intersphincteric fistula" and "ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract."

STUDY SELECTION

Original, English-language studies reporting the primary healing rate for each technical variation of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were included. Studies were excluded when the technique used was unclear or when primary healing rate was reported in a pooled manner including outcomes from multiple technical variations of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure.

INTERVENTION

Outcomes associated with all of the technical variations of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measured was primary healing rate. Secondary outcome measures included time to healing, changes in continence, and risk factors for failure.

RESULTS

In all, 26 studies met criteria for review, including 1 randomized controlled trial and 25 cohort/case series. Seven technical variations of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were identified and classified according to the surgical technique. Primary healing rates ranged from 47% to 95%.

LIMITATIONS

The levels of evidence available in the published works are relatively low, as indicated by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure is a promising treatment option for transsphincteric fistulas, with reasonable success rates and minimal impact on continence. The true efficacy of the procedure is unknown because of the number of technical variations and the pooled results reported in the literature.

Biomaterials in the treatment of anal fistula: hope or hype?

Anal fistula (AF) presents a chronic problem for patients and colorectal surgeons alike. Surgical treatment may result in impairment of continence and long-term risk of recurrence. Treatment options for AFs vary according to their location and complexity. The ideal approach should result in low recurrence rates and minimal impact on continence. New technical approaches involving biologically derived products such as biological mesh, fibrin glue, fistula plug, and stem cells have been applied in the treatment of AF to improve outcomes and decrease recurrence rates and the risk of fecal incontinence. In this review, we will highlight the current evidence and describe our personal experience with these novel approaches.

Management of complex anorectal fistulas with seton drainage plus partial fistulotomy and subsequent ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT)

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a relatively new technique in the treatment of complex anorectal fistulas. As it spares the anal sphincter, rates of post-operative incontinence may be lower when compared to conventional treatment. To date, there have not been enough reports of long-term fistula recurrence rates. We performed a long-term follow-up study of 75 patients who underwent LIFT following seton drainage and partial fistulotomy.

METHODS

Only patients with complex cryptogenic anorectal fistulas were included. After seton insertion and partial fistulotomy, the tract was reviewed at 4 months for the absence of anorectal sepsis. Patients then underwent LIFT in a day surgery setting. Operative time, complications, recurrences and incontinence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between May 2008 and June 2013, 75 patients [51 men, mean age 49.5 years, standard error of the mean (SEM) 1.4 years] were treated with a LIFT protocol. The mean operating time for LIFT was 13.2 min (SEM 1.5 min). Complications included minor bleeding, superficial wound dehiscence and perianal pain. At a mean follow-up of 14.6 months (SEM 1.7 months), there were nine (12 %) recurrences, diagnosed at a mean 9.2 months (SEM 2.7 months). They were treated with seton insertion followed by LIFT with biomesh or anorectal advancement flap, and there were no subsequent recurrences. Review of preoperative and post-operative continence scores revealed only one (1.3 %) patient with minor incontinence following LIFT. Recurrences were significantly related to fistulas with multiple tracts (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the protocol of seton insertion and partial fistulotomy followed by LIFT is associated with a low recurrence rate comparing well with published results from studies involving other techniques and protocols for treating anal fistula.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for treatment of complex anal fistula

Ligation of intershpincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a novel surgical procedure for complex fistula, especially transsphincteric fistula which was first proposed by Thailand doctor Rojanasakul.This sphincter-saving procedure has a high success rate, and more importantly, a very low continence rate. Recent clinical research of LIFT has showed that its efficacy varies greatly. In this article, we will review the recent advances in research on ligation of intershpincteric fistula tract for complex anal fistula.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: What is the evidence in a review?

Broadly, complex fistulas are those that are not low transsphincteric or intersphincteric. The objectives of surgical management are to achieve fistula healing, prevent recurrences and maintain continence. The risk of incontinence associated with treatment ranges from 10% to 57%. The objective of this manuscript is to review the current literature to date on the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure (LIFT procedure) as a treatment option in these types of fistula. A search was conducted in Medline, PUBMED, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge, and studies published from January 2009 to May 2013 were included. The primary outcomes were fistula healing rates, mean healing time and patient satisfaction with this surgical technique. Eighteen studies were included in this review. The total number of patients included was 592 (65% male). The median age reported was 42.8 years. The most common type of fistula included was transsphincteric (73.3% of cases). The mean healing rate reported was 74.6%. The risk factors for failure discovered were obesity, smoking, multiple previous surgeries and the length of the fistula tract. The mean healing time was 5.5 wk, and the mean follow-up period was 42.3 wk. The patient satisfaction rates ranged from 72% to 100%. No de novo incontinence developed secondary to the LIFT procedure. There is not enough evidence that variants in the surgical technique achieve better outcomes (Bio-LIFT, LIFT-Plug, LIFT-Plus). This review indicates that the LIFT procedure is primarily effective for transsphincteric fistulas with an overall fistula closure of 74.6% and has a low impact on fecal continence. This procedure produces better outcomes at the first surgical attempt.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in the management of anal fistula. A systematic review

AIM

Over the last 5 years, the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has become increasingly popular as a sphincter-preserving technique for the treatment of anal fistula. The aim of this article was to review the published literature on the LIFT procedure.

METHOD

The Cochrane database and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 to November 2012, and PubMed from January 1966 to November 2012. All peer-reviewed studies that investigated the LIFT procedure for the treatment of anal fistula were eligible for inclusion. Technical notes, commentaries, letters and meeting abstracts were excluded. The primary outcome measured was the overall fistula closure rate in relation to the length of follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles were originally identified using the search criteria. Thirteen were finally included for analysis. Sample sizes ranged from 18 to 93 patients, with a pooled total of 498. Most fistulae, 494 (99%), were of cryptoglandular aetiology, of which 470 (94%) were transsphincteric. Overall success rates ranged from 40 to 95%, with a pooled success of 71% (352 of 495 patients; 3 of 498 were lost to follow-up). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 55 months, with a reported mean or median of 4 to 19.5 months. One hundred and eighty-three patients were formally assessed for continence, out of whom 11 (6%) had a minor disturbance.

CONCLUSION

Overall the systematic review shows that the LIFT procedure appears to be an effective sphincter-conserving approach for the treatment of transsphincteric anal fistula with a pooled healing rate of 71% over a mean or median follow-up period ranging from 4 to 19.5 months.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and its modification: Results from treatment of complex fistula

AIM: To compare healing rates between intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and LIFT plus partial fistulectomy procedures.

METHODS: A study of complex fistula-in-ano patients was carried out from 1^st March 2010 to 31^th January 2012. All operations were done by colorectal surgeons at a referral center in a Ministry of Public Health hospital. Data collected included patients’ demographic details, fistula type determined by endorectal-ultrasonography, preoperative and postoperative continence status, previous operations, time between diagnosis of fistula-in-ano and operation, type of surgery, healing rates, recurrence rates, and types of failure examined by endorectal-ultrasosnography, re-operation in recurrence or failure cases, and complications.

RESULTS: The study involved 41 patients whose average age was 40.78 ± 11.84 years (range: 21-71 years). The major fistula type was high-transsphincteric type fistula. The median follow-up period was 24 wk. The overall success rate was 83%: in the LIFT (Ligation intersphincteric fistula tract) group the success rate was 81% and in the LIFT plus (LIFT with partial coreout fistulectomy) group it was 85% (P = 0.529). The median wound-healing time was 4 wk in both groups (P = 0.262). The median time to recurrence was 12 wk. Neither group had incontinence (Wexner incontinence score-0) and the difference in healing rates between the two groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: There was no difference in results between LIFT and LIFT plus operations. The LIFT procedure is a good option for maintaining continence in management of fistula-in-ano.