1
|
Fletcher T, Thompson AJ, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. The measurement and modification of hypoxia in colorectal cancer: overlooked but not forgotten. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac042. [PMID: 36032656 PMCID: PMC9406947 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is the inevitable consequence of a tumour's rapid growth and disorganized, inefficient vasculature. The compensatory mechanisms employed by tumours, and indeed the absence of oxygen itself, hinder the ability of all treatment modalities. The clinical consequence is poorer overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control. Recognizing this, clinicians have been attenuating the effect of hypoxia, primarily with hypoxic modification or with hypoxia-activated pro-drugs, and notable success has been demonstrated. However, in the case of colorectal cancer (CRC), there is a general paucity of knowledge and evidence surrounding the measurement and modification of hypoxia, and this is possibly due to the comparative inaccessibility of such tumours. We specifically review the role of hypoxia in CRC and focus on the current evidence for the existence of hypoxia in CRC, the majority of which originates from indirect positron emission topography imaging with hypoxia selective radiotracers; the evidence correlating CRC hypoxia with poorer oncological outcome, which is largely based on the measurement of hypoxia inducible factor in correlation with clinical outcome; the evidence of hypoxic modification in CRC, of which no direct evidence exists, but is reflected in a number of indirect markers; the prognostic and monitoring implications of accurate CRC hypoxia quantification and its potential in the field of precision oncology; and the present and future imaging tools and technologies being developed for the measurement of CRC hypoxia, including the use of blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teddy Fletcher
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alex J Thompson
- The Hamlyn Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borstlap WAA, Buskens CJ, Tytgat KMAJ, Tuynman JB, Consten ECJ, Tolboom RC, Heuff G, van Geloven N, van Wagensveld BA, C A Wientjes CA, Gerhards MF, de Castro SMM, Jansen J, van der Ven AWH, van der Zaag E, Omloo JM, van Westreenen HL, Winter DC, Kennelly RP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing ferric(III)carboxymaltose infusion with oral iron supplementation in the treatment of preoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Surg 2015; 15:78. [PMID: 26123286 PMCID: PMC4485873 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-015-0065-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background At least a third of patients with a colorectal carcinoma who are candidate for surgery, are anaemic preoperatively. Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In general practice, little attention is paid to these anaemic patients. Some will have oral iron prescribed others not. The waiting period prior to elective colorectal surgery could be used to optimize a patients’ physiological status. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative intravenous iron supplementation in comparison with the standard preoperative oral supplementation in anaemic patients with colorectal cancer. Methods/Design In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with an M0-staged colorectal carcinoma who are scheduled for curative resection and with a proven iron deficiency anaemia are eligible for inclusion. Main exclusion criteria are palliative surgery, metastatic disease, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy = no exclusion) and the use of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin within three months before inclusion or a blood transfusion within a month before inclusion. Primary endpoint is the percentage of patients that achieve normalisation of the haemoglobin level between the start of the treatment and the day of admission for surgery. This study is a superiority trial, hypothesizing a greater proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoint in favour of iron infusion compared to oral supplementation. A total of 198 patients will be randomized to either ferric(III)carboxymaltose infusion in the intervention arm or ferrofumarate in the control arm. This study will be performed in ten centres nationwide and one centre in Ireland. Discussion This is the first randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of preoperative iron supplementation in exclusively anaemic patients with a colorectal carcinoma. Our trial hypotheses a more profound haemoglobin increase with intravenous iron which may contribute to a superior optimisation of the patient’s condition and possibly a decrease in postoperative morbidity. Trial registration ClincalTrials.gov: NCT02243735.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W A A Borstlap
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - C J Buskens
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K M A J Tytgat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - R C Tolboom
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - G Heuff
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - N van Geloven
- Department of Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - B A van Wagensveld
- Department of Surgery, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A C A Wientjes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M F Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S M M de Castro
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - E van der Zaag
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - J M Omloo
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | | | - D C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R P Kennelly
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M G W Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|