Does stapled anopexy for bleeding haemorrhoids cure associated anaemia?

The comparison of doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and the tissue selecting technique for patients with grade III/IV haemorrhoids: a retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation (DG-HAL) and tissue-selecting technique (TST) in patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 251 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids between January 2019 and January 2021. Among them, 119 patients had received TST, and the remaining 132 patients received DG-HAL. We collected and compared clinical characteristics of both groups, including post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, post-operative bleeding, post-operative defecation, urinary retention, and recurrence rate (prolapse and bleeding). The VAS pain score of the first post-operative defecation and at the post-operative day (POD)1 and 2 for the DG-HAL group was lower than those for the TST group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.029). The incidence of post-operative complications (including bleeding, urinary retention and sensation of rectal tenesmus) in the DG-HAL group was lower than that in the TST group (P = 0.021, P = 0.035 and P = 0.047). At follow-up by telephone or outpatient 3 years after surgery, the recurrence rate (prolapse) was lower in the TST group than in the DG-HAL group (P = 0.013). Subgroup analysis showed a higher prolapse recurrence rate in grade IV patients than grade III patients after DG-HAL (P = 0.013). DG-HAL had fewer complications, lower bleeding rates, and less early post-operative pain but showed a higher recurrence rate than TST at the 3-year follow-up, especially in grade IV patients.

Prospective Randomized Study on Stapled Anopexy Height and Its Influence on Recurrence for Hemorrhoidal Disease Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To know the influence of the stapled line height (SLH) in the recurrence rate and the postoperative disturbances in stapled anopexy (SA) for the treatment of hemorrhoids.

DESIGN

Simple randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Randomization with closed-envelope technique in two groups with two different SLH.

SETTING

Colorectal Surgery Unit. Department of General Surgery. Hospital de Mataró (Barcelona, Spain).

PARTICIPANTS

119 patients with the diagnosis of symptomatic third- and fourth-grade hemorrhoids were included.

INTERVENTION

SA was performed with two different SLH: group A, 4.5 cm (58 patients) and group B, 6 cm (61 patients) from the external anal verge. Postoperative disturbances were evaluated by a colorectal surgeon who was blind for the randomization and pain was measured (visual analogic scale) one week and 3 months after surgery. Mean operative time, number of hemostatic stitches performed and resected mucosal area were considered as well. Mean follow-up was 11.05 ± 1.6 years.

RESULTS

Differences between the operative time and resected mucosa-submucosa area were not found. The patients of group A needed a significantly higher number of stitches for intraoperative bleeding control along the stapled line. We did not found differences between both groups in terms of postoperative pain neither anorectal disturbances. At the follow-up, persistence of symptomatology was 10.41% in group A and 10.71% in group B, without statistically significance. Neither mortality nor undesirable effects occurred in the series.

CONCLUSIONS

SLH do not influence the recurrence rate neither the postoperative evolution in SA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials NCT03383926.