Representation of the elderly in trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

The Role of Frailty in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Owing to the gradual aging of today's population, an increase in the prevalence of frailty syndrome has been noticed. This complex state of health, characterized by decreased resilience and tolerance with concurrent increased vulnerability to stressors and adverse health-related factors, has drawn researchers' attention in recent years. Rectal cancer, which constitutes ~30% of all colorectal cancers, is a disease noticeably related to the elderly. In its locally advanced form, it is conventionally treated with trimodal therapy-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite its good clinical outcomes and improvement in rectal cancer local control, as evidenced by clinical trials, it remains unclear if all frail patients benefit from that approach since it may be associated with adverse side effects that cannot be handled by them. As old patients, and frail ones even more noticeably, are poorly represented in the clinical trials describing outcomes of the standard treatment, this article aims to review the current knowledge on the trimodal therapy of rectal cancer with an emphasis on novel approaches to rectal cancer that can be implemented for frail patients.

Benefits of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults compared with younger adults: a retrospective study

Randomized research demonstrated that robotic surgery was oncologically safe and beneficial in the short term. We investigated whether older adults benefit from robotics more than younger adults do in terms of short-term outcomes. We identified all older (≥ 70 years old) and younger (≤ 70) adults with rectal cancer treated with resection between 2019 and 2022 from an institutional database. We assessed the short-term post-operative 90-day outcomes, which included the first bowel movement, length of hospital duration, sepsis, and harvested lymph node on an age-based differentiation. The key outcomes were complications and grades III-IV on the Clavien-Dindo scale. We identified 298 individuals treated with oncologic resection of rectal cancer: 108 (36.6%) were older adults, while 190 (63.4%) were younger adults. Older adults treated with robotic surgery include 45 (41.6%), whereas 63 (58.3%) older adults were treated with laparoscopic surgery, and 85 (44.7%) younger adults were treated with robotic surgery, while 105 (55.2%) younger adults were treated with laparoscopic surgery. The Clavien-Dindo grading system exposes a substantial P < 0.05 in younger group, whereas grade III-IV patients are seen more frequently in laparoscopic surgery than robotic surgery. Younger and older persons both benefited differently from robotic surgery when compared to laparoscopic surgery in terms of major post-operative complications.

Barriers and potential solutions in the recruitment and retention of older patients in clinical trials-lessons learned from six large multicentre randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

older people remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and evidence generated in younger populations cannot always be generalized to older patients.

OBJECTIVE

to identify key barriers and to discuss solutions to specific issues affecting recruitment and retention of older participants in clinical trials based on experience gained from six current European randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on older people.

METHODS

a multidisciplinary group of experts including representatives of the six RCTs held two networking conferences and compiled lists of potential barriers and solutions. Every item was subsequently allocated points by each study team according to how important it was perceived to be for their RCTs.

RESULTS

the six RCTs enrolled 7,612 older patients. Key barriers to recruitment were impaired health status, comorbidities and diverse health beliefs including priorities within different cultural systems. All trials had to increase the number of recruitment sites. Other measures felt to be effective included the provision of extra time, communication training for the study staff and a re-design of patient information. Key barriers for retention included the presence of severe comorbidities and the occurrence of adverse events. Long study duration, frequent study visits and difficulties accessing the study site were also mentioned. Solutions felt to be effective included spending more time maintaining close contact with the participants, appropriate measures to show appreciation and reimbursement of travel arrangements.

CONCLUSION

recruitment and retention of older patients in trials requires special recognition and a targeted approach. Our results provide scientifically-based practical recommendations for optimizing future studies in this population.

Effects of Low Intraperitoneal Pressure on Quality of Postoperative Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery for Genital Prolapse in Elderly Patients Aged 75 Years or Older

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Previous clinical trials for laparoscopic surgery have included few elderly patients aged ≥75 years. We aimed to evaluate the quality of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic surgery using low intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) (6 mm Hg) and warmed, humidified carbon dioxide gas for genital prolapse in elderly patients aged ≥75 years.

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive case series.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients (n = 30) aged ≥75 years planning to undergo laparoscopic surgery for genital prolapse by the same surgeon were recruited from October 2016 through December 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic promontofixation for the treatment of genital prolapse was performed using low IPP and warmed, humidified carbon dioxide gas. When a promontory could not be easily identified, laparoscopic pectopexy was alternatively performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score at 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale and the length of hospital stay after surgery (LHSS). For the global QoR-40 score and for 4 dimensions of the QoR-40, "emotional state," "physical comfort," "psychologic support," and "pain," no differences were observed between the baseline score and the score at 24 hours. The score for the "physical independence" dimension at 24 hours was significantly lower than the baseline score (p <.001). No patient had visual analog scale pain scores >30 out of 100 at 12 hours or later. LHSS was <48 hours in 22 patients (73.3%) and <72 hours in 8 patients (26.7%). Multivariable analysis showed that the odds of an LHSS >48 hours were more than 8 times higher in patients who were discharged from the operating room in the afternoon compared with those with a morning discharge.

CONCLUSION

The use of a low IPP is feasible, safe, and has clinical benefits for elderly patients aged ≥75 years who undergo laparoscopic surgery for genital prolapse.

Glucocorticoid-trials in rheumatoid arthritis mostly study representative real-world patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in clinical research due to credible causality. Their results, however, may not be generalizable to real-world populations. While glucocorticoids (GCs) remain a mainstay of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, it is unclear whether the results of GC-RCTs are generalizable to current real-world RA patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for RCTs and, as comparators, cohort studies (CSs) in RA evaluating systemic GCs. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for descriptive baseline characteristics (including general demographics, comorbidities, and disease activity) that have been shown to be able to modify the benefit-risk-ratio of various RA therapeutics. These meta-analyses were stratified by study type (RCT and CS). Stratified estimates were subsequently compared. Further sensitivity analyses were performed stratifying by disease duration.

RESULTS

56 RCTs (7053 participants) and 10 CSs (14,688 participants) were included. 12 characteristics were reported frequently enough to allow for comparative analysis. In 10/12 characteristics (83%), RCT estimates did not appear to differ from CS estimates. However, RCT participants were younger (-4.7 years [95% CI -7.2 to -2.1]; p < 0.001) and had higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (11.8 mm/h [5.7 to 17.8]; p < 0.001) than CS participants. Comorbidities could not be assessed due to insufficient reporting.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that evidence from GC trials in RA is of acceptable generalizability to current real-world patients - especially compared to findings from biologic agents in RA. However, RCT participants were younger than real-world patients, potentially limiting the generalizability of trial results to elderly patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42019134675).

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Open Right Hemicolectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Open and laparoscopic resections for colon cancer have equivalent perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, there are little data concerning patient-reported outcomes in the early postdischarge period.

OBJECTIVE

We examined patient-reported outcomes in the early postdischarge period for open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted using linked administrative healthcare databases in the province of Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic or open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry and physician billing data.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the presence of moderate-to-severe symptom scores on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (≥4 of 10) within 6 weeks of hospital discharge after right hemicolectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 1022 patients completed ≥1 Edmonton Symptom Assessment System survey within 6 weeks of surgery and were included in the study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection were more likely to have an urban residence, to have undergone planned resections, and to have had proportionally more stage 1 disease compared with patients undergoing open resection. On multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient demographics, cancer stage, and planned versus unplanned admission status, there were no differences in the adjusted odds of moderate-to-severe symptom scores between the laparoscopic and open approaches.

LIMITATIONS

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scores are not collected for inpatients and thus only represent outpatient postoperative visits. Scores were reported by 19% of all resections in the population, with a bias to patients treated at cancer centers, and therefore they are not fully representative of the general population of right hemicolectomy. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is not a disease-specific tool and may not measure all relevant outcomes for patients undergoing right hemicolectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of the open or laparoscopic surgical technique was not associated with increased risk of elevated symptom burden in the early postdischarge period. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B27. REPORTE COMPARATIVO DE RESULTADOS INFORMADOS DE PACIENTES CON HEMICOLECTOMÍA DERECHA LAPAROSCÓPICA Y ABIERTA: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: Las resecciones abiertas y laparoscópicas para el cáncer de colon, presentan semejante morbilidad y mortalidad perioperatoria. Sin embargo, en el período inicial posterior al alta, hay pocos datos sobre los resultados informados por los pacientes.Examinamos los resultados informados por los pacientes, en el período temprano posterior al alta, para hemicolectomía derecha abierta y laparoscópica en cáncer de colon.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.El estudio se realizó utilizando bases de datos administrativas de atención médica en la provincia de Ontario, Canadá.Pacientes sometidos a hemicolectomía derecha abierta o laparoscópica para cáncer de colon, de enero 2010 a diciembre 2014, se identificaron mediante el Registro de cáncer de Ontario y de los datos médicos de facturación.El resultado primario, después de la hemicolectomía derecha, fue la presencia de síntomas de moderados a graves en el Sistema de evaluación de síntomas de Edmonton (≥4 de cada 10) dentro de las seis semanas posteriores al alta hospitalaria.Un total de 1022 pacientes completaron al menos una encuesta del Sistema de evaluación de síntomas de Edmonton, dentro de las seis semanas de la cirugía y se incluyeron en el estudio. Los pacientes sometidos a resección laparoscópica fueron más propensos a residir en zona urbana, a resecciones planificadas y proporcionalmente más enfermedad en estadio 1; en comparación con los pacientes sometidos a resecciones abiertas. En los análisis multivariables, que se ajustaron a la demografía del paciente, al estadio del cáncer y del estado de ingreso planificado versus no planificado, no hubo diferencias en las probabilidades ajustadas de las puntuaciones de los síntomas moderados a severos entre el abordaje abierto o laparoscópico.Las puntuaciones del Sistema de evaluación de síntomas de Edmonton no se recopilan para pacientes hospitalizados y por lo tanto, solo representan las visitas postoperatorias de pacientes ambulatorios. Las puntuaciones informadas fueron del 19% de todas las resecciones en la población, con un sesgo en los pacientes tratados en los Centros de Cáncer y por lo tanto, no son totalmente representativos de la población general de hemicolectomía derecha. El Sistema de evaluación de síntomas de Edmonton no es una herramienta específica de la enfermedad y puede no medir todos los resultados relevantes para los pacientes que se someten a una hemicolectomía derecha.La recepción entre una técnica quirúrgica abierta o laparoscópica, no se asoció con un aumento del riesgo de síntomas en el período temprano posterior al alta. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B27.

Benefits of minimally-invasive surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancer in older adults compared with younger adults: Do older adults have the most to gain?

INTRODUCTION

Randomized trials demonstrated oncologic safety and short-term benefits of laparoscopy. We investigated if the benefit of laparoscopy on short-term outcomes is greater for older adults compared with younger adults.

METHODS

We identified all older (≥70 years old) and younger (<70) adults with primary sigmoid and rectal cancer treated with resection between 2002 and 2018 from an institutional database. We compared 30-day postoperative outcomes using multivariable logistic regression with an interaction term between age group and surgical approach. Primary outcomes were death, major (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) and minor (Clavien-Dindo I-II) complications, and wound complications.

RESULTS

We included 792 patients, 293 (37%) older and 499 (63%) younger. Use of laparoscopy was similar between age groups: 120/293 (41%) older, 204/499 (41%) younger (p = .98). All patients had 30-day follow-up. Compared with open resection, minimally-invasive resection was associated with a greater reduction in deaths in older adults than in younger adults (absolute difference in older adults 7.0% less versus 2.1% less in younger adults; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] older 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-7.33; aOR younger 0.31, 95% CI 0.05-1.24; interaction p = .01). Similarly, minimally-invasive resection was associated with a greater reduction in major complications in older adults than in younger adults (absolute difference in older adults 6.4% less versus 2.4% less in younger adults; aOR older 1.91, 95% CI 1.07-3.41; aOR younger 0.70, 95% CI 0.34-1.38; interaction p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally-invasive compared with open surgery demonstrated a differential benefit on postoperative death and major complications between younger and older adults.

Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies

PURPOSE

Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are elderly. This systematic review identifies and describes observational studies evaluating the influence of age on first-line treatment effectiveness in real-world practice.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016. The included studies were those that investigated first-line treatment of mCRC and reported age groups and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall response rate (ORR) were included. Studies published before 2008 were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were evaluated by age group (< 70 vs. ≥ 70 years; 65-75 vs. ≥ 75 years) and outcome. A pooled survival median was calculated for patients (cutoff = 70 years).

RESULTS

In total, 11 articles with 11,063 patients were included. Four studies using a cutoff of 70 years of age reported OS and PFS, and two studies reported ORRs. In terms of OS, all studies showed a higher OS for those < 70 years of age than for those ≥ 70 years of age. PFS did not find differences by age. For ORRs, one study favoured the younger group, while the second study did not differ by age. Based on three studies, the pooled medians for  < 70 years of age and ≥ 70 years of age were the same for PFS (10.2) and were 27.0 and 22.9 for OS, respectively. All included studies were of high or acceptable quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that age has no effect on PFS. For ORR, the results were inconsistent between studies. Younger patients in general had better OS, which might be partly explained by more aggressive treatment. This treatment seemed not to be guided by performance status or number of metastatic sites.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has spread globally. The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients was initially indicated by comparison with open surgery. However, whether the procedure is safe for elderly as well as non-elderly patients with colorectal cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

In this review, patients aged ≥ 75 were defined as elderly. We conducted literature searches using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials. Two authors independently reviewed resultant articles to identify relevant observational studies. Data synthesis was performed with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by using forest plots and I² statistics. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed by the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. The incidence of overall complications was slightly higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients, with statistical significance (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.34). There was no difference between them in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.86-1.80) and mortality (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is mostly safe for elderly patients as well as non-elderly patients. Preoperative comorbidities or poor physical capacity should be cared for in the elderly.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer remains controversial. The study aimed to compare the operative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes of robotic (robotic colorectal resection surgery [RCRS]) versus laparoscopic colorectal resection surgery (LCRS) in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare patients aged 70 years and more undergoing elective RCRS or LCRS for colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2017.

RESULTS

Overall, 160 patients underwent elective curative LCRS (n = 102) or RCRS (n = 58) for colorectal cancer. Before PSM, the mean preoperative Charlson score and the tumor size were significantly lower in the robotic group. After matching, 43 RCRSs were compared with 43 LCRSs. The RCRS group showed longer operative times (300.6 versus 214.5 min, P = .03) compared with LCRS, but all other operative variables were comparable between the two groups. No differences were found for postoperative morbidity, mortality, time to flatus, return to regular diet, and length of hospital stay. R0 resection was obtained in 95.3% of procedures. The overall and disease-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were similar between RCRS and LCRS patients. The presence of more than one comorbidity before surgery was significantly associated with the incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged 70 years or more, robotic colorectal surgery showed operative and oncologic outcomes similar to those obtained by laparoscopy, despite longer operative times. Randomized trials are awaited to reliably assess the clinical and oncological noninferiority and the costs/benefits ratio of robotic colorectal surgery in elderly populations.

Demographic and Urbanization Disparities of Liver Transplantation in Taiwan

Limited access to or receipt of liver transplantation (LT) may jeopardize survival of patients with end-stage liver diseases. Taiwan launched its National Health Insurance (NHI) program in 1995, which essentially removes financial barriers to health care. This study aims to investigate where there are still demographic and urbanization disparities of LT after 15 years of NHI program implementation. Data analyzed in this study were retrieved from Taiwan’s NHI inpatient claims. A total of 3020 people aged ≥18 years received LT between 2000 and 2013. We calculated crude and adjusted prevalence rate of LT according to secular year, age, sex, and urbanization. The multiple Poisson regression model was further employed to assess the independent effects of demographics and urbanization on prevalence of LT. The biennial number of people receiving LT substantially increased from 56 in 2000–2001 to 880 in 2012–2013, representing a prevalence rate of 1.63 and 18.58 per 10⁶, respectively. Such increasing secular trend was independent of sex. The prevalence was consistently higher in men than in women. The prevalence also increased with age in people <65 years, but dropped sharply in the elderly (≥65 years) people. We noted a significant disparity of LT in areas with different levels of urbanization. Compared to urban areas, satellite (prevalence rate ratio (PRR), 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.69) and rural (PRR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.69–0.83) areas were both associated with a significantly lower prevalence of LT. There are still significant demographic and urbanization disparities in LT after 15 years of NHI program implementation. Given the predominance of living donor liver transplantation in Taiwan, further studies should be conducted to investigate factors associated with having a potential living donor for LT.

Trends in laparoscopic colorectal surgery over time from 2005-2014 using the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy, originally pioneered by gynecologists, was first adopted by general surgeons in the late 1980s. Since then, laparoscopy has been adopted in the surgical specialties and colorectal surgery for treatment of benign and malignant disease. Formal laparoscopic training became a required component of surgery residency programs as validated by the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum; however, some surgeons may be more apprehensive of widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques. Although an overall increase in the use of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery is anticipated over a 10-year period, it is unknown if a similar increase will be seen in higher risk or more acutely ill patients.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005-2014, colorectal procedures were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes and categorized to open or laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of colorectal surgeries performed laparoscopically was calculated for each year. Separate descriptive statistics was performed and categorized by age and body mass index (BMI). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification and emergency case status variables were added to the project to help assess complexity of cases.

RESULTS

During the 10-year study period, the number of colorectal cases increased from 3114 in 2005 to 51,611 in 2014 as more hospitals joined NSQIP. A total of 277,376 colorectal cases were identified; of which, 114,359 (41.2%) were performed laparoscopically. The use of laparoscopy gradually increased each year, from 22.7% in 2005 to 49.8% in 2014. Laparoscopic procedures were most commonly performed in the youngest age group (18-49 years), overweight and obese patients (BMI 25-34.9), and in ASA class 1-2 patients. Over the 10-year period, there was a noted increase in the use of laparoscopy in every age, BMI, and ASA category, except ASA 5. The percent of emergency cases receiving laparoscopic surgery also doubled from 5.5% in 2005 to 11.5% in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 10-year period, there was a gradual increase in the use of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Further, there was a consistent increase of laparoscopic surgery in all age groups, including the elderly, in all BMI classes, including the obese and morbidly obese, and in most ASA classes, including ASA 3-4, as well as in emergency surgeries. These trends suggest that minimally invasive colorectal surgery appears to be widely adopted and performed on more complex or higher risk patients.

Pulmonary Complications after Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: Evaluation of Laparoscopic versus Open Approach from a Multicenter Study on 477 Consecutive Cases

AIM

To evaluate the impact of open or laparoscopic rectal surgery on pulmonary complications in elderly (>75 years old) patients.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open rectal surgery for cancer were collected prospectively from 3 institutions. Pulmonary complications were defined according to the ACS/NSQUIP definition.

RESULTS

A total of 477 patients (laparoscopic group: 242, open group: 235) were included in the analysis. Postoperative pulmonary complications were significantly more common after open surgery (8 out of 242 patients (3.3%) versus 23 out of 235 patients (9.8%); p = 0.005). In addition, PPC occurrence was associated with the increasing of postoperative pain (5.04 ± 1.62 versus 5.03 ± 1.58; p = 0.001) and the increasing of operative time (270.06 ± 51.49 versus 237.37 ± 65.97; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery a safety and effective way to treat rectal cancer in elderly patients, highlighting that laparoscopic surgery reduces the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Morbidity after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of morbidity in octogenarians and younger patients

AIM

Although the oncological adequacy of laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) appears equivalent to open resection (OR), its benefit is controversial in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of LR on morbidity and mortality in octogenarians.

METHOD

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent rectal surgery for cancer between 2003 and 2013 in a teaching hospital. The primary aim of the study was to assess the influence of surgical approach on mortality and morbidity of rectal resection in patients ≥ 80 years old. Regression analysis was performed to control the effect of covariables on the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of 408 patients 203 were in the LR group and 205 in the OR group including 303 (74.3%) less than 80 years and 105 (25.7%) over 80 years. The mortality was lower in the LR group compared with the OR group for patients under 80 years (0% vs 4.6%; P = 0.049) and no different in the over 80 group (11.5% vs 9.4%; P = 0.859). In younger patients, the OR group showed longer hospital stay (9 vs 7 days; P < 0.001) and more complications (44.1% vs 29.8%; P = 0.042). Medical complications were more frequent in LR group than OR group octogenarians (40.4% vs 20.8%; P = 0.009) as well as grade C anastomotic leakage (13.8 vs 10.7; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

LR for rectal cancer showed clinical advantages in patients under 80 years and was as safe as OR in patients over 80 years, although the advantages of laparoscopic surgery were lost in the elderly group due to a higher rate of medical complications. OR may be an option in elderly patients with important comorbidities.

Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery (LCS) for colon and rectal cancer in the very elderly over 80 years old.

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicentric analysis comparing patients over 80 years (Group A) and patients between 60 and 69 years (Group B) undergoing LCS for cancer from January 2008 to December 2013. Colon and rectal cancers were analyzed separately. Comorbidity and complications were classified using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Clavien-Dindo system, respectively. Oncological parameters included tumor-free margins, number of lymph nodes harvested and circumferential resection margin.

RESULTS

Group A included 96 and 33 patients, and Group B 220 and 82 for colon and rectal cancers, respectively. Groups were similar except for ASA score and CCI, as expected. There was no significant difference in operative time [colon; rectum] (180[IQR 150-200] vs 180[150-210] min; NS-180[160-210] vs 180[165-240] min; NS), estimated blood loss (50[25-75] vs 50[25-120] mL; NS-50[0-150] vs 50[25-108.7] mL; NS) and conversion rate (2.1 vs 2.7 %; NS-3.0 vs 2.4 %; NS). Timing of first stool (3[2-3.25] vs 3[2-5] dd; NS-3[2-4] vs 3[2-5] dd; NS), length of stay (7[6-8] vs 7[6-8] dd; NS-8[8-9] vs 8[7-9] dd; NS) and readmission rate (1.0 vs 0.45 %; NS-6.1 vs 1.2 %; NS) were similar. Tumor-free margins were appropriate, and positivity of CRM is poor (6.1 vs 4.9; NS). We did not record significant differences in complications rate (47.9 vs 43.6 %; NS-63.6 vs 52.4 %; NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is effective for the treatment of colorectal cancer even in the very elderly. Age is not a risk factor or a limitation for LCS.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence, and approximately 60% of colorectal cancer patients are older than 70, with this incidence likely increasing in the near future. Elderly patients (> 70-75 years of age) are a very heterogeneous group, ranging from the very fit to the very frail. Traditionally, these patients have often been under-treated and recruited less frequently to clinical trials than younger patients, and thus are under-represented in publications about cancer treatment. Recent studies suggest that fit elderly patients can be treated in the same way as their younger counterparts, but the treatment of frail patients with comorbidities is still a matter of controversy. Many factors should be taken into account, including fitness for treatment, the wishes of the patient and family, and quality of life. This review will focus on the existing evidence for surgical, oncologic, and palliative treatment in patients over 70 years old with colorectal cancer. Careful patient assessment is necessary in order to individualize treatment approach, and this should rely on a multidisciplinary process. More well-designed controlled trials are needed in this patient population.

Do elderly patients have the most to gain from laparoscopic surgery?

Populations are aging worldwide, people are living longer, and the surgical needs of elderly patients are rising. Laparoscopic techniques have become more common with improved training, surgeon skill and evidence of improved outcomes. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay; improved mobilization, quicker return to normal activity; and fewer pulmonary, thrombotic, and abdominal wall complications. Indeed, for many common pathologies laparoscopy has become the gold standard, unless contraindicated. It has been questioned as to whether elderly patients can reap the same benefits from laparoscopic surgery. The concern in elderly patients is that physiologic demands may outweigh the benefit seen in younger patients. This question stems from concerns related to longer operative times, increased technical challenge, as well as the impact of physiologic demands of pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning. However, with anesthesia and adequate perioperative cardiac care, there is no evidence that these factors lead to worse clinical outcomes in elderly patients. In contrast, perhaps elderly patients - with increased prevalence of multi-morbidity, geriatric syndromes and diminished physiologic reserve - have the most to gain from a laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is being increasingly offered to the older person.

Objective

To systematically review the literature regarding laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in older people and compare to younger adult populations.

Study selection

We included randomized controlled trials that compared open to laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Older people were defined as being 65 years and above.

Outcome measures

Overall survival and post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, wound recurrence, disease-free survival and conversion rate.

Results

Seven trials included older people, average age of approximately 70 years. Two reported data specific to older patients (over 70 years): The ALCCaS study reported reduced length of stay and short-term complication rates in the laparoscopic group when compared to open surgery (8 versus 10 days, and 36.7% versus 50.6% respectively) and the CLASICC study reported equivalent 5 year survival between arms and a reduction of 2 days length of stay following laparoscopic surgery in older people. In trials which considered data on older and younger participants all five trials reported comparable overall survival and showed comparable or reduced complication rates; two demonstrated significantly shorter length of stay following laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.

Conclusion

Large numbers of older people have been included in well-conducted, multi-centre, randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery. This systematic review suggests that age itself should not be a factor when considering the best surgical option for older patients.

•

Seven well conducted randomised controlled trials of open versus laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery have included older people.

•

Age alone should not be a barrier to laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

•

The effect of comorbidity in older people undergoing laparoscopic surgery is less clear and warrants further study.

Non-surgical complications after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer - A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cardiac and pulmonary complications account for a large part of postoperative mortality, especially in the growing number of elderly patients. This review studies the effect of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer on short term non-surgical morbidity.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify randomised trials on laparoscopic compared to open surgery for colorectal cancer with reported cardiac or pulmonary complications.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 3302 articles; 18 studies were included with a total of 6153 patients. Reported median or mean age varied from 56 years to 72 years. The percentage of included patients with ASA-scores ≥ 3 ranged from 7% to 38%. Morbidity was poorly defined. Overall reported incidence of postoperative cardiac complications was low for both laparoscopic and open colorectal resection (median 2%). There was a trend towards fewer cardiac complications following laparoscopic surgery (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.06, p = 0.08), and this effect was most marked for laparoscopic colectomy (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.71, p = 0.007). Incidence of pulmonary complications ranged from 0 to 11% and no benefit was found for laparoscopic surgery, although a possible trend was seen in favour of laparoscopic colectomy (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.13, p = 0.19). Overall morbidity rates varied from 11% to 69% with a median of 33%.

CONCLUSION

Although morbidity was poorly defined, for laparoscopic colectomies, significantly less cardiac complications occurred compared with open surgery and a trend towards less pulmonary complications was observed. Subgroup analysis from two RCTs suggests that elderly patients benefit most from a laparoscopic approach based on overall morbidity rates.