The Ueno method for substaging pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma by depth and width measurement: an interobserver study

Histopronostic factors in superficial colorectal adenocarcinomas treated by endoscopy: reproducibility and impact of immunohistochemistry and digital pathology

Endoscopic dissection is the first-choice treatment for superficial pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma (sCRC). Complementary surgery decision is influenced by histopronostic factors. Prognostic significance and reproducibility of each factor are not well established. The role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and digital pathology in this context is unknown. Our aims were (1) to evaluate each histopronostic factor reproducibility comparing HES and IHC ± digital pathology and (2) to evaluate how the different techniques would affect indications for additional surgery. We performed a single-centre retrospective study of 98 patients treated between 2010 and 2019 in Hospices Civils de Lyon, France. We analyzed physical or digital slides of HES and keratin/desmin immunostaining of 98 sCRC dissection specimens. Three pathologists evaluate the histopronostic factors including submucosal invasion depth (SMI) measured using different recommended methods. Assessment of SMI with Ueno or JSCCR methods showed good to excellent interobserver reproducibility (IOR) (ICCs of 0.858 to 0.925) using HES staining and IHC. Assessment of budding on HES sections was poorly reproducible compared to IHC which exhibit moderate IOR (κ = 0.714). IHC increased high-grade budding detection. For lymphovascular invasion and poor differentiation, the IOR was poor (κ = 0.141, 0.196 and 0.313 respectively). IHC gave a better reproducibility for further treatment indication according to JSCCR criteria (κ = 0.763) or forthcoming European guidelines (κ = 0.659). Digital pathology was equivalent to the microscope for all analyses. Histopronostic factor reproducibility in sCRC is moderate. Immunohistochemistry may facilitate the evaluation of certain criteria and improve the reproducibility of treatment decisions.

Desmin immunostaining is effective for improving interobserver variability in the depth assessment of the submucosal invasion of colorectal cancers

Tumor depth evaluation is essential for pathological tumor staging because it affects clinical management as an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancers. However, poor interobserver variability of invasion depth has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of desmin immunostaining in the histological diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Overall, 63 sets of slides of colorectal cancer stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and desmin were prepared and independently reviewed by four examiners. After reviewing the desmin-stained slides, the interobserver variability of H&E slides alone was significantly improved for all examiners. For the assessment of Tis vs. T1, the sensitivity and accuracy were significantly improved for all examiners by combining H&E and desmin immunostaining. For the diagnosis of T1b vs. Tis or T1a, specificity and accuracy were significantly improved by adding desmin immunostaining. Ancillary desmin staining to assess submucosal invasion in colorectal cancers significantly improved interobserver agreement, led to efficient screening of T1 cancers, and reduced excessive T1b diagnoses. The combination of desmin immunostaining and H&E staining is highly recommended for diagnosing invasive colorectal cancer.

Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Are Pathology Reports Sufficient for Decision Making?

AIM

This study aims to assess the completeness of pathology reports of T1 colorectal cancers from different healthcare centers and the change of treatment decision after reevaluation of the polyps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, several pathology reports of endoscopically excised malignant colorectal polyps at diverse healthcare centers in Turkey were reassessed at a comprehensive cancer center in Istanbul. Reassessment was mainly focused on core elements such as the size of invasive carcinoma, histologic type and grade, tumor extension, surgical margin (deep and mucosal), and lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven endoscopically resected malignant polyps were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62.2 years and 38 (58%) patients were males. Tumor size, histologic type and grade, surgical margin (deep and mucosal), and lymphovascular invasion were reported in 11%, 100%, 31%, 9%, and 19%, respectively. All 5 prognostic factors were reported only in 1 (1.5%) pathology report. Because of the missing (incomplete) data, the pathologic examination of 59 (88%) patients was determined to be inadequate to make an accurate treatment decision.

CONCLUSION

Several variables are not considered and frequently missing for decision-making, suggesting the reassessment of the specimen by a second pathologist at a high-volume comprehensive cancer center.

Current problems and perspectives of pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review

With the prevalence of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full thickness resection, which enable complete resection of T1 colorectal cancer with a negative margin, the treatment strategy following endoscopic resection has become more important. The necessity of secondary surgical resection is determined on the basis of the risk of lymph node metastasis according to the histopathological findings of resected specimens because ~10% of T1 colorectal cancer cases have lymph node metastasis. The current Japanese treatment guidelines state four risk factors for lymph node metastasis: lymphovascular invasion, histological differentiation, depth of submucosal invasion, and tumor budding. These guidelines have succeeded in stratifying the low-risk group for lymph node metastasis, in which endoscopic resection alone is acceptable for cure. On the other hand, there are some problems: there is variation in diagnosis methods and low interobserver agreement for each pathological factor and 90% of surgical resections are unnecessary, with lymph node metastasis negativity. To ensure patients with T1 colorectal cancer receive more appropriate treatment, these problems should be addressed. In this systematic review, we gave some suggestions to these practical issues of four pathological factors as predictors.

Management of Significant Polyp and Early Colorectal Cancer Is Optimized by Implementation of a Dedicated Multidisciplinary Team Meeting: Lessons Learned From the United Kingdom National Program

BACKGROUND

The concept of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer encompasses complex polyps not amenable to routine snare polypectomy or where malignancy cannot be excluded. The assessment and management of these lesions is contentious and increasingly important due to the significant risk of over- or undertreatment.

OBJECTIVE

Following the recommendations of the Significant Polyps and Early Colorectal Cancer National Program, we implemented a dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting and analyzed the influence on patient outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected database of patients discussed at the dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a single tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with significant polyps and early colorectal cancer were identified either through the Bowel Cancer Screening Program or colonoscopy for symptomatic patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of patients who had organ preservation, and secondary treatment and recurrence rate served as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 135 patients discussed at the dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting were included, with a median age of 71 years. Median size of the lesions was 25 mm, and 39% were in the rectum. Patients were discussed either after the lesion was removed during the initial colonoscopy (n = 38), of whom 16 (42%) had unexpected cancer, or had no initial treatment with subsequent case review (n = 97). Of these 97 patients, 46 underwent endoscopic excision (26% cancer), 20 trans-anal excision (10% cancer), 23 primary surgical resection (35% cancer), and 8 had no treatment. In 104 (82%) patients, organ preservation was achieved. Secondary surgery was required in 7 of 104 (6.7%) patients after local excision due to radical treatment of high-risk T1 lesions, local recurrence, or patients' decisions. The cumulative hazard estimates for recurrence after a median follow-up of 18.5 months was less than 10% for both benign and malignant lesions.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its relatively small sample size and single-center setting.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting improved the management of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer, safely refining organ preservation for patients, with low recurrence rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B826.

MANEJO DE SPECC PLIPO COMPLEJO Y CNCER COLORRECTAL TEMPRANO ES OPTIMIZADO MEDIANTE LA IMPLEMENTACIN DE REUNIONES DE UN EQUIPO MULTIDISCIPLINARIO ESPECIALIZADOS LECCIONES APRENDIDAS DEL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DEL REINO UNIDO

ANTECEDENTES:El concepto de pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano abarca engloba pólipos avanzados que no es posible la reseccion endoscopica rutinaria, o aquellos en los que no se puede excluir malignidad. La evaluación y el manejo de estas lesiones es controversial y cada vez más importante debido al riesgo significativo de ser tratadas o no.OBJETIVO:Siguiendo las recomendaciones del Programa Nacional de Pólipos Complejos y Cáncer Colorrectal Temprano, implementamos reuniónes del equipo multidisciplinario especializado y analizamos el impacto en los resultados de los pacientes.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo sobre una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente de los pacientes discutidos en la reunión del equipo multidisciplinario especializado.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano identificado a través del Programa de detección de cáncer intestinal o colonoscopia para pacientes sintomáticos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Proporción de pacientes que tuvieron preservación de órganos, tratamiento secundario y tasa de recurrencia.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 135 pacientes discutidos en la reunión del equipo multidisciplinario especializado dedicada, con una media de edad de 71 años. El tamaño medio de las lesiones fue de 25 mm y el 39% estaban en el recto. Se discutio de los pacientes después de que se resecara la lesión durante la colonoscopia inicial [n = 38, de los cuales 16 (42%) tenían un cáncer imprevisto] o no recibieron tratamiento de inicio, con revisión posterior del caso (n = 97). De estos, 46/97 fueron sometidos a resección endoscópica (26% cáncer), 20/97 resección transanal (10% cáncer), 23/97 resección quirúrgica primaria (35% cáncer) y 8/97 no recibieron tratamiento. En 104 (82%) pacientes, se logró la preservación de órgano. Cirugía secundaria fue requeria en 7/104 (6,7%) pacientes después de la resección local debido a tratamiento radical de lesiones T1 de alto riesgo, recidiva local o decisión del paciente. Las estimaciones de riesgo acumulativo de recurrencia después de una media de seguimiento de 18,5 meses fue inferior al 10% tanto para las lesiones benignas como para las malignas.LIMITACIONES:Tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y entorno de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:La Reunion del equipo multidisciplinario especializado mejoró el manejo de los pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano, refinando de manera segura la preservación de órganos para los pacientes, con bajas tasas de recurrencia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B826. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

The Importance of Being “That” Colorectal pT1: A Combined Clinico-Pathological Predictive Score to Improve Nodal Risk Stratification

The management of endoscopically resected pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) relies on nodal metastasis risk estimation based on the assessment of specific histopathological features. Avoiding the overtreatment of metastasis-free patients represents a crucial unmet clinical need. By analyzing a consecutive series of 207 pT1 CRCs treated with colectomy and lymphadenectomy, this study aimed to develop a novel clinicopathological score to improve pT1 CRC metastasis prediction. First, we established the clinicopathological profile of metastatic cases: lymphovascular invasion (OR: 23.8; CI: 5.12–110.9) and high-grade tumor budding (OR: 5.21; CI: 1.60–16.8) correlated with an increased risk of nodal metastasis, while age at diagnosis >65 years (OR: 0.26; CI: 0.09–0.71) and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.06–0.59) showed a protective effect. Combining these features, we built a five-tier risk score that, applied to our series, identified cases with a higher risk (score ≥ 2) of nodal metastasis (OR: 7.7; CI: 2.4–24.4). Notably, a score of 0 was only assigned to cases with no metastases (13/13 cases) and all the score 4 samples (2/2 cases) showed nodal metastases. In conclusion, we developed an effectively combined score to assess pT1 CRC nodal metastasis risk. We believe that its adoption within a multidisciplinary pT1 unit could improve patients' clinical management and limit surgical overtreatment.

The histomorphological and molecular landscape of colorectal adenomas and serrated lesions

The 2019 WHO classification of digestive system tumors significantly reformed the classificatory definition of serrated lesions of the colorectal mucosa and added new essential diagnostic criteria for both conventional adenomas and hereditary gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Histopathological examination of colorectal adenocarcinoma precursors lesions represents an important segment of daily clinical practice in a pathology department and is essential for the implementation of current colorectal adenocarcinoma secondary prevention strategies. This overview will focus on a schematic histopathological and molecular classification of precursor lesions arising within colorectal mucosa.

The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: new parameters to assess the degree of submucosal invasion

PURPOSE

In T1 colorectal cancer, the depth is the main factor assessing the degree of submucosal invasion (DSI) to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The width (WSI) and the area of submucosal invasion (ASI) have been suggested as additional parameters to assess the risk of LNM. A review of the literature was undertaken on the correlation between WSI and ASI parameters and the incidence of LNM.

METHODS

A Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search was performed to retrieve all studies reporting correlation between WSI/ASI and risk of LNM in T1 colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Eight studies including 1727 patients were identified. All considered the degree of WSI and its influence on LNM: seven assessed different width cut-off of submucosal invasion, and one study the mean width of submucosal invasion in patients having or not involved lymph nodes. The WSI was significantly a prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05) in four studies. Both 2 and 3 mm seem to be the most discriminatory cut-off values of submucosal width invasion in defining the risk difference of LNM above and below the cut-off (2 mm, OR = infinite; 3 mm, OR = 6.9). Patients having a cut-off ≤ 5 mm of WSI showed a low risk (5.6%) of LNM rendering radical surgery unnecessary. Four studies assessed the risk of LNM according to the involved submucosal area (width × depth). In two of these, the ASI was a significant prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The WSI and ASI seem to be reliable prognostic factors for LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. There is no agreement on ideal cut-off value.

Re-examining the 1-mm margin and submucosal depth of invasion: a review of 216 malignant colorectal polyps

Malignant colorectal polyps have a risk of lymph node metastases between 9 and 24%, but patients who are negative for certain histologic poor prognostic factors have the potential to be treated with polypectomy alone. Retrospective cohort of 216 malignant polyps from 213 patients identified through the British Columbia Colon Screening Program. Complete pathologic reporting (reporting of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, margin status, and tumor budding) was present in only 43% of patients. Sixty-one patients had no poor prognostic factors on polypectomy, and 23 (37%) of those underwent surgery. A positive margin cutoff of tumor at cautery showed significantly increased rates of lymph node metastases (p = 0.04) compared to a margin of greater than 0 mm, and polyps with a margin of greater than 0 mm had no risk of residual carcinoma. A submucosal depth of ≥ 2000 μm had an increased rate of lymph node metastases compared to < 2000 μm (p = 0.01). Malignant polyps with either tumor at cautery or a submucosal depth of ≥ 2000 μm, compared to polyps without these risk factors, had a relative risk for lymph node metastases of 16.3. Adoption of submucosal depth and refinement of the cutoffs for positive margin and submucosal depth have the potential to identify high-risk patients and reduce the number of surgeries required in patients with malignant polyps, a group that continues to grow significantly in part due to the introduction of colon screening programs.

Interobserver variability amongst gastrointestinal pathologists in assessing prognostic parameters of malignant colorectal polyps: a cause for concern

BACKGROUND

Malignant colorectal polyps (MCRP) have become a major challenge in the field of coloproctology from diagnosis to full treatment. One important facet of the challenge is the histopathological staging of the lesion and identifying various prognostic parameters. The primary aim of this study was to find the interobserver variation amongst 4 experienced gastrointestinal pathologists when assessing important parameters and staging systems (Haggitt, Kikuchi and Ueno) in MCRPs.

METHODS

Four experienced gastrointestinal pathologists independently assessed 56 cases of MCRP, and each pathologist completed a pro forma for each case. The results were collated and statistically analysed.

RESULTS

There was a significant variation in the assessments using the various published staging systems agreed upon on important prognostic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the staging systems used is suitable for all polyp types or has good reproducibility. There is an urgent need to make pathologists' assessment of MCRPs easier and more reproducible.