Efficacy and quality of life after transcutaneous posterior tibial neuromodulation for faecal incontinence

Long-Term Outcome of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Functional Non-Retentive Fecal Incontinence in Children

BACKGROUND

Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) is a psychologically upsetting and embarrassing issue and affects children's quality of life negatively.

AIM OF THIS STUDY

Evaluation of the short and long-term effect of Bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BTPTNS) in the treatment of FNRFI in children and its impact on the quality of life (QoL). Methodology: The current randomized controlled study included 94 Children with FNRFI who were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received BTPTNS and Group B Received Sham BTPTNS. Follow-up was planned for 24 months for manometric findings, incontinence score, Incontinence episodes, and the QoL.

RESULTS

The incontinence score was significantly decreases in Group A more than what was reported in Group B at 6, 12, 24 months follow up . In group A 53.2% of the included children who received BTPTNS showed a decrease in the incontinence episodes more than 75% and among them, 23.4% were fully continent. All the QoL domains were significantly improved in Group A after 6, 12, and 24 months when compared with Group B.

CONCLUSION

BTPTNS can be a good modality in the treatment of FNRFI with favorable long-term maintenance of its effect together with a remarkable positive impact on all domains of QoL.

Importance of some technical aspects of the procedure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION

The results of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of fecal incontinence (IF) are modest. The aim of the study is to assess the relationship of some technical aspects with the clinical response: location of the nerve, distal response (motor or sensory) and accommodation.

METHODS

Prospective study of patients with FI undergoing PTNS therapy. The clinical response was assessed using the Wexner scale, defecation diary and anorectal manometry.

RESULTS

32 patients were studied. The intensity of localization (proximity to the nerve) was not correlated with clinical or manometric changes. Motor response was associated with a decrease on the Wexner scale [12.12 (±5.39) to 7.71 (±4.57) P < .005], the number of episodes of passive incontinence [8.78 (±9.64) to 4.11 (±7.11) P = .025], the total number of incontinence episodes [16.11 (±16.03) to 7.78 (±11.34) P = .009] and the number of days with fecal soiling [6.89 (±5.53) to 2.56 (±4.13) P = .002] and with an increase in the length of the manometric anal canal at rest [4.55 (±0.596) to 4.95 (±0.213) P = .004]. The increase in stimulation (accommodation) was inversely correlated with the decrease in the Wexner scale (r = -0.677 P < .005) and the number of days with soiling (r = -0.650 P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

The motor response during PTNS seems to be related to a better clinical response. The accommodation phenomenon could be associated with worse results. The proximity of the electrode to the nerve does not seem to be important as long as a good distal response is achieved.

Importance of some technical aspects of the procedure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION

The results of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of fecal incontinence (IF) are modest. The aim of the study is to assess the relationship of some technical aspects with the clinical response: location of the nerve, distal response (motor or sensory) and accommodation.

METHODS

Prospective study of patients with FI undergoing PTNS therapy. The clinical response was assessed using the Wexner scale, defecation diary and anorectal manometry.

RESULTS

32 patients were studied. The intensity of localization (proximity to the nerve) was not correlated with clinical or manometric changes. Motor response was associated with a decrease on the Wexner scale [12.12 (± 5.39) to 7.71 (± 4.57) p < 0.005], the number of episodes of passive incontinence [8.78 (± 9.64) to 4.11 (± 7.11) p = 0.025], the total number of incontinence episodes [16.11 (± 16.03) to 7.78 (± 11.34) p = 0.009] and the number of days with faecal soiling [6.89 (± 5.53) to 2.56 (± 4.13) p = 0.002] and with an increase in the length of the manometric anal canal at rest [4.55 (± 0.596) to 4.95 (± 0.213) p = 0.004]. The increase in stimulation (accommodation) was inversely correlated with the decrease in the Wexner scale (r = -0.677 p < 0.005) and the number of days with soiling (r = -0.650 p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The motor response during PTNS seems to be related to a better clinical response. The accommodation phenomenon could be associated with worse results. The proximity of the electrode to the nerve does not seem to be important as long as a good distal response is achieved.

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) in the control of Fecal Incontinence (FI).

METHODS

Two independent reviewers extensively searched in the electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus for the studies published until the end of 2016. Only randomized clinical trials were included. The studied outcomes included FI episodes, FI score, resting pressure, squeezing pressure, and maximum tolerable pressure. The data were reported as Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Five articles were included in the present study (249 patients under treatment with PTNS and 239 in the sham group). Analyses showed that PTNS led to a significant decrease in the number of FI episodes (SMD=-0.38; 95% CI: -0.67-0.10; P=0.009). Yet, it did not have an effect on FI score (SMD=0.13; 95% CI: -0.49-0.75; P=0.68), resting pressure (SMD=0.12; 95% CI: -0.14-0.37; P=0.67), squeezing pressure (SMD=-0.27; 95% CI: -1.03-0.50; P=0.50), and maximum tolerable pressure (SMD=-0.10; 95% CI: -0.40-0.24; P=0.52).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, it seems that the prescription of PTNS alone cannot significantly improve FI.

Efficacy of Bilateral Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence

CONTEXT

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a new second-line treatment for refractory fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (BTPTNS) for treatment of fecal incontinence in Japanese patients and its impact on quality of life.

DESIGN

A prospective observational-interventional study was conducted from May 2015 to June 2017 in patients with fecal incontinence in whom conservative treatment had failed. All patients received a 30-minute session of stimulation twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. Evaluation at baseline and at 6 weeks involved the Wexner score, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, and anal manometry. Patients recorded episodes of incontinence in a weekly diary.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction of 50% or greater in incontinence episodes, decreased Wexner score, and improved FIQL scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with a median age of 64.1 years (range, 26-81 years) and men:women ratio of 9:13 completed BTPTNS. Mean episodes of fecal incontinence were significantly reduced from 4.7 to 1.5 (p < 0.05). An improvement of 50% or better in episodes of fecal incontinence was achieved in 77.2% of patients. The median Wexner score significantly decreased from 10.2 to 6.9 (p < 0.05). The median FIQL score improved from 2.7 to 3.1 (p = 0.06), and significant improvement was seen in the embarrassment domain (2.2 vs 2.8, p < 0.05). Resting and squeezing anal pressures revealed no significant changes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that BTPTNS is safe and well tolerated and may improve symptoms of fecal incontinence. This technique offers an additional noninvasive, less expensive form of treatment.

Bilateral transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for chronic constipation

AIM

Chronic constipation is difficult to treat when symptoms are intractable. Colonic propulsion may be altered by distal neuromodulation but this is conventionally delivered percutaneously. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is noninvasive and cheap: this study aimed to assess its efficacy in chronic constipation.

METHOD

Eighteen patients (median age 46 years, 12 female) with chronic constipation were recruited consecutively. Conservative and behavioural therapy had failed to improve symptoms in all 18. Thirty minutes of daily bilateral transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation was administered by each patient at home for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a change in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score. Change in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM), weekly bowel frequency and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were also measured.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (12 female) completed the trial. The PAC-QoL score improved significantly with treatment [pretreatment, median 2.95, interquartile range (IQR) 1.18; posttreatment, median 2.50, IQR 0.70; P = 0.047]. There was no change in PAC-SYM score (pretreatment, median 2.36, IQR 1.59; posttreatment, median 2.08, IQR 0.92; P = 0.53). Weekly stool frequency improved as did VAS score, but these did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.229 and 0.161). The PAC-QoL and PAC-SYM scores both improved in four (26%) patients. Two patients reported complete cure. There were no adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation appears to be effective in a quarter of patients with chronic constipation. Carefully selected patients with less severe disease may benefit more. This requires further study.