Progress in the management of retrorectal tumours

Tailgut Cyst-Gynecologist's Pitfall: Literature Review and Case Report

Background and Clinical Significance: Retrorectal cystic hamartomas ("Tailgut cysts") are rare developmental cysts that appear in the retrorectal space, arising from aberrant remnants of the post-anal primitive gut in case of an incomplete embryogenetic involution. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 30-year-old woman with a history of chronic lower abdominal pain. Other digestive symptoms, like rectal fullness, constipation, pain on defecation, rectal bleeding or genitourinary obstruction symptoms, were not associated. During a period of 3 years, she underwent several surgical procedures for ovarian cysts, without relieving the symptomatology. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a presacral tumor with a right pararectal development. A surgical resection of the lesion using an anterior approach was performed, with the final pathological diagnosis of a retrorectal cystic hamartoma ("tailgut cyst"). Conclusions: This case underlines the fact that retrorectal masses can be challenging to diagnose, and tailgut cysts must be taken into consideration in cases of perirectal tumors in patients with a history of multiple failed procedures and surgeries.

Risk factors for long-term urination and sexual function impairment following laparoscopic resection of presacral lesions

Background

Presacral cysts are rare congenital lesions predominantly affecting females. Surgery is often recommended after diagnosis due to the risk of malignant transformation and complications associated with cyst enlargement. Laparoscopic excision is increasingly favored due to its enhanced visualization and precision.

Aim

To assess long-term urinary, sexual function outcomes and quality of life in female patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of presacral cysts.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of female patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of presacral cysts between August 2012 and May 2020. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed. The urinary function was assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTS), the sexual function was evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and quality of life was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

Results

Among the 32 female patients included, 10 experienced postoperative urinary incontinence, predominantly of the mixed type. The risk factors for urinary incontinence included abdominal distension and the proximity of the cyst to the rectum. Notably, urinary incontinence significantly impacted the overall lower urinary tract symptoms and quality of life. Additionally, seven patients reported postoperative sexual dysfunction, with previous abdominal or pelvic surgery and cyst location under S3 identified as risk factors, affecting the mental health aspects of their quality of life.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic cyst resection in females poses risks of urinary and sexual dysfunction, potentially impacting quality of life. Thus, tailored management approaches are crucial.

The management of retrorectal tumors - a single-center analysis of 21 cases and overview of the literature

AIM

Retrorectal tumors are rare and heterogeneous. They are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, making management challenging. This study examines the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2022, 21 patients with retrorectal tumors were treated in our department. We analyzed patient characteristics, diagnosis and treatment modalities retrospectively. Additionally, a literature review (2002-2023, "retrorectal tumors" and "presacral tumors", 20 or more cases included) was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients (median age 54 years, 62% female), 17 patients (81%) suffered from benign lesions and 4 (19%) from malignant lesions. Symptoms were mostly nonspecific, with pain being the most common (11/21 (52%)). Diagnosis was incidental in eight cases. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 20 (95%) and biopsy was obtained in 10 (48%). Twenty patients underwent surgery, mostly via a posterior approach (14/20 (70%)). At a mean follow-up of 42 months (median 10 months, range 1-166 months), the local recurrence rate was 19%. There was no mortality. Our Pubmed search identified 39 publications.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirms the significant heterogeneity of retrorectal tumors, which poses a challenge to management, especially considering the often nonspecific symptoms. Regarding diagnosis and treatment, our data highlights the importance of MRI and surgical resection. In particular a malignancy rate of almost 20% warrants a surgical resection in case of the findings of a retrorectal tumour. A local recurrence rate of 19% supports the need for follow up.

Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature

Presacral/Retrorectal tumors (RRT) are rare lesions that comprise a multitude of histological types. Data on surgical management are limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathological subtypes, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes. A PubMed search using terms "retrorectal tumor" and "presacral tumor" was used to identify articles reporting RRT of non-urological, non-gynecologic, and non-metastatic origin. Articles included were between 2015 and 2023. A total of 68 studies were included, comprising 570 patients. About 68.2% of patients were female, and the mean overall age of both sexes was 48.6 years. Based on histopathology, 466 patients (81.8%) had benign lesions, and 104 (18.2%) were malignant. In terms of surgical approach, 191 (33.5%) were treated anteriorly, 240 (42.1%) through a posterior approach, and 66 (11.6%) combined. The mean length of stay was 7.6 days. Patients treated using the posterior approach had a shorter length of stay (5.7 days) compared to the anterior and combined approaches. RRT are rare tumors of congenital nature with prevalence among the female sex. R0 resection is crucial in its management, and minimal access surgery appears to be a safer option in appropriate case selection.

Factors affecting operative morbidity and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for presacral tumours: a multicentric cohort study from the Turkish Collaborative Group for Quality Improvement in Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery

AIM

Data regarding the operative management of presacral tumours present various dilemmas due to their rarity and heterogeneous nature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management strategy, factors associated with operative morbidity and long-term postoperative outcomes in a large group of patients undergoing surgery for presacral tumours.

METHOD

This study was designed as a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Records of patients who underwent surgery for presacral tumours at 10 tertiary colorectal centres between 1996 and 2017 were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty seven patients (44 men) with a mean age of 46 years and body mass index of 27 kg/m2 were included. Fifty eight per cent of the patients had low sacral lesions (below S3). The operative approaches were transabdominal (17%), transsacral (65%) and abdominosacral (17%). The postoperative morbidity was 19%. Thirty per cent of the patients had a malignant tumour. Longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.01), abdominosacral operations (p = 0.0001) and presacral tumours located above S3 (p = 0.004) were associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity. Overall long-term postoperative recurrence and mortality were 6% and 5%, respectively, within a 3-year mean follow-up period in patients with presacral malignant tumours.

CONCLUSION

Reduced physical condition, omission of symptoms prior to surgery, combined resections and high sacral tumours are the risk factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for presacral tumours. Meticulous planning of the operation and intensified perioperative care may improve the outcomes in high-risk patients.

Primary malignant tumours and malignant transformation of cysts in the retrorectal space: MRI diagnosis and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

There are no clear guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant retrorectal tumours. The purpose of this study was to increase preoperative diagnostic knowledge and to describe the outcomes of treatment for these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent complete retrorectal tumour resection between May 2006 and July 2018, and had confirmed post-operative pathology reports. Demographic and clinical data (including imaging, perioperative, pathological, and prognostic data) were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Malignant lesions were identified in 15 (9 [60%], female) patients. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 34-72 years). Primary malignant tumours were identified in seven patients with solid tumours, in which gastrointestinal stromal tumours accounted for 71.4% (five of seven) and the remainder were chordoma or mucinous adenocarcinoma. Malignant transformation of cysts occurred in another eight patients with heterogeneous tumours, while histopathological features were present in 75% (six of eight) of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma, and the remainder were squamous-cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumour (Grade 2). The malignant characteristics of the solid portions observed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were as follows: the cyst wall of the tumour was irregularly thickened; the surface was convex or lobed; the solid tumour had no capsule, or the capsule was destroyed; and the surface had a gyrus-like morphology. At a median follow-up time of 52 months (range, 13-100 months), the overall recurrence-free survival rate was 40.0% and the survival rate was 46.7%.

CONCLUSION

Some MRI features can be used to distinguish malignant retrorectal tumours from benign retrorectal tumours. The survival rate of patients with malignant retrorectal tumours is poor.

Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision

Background

The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility and safety of the surgical resection of presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision.

Methods

The clinical data and prognoses of patients with presacral tumors who underwent surgery at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 110 patients with presacral tumors were included in this study, including 82 female patients and 28 male patients, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.9:1. A posterior approach (transsacrococcygeal transverse incision) was utilized in 105 patients, an anterior approach (transabdominal excision) was utilized in 1 patient, and a combined (posterior plus anterior) approach was utilized in 4 patients. The mean tumor size was 8.72 ± 4.28 cm. More than half of the patients (n=59/110) with presacral tumors were asymptomatic. Twenty-six pathological types were observed in our study, including 97 benign lesions and 13 malignant lesions. The intraoperative complication rate was 42.7% (n=47/110), whereas the postoperative morbidity rate was 3.6% (n=4/110). The length of hospital stay for patients treated with the posterior approach was shorter than that of patients treated with the anterior and combined approaches. After a mean follow-up of 90.13 ± 31.22 months, 11 patients had local presacral tumor recurrence, and 1 patient had distant metastasis, with a combined recurrence rate of 10.9% (n=12/110).

Conclusions

The surgical resection of primary presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision is feasible and safe, with acceptable oncological therapeutic outcomes and a low postoperative morbidity rate, making it worth popularizing in clinical practice.

The management of retrorectal tumours: tertiary centre retrospective study

AIM

Tumours of the retrorectal space are uncommon, pathologically heterogeneous, and difficult to diagnose, with ongoing controversy over their surgical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone excision of primary retrorectal tumours (PRRTs) at a tertiary referral centre.

METHOD

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database between 1 March 2001 and 1 August 2021. Electronic patient records were reviewed for demographics, preoperative imaging, operative details, histology, and follow-up. A chi-squared test was used to assess the statistical significance of findings.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included in the study. Of these, 103 patients were female (71.5 per cent), 46 patients (31.9 per cent) presented incidentally, and 99 of the patients had tumours located below S3 (68.7 per cent). Overall, 76 patients underwent a transperineal approach (52.7 per cent) with the most common findings of a benign tailgut cyst occurring in 59 (40.9 per cent) of cases. Preoperative MRI predicted urovascular and pelvic sidewall involvement assessed intraoperatively with a sensitivity of 83.3 and 90 per cent and a specificity of 98.1 and 98 per cent respectively. Risk of malignancy in solid tumours was 31.4 versus 8.8 per cent in cystic tumours (relative risk 3.5, 95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 7.6, P < 0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III and above) occurred in eight patients (5.6 per cent) and all-cause long-term mortality was 4.8 per cent (seven patients).

DISCUSSION

PRRTs can be safely excised with minimal complications in specialized centres by surgical teams with the relevant expertise. This study questions the conservative management of cystic tumours and given the risk of solid tumour malignancy, supports surgical management.

Long-term surgical outcomes after resection of presacral tumours and risk factors associated with recurrence

AIM

The incidence of presacral tumours is low and pertinent data on the management and outcomes after surgery are sparse. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrence in patients with presacral tumours undergoing surgery at our institution.

METHOD

Patients undergoing resection of a presacral tumour between 2009 and 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, clinicopathological features, preoperative imaging, operative details, morbidity, mortality, recurrence and survival were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were identified. There were 95 women (77.9%) and the median age was 34 years. The most common presenting symptoms included pelvic pain (n = 60, 49.2%) and recurrent abscesses or fistulas (n = 40, 32.8%). The accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing malignant from benign tumours was 93.9%. Six patients underwent three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA) and preoperative interventional embolization. Procedures were performed using transabdominal (n = 9), posterior (n = 99) and combined abdominal and posterior (n = 14) approaches. There were 21 (17.2%) malignant and 101 (82.8%) benign tumours. The local recurrence rate was 33.3% for malignant tumours and 9.9% for benign tumours. Multivariate analysis revealed that recurrence of malignant tumours was associated with R1 resection while recurrence of benign tumours was associated with secondary resections and intraoperative lesion rupture.

CONCLUSION

Presacral tumours continue to be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A multidisciplinary team, informed by modern imaging modalities, is essential for the management of presacral tumours.

Surgical Management of Retrorectal Tumors: A French Multicentric Experience of 270 Consecutives Cases

OBJECTIVE

To report the largest multicentric experience on surgical management of retrorectal tumors (RRT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Literature data on RRT is limited. There is no consensus concerning the best surgical approach for the management of RRT.

METHODS

Patients operated for RRT in 18 academic French centers were retrospectively included (2000-2019).

RESULTS

270 patients were included. Surgery was performed through abdominal (n=72, 27%), bottom (n=190, 70%) or combined approach (n=8, 3%). Abdominal approach was laparoscopic in 53/72 (74%) and bottom approach was a Kraske modified procedures in 169/190 (89%) patients. In laparoscopic abdominal group, tumors were more frequently symptomatic (37/53, 70% vs 88/169, 52%, p=0.02), larger (mean diameter = 60.5 ± 24 (range, 13-107) vs 51 ± 26 (20-105) mm, p=0.02) and located above S3 vertebra (n=3/42, 7% vs 0, p=0.001) than those from Kraske modified group. Laparoscopy was associated with a higher risk of postoperative ileus (n=4/53, 7.5% vs 0%, p=0.002) and rectal fistula (n=3/53, 6% vs 0%, p=0.01) but less wound abscess (n=1/53, 2% vs 24/169, 14%, p=0.02) than Kraske modified procedures. RRT was malignant in 8%. After a mean follow up of 27 ±39 (1-221) months, local recurrence was noted in 8% of the patients. After surgery, chronic pain was observed in 17% of the patients without significant difference between the 2 groups (15/74, 20% vs 3/30, 10%; p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and Kraske modified approaches can be used for surgical treatment of RRT (according to their location and their size), with similar long-term results.

Retrorectal cystic hamartoma: A case report

Introduction

and importance: Retrorectal cystic hamartoma (RCH) is a rare congenital lesion of the presacral space, which is part of the vestigial cystic tumors often benign and predominantly in women. Generally asymptomatic, the appearance of symptoms such as pain or neurological disorders should raise suspicion of degeneration.

Case presentation

We report an unusual observation of a 62-year-old patient admitted for perineal pain evolving for 2 months associated with tenesma and chronic constipation. The digital rectal examination found a posterior bulge at 4 cm from the anal margin, without intraluminal lesion. Rectosigmoidoscopy had noted posterior extrinsic compression but no rectal tumor. Pelvic CT and MRI had shown a solidocystic formation of the retro-rectal and presacral spaces, related to an enteric cyst. The operation was performed by abdominal approach and the surgical exploration had found a bilobed cystic formation. The cystic mass was removed and the anatomopathological examination concluded that it was a cystic hamartoma with no sign of malignancy.

Clinical discussion

Retrorectal tumors develop in the space bounded anteriorly by the propria fascia of the rectum and posteriorly by the presacral fascia overlying the sacrum. Common in children and then often malignant, inversely, in adults, they are rare and most often benign tumors. They are generally asymptomatic with a predominance of females, unlike our observation where the patient was male with a symptomatology dominated by perineal pain and constipation. The discovery is incidental in the majority of cases, however, in some cases, these cysts may be revealed by complications. The lesion can be explored by transrectal or suprapubic ultrasound, MRI and CT scan. Rectoscopy and fistulography may complete the exploration in case of diagnostic doubt. The resection must be thorough and in monobloc because of the risk of recurrence and the approach depends on the location and the size of the lesion.

Conclusion

RCH is a rare benign lesion whose morphological characteristics seem quite stereotyped. A detailed postoperative anatomopathological examination allows the diagnosis to be made and, above all, to look for a site of malignant transformation. This is why a complete surgical removal is necessary to prevent recurrence.

Retrorectal tumors: Case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Retrorectal tumors are rare diseases and they can be challenging to diagnose and to manage. Usually they have a slow growth and they are asymptomatic. When present, symptoms depends on the dimensions of the tumor and their position. Inside the retrorectal space may develope a wide variety of benign and malignant masses.

CASE REPORT

A 70-years-old, obese, female patient was admitted to our hospital referring pelvic and lower-back pain for six months. The retrorectal mass was incidentally detected on imaging, and treated with a modified Kraske procedure.
Pathological examination revealed a rare retrorectal epidermoid cyst. We also reviewed the informations present in the scientific literature about the incidence, diagnosis and treatment options of retrorectal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the rarity and heterogeneity of these tumors, we agree with literature that their surgical management is mandatory in order to achieve a definitive diagnosis and to avoid complications including malignant transformation. The surgical approach should be tailored for each patient and according to tumor's features.

Clinical management of 52 consecutive retro-rectal tumours treated at a tertiary referral centre

AIM

The aim of this single-institution study was to analyse the diagnostic methods, preoperative work-up and outcomes of 52 retro-rectal tumours.

METHOD

All patients treated for retro-rectal tumours from 2012 to 2017 were included.

RESULTS

Out of 52 patients, 40 (77%) were women. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 43 (19-76) years, and 30 (58%) were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. All tumours were visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignancy on preoperative imaging for retro-rectal tumours were 25% and 98%, respectively. Forty-four procedures (85%) were performed using the perineal approach. The median hospital stay was 3 (1-18) days. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. Eleven (21%) patients developed postoperative complications, mostly surgical site infections. Twenty-nine tumours (56%) were benign tailgut cysts. Four (8%) tumours were malignant and were considered to be removed with a tumour-free resection margin. Local recurrent disease was detected on MRI in 14 (27%) patients at a median of 1.05 (range 0.78-1.77) years after primary surgery. Only the multi-lobular shape of the tumour was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrence (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

A preoperative MRI is mandatory in order to plan the surgical strategy for retro-rectal tumours. Symptomatic, solid, large tumours should be removed because of the risk of malignancy. Minor cystic lesions with thin walls as well as asymptomatic recurrences of benign tumours are suitable to be followed conservatively.

Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience

Purpose

Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are a rare incidence and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and follow-up results of patients undergoing excision of RTs at our institution.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for undergoing surgery for RT between January 2009 and January 2019. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, preoperative diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, histopathological results, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 30-day mortality, 90-day unplanned readmission rate, and long-term outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Twenty patients with a mean age of 48.3 ± 14.2 were analyzed. The most common presenting complaint was perineal pain (35.0%). Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography was preferred in 18 and 2 patients, respectively. Tumor localization was below the level of the third sacral vertebrae in 14 patients for whom the posterior surgical approach was used. No postoperative mortality was recorded at the end of follow-up of 53.8 ± 40 months. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.6 ± 9.4 days. Ten percent of the patients had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. Recurrence developed in 1 patient, for whom pathology were reported as chordoma.

Conclusion

RT should be managed by a multidisciplinary team given the complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors despite the fact that the majority are benign. A good understanding of pelvic anatomy and characterization of lesions through detailed radiological imaging is crucial to optimize surgical planning. Complete surgical resection is key for prolonged disease-free and overall survival of patients diagnosed with RTs.

Laparoscopic resection of large retrorectal developmental cysts in adults: Single-centre experiences of 20 cases

Context

Retrorectal tumours are rare with developmental cysts being the most common type. Conventionally, large retrorectal developmental cysts (RRDCs) require the combined transabdomino-sacrococcygeal approach.

Aims

This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes of the laparoscopic approach for large RRDCs.

Settings and Design

A retrospective case series analysis.

Subjects and Methods

Data of patients with RRDCs of 10 cm or larger in diameter who underwent the laparoscopic surgery between 2012 and 2017 at our tertiary centre were retrospectively analyzed.

Statistical Analysis Used

Results are presented as median values or mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and numbers (percentages) for categorical variables.

Results

Twenty consecutive cases were identified (19 females; median age, 36 years). Average tumour size was 10.9 ± 1.1 cm. Cephalic ends of lesions ranged from S1/2 junction to S4 level. Caudally, 18 cysts extended to the sacrococcygeal hypodermis. Seventeen patients underwent the pure laparoscopy; three patients received a combined laparoscopic-posterior approach. The operating time was 167.1 ± 57.3 min for the pure laparoscopic group and 212.0 ± 24.5 min for the combined group. The intraoperative haemorrhage was 68.2 ± 49.7 and 66.7 ± 28.9 (mL), respectively. Post-operative complications included one trocar site hernia, one wound infection and one delayed rectal wall perforation. The median post-operative hospital stay was 7 days. With a median follow-up period of 36 months, 1 lesions recurred.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach can provide a feasible and effective alternative for large RRDCs, with advantages of the minimally invasive surgery. For lesions with ultra-low caudal ends, especially those closely clinging to the rectum, a combined posterior approach is still necessary.

A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors

Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18-89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic-perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1-8 and 2-10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5-71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.

Management approach and surgical strategies for retrorectal tumours: a systematic review

AIM

The management strategy for retrorectal tumours is complex. Due to their rarity, few surgeons have expertise in management.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed database. English language publications in the years 2011-2015 that assessed preoperative management, surgical strategies and chemoradiotherapy for presacral tumours were included. Two hundred and fifty-one abstracts were screened of which 88 met the inclusion criteria. After review of the full text, this resulted in a final list of 42 studies eligible for review.

RESULTS

In all, 932 patients (63.2% female, 36.8% male; P < 0.01) with a retrorectal tumour were identified. Most were benign (65.9% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.01). Imaging distinguished benign from malignant lesions in 88.1% of cases; preoperative biopsy was superior to imaging in providing an accurate definitive diagnosis (91.3% vs. 61.4%, P < 0.05) with negligible seeding risk. Biopsy should be performed in solid tumours. It is useful in guiding neoadjuvant therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcomas and desmoid type fibromatosis and may alter the management strategy in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and metastases. Biopsies for cystic lesions are not recommended. The gold standard in imaging is MRI. The posterior Kraske procedure is the most common surgical approach. Overall, the reported recurrence rate was 19.7%.

CONCLUSION

This review evaluated the management strategies for retrorectal tumours. A preoperative biopsy should be performed for solid tumours. MRI is the most useful imaging modality. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. There is limited information on robotic surgery, single-port surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, chemoradiotherapy and reconstruction.