Anal function after endoluminal locoregional resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy on the Functional Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the functional outcome of patients with resectable rectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on anorectal function (ARF), urinary function and sexual function in relevant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. All English-language studies, published from January 2000 to July 2021, that explored the (postoperative) effects of neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery on ARF, urinary function and sexual function of patients were included (PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021281617).

RESULTS

The data in this study were derived from 37 articles based on 33 studies; in total, 17 917 patients were enrolled. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of anorectal dysfunction in the neoadjuvant therapy group was significantly higher than that in the group of upfront surgery, which was manifested by a higher incidence of major low anterior resection syndrome (odds ratio = 3.09, 95% confidence interval = 2.48, 3.84; P < 0.001), reduction of mean squeeze pressure and mean resting pressure, and other manifestations, including clustering of stools, incontinence, urgency and use of pads. With the extension of follow-up time, the adverse effects of neoadjuvant therapy on major low anterior resection syndrome existed. Compared with patients undergoing upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy increased the risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio = 1.31, 95% confidence interval = 1.00, 1.72; P = 0.05) and erectile dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval = 1.27, 2.45; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy is not only associated with impairment of ARF, but also with increased incidence of urinary incontinence and male erectile dysfunction. However, the influence of confounding factors (e.g. surgical method, tumour stage) needs to be considered.

Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery – A Single-Center Experience

Aim

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is widely performed in early rectal cancer. This technique offers greater organ preservation and decreases the risk of subsequent surgery. However, postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis remain challenges for patients with high-risk pathological factors. This single-center study reports the prognosis of early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old after TEM.

Methods

The data of the patients over 60 years old who underwent local anal resection were collected retrospectively. Moreover, the 5-year follow-up data were analyzed to determine the 5-year DFS and OS.

Results

47 early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old underwent TEM. There were 27 patients with high-risk factors and 20 patients without high-risk factors. Two patients underwent radical surgery after TEM and ten patients received adjuvant treatment. Local recurrence occurred in 7 patients, of which 4 underwent salvage surgery. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 75.6%, which was lower in the high-risk patients group (69.6%) than in the non-high-risk patients group (83.3%) (P&gt;0.05). The 5-year OS was 90.2%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (high-risk patients 87.0%, non-high-risk patients 94.4%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between people over and under 70 years old.

Conclusion

Some high-risk factor patients over 60 years old do not have inferior 5-year DFS and OS to the non-high-risk patients. TEM is an option for old patients with high surgical risks. Even if postoperative pathology revealed high-risk factors, timely surgical treatment after local recurrence would be beneficial to improve the 5-year DFS and OS.

Transanal Local Excision of Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Is There a Place for It or Should Be Avoided at All Costs?

Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) with tumor downsizing and downstaging has significantly impacted the number of patients considered to be appropriate candidates for transanal local excision (TLE). Some patients may harbor small residual lesions, restricted to the bowel wall. These patients, who exhibit major response ("near-complete") by digital rectal examination, endoscopic assessment, and radiological assessment may be considered for this approach. Although TLE is associated with minimal postoperative morbidity, a few clinical consequences and oncological outcomes must be evaluated in advance and with caution. In the setting of nCRT, a higher risk for clinically relevant wound dehiscences leading to a considerable risk for readmission for pain management has been observed. Worse anorectal function (still better than after total mesorectal excision [TME]), worsening in the quality of TME specimen, and higher rates of abdominal resections (in cases requiring completion TME) have been reported. The exuberant scar observed in the area of TLE also represents a challenging finding during follow-up of these patients. Local excision should be probably restricted for patients with primary tumors located at or below the level of the anorectal ring (magnetic resonance defined). These patients are otherwise candidates for abdominal perineal resections or ultra-low anterior resections with coloanal anastomosis frequently requiring definitive stomas or considerably poor anorectal function.

Tolerability and safety of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) after local excision for pT1 with high-risk features or pT2 rectal cancer is recommended as an optional treatment to achieve both curability and maintenance of quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety of combining limited surgery with adjuvant CRT for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase II trial. Patients diagnosed with lower rectal or anal canal cancer (clinical T1 or T2 with a maximum diameter of 30 mm and N0 and M0) underwent local excision or endoscopic resection. Patients received CRT with S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) after confirmation of well- or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and negative margins, and/or depth of submucosal invasion ≥ 1000 µm or muscularis propria, and/or positive lymphovascular invasion, and/or tumor budding grade of 2/3. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall and local relapse-free survival, safety, anal sphincter preservation rate, and anal function.

RESULTS

Pathological diagnosis was T1 in 36 patients and T2 in 16 patients. Serious complications after surgery were not reported. The CRT completion rate per protocol was 86.5% (45/52). Thirty-two patients developed 54 events of CRT-related adverse events, including only one patient with a grade 3 event (stomatitis). The most common CRT-related adverse event was diarrhea (n = 14). No patients showed deterioration of anal function at 3 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

CRT with S-1 after limited surgery for T1 or T2 lower rectal cancer resulted in a low incidence of toxicities and maintenance of anal function.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: A Comparison With the Conventional Top-to-Bottom Approach

BACKGROUND

Advances in sphincter-saving procedures improved the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer. However, many of them experienced functional disturbances after surgery, including low anterior resection syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the severity of low anterior resection syndrome after transanal total mesorectal excision and compare it with the conventional transabdominal, top-to-bottom, total mesorectal excision.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, retrospective analysis.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary academic institution.

PATIENTS

This study analyzed patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for mid to low rectal cancer from January 2016 to April 2018. Cases were matched one-to-one according to the tumor height and history of pelvic irradiation using the propensity score.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the severity of low anterior resection syndrome and fecal incontinence at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery or stoma reversal, whichever was later.

RESULTS

There were 35 patients in each group after matching; 67.1% were male, and 41.4% had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. At 3 months, the median low anterior resection syndrome score was 37 after transanal total mesorectal excision, which was significantly higher than the conventional approach, 32 (p = 0.045). Apart from this, the low anterior resection syndrome score, severity grading, and the Wexner score were comparable at 6 and 12 months.

LIMITATIONS

A difference between the 2 groups might not be detected because of the study's small sample size and because of its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher low anterior resection syndrome score was observed after transanal total mesorectal excision at the initial 3-month period, but such a difference was not observed thereafter. This study showed that both surgical techniques had similar anal and bowel functional outcomes in the long run. However, because of the limited case number and study design, further study is needed to prove this. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B146. SÍNDROME DE RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJA DESPUÉS DE LA ESCISIÓN MESORRECTAL TOTAL TRANSANAL: UNA COMPARACIÓN CON EL ABORDAJE CONVENCIONAL DE SUPERIOR A INFERIOR: Los avances en los procedimientos para salvar esfínteres mejoraron la calidad de vida de los pacientes con cáncer rectal. Sin embargo, muchos de ellos sufrieron trastornos funcionales después de la cirugía, incluyendo el síndrome de resección anterior baja.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la gravedad del síndrome de resección anterior baja después de la escisión mesorrectal total transanal y comparar con la escisión mesorrectal total convencional transabdominal, de arriba a abajo.El estudio se realizó en una institución académica terciaria.Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de un solo centro de pacientes que se sometieron a una escisión mesorrectal total por cáncer rectal medio a bajo desde enero de 2016 hasta abril de 2018. Los casos fueron emparejados uno a uno de acuerdo con la altura del tumor y los antecedentes de irradiación pélvica con puntaje de propensión.La gravedad del síndrome de resección anterior baja y la incontinencia fecal a los 3, 6 y 12 meses después de la cirugía o la reversión del estoma, lo que ocurriera más tarde.Hubo 35 pacientes en cada grupo después del emparejamiento. El 67.1% eran hombres. El 41,4% tenía radioterapia neoadyuvante. A los tres meses, la puntuación media del síndrome de resección anterior baja fue de 37 después de la escisión mesorrectal transanal total, que fue significativamente mayor que el enfoque convencional, 32 (p = 0.045). Aparte de esto, la puntuación baja del síndrome de resección anterior, la clasificación de gravedad y la puntuación de Wexner fueron comparables a los 6 y 12 meses.Es posible que no se detecte una diferencia entre los dos grupos debido al pequeño tamaño de la muestra del estudio. La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.Se observó una puntuación más alta en el síndrome de resección anterior baja después de la escisión mesorrectal total transanal en el período inicial de tres meses, pero dicha diferencia no se observó posteriormente. Este estudio mostró que ambas técnicas quirúrgicas tuvieron resultados similares de funcionamiento anal e intestinal a largo plazo. Sin embargo, debido al número limitado de casos y al diseño del estudio, es necesario realizar más estudios para demostrarlo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B146.

Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common following surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) involves intraoperative stretching of the anal sphincter while an anal single port is placed, which can potentially further disturb anorectal function. The aim of our study was to systematically assess anal function after TaTME using anorectal manometry and questionnaires.

METHODS

Patients who had TaTME for rectal cancer at our institution were prospectively assessed by means of anorectal manometry and the standard LARS score. The primary endpoint was the resting pressure to assess internal sphincter damage and the secondary endpoints were squeeze pressure to assess external anal sphincter and analysis of correlation between LARS score and these two manometry parameters. Patients who had laparoscopic TME (LaTME) served as a control group.

RESULTS

Out of 81 patients invited to participate 48 accepted. There were 36 in theTaTMEgroup, and 12 in the LaTMEgroup. The mean follow-up time from the index operation date to the assessment date was 41.34 months (± SD 24.834). The mean resting pressure did not differ significantly between the groups (36.44 mmHg ± 18.514 and 36.58 mmHg ± 13.318 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.981). The mean squeeze pressure was also comparable (125.00 mmHg ± 66.141 and 111.83 mmHg ± 51.111 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.533). The mean LARS score was comparable and showed comparable results. The analysis of correlation between LARS score and manometry parameters showed no significant associations between resting or squeeze pressure and L:ARS score.

CONCLUSIONS

Following TME surgery, the resting and squeeze pressures of the anal sphincter measured by manometry were generally decreased, with no differences between the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.

Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution

PURPOSE

The introduction of transanal endoscopic or minimally invasive surgery has allowed organ preservation for rectal tumors with good oncological results. Data on functional and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes are scarce and controversial. This systematic review sought to synthesize fecal continence, QoL, and manometric outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted searching for articles reporting on functional outcomes after TEM or TAMIS between January 1995 and June 2018. The evaluated outcome parameters were pre- and postoperative fecal continence (primary endpoint), QoL, and manometric results. Data were extracted using the same scales and measurement units as from the original study.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies comprising 1297 patients were included. Fecal continence outcomes were evaluated in 23 (79%) studies with a wide variety of assessment tools and divergent results. Ten studies (34%) analyzed QoL changes, and manometric variables were assessed in 15 studies (51%). Most studies reported some deterioration in manometric scores without major QoL impairment. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, it was not possible to perform any pooled analysis or meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These techniques do not seem to affect continence by themselves except in minor cases. The possibility of worsened function after TEM and TAMIS should not be underestimated. There is a need to homogenize or standardize functional and manometric outcomes assessment after TEM or TAMIS.

Quality of life in patients with loco-regional rectal cancer after ELRR by TEM versus VLS TME after nChRT: long-term results

BACKGROUND

Endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME), in selected patients with N0 rectal cancer. Post-operative quality of life (QoL) evaluation is an important parameter of outcomes related to high percentage of functional sequelae. We reported, in a previous paper, the short and medium term results of QoL in patients who underwent ELRR or LTME. The aim is to evaluate the 3 year QoL in patients with iT2-T3 N0/+ rectal cancer who underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (nChRT) in a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

METHODS

We enrolled in this study, 39 patients with iT2-T3 rectal cancer who underwent ELRR (n = 19) or LTME (n = 20), according to predefined criteria. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires at admission, after n-RCT and 1, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in QoL evaluation were observed between the two groups, both at admission and after n-RCT. In short term (1-6 months) period, significantly better results were observed in ELRR group by QLQ-C30 in global health status (p = 0.03), physical functioning (p = 0.026), role functioning (p = 0.04), emotional functioning (p = 0.04), cognitive functioning, fatigue (p < 0.05), dyspnoea (p < 0.001), insomnia (p < 0.05), appetite loss (p < 0.05), constipation (≤ 0.05), and by QLQ-CR38 in: body image (p = 0.03) and defecation (p = 0.025). At 1 year, the two groups were homogenous as assessed by QLQ-C30, whereas the QLQCR38 still showed better results of ELRR versus LTME in body image (p = 0.006), defecation problems (p = 0.01), and weight loss (p = 0.005). At 3 years, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with rectal cancer, who underwent ELRR by TEM or LTME, QoL tests at 3 years do not show any statistical differences on examined items.

Ectopic air localizations after transanal procedures: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study is to report and to analyze the incidence, clinical impact and treatment options of ectopic air localizations after transanal procedures.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The research was carried out using the PubMed database, identifying 40 articles with the following keywords: "transanal" AND "emphysema"; "transanal" AND "subcutaneous emphysema"; "transanal" AND "pneumomediastinum"; "transanal" AND "pneumothoraces"; "transanal" AND "pneumopericardium"; "transanal" AND "retropneumoperitoneum".

RESULTS

Nineteen articles, published between 1993 and 2017, were included in the study for a total of 29 patients. The most frequent air localization was in the retroperitoneum, followed by subcutaneous tissues, mediastinum and neck. This condition was treated conservatively in 20 patients, with colostomy in 4 patients, with bowel resection and negative diagnostic laparoscopy in one patient each. In three cases the treatment was not specified. Ectopic air location resolved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumo-mediastinum and pneumo-retroperitoneum after transanal procedures are unusual complications with a dramatic radiological appearance but can be managed successfully with a completely benign course in most cases. Initially, a conservative approach is recommended. Surgical treatment should be reserved only in case of fluid collection or suture dehiscence.