1
|
Alipouriani A, Hull T, Lipman J, Holubar SD, Gorgun E, Liska D, Valente M, Steele SR. Diagnosis and treatment of primary ileal pouch leaks: a 27-year experience at a referral center. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:860-866. [PMID: 38553296 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the preferred restorative surgical procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis requiring proctocolectomy. Unfortunately, postoperative leaks remain a complication with potentially significant ramifications. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive description of the evaluation, management, and outcomes of leaks after primary IPAA procedures. METHODS Between 1995 and 2022, a total of 4058 primary IPAA procedures were performed at Cleveland Clinic. From a prospectively maintained pouch registry, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 237 patients who presented to the pouch center for management. Of these, 114 (3%) had undergone the index IPAA procedure at our clinic (de novo cases), whereas 123 patients had their index IPAA performed elsewhere. Data were missing for 43 patients, resulting in a final cohort of 194 patients. RESULTS Our cohort had an average age of 41 years (range, 16-76) at the time of leak diagnosis. Overall, 55.2% were males, average body mass index was 24.4 kg/m2, and pain was the most prevalent presenting symptom (61.8%), followed by fever (34%). Leaks were confirmed through diagnostic testing in 141 cases, whereas 27.3% were detected intraoperatively. The most common initial diagnoses were pelvic abscess (47.4%) and enteric fistulas (26.8%), including cutaneous (9.8%), vaginal (7.2%), and bladder fistulas (3.1%). By location, leaks occurred at the tip of the "J" (52.6%), at the pouch-anal anastomotic site (35%), and in the body of the pouch (12.4%). A nonoperative management approach was initially attempted in 49.5% of cases, including antibiotic therapy, drainage, endoclip, and endo-sponge, with a success rate of 18.5%. Surgery was eventually required in 81.4% of patients, including (1) sutured or stapled pouch repair (52.5%), with diversion performed in 87.9% of these cases either before or during the salvage surgery; (2) pouch excision with neo-IPAA (22.7%), including 9 patients from the first group; and (3) pouch disconnection, repair, and reanastomosis (9.3%). Pouch failure occurred in 8.4%, with either pouch excision (11.1%) or permanent diversion (4.5%). Ultimately, 12.4% of patients (24 of 194) required permanent diversion, with all necessitating pouch excision. In the 30-day follow-up after salvage surgery, short-term complications arose in 38.7% of patients. The most common complications observed were ileus, pelvic abscess/sepsis, and fever. CONCLUSION Leaks after primary IPAA procedures represent an infrequent, yet challenging, complication. Despite attempts at nonoperative management, the success rate is limited. Salvage surgery is associated with a high pouch retention rate, underscoring its importance in the management of post-IPAA leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alipouriani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Tracy Hull
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Jeremy Lipman
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Michael Valente
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilad O, Tulchinsky H, Kariv R. Surveillance and Management of Pouch Neoplasia in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S82-S90. [PMID: 37878460 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis often require prophylactic colectomy with IPAA to treat or reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia. However, after surgery, patients are still at some risk of developing pouch polyps and even cancer in both handsewn and stapled anastomoses. Management relies mainly on endoscopic or surgical interventions, whereas chemopreventive agents have a limited role in the management and prevention of pouch neoplasia. Novel endoscopic techniques are evolving and may gradually overtake surgical intervention in selected cases. Because familial adenomatous polyposis is relatively rare, there is a scarcity of data regarding the natural history of pouch polyps and cancer in this population. OBJECTIVE This systematic literature review aims to describe the evolution, characteristics, various treatment modalities and their outcomes, and recommended surveillance strategies of pouch neoplasia. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Cochrane databases and the International Ileal Pouch Consortium (for expert opinion). STUDY SELECTION Studies published between 1990 and 2023 in English were included. Studies reporting neoplastic outcomes of only patients with IBD-related pouch neoplasia were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence of pouch neoplasia and its outcomes (successful resections, surgical complications, and mortality). RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included. LIMITATIONS Most studies focused on patients with IBD-related pouch neoplasia; there were scarce data regarding polyposis patients only. Most cohorts were small and retrospective. Data on interventions were mainly descriptive, and no randomized controlled trials were available. CONCLUSIONS Pouch adenomas are common and well managed by endoscopic resections because advanced endoscopic techniques are becoming more available. Additional data are required for defining updated recommendations for either endoscopic or surgical intervention. Pouch cancer is a very rare event and may arise despite surveillance. Continued endoscopic surveillance is key in cancer prevention and early detection. The outcome of cancer cases is poor, and management in a referral center should be advised with tumor board discussions. See video from symposium .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophir Gilad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hagit Tulchinsky
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Izutani Y, Ogino T, Sekido Y, Takeda M, Hata T, Hamabe A, Miyoshi N, Uemura M, Mizushima T, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Salvage surgery for pouch-related complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a report of two cases. Surg Case Rep 2024; 10:111. [PMID: 38700734 PMCID: PMC11068705 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01910-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouch-related complications (PRCs), such as pelvic abscesses and perianal complex fistulas, can occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis (UC). They are often difficult to treat and require salvage surgery. We report two cases of PRC associated with fistulas. CASE PRESENTATION First case: A 38-year-old man was diagnosed with UC at age 26 years. Four months after the diagnosis of UC, the patient underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy, IPAA, and ileostomy for acute fulminant UC. Two years after the closure of the ileostomy, the patient developed a perianal abscess and underwent ileostomy reconstruction. He was referred to our department at 35 years of age, because his symptoms did not improve despite repeated seton drainage of a complicated perineal fistula. We diagnosed PRC with a pelvic abscess and complicated pouch fistula and performed salvage surgery. This diagnosis was revised to Crohn's disease. SECOND CASE A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with UC at age 18 years and was administered high doses of steroids; however, his symptoms did not improve. He underwent restorative proctocolectomy, IPAA, and ileostomy at another hospital. The ileostomy was closed, and his condition stabilized thereafter. At 35 years of age, perianal pain developed, and he was diagnosed with a complicated pouch-perineal fistula. A fistula was observed near the staple line of the ileal end closure on the head side of the pouch. Reconstruction of the ileostomy and seton drainage were performed; however, his symptoms did not improve, and he was referred to our hospital. We diagnosed PRC with a pelvic abscess and a complicated pouch fistula and performed salvage surgery. The resected specimen showed strictures in two locations: at the oral site of the afferent limb (at the pouch) and at the IPAA. Both patients returned to society and are currently outpatients. CONCLUSIONS We encountered two cases of PRC after IPAA that did not improve with seton drainage or ileostomy. Pouch resection was performed after considering the patient's quality of life and reintegration into society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Izutani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ogino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yuki Sekido
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mitsunobu Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Atsushi Hamabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Norikatsu Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Tennoji-Ku Kitayamacho 10-31, Osaka City, Osaka, 543-0035, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anto VP, Ramos AE, Mollen KP. Ouch, my pouch! a clinician's guide to pouchitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33:151406. [PMID: 38636151 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2024.151406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Pouchitis is defined as inflammation of the ileal pouch created during a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Although the incidence of this inflammatory condition is high, the exact etiology often remains unclear and the management challenging. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of this common complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Anto
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anna E Ramos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kevin P Mollen
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Santiago P, Barnes EL, Raffals LE. Classification and Management of Disorders of the J Pouch. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1931-1939. [PMID: 37252759 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Total abdominal proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with substantial complications despite the benefits of managing refractory and/or neoplasia-associated disease. For the purpose of this review, we focused on the diagnosis of some of the most common inflammatory and structural pouch disorders and their respective management. Pouchitis is the most common complication, and it is typically responsive to antibiotics. However, chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP) has been increasingly recognized, and biologic therapies have emerged as the mainstay of therapy. Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) can affect up to 10% of patients with UC after IPAA. Medical options are similar to CARP therapies, including biologics with immunomodulators. Studies have shown higher efficacy rates of biologics for CLDP when compared with those for CARP. In addition, managing stricturing and fistulizing CLDP is challenging and often requires interventional endoscopy (balloon dilation and/or stricturotomy) and/or surgery. The implementation of standardized diagnostic criteria for inflammatory pouch disorders will help in advancing future therapeutic options. Structural pouch disorders are commonly related to surgical complications after IPAA. We focused on the diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks, strictures, and floppy pouch complex. Anastomotic leaks and anastomotic strictures occur in approximately 15% and 11% of patients with UC after IPAA, respectively. Further complications from pouch leaks include the development of sinuses, fistulas, and pouch sepsis requiring excision. Novel endoscopic interventions and less invasive surgical procedures have emerged as options for the management of these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priscila Santiago
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ecker NKJ, Dinh C, Möslein G, Ecker KW. Comparing continent ileostomy (CI) conversion to repair/redo IPAA: favorable outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:261. [PMID: 37906299 PMCID: PMC10618396 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04555-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to compare the outcomes of repair/redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (repair/redo-IPAA) with the conversion of IPAA to continent ileostomy (CI) in an effort to prevent the need for a permanent ileostomy (IS) following IPAA failure. METHODS This research involved a retrospective analysis of surgical records, employing descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS Among 57 patients with an IPAA, up to three revisions were necessary due to complications or complete failure. Ultimately, repair/redo-IPAA preserved the IPAA in 14 patients (24.6%), conversion to CI salvaged the pouch in 21 patients (36.8%), and IS was unavoidable in 22 patients (38.6%). The cumulative probability of requiring conversion surgery was calculated to be 54.0% at 20 years, thereby reducing the cumulative risk of IS to 32.3%. The 20-year cumulative probability of pouch salvage by repair/redo IPAA was only 21.9%. However, this rate increased to 67.7% when conversion procedures were considered. Following repair/redo-IPAA, only 8.3% of patients reported evacuation frequencies of ≤ 4 during the day, and 16.7% were evacuation-free at night. In contrast, after conversion to CI, 98.0% of patients reported a maximum of four evacuations in a 24-h period. After undergoing repair/redo IPAA, between half and two-thirds of patients reported experiencing incontinence or soiling, while complete continence was achieved in all patients following conversion to CI. Notably, the majority of patients expressed overall satisfaction with their respective procedures. A positive correlation was identified between very high subjective satisfaction and positive objective surgical outcomes exclusively in patients who underwent conversion to CI. CONCLUSION When complications or failure of IPAA occur, conversion to CI emerges as a highly viable alternative to repair/redo IPAA. This conclusion is supported by the observation that patient satisfaction appears to be closely tied to stable surgical outcomes. To reinforce these findings, further prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gabriela Möslein
- Center for Hereditary Tumors, Ev. Krankenhaus BETHESDA, University of Düsseldorf, Heerstraße 219, D-47053, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Wilhelm Ecker
- Dept. of General, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
- Surgical Dept., MediClin Müritz-Klinikum, Weinbergstraße 19, D-17192, Waren, Germany.
- , Tannenweg 1, D-22889, Tangstedt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ricardo AP, Kayal M, Plietz MC, Khaitov S, Sylla P, Dubinsky MC, Greenstein A. Predictors of pouch failure: A tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease centre experience. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:1469-1478. [PMID: 37128185 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM Rates of pouch failure after total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) range from 5% to 18%. There is little consistency across studies regarding the factors associated with failure, and most include patients who underwent IPAA in the pre-biologic era. Our aim was to analyse a cohort of patients who underwent IPAA in the biologic era at a large-volume inflammatory bowel disease institution to better determine preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors associated with pouch failure. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with data from an institutional review board approved prospective database with ulcerative colitis or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2008 and 2017. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with increased risk of pouch failure. RESULTS Out of 664 patients included in the study, pouch failure occurred in 41 (6.2%) patients, a median of 23.3 months after final surgical stage. Of these, 17 (41.4%) underwent pouch excision and 24 (58.5%) had diverting ileostomies. The most common indications for pouch failure were Crohn's disease like pouch inflammation (CDLPI) (n = 17, 41.5%), chronic pouchitis (n = 6, 14.6%), chronic cuffitis (n = 5, 12.2%) and anastomotic stricture (n = 4, 9.8%). On multivariate analysis, pre-colectomy biologic use (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.09-4.67), CDLPI (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.49-6.76) and pouch revision (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.26-5.32) were significantly associated with pouch failure. CONCLUSIONS Pouch failure was significantly associated with CDLPI, preoperative biologic use and pouch revision; however, reassuringly it was not associated with postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison P Ricardo
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael C Plietz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sergey Khaitov
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexander Greenstein
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Long-term outcomes after close rectal dissection and total mesorectal excision in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:297-307. [PMID: 36336745 PMCID: PMC10008209 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02713-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC), rectal dissection can be performed via close rectal dissection (CRD) or in a total mesorectal excision plane (TME). Although CRD should protect autonomic nerve function, this technique may be more challenging than TME. The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CRD and TME. METHODS This single-centre retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent IPAA surgery for UC between January 2002 and October 2017. Primary outcomes were chronic pouch failure (PF) among patients who underwent CRD and TME and the association between CRD and developing chronic PF. Chronic PF was defined as a pouch-related complication occurring ≥ 3 months after primary IPAA surgery requiring redo pouch surgery, pouch excision or permanent defunctioning ileostomy. Secondary outcomes were risk factors and causes for chronic PF. Pouch function and quality of life were assessed via the Pouch dysfunction score and Cleveland global quality of life score. RESULTS Out of 289 patients (155 males, median age 37 years [interquartile range 26.5-45.5 years]), 128 underwent CRD. There was a shorter median postoperative follow-up for CRD patients than for TME patients (3.7 vs 10.9 years, p < 0.01). Chronic PF occurred in 6 (4.7%) CRD patients and 20 (12.4%) TME patients. The failure-free pouch survival rate 3 years after IPAA surgery was comparable among CRD and TME patients (96.1% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.5). CRD was a no predictor for developing chronic PF on univariate analyses (HR 0.7 CI-95 0.3-2.0, p = 0.54). A lower proportion of CRD patients developed chronic PF due to a septic cause (1% vs 6%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Although differences in chronic PF among CRD and TME patients were not observed, a trend toward TME patients developing chronic pelvic sepsis was detected. Surgeons may consider performing CRD during IPAA surgery for UC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Leaks From the Tip of the J-pouch: Diagnosis, Management, and Long-term Pouch Survival. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:97-105. [PMID: 36367463 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch. Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch are a known complication, but there is a paucity of literature regarding this type of leak. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the diagnosis, management, and long-term clinical outcomes of leaks from the tip of the J-pouch at our institution. DESIGN This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained pouch registry. SETTING This study was conducted at a quaternary IBD referral center. PATIENTS Patients included those with ileal J-pouches diagnosed with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main measures of outcomes were pouch salvage rate, type of salvage procedures, and long-term Kaplan-Meier pouch survival. RESULTS We identified 74 patients with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch. Pain (68.9%) and pelvic abscess (40.9%) were the most common presentations, whereas 10.8% of patients presented with an acute abdomen. The leak was diagnosed by imaging and/or endoscopy in 74.3% of patients but only discovered during surgical exploration in 25.6% of patients. Some 63.5% of patients were diagnosed only after loop ileostomy closure, whereas 32.4% of patients were diagnosed before ileostomy closure. The most common methods used for diagnosis were pouchoscopy (31.1%) and gastrograffin enema (28.4%). A definitive nonoperative approach was attempted in 48.6% of patients but was successful in only 10.8% of patients overall. Surgical repair was attempted in 89.2% of patients, whereas 4.5% of patients had pouch excision. Salvage operations (n = 63) included sutured or stapled repair of the tip of the J (65%), pouch excision with neo-pouch (25.4%), and pouch disconnection, repair, and reanastomosis (9.5%). Ultimately' 10 patients (13.5%) required pouch excision, yielding an overall 5-year pouch survival rate of 86.3%. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective review; referral bias may limit the generalizability. CONCLUSIONS Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch have variable clinical presentations and require a high index of suspicion. Pouch salvage surgery is required in the majority of patients and is associated with a high pouch salvage rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 . FUGAS DEL EXTREMO DE LA BOLSA EN J DIAGNSTICO, MANEJO Y SUPERVIVENCIA A LARGO PLAZO DE LA BOLSA ANTECEDENTES:El estándar de atención para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la colitis ulcerosa es la proctocolectomía restauradora con bolsa ileal en J. Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J son una complicación conocida, pero hay escasez de literatura sobre este tipo de fuga.OBJETIVO:Describir el diagnóstico, manejo y resultados clínicos a largo plazo de las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J en nuestra institución.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de registro de bolsa mantenido prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal cuaternaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes con bolsas ileales en J diagnosticadas con fugas del extremo de la J.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Tasa de rescate de la bolsa, tipo de procedimientos de rescate y supervivencia a largo plazo de la bolsa Kaplan-Meier.RESULTADOS:Identificamos 74 pacientes con fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J. El dolor (68,9%) y el absceso pélvico (40,9%) fueron las presentaciones más comunes, mientras que el 10,8% de los pacientes presentaron abdomen agudo. La fuga se diagnosticó por imagen y/o endoscopia en el 74,3%, pero solo se descubrió durante la exploración quirúrgica en el 25,6%. El 63,5% fueron diagnosticados solo después del cierre de la ileostomía en asa, mientras que el 32,4% lo fueron antes del cierre de la ileostomía. Los métodos más comunes utilizados para el diagnóstico fueron la endoscopia (31,1%) y el enema de gastrografín (28,4%). Se intentó un abordaje no quirúrgico definitivo en el 48,6%, pero tuvo éxito en solo el 10,8% de los pacientes en general. Se intentó la reparación quirúrgica en el 89,2% de los pacientes, mientras que en el 4,5% se realizó la escisión del reservorio. Las operaciones de rescate (n = 63) incluyeron la reparación con sutura o grapas del extremo de la J (65%), la escisión del reservorio con neo-reservorio (25,4%) y la desconexión, reparación y reanastomosis del reservorio (9,5%). Finalmente, 10 (13,5%) pacientes requirieron la escisión de la bolsa, lo que se asocio con una alta tasa de supervivencia general de la bolsa a los 5 años del 86,3%.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva; el sesgo de referencia puede limitar la generalización.CONCLUSIONES:Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J tienen presentaciones clínicas variables y requieren un alto índice de sospecha. La cirugía de rescate de la bolsa se requiere en la mayoría y se asocia con una alta tasa de rescate de la bolsa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 . (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).
Collapse
|
10
|
Ecker KW, Dinh C, Ecker NKJ, Möslein G. Conversion of ileo-pouch anal anastomosis to continent ileostomy: strategic surgical considerations and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:631-638. [PMID: 35073447 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to evaluate surgical strategies for conversion of failed ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) to continent ileostomy (CI), taking morbidity and overall outcome into account. The hypothesis was that complex conversions are equivalent to the primary construction of a CI at the time of proctocolectomy. METHOD This was a retrospective analysis of IPAA conversions acknowledging the underlying disease (inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and non-IBD) and extent of pouch reconstruction (PR): type 1 (without PR), type 2 (partial PR), and type 3 (complete PR). RESULTS Twenty-six patients (IBD, n = 16; non-IBD, n = 10) were converted (type 1, n = 13; type 2, n = 7; and type 3, n = 6).12/26 patients (46.2%) presented postoperative complications directly related to the conversion with scarification of two pouches. In a mean follow-up time of 7.5 ± 6.6 years, 5/24 patients required revisional surgery. Of these, three required pouch excision. The cumulative probability of reoperation at the end of the second year increased to 21.7% and remained constant thereafter until the maximum follow-up time of 26 years. The total pouch loss rate was 19.2% (5/26), of which all occurred in the first 3 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the conversion types, complications or pouch survival. For all parameters, IBD patients performed slightly unfavourably. Due to the overall small number of respective patients, a differentiated investigation of IBD was not performed. CONCLUSION Complex conversion procedures (types 1 and 2) deliver comparable long-term results to new constructions (type 3), thereby limiting the loss of small bowel. IBD compromises outcome versus non-IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Wilhelm Ecker
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.,Department of the Surgical, MediClin Müritz-Klinikum, Waren, Germany
| | | | | | - Gabriela Möslein
- Center for Hereditary Tumors, Ev. Krankenhaus BETHESDA, Duisburg, Germany.,University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fuschillo G, Pellino G. Chronic Perineal Sinus After Proctectomy for Crohn's Disease: Risk Reduction Strategies and Management. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:468-471. [PMID: 35067504 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Fuschillo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:691-705. [PMID: 35357610 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02617-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly used to restore gastrointestinal continuity after surgical treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the outcomes of patients with MUC and patients with FAP who underwent IPAA. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2021. Cohort and randomized studies were eligible for inclusion if they directly compared patients with MUC and FAP who underwent IPAA. The main outcome measures were pouch failure, complications, and need for pouch excision or revision. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias across the studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-three studies (9200 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Seven thousand nine hundred fifty (86.4%) had MUC and 1250 (13.6%) had FAP. The median age of patients was 33.1 years. The male to female ratio was 1.4:1. MUC had higher odds of pouchitis (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.8-5.4, p < 0.001), stricture (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.25-2.65, p = 0.002), fistula (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.18-2.54, p = 0.004), and total complications (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.3-2.77, p < 0.001) as compared to FAP. Both groups had similar odds of pelvic sepsis, leakage, pouch failure, excision, revision, and fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS Although patients with MUC undergoing IPAA may be at a higher risk of developing complications, particularly pouchitis, stricture, and fistula; the ultimate and functional outcome of the pouch is similar to patients with FAP. Pouch failure, excision and revision were similar in the two groups.
Collapse
|
13
|
Yuen A, Brar MS, de Buck van Overstraeten A. Indications and Surgical Technique for Transanal Proctectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:135-140. [PMID: 35237109 PMCID: PMC8885156 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease has advanced significantly over the years. One particular focus of its evolution has been to minimize invasiveness. Transanal surgery has given the contemporary surgeon an alternate approach to access the low rectum situated in the confines of the deep pelvis. In benign disease, combining transanal surgery with laparoscopy has allowed for the development of novel techniques to create ileal pouch-anal anastomoses, perform intersphincteric Crohn's proctectomies, manage complications from pelvic surgery, and facilitate redo pelvic surgery. We aim to review the indications for transanal surgery in benign disease, describe an approach to transanal pouch surgery in detail, and discuss the potential benefits, pitfalls, and contentious issues surrounding this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Yuen
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mantaj S. Brar
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Address for correspondence Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, MD, MSc 600 University Avenue Rm 455, Toronto, ON M5G1X5Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) for colitis; development of Crohn's and Pouchitis. Am J Surg 2022; 224:453-458. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
15
|
Heuthorst L, Wasmann KATGM, Reijntjes MA, Hompes R, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA. Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e074. [PMID: 37636549 PMCID: PMC10455305 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. Background Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman's correlations. Results Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56-10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24-14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1-17%), pelvic sepsis (2-18%), fistula (1-30%), stricture (1-34%), pouchitis (11-61%), and Crohn's disease of the pouch (0-18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). Conclusions The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. Mini abstract This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Heuthorst
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maud A. Reijntjes
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne J. Buskens
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A. Bemelman
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deputy M, Segal J, Reza L, Worley G, Costello S, Burns E, Faiz O, Clark S, Hart A. The pouch behaving badly: management of morbidity after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1193-1204. [PMID: 33523546 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or a 'pouch', allows restoration of intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Most patients have a good long-term outcome after IPAA, but in a significant proportion the functional outcome and quality of life are unsatisfactory. We term this outcome 'the pouch behaving badly'. Managing this, especially one is when unfamiliar with the possible underlying pathologies, is a challenge for both patient and clinician. We aim to outline the clinical approach to the pouch behaving badly, highlighting key aspects of investigation and management. METHOD This is a narrative review of the literature covering the investigation and management of postoperative complications and morbidity after IPAA. RESULTS Management of the pouch behaving badly requires a careful clinical assessment. The patient may present with multiple symptoms and a clear picture of the symptomatology and past history should be constructed before thorough examination and specialist investigation. We divide the pathology that underlies this clinical scenario into surgical, inflammatory, mechanical, functional and dysplastic causes and outline the investigation and management of each one. CONCLUSION The pouch behaving badly is a challenging problem for both patient and clinician. A detailed clinical assessment with careful specialist investigation is key to diagnosing the underlying pathology. We stress the importance of patient-centred care - the aim is to improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Deputy
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Segal
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lillian Reza
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Guy Worley
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Costello
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia
| | - Elaine Burns
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Clark
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
MacDonald S, Au S, Thornton M, Macdonald A. Complications and functional outcomes after ileo-anal pouch excision-a systematic review of 14 retrospective observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:677-687. [PMID: 33471205 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The ileo-anal pouch (IAP) has been the gold standard procedure for maintenance of bowel continuity after panproctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. However, the IAP has an estimated failure rate of 13% at 10 years post-procedure (Tulchinsky et al., Ann Surg 238(2):229-34, 2003), which can result in pouch excision (P.E.). This systematic review aims to synthesise all the available studies reporting post-operative outcomes of P.E. and its impact on patient quality of life (QoL), when available, which have not previously been summarised. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane library databases were searched with terms 'Pouch AND excision' OR 'Pouch AND removal' OR 'Pouch AND remove' OR 'IAP AND excision'. All studies reporting post-operative morbidity, mortality or functional outcomes in patients who had P.E. were included. Studies with < 5 patients, non-English studies and conference abstracts were excluded. RESULTS 14 studies comprising 1601 patients were included. Overall complications varied from 18 to 63% with the most common being persistent perineal sinus (9-40%) or surgical site infection (wound-2 to 30%; intra-abdominal collection-3 to 24%). The mortality rate was between 0.58 and 1.4%. QoL is generally lower in P.E. patients compared to the normal population across various QoL measures and P.E. patients often had urinary and sexual dysfunction post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS There is a substantial incidence of complications after P.E.; however, there is no evidence describing QoL pre- and post-P.E. Further longitudinal research comparing QoL in patients undergoing P.E. and other treatment options such as indefinite diversion is required to definitively assess QoL post-procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S MacDonald
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, ML6 0JS, UK.
| | - S Au
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, ML6 0JS, UK
| | - M Thornton
- Department of Surgery, Wishaw General Hospital, 50 Netherton St., Wishaw, Scotland, ML2 0DP, UK
| | - A Macdonald
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, ML6 0JS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Following Pelvic Pouch Excision: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1621-1627. [PMID: 33149024 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have reported surgical outcomes following pouch excision and fewer have described the long-term sequelae. Given the debate regarding optimal surgical management following pouch failure, an accurate estimation of the morbidity associated with this procedure addresses a critical knowledge gap. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review our institutional experience with pouch excision with a focus on indications, short-term outcomes, and long-term reintervention rates. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING This study was conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients registered in the prospectively maintained IBD database with a diagnosis of pelvic pouch failure between 1991 and 2018 were selected. INTERVENTION The patients had undergone pelvic pouch excision was measured. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Indications for excision, incidence of short-term and long-term complications, and long-term surgical reintervention were the primary outcomes. In addition, multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors of chronic perineal wound complications and the effect of preoperative diversion. The positive predictive value of a clinical suspicion of Crohn's disease of the pouch was also evaluated. RESULTS One hundred forty cases were identified. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced short-term complications and 49.3% experienced delayed morbidity. Overall, one-third of patients required long-term reoperation related to perineal wound, stoma, and hernia complications. On multivariable regression, immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of perineal wound complications, and preoperative diversion was not associated with perineal wound healing. Crohn's disease was suspected in 24 patients preoperatively but confirmed on histopathology in only 6 patients. LIMITATIONS This is a retrospective chart review of a single institution's experience, whereby complication rates may be underestimates of the true event rates. CONCLUSIONS Pouch excision is associated with high postoperative morbidity and long-term reintervention due to nonhealing perineal wounds, stoma complications, and hernias. Further study is required to clarify risk reduction strategies to limit perineal wound complications and the appropriate selection of patients for diversion alone vs pouch excision in IPAA failure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348. RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DESPUÉS DE LA EXTIRPACIÓN DE LA BOLSA PéLVICA: LA EXPERIENCIA DEL HOSPITAL MOUNT SINAÍ: Pocos estudios han informado resultados quirúrgicos después de la escisión de bolsa pélvica (reservorio ileoanal) y menos han descrito las secuelas a largo plazo. Dado el debate sobre el manejo quirúrgico óptimo después de la falla de la bolsa, una estimación precisa de la morbilidad asociada con este procedimiento aborda una brecha crítica de conocimiento.El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar nuestra experiencia institucional con la extirpación de la bolsa con un enfoque en las indicaciones, los resultados a corto plazo y las tasas de reintervención a largo plazo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Hospital Mt Sinaí, Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.Pacientes adultos registrados en la base de datos de EII mantenida prospectivamente con un diagnóstico de falla de la bolsa pélvica entre 1991 y 2018.Escisión de bolsa pélvica.Las indicaciones para la escisión, la incidencia de complicaciones a corto y largo plazo y la reintervención quirúrgica a largo plazo fueron los resultados primarios valorados. Además, se ajustaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable para identificar predictores de complicaciones de la herida perineal crónica y el efecto de la derivación preoperatoria. También se evaluó el valor predictivo positivo de una sospecha clínica de enfermedad de Crohn de la bolsa.Se identificaron 140 casos. El 59% de los pacientes desarrollaron complicaciones a corto plazo y el 49,3% con morbilidad tardía. En general, 1/3 de los pacientes requirieron una reoperación a largo plazo relacionada con complicaciones de herida perineal, estoma y hernia. En la regresión multivariable, la inmunosupresión se asoció con mayores probabilidades de complicaciones de la herida perineal y la derivación preoperatoria no se asoció con la cicatrización de la herida perineal. La enfermedad de Crohn se sospechó en 24 pacientes antes de la operación, pero se confirmó por histopatología en solo 6 pacientes.Revisión retrospectiva del cuadro de la experiencia de una sola institución por la cual las tasas de complicaciones pueden ser subestimadas de las tasas de eventos reales.La escisión de la bolsa se asocia con una alta morbilidad postoperatoria y una reintervención a largo plazo debido a complicaciones de heridas perineales, complicaciones del estoma y hernias. Se requieren más estudios para aclarar las estrategias de reducción de riesgos para limitar las complicaciones de la herida perineal y la selección adecuada de pacientes para la derivación sola versus la escisión de la bolsa en caso de falla de reservorio ileoanal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wasmann KA, van der Does de Willebois EM, Koens L, Duijvestein M, Bemelman WA, Buskens CJ. The Impact of Rectal Stump Inflammation After Subtotal Colectomy on Pouch Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis Patients. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 15:jjaa157. [PMID: 32901798 PMCID: PMC7904055 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Proctitis after subtotal colectomy with ileostomy for ulcerative colitis [UC] is common, but its impact on short- and long-term outcome after pouch surgery is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of proctitis after subtotal colectomy and its impact on postoperative morbidity and pouchitis. METHODS The distal margin of the rectal stump of all consecutive patients undergoing completion proctectomy and pouch procedure for UC, between 1999 and 2017, was revised and scored for active inflammation according to the validated Geboes score, and for diversion proctitis. Pathological findings were correlated to complications after pouch surgery and pouchitis [including therapy-refractory] using multivariate analyses. RESULTS Out of 204 included patients, 167 [82%] had active inflammation in the rectal stump and diversion colitis was found in 170 specimens [83%]. Overall postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage rates were not significantly different between patients with and without active inflammation in the rectal stump [34.7% vs 32.4%, p = 0.79, and 10.2% vs 5.4%, p = 0.54, respectively]. Active inflammation of the rectal stump was significantly associated with the development of pouchitis [54.3% vs 25.5%, plog = 0.02], as well as with therapy refractory pouchitis [14% vs 0%, plog = 0.05]. Following multivariate analysis, active inflammation was an independent predictor for the development of pouchitis. Diversion proctitis showed no association with these outcome parameters. CONCLUSIONS Active inflammation in the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy occurs in 80% of UC patients and is a predictor for the development of pouchitis and therapy-refractory pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin A Wasmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lianne Koens
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Departmen of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne J Buskens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Denning NL, Kallis MP, Kvasnovsky CL, Lipskar AM. Outcomes of Initial Subtotal Colectomy for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Surg Res 2020; 255:319-324. [PMID: 32593890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy (STC-I) has been well established in the adult literature as an initial surgical treatment for refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related colitis. However, in the pediatric population, the efficacy of this approach has been less well characterized, likely because of concerns regarding the advisability of leaving a diseased rectum in situ. Our aim was to examine the outcomes after STC-I for refractory IBD at our pediatric tertiary care center. METHODS An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients aged 5-21 y who underwent operative treatment with initial STC-I for medically refractory IBD from January 2010 to August 2018. Only complications related to the STC-I were considered; complications subsequent to reconstruction are excluded from analysis. Early complications were defined as occurring within 60 d of STC-I. We performed descriptive statistics using the Fisher exact test and the Student t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS Over the study period, 37 patients (aged 12.3 ± 4.2 y) underwent STC-I, with 73.0% performed laparoscopically. Patients were predominately male (51.4%) and Caucasian (48.6%). Thirty-one (83.8%) colectomies were performed for ulcerative colitis, two (5.4%) for Crohn disease, and four (10.8%) for indeterminate colitis. Nutritional status improved postcolectomy. Albumin levels of 3.3 ± 0.8 preoperatively increased to 4.3 ± 0.47 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Colonic bleeding was stopped by STC-I with increases in the hematocrit from 30.5 ± 6.8 preoperative to 38.9 ± 4.1 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Average time to discontinuation of IBD-related medications was 4 wk (n = 27). Forty-eight percent required outpatient rectal treatment for proctitis. Patients did well long term, with 67.5% reestablishing intestinal continuity at our institution. Average postoperative length of stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group compared with those undergoing open operations (5.1 ± 2.2 versus 6.9 ± 1.6 d, P = 0.03). Readmission rate at 30 d was 21.1%. Patients experiencing unplanned readmission or unplanned operations were similar between groups (30% versus 33.3%, P = 0.85 and 30% versus 18.5%, P = 0.45, respectively). Overall, 14 (37.8%) patients experienced a complication with many patients experiencing multiple complications. Early complications occurred in nine (24.3%) patients. Late complications also occurred in 24.3% of patients. There were four (10.8%) patients with five admissions for bowel obstruction, two of whom required operative intervention (5.4%). CONCLUSIONS Use of STC-I as an initial procedure in the treatment of refractory IBD-related colitis in children is a safe and reasonable surgical approach that allows weaning from immunosuppressing mediations and stops colonic bleeding. Implementing a laparoscopic approach to subtotal colectomy provides further benefit by reducing postoperative length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi-Liza Denning
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New York, New York; Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York
| | - Michelle P Kallis
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New York, New York; Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York
| | - Charlotte L Kvasnovsky
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New York, New York
| | - Aaron M Lipskar
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New York, New York; Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health System, Manhasset, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holubar SD, Hull T. Crohn's disease of the ileoanal pouch. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2020.100748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Continent Ileostomy as an Alternative to End Ileostomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:9740980. [PMID: 32382274 PMCID: PMC7199532 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9740980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Continent ileostomy (CI) was once a prevalent surgical technique for patients who required total proctocolectomy but then gave way to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after 1980. Although IPAA has been the gold standard procedure preferred by most patients when total proctocolectomy is required, due to its imitation of physiological function of rectum and preserved function of anus, various complications have been observed with a relatively high rate of morbidity that could affect pouch longevity. Once serious complications such as pelvic abscesses and/or fistula occur, the pouch often needs to be removed. In addition, for some patients with a shortened small intestine or foreshortened mesentery, it is impossible for the ileal pouch to reach the pelvic floor, thus making the creation of an IPAA difficult. Previously, most of these patients would be referred for an end ileostomy, with an associated poor quality of life. In this circumstance, we propose that CI may deserve a reappraisal and serve as an alternative. In this article, we review the indications, contraindications, technique evolution, and outcomes of CI.
Collapse
|
23
|
Re-operation surgery following IPAA: is there a role for laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1591-1596. [PMID: 32266546 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07537-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for mucosal ulcerative colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Some patients require re-operation, including pouch revision, advancement, or excision. Re-operative procedures are technically demanding and usually performed only by experienced colorectal surgeons in a small number of referral centers. There is a paucity of data regarding feasibility, safety, and outcomes of laparoscopic re-operative IPAA surgery. This study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic approach for re-operative IPAA, trans-abdominal surgery. METHODS Retrospective analysis of IRB-approved prospective database for patients who underwent trans-abdominal re-operative IPAA from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics and operative reports were reviewed to classify type of re-operation into pouch excision, revision, or advancement and further classify as laparoscopic, laparoscopic converted to open, or open surgery. Main outcome measures were post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Seventy-six patients met the inclusion criteria: 19 underwent attempted laparoscopic re-operative IPAA surgery, 12 of whom underwent successful laparoscopic surgery while 7 were converted to laparotomy, for an overall laparoscopic intent to treat 63% success rate. The remaining operations (n = 57) were performed through midline laparotomy. Length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery was significantly shorter (5.5 vs 9.7 days, p < 0.001) as were abdominal superficial surgical site infections (SSI) (0% vs 18%, p < 0.001) and deep SSI (0% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Laparotomy was performed by 6 colorectal surgeons at our institution while laparoscopy was successfully performed only by the senior author. There was no significant difference in overall complications, re-admission, re-operation, or mortality. CONCLUSION Re-operative, trans-abdominal, laparoscopic IPAA is both feasible and safe and has clear benefits compared to laparotomy in terms of LOS and superficial and deep SSI. However, this approach needs to be undertaken only by very experienced, high-volume laparoscopic IPAA surgeons.
Collapse
|
24
|
Helavirta I, Lehto K, Huhtala H, Hyöty M, Collin P, Aitola P. Pouch failures following restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:2027-2033. [PMID: 32592093 PMCID: PMC7541371 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03680-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is the most common operation in ulcerative colitis. Nevertheless, permanent ileostomy will sometimes be unavoidable. The aim was to evaluate the reasons for pouch failure and early morbidity after pouch excision. METHODS The number and the reasons for pouch failures were analysed in patients undergoing RPC 1985-2016. RESULTS Out of 491 RPC patients, 53 experienced pouch failure (10 women, 43 men); 52 out of 53 underwent pouch excision. The cumulative risk for excision at 5, 10 and 20 years was 5.6, 9.4 and 15.5%, respectively. The reasons for failure included septic events such as fistula in 12 (23%), chronic pouchitis in 11 (21%) and leakage in 8 (15%) patients. Functional reasons for pouch failure were recorded as poor function in 16 (30%), incontinence in 12 (23%) and stricture in 12 (23%) patients. Multiple causes for pouch failure were recorded for individual patients. Seven cases of Crohn's disease were found among the failure cases: two before pouch excision and five after. Altogether, 15 Crohn's disease diagnoses were set in the RPC cohort, giving a percentage of 47% of pouch failure in this disorder. A complication occurred in 23 (44%) patients within 30 days after surgery; 16 were mild (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). CONCLUSIONS Eleven percent of RPC patients suffered pouch failure: more men than women. The reasons were multiple. Crohn's disease created a risk of failure, but a half of these patients maintained the pouch. Morbidity after pouch excision was moderate, but in most cases slight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Helavirta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Kirsi Lehto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland
| | - Heini Huhtala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland
| | - Marja Hyöty
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pekka Collin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland
| | - Petri Aitola
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kalaiselvan R, McWhirter D, Martin K, Byrne C, Rooney PS. Ileo-anal pouch excision and permanent ileostomy - Indications and outcomes from a tertiary centre. Surgeon 2019; 18:226-230. [PMID: 31813778 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pouch excision is a major complication of ileoanal pouch surgery. Current practice is for this type of surgery to be performed in a specialist centre. We present a series of patients undergoing pouch excision surgery in a high volume centre in the UK and assess the outcomes in these patients. METHODS All patients undergoing pouch excision at the Royal Liverpool Hospital between 1995 and 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were included. Demographics and outcomes were taken from patients' notes and a dedicated retrospectively compiled database. RESULTS 35 patients underwent pouch excision surgery during this period. Around half the patients had their original pouch surgery elsewhere and were referred for management of complications. Median time to pouch excision was 13 years from the original operation. Overall complication rate was 31% with 11% requiring re-intervention post-operatively. There was no mortality in this series. CONCLUSION Pouch excision is a complex, high-risk procedure that should be carried out in specialist centres. Our series shows that in such settings, good outcomes can be achieved for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kalaiselvan
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D McWhirter
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - K Martin
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - C Byrne
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - P S Rooney
- Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wasmann KA, Reijntjes MA, Stellingwerf ME, Ponsioen CY, Buskens CJ, Hompes R, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Endo-sponge Assisted Early Surgical Closure of Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomotic Leakage Preserves Long-term Function: A Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:1537-1545. [PMID: 31054256 PMCID: PMC7006944 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endo-sponge [Braun Medical] assisted early surgical closure [ESC] is an effective treatment to control pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] leakage, and became standard treatment in our centre from 2010 onwards. The aim of this cohort study was to assess the long-term pouch function of ulcerative colitis [UC] patients treated with ESC or conventional management [CM] for anastomotic leakage after IPAA. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent an IPAA for UC between 2002 and 2017 were included. Patients treated with ESC [2010-2017] or CM [2002-2009] for anastomotic leakage were compared with control patients without anastomotic leakage of the corresponding time period. Main endpoints were long-term pouch function on a 3-point scale and pouch failure, as measured with the validated pouch dysfunction score questionnaire. RESULTS Some 280 of 334 patients [84%] returned the pouch dysfunction questionnaire, of whom 18 were treated with ESC and 22 with CM for anastomotic leakage. Control cohorts included 133 [2010-2017] and 107 patients [2002-2009]. Between ESC-treated patients and control patients, pouch function [p = 0.647] and pouch failure rates [0/18 versus 5/133, p >0.99] were similar. CM resulted in worse pouch function [p = 0.016] and a higher pouch failure rate [5/22 versus 5/107, p = 0.013] compared with control patients. CONCLUSIONS ESC, in contrast to CM, for IPAA leakage in UC patients is associated with preservation of pouch function and preclusion of pouch failure, probably due to early and effective treatment of pelvic sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin A Wasmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maud A Reijntjes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: W. A. Bemelman, MD PhD, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, G4-111, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: 0031-20-56-26818; Fax: 0031-20-56-66596;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4320-4342. [PMID: 31496616 PMCID: PMC6710180 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kheng-Seong Ng
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Simon Joseph Gonsalves
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Michael Sagar
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouch excision is required for many of those patients experiencing pouch failure in whom ileostomy alone is inadequate and revision surgery is not appropriate. The published rate of pouch failure is approximately 10% at 10 years, resulting in a growing cohort of patients requiring excision. OBJECTIVE In this article, we aim to describe the indications for excision and postoperative outcomes at our center since 2004. DESIGN This is a retrospective observational study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center for ileal pouch dysfunction. Cases were documented from 2004 to 2017. PATIENTS The cohort comprised 92 patients; 83% were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 15% with familial adenomatous polyposis, and 2% with indeterminate colitis. INTERVENTIONS Patients underwent excision of pelvic ileal pouches. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were the time to perineal wound healing and healing at 6 months. Thirty- and 90-day morbidity and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS Postoperative histology was consistent with Crohn's disease in 1 patient. The median time from pouch creation to excision was 7 years. The rate of perineal wound healing at 6 months was 78%, and regression analysis demonstrated significantly improved chances of healing for noninfective indications for excision (p = 0.023; OR, 15.22; 95% CI, 1.45-160.27) and for more recent procedures (p = 0.032; OR, 12.00; 95% CI, 1.87-76.87). LIMITATIONS This study was limited because it was retrospective in nature, and it was a single-center experience. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the most contemporary cohort of patients undergoing pouch excision surgery. The procedure retains a relatively high postoperative morbidity, but this study demonstrates a learning curve with improving perineal healing over time associated with a high institutional volume. Defunctioning ileostomy may improve perineal wound healing in patients with infective indications for excision. Further investigation is required to establish the quality-of-life benefits of pouch excision in this modern cohort. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A804.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sheedy SP, Bartlett DJ, Lightner AL, Trenkner SW, Bruining DH, Fidler JL, VanBuren WM, Menias CO, Reber JD, Fletcher JG. Judging the J pouch: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:845-866. [PMID: 30259096 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1786-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Restorative total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgery of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, ulcerative colitis with high-grade dysplasia or multi-focal low-grade dysplasia, and for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The natural history of the surgery is favorable, and patients generally experience improved quality of life and acceptable long-term functional outcome. However, some patients experience significant long-term morbidity from early and/or late pouch-related complications. When complications arise, radiologists must understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various imaging modalities that can be used to assess the pouch. Radiologist familiarity with the surgical technique, pouch anatomy, and imaging appearance of the various potential early and late complications will help facilitate appropriate clinical and surgical decision-making. This review provides an anatomic-based imaging review of the pouch and pouch-related complications, including numerous illustrative fluoroscopic and cross-sectional imaging examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon P Sheedy
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - David J Bartlett
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Steven W Trenkner
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeff L Fidler
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Wendaline M VanBuren
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Reber
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Joel G Fletcher
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Holubar SD, Neary P, Aiello A, Shawki S, Delaney CP, Steele SR, Hull T, Stocchi L. Ileal pouch revision vs excision: short-term (30-day) outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:209-218. [PMID: 30444323 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) failure occurs in approximately 5%-10% of patients. We aimed to compare short-term (30-day) postoperative outcomes associated with pouch revision and pouch excision using a large international database. Our null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference in overall postoperative complications between patients selected for pouch revision vs pouch excision. METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User File from 2005 to 2016 we identified patients who underwent either IPAA revision via the combined abdominoperineal approach [Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 46712] or IPAA excision (CPT 45136). Differences in baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes between groups were assessed with univariate and matched analyses. RESULTS We identified 593 reoperative IPAA procedures: revision group 78 (13%) and excision group 515 (86%). The groups had similar age and body mass index (kg/m2 ), but the revision group had more women (65.4% vs 51.8%, P = 0.02) and fewer were on chronic steroids (3.9% vs 17.9%, P = 0.0008) relative to the excision group. Revision IPAA patients were more likely to have received a preoperative transfusion (5.1% vs 0.97%, P = 0.02). Revision and excision were associated with similar postoperative length of stay (9.3 vs 8.6 days, 0.44), mortality (nil vs 0.58%, respectively; P = 0.99) and short-term morbidity (34.6% vs 40.2%, respectively; P = 0.88) at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Pouch revision and excision have comparable short-term postoperative outcomes, but pouch excision appears to be more commonly utilized. Increased awareness of the indications for pouch revision or referral to specialized centres may improve pouch revision rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Holubar
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - P Neary
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - A Aiello
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S Shawki
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - C P Delaney
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S R Steele
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - T Hull
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - L Stocchi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Caycedo-Marulanda
- Health Sciences North, 65 Larch St. Suite 308, Sudbury, ON, P3E 1B8, Canada. .,Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada. .,Colorectal Surgery North, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
| | - G Ma
- Health Sciences North, 65 Larch St. Suite 308, Sudbury, ON, P3E 1B8, Canada.,Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada.,Colorectal Surgery North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lachance S, Abou-Khalil M, Vasilevsky CA, Ghitulescu G, Morin N, Faria J, Boutros M. Outcomes of Ileal Pouch Excision: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:2142-2149. [PMID: 30066066 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3844-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to define the incidence and risk factors of postoperative morbidity and mortality after pouch excision (PE). METHODS ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent PE between 2005 and 2015. Main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, major morbidity, overall surgical site infections (SSI), reoperation, and length of stay (LOS). Risk factors associated with these outcomes were assessed using multivariate logistic or quantile regression. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-one patients underwent PE (mean age 47.7(±15.3) years; 51.7% female). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.6(±5.7) kg/m2, 55.4% were ASA class 1-2 and 18.4% were immunosuppressed. Mean operative time was 252(±112.7) min, 98% were elective cases, and median LOS was 7(5-11) days. Twenty-eight percent experienced major morbidity, including SSIs (21.5% overall, 9.2% superficial, 3.7% deep, 10.3% organ space), sepsis (9.5%), urinary tract infection (5.8%), and postoperative pneumonia (2.4%). The observed venous thromboembolism rate was low, with 0.5 and 0.8% of patients suffering pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, respectively; 5.5% required reoperation. Postoperative mortality was 0.8%. On multivariate logistic regression, smoking (OR 3.03 [95% CI 1.56, 5.88]) and operative time (OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.0003, 1.0005) were associated with increased odds of major morbidity. Smoking (OR 3.29 [95% CI 1.65, 6.54]) and operative time (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.000, 1.004]) were independent risk factors for overall SSI. LOS was significantly increased in patients with major morbidity (3.29 days [95% CI 1.60, 4.99]) and increased operative time (0.013 days [95% CI 0.007, 0.018]). CONCLUSIONS PE is an operation with significant risk of morbidity. However, mortality was low in the present cohort of patients. Patients who were smokers and had longer operative time had increased risk of overall infectious complications and major morbidity. Furthermore, major morbidity and operative time were associated with increased hospital length of stay following PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastien Lachance
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Maria Abou-Khalil
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ghitulescu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Nancy Morin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Julio Faria
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brown SR, Fearnhead NS, Faiz OD, Abercrombie JF, Acheson AG, Arnott RG, Clark SK, Clifford S, Davies RJ, Davies MM, Douie WJP, Dunlop MG, Epstein JC, Evans MD, George BD, Guy RJ, Hargest R, Hawthorne AB, Hill J, Hughes GW, Limdi JK, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, O'Connell PR, Pinkney TD, Pipe J, Sagar PM, Singh B, Soop M, Terry H, Torkington J, Verjee A, Walsh CJ, Warusavitarne JH, Williams AB, Williams GL, Wilson RG. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 8:3-117. [PMID: 30508274 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology. METHODS Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines. RESULTS All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management. CONCLUSION These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - O D Faiz
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - A G Acheson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - R G Arnott
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - S K Clark
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - R J Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M M Davies
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - W J P Douie
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - J C Epstein
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - M D Evans
- Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK
| | - B D George
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R J Guy
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hargest
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - J Hill
- Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G W Hughes
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - J K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - T D Pinkney
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Pipe
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - P M Sagar
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - B Singh
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - M Soop
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - H Terry
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, St Albans, UK
| | | | - A Verjee
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - C J Walsh
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, UK
| | | | - A B Williams
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reber JD, Barlow JM, Lightner AL, Sheedy SP, Bruining DH, Menias CO, Fletcher JG. J Pouch: Imaging Findings, Surgical Variations, Natural History, and Common Complications. Radiographics 2018; 38:1073-1088. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D. Reber
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - John M. Barlow
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Amy L. Lightner
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Shannon P. Sheedy
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - David H. Bruining
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Christine O. Menias
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Joel G. Fletcher
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., J.M.B., S.P.S., J.G.F.), Colorectal Surgery (A.L.L.), and Gastroenterology (D.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| |
Collapse
|