Pelvic floor reconstruction with bilateral gracilis flaps following extralevator abdominoperineal excision - a video vignette

Long-term follow-up of bilateral gracilis reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal operations such as an extra-levator abdominoperineal (elAPE) excision for locally advanced or recurrent cancer create a significant perineal tissue deficit. Options for perineal reconstruction include bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMF). Fashioning the gracili into a 'weave' creates a muscular sling that supports pelvic contents and is a novel technique. Our series reports the outcomes of the BPGMF in 50 patients undergoing surgery for pelvic cancer.

METHOD

This is a retrospective, single-centre study of patients undergoing reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMF. All surgeries took place between January 2008 and February 2021. The primary outcome measured was perineal wound healing. The secondary outcomes measured were complications of surgical sites and length of hospital stay (short term), flap integrity on follow-up imaging and functional outcomes (long term).

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent perineal reconstruction using BPGMF (26 males). The median age was 62 years. The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). The average follow-up period was 2 years. Complete perineal wound healing was 86% (42/49) at outpatient follow-up. Complication rates for the donor site and reconstructed site were 14% and 22%, respectively. Complications included infection (2% donor site, 12% perineum), haematoma (4% donor site), dehiscence (2% donor site, 4% perineum) and seroma (3% donor site, 2% perineum).

CONCLUSION

BPGMF offers a reliable and technically simple muscle flap to reconstruct large perineal defects. The muscle flap integrity appears maintained on follow-up imaging despite a lack of flap monitoring tools. This cohort had minimal functional impairment following BPGMF.

The combined use of pedicled profunda artery perforator and bilateral gracilis flaps for pelvic reconstruction: A cohort study

The result of an extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (ELAPE) is a composite three-dimensional defect. This is performed for locally advanced anorectal cancer, and may involve partial excision of the vagina. The aim of reconstruction is to achieve wound healing, restore the pelvic floor and to allow micturition and sexual function. We aim to evaluate the concurrent use of profunda artery perforator (PAP) and bilateral gracilis flaps for vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction. We performed a retrospective case note review of patients undergoing pelvo-perineal reconstruction with combined gracilis and PAP flaps between July 2018 and December 2019. Eighteen pedicled flaps were performed on six patients with anal or vulval malignancies. All underwent pre-operative radiotherapy. Four patients had extended abdominoperineal tumour resections, while two patients underwent total pelvic exenteration. The median age was 57 (range 47-74) years, inpatient stay was 22 (11-47) days and the follow-up was 10 (5-21) months. Four patients developed partial perineal wound dehiscence, of which one was re-sutured. One patient had a post-operative bleed requiring radiological embolisation of an internal iliac branch and had subsequent 1cm PAP flap loss. All other flaps survived completely. Median time to heal was 4 (1-6) months. This is the first series reporting combined bilateral gracilis and PAP flaps for pelvic reconstruction. The wound dehiscence rate and healing times were expected in the context of irradiation and radical pelvic tumour resection. This is a reliable technique for perineal and vaginal reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity.

MRI of surgical flaps in pelvic reconstructive surgery: a pictorial review of normal and abnormal findings

Surgical flaps are commonly used for pelvic reconstruction in a subgroup of patients with locally advanced or recurrent anorectal and gynecologic malignancies and following complications of pelvic irradiation. Surgical scenarios where flaps may be placed include (but are not limited to) extended or radical abdominal perineal resection (APR) and total pelvic exenteration (PE). Surgical flaps in pelvic reconstruction serve several functions, including reducing dead space and providing structural support, facilitating wound closure and cosmetic appearance, enhancing the postsurgical healing process, protecting anastomoses and helping to prevent adhesions of organs and viscera to adjacent structures and the pelvic side wall. The most commonly used surgical flaps in pelvic reconstruction surgery include the VRAM (Vertical Rectus Abdominis Muscle), MRAM (Modified Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous flap), gracilis, sartorius and omental flaps. Surgical flaps can be mistaken for recurrent or residual tumor by radiologists who are not familiar with the appearance or surgical methods of flap placement, since flaps may have a mass-like appearance on cross sectional imaging, including CT and MRI. Recurrent neoplasm may be difficult to differentiate from postoperative changes of flap placement and associated postsurgical anatomic distortion. This review article focuses on understanding the nuances of surgically placed pelvic flaps and identifying their normal and abnormal appearances on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along a time continuum. Postsurgical complications, including hematoma, postoperative fluid collections, infection, ischemia, and necrosis as well as tumor recurrence on the initial and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging are illustrated and discussed.

Single centre experience of bilateral gracilis flap perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision

AIM

A variety of tissue flaps have been described for the closure of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APE) or exenteration for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer and salvage surgery for anal cancer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMFs) as a reconstruction option in these patients. This is of particular benefit when using a laparoscopic approach for the abdominal component of the operation, avoiding disruption of the abdominal wall and risk of herniation with other reconstruction options, e.g. vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps.

METHOD

This is a retrospective single centre case series of patients who underwent reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMFs using a novel weave technique, from January 2008 to August 2017.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients (16 female), with a median follow-up of 19 months (3-102). The indications for BPGMFs were cancer resection (21) and perineal hernia (4). The median length of stay was 14 days (6-60). All-cause mortality was 36% within the follow-up period. A healed perineal wound was achieved in 72% of patients within 30 days (84% of patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The overall donor site complication rate was 20% (including infection, dehiscence, numbness, haematoma and seroma) and 28% for the perineal site (including infection, dehiscence and prolapse).

CONCLUSIONS

BPGMFs provide an important option for reconstruction of the perineum particularly with a minimally invasive approach or with two stomas.

Current Methods for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Repair and Regeneration

Skeletal muscle has the capacity of regeneration after injury. However, for large volumes of muscle loss, this regeneration needs interventional support. Consequently, muscle injury provides an ongoing reconstructive and regenerative challenge in clinical work. To promote muscle repair and regeneration, different strategies have been developed within the last century and especially during the last few decades, including surgical techniques, physical therapy, biomaterials, and muscular tissue engineering as well as cell therapy. Still, there is a great need to develop new methods and materials, which promote skeletal muscle repair and functional regeneration. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview over the epidemiology of muscle tissue loss, highlight current strategies in clinical treatment, and discuss novel methods for muscle regeneration and challenges for their future clinical translation.