1
|
Raichurkar P, Brown K, Koh C, Dela Cruz A, Sitharthan D, Moran B, Ansari N, Ahmadi N, Solomon M, Steffens D. Reported outcomes following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A systematic review to inform evidence-based practice and international consensus. Colorectal Dis 2025; 27:e17280. [PMID: 39734262 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/31/2024]
Abstract
AIM Cytoreductive surgery provides a chance for long-term survival and cure in selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. As clinical and academic interest in this field increases, heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinders the valid and meaningful synthesis of data into high-quality meta-analyses. The aim of this systemic review was to investigate variability in outcome reporting following cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHOD Five electronic databases [MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)] were interrogated from 2000 to October 2023 to identify all reported outcomes in the current literature. Extracted outcomes were catalogued and reviewed by a multidisciplinary working group into standardized terms and domains. RESULTS A total of 294 studies, from 5112 screened, were included for analysis. We extracted 2903 outcomes verbatim from included studies and catalogued them into 85 standardized outcomes across seven outcome domains. The most frequently reported domains were survival, in 274 (93%) studies, and pathological outcomes, in 232 (79%) studies. Outcomes pertaining to function and life impact were only reported in seven (2%) studies. Reported outcomes were only defined in 35% of cases, and significant variability existed between definitions. CONCLUSION This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcome measurement and reporting following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Patient-reported outcomes are relatively underrepresented in the current literature. The results of this review will inform an international collaborative effort to create a core outcome set to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Raichurkar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kilian Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annie Dela Cruz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darshan Sitharthan
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nima Ahmadi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Samuel R, Knight SR, Adams R, Das P, Dorth J, Finch D, Guren MG, Hawkins MA, Moug S, Rajdev L, Sebag-Montefiore D, Renehan AG, Fish R. International consensus to define outcomes for trials of chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer (CORMAC-2): defining the outcomes from the CORMAC core outcome set. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 78:102939. [PMID: 39720423 PMCID: PMC11667046 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Variation in outcomes definitions and reporting limit the utility of clinical trial results. The Core Outcome Research Measures in Anal Cancer (CORMAC) project developed a core outcome set (COS) for chemoradiotherapy trials for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) through an international healthcare professional and patient consensus process. The CORMAC-COS comprises 19 outcomes across 4 domains (disease activity, survival, toxicity, life impact). In CORMAC-2 we have established standardised definitions for the 11 disease activity and survival outcomes in the CORMAC COS. Definitions were agreed through a 3 step process, initially identifying existing definitions through systematic review (registered with PROSPERO, CRD42016036540), using these to populate a two-round Delphi questionnaire completed by 51 experts from 13 countries, and finally ratification through an online consensus meeting. Standardising the definitions for these core outcomes facilitates real world utilisation of the CORMAC-COS, thereby increasing the quality of data available for clinical decision-making and ultimately enhancing patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Samuel
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute for Medical Research, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen R. Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Prajnan Das
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Centre, Cleveland, USA
| | - David Finch
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS FT, Manchester
| | - Marianne G. Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria A. Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Moug
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | - Lakshmi Rajdev
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute for Medical Research, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew G. Renehan
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS FT, Manchester
| | - Rebecca Fish
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS FT, Manchester
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Axelsson A, Johansson M, Haglind E, Li Y, Nilsson PJ, Angenete E. Patient reported long-term side effects from treatment on urinary and sexual function in anal cancer survivors - 3- and 6-year results from the Swedish national ANCA study. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1359-1369. [PMID: 38816903 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
AIM The standard treatment for anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy. Most patients survive anal cancer but remain living with long-term side effects related to the treatment received. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of long-term impairment of urinary and sexual function at 3 and 6 years after diagnosis and to investigate the additive effect from chemotherapy in combined chemoradiotherapy on urinary incontinence, compared to radiotherapy alone. METHOD The ANal CAncer study (ANCA) is based on a national Swedish cohort of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 2011 and 2013. All identified patients within the study were invited to respond to a study-specific questionnaire at 3 and 6 years. Descriptive analyses for the primary endpoint were performed. To investigate a possible additional effect from chemotherapy logistic regression was used. RESULTS A total of 388 patients were included in the study. At 3 years 264 patients were alive and invited to respond to an anal cancer specific questionnaire. The 3- and 6 year response rates were 195 (74%) and 155 patients (67%), respectively. The patient reported urinary function impairment at 3 years were urgency (63%), incomplete bladder emptying (47%), and incontinence (46%) and there was an absolute increase of the prevalence of urinary dysfunction in about 10% at 6 years. Three years after diagnosis, 77% reported that intercourse was not part of their sex life; this percentage increased at 6 years to 83%. We found no negative effect of chemotherapy in combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone on patient reported urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION For anal cancer survivors, urinary function was impaired after 3 years and continued to deteriorate as measured at 6 years after diagnosis. Anal cancer and its treatment negatively affected sexual function for both men and women. This may explain why patients reported that sexual activity and frequency of intercourse was not of importance in their life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Axelsson
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mia Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Haglind
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of Pelvic Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang W, Brown KGM, Koh C, Karunaratne S, Solomon M, Beckenkamp PR, Cole R, Steffens D. Outcome Heterogeneity in Prehabilitation Trials-Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges? J Surg Res 2024; 296:366-375. [PMID: 38306943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the last decade, the number of prehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has increased significantly. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the outcomes reported in prehabilitation RCTs in patients undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS A search was conducted in Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to July 2021. We included RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in adult oncology patients who underwent thoracic and gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The verbatim outcomes reported in each article were extracted, and each outcome was assessed to determine whether it was defined and measured using a validated tool. Verbatim outcomes were grouped into standardized outcomes and categorized into domains. The quality of outcome reporting in each identified article was assessed using the Harman tool (score range 0-6, where 0 indicated the poorest quality). RESULTS A total of 74 RCTs were included, from which 601 verbatim outcomes were extracted. Only 110 (18.3%) of the verbatim outcomes were defined and 270 (44.9%) were labeled as either "primary" or "secondary" outcomes. Verbatim outcomes were categorized into 119 standardized outcomes and assigned into one of five domains (patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, physical/functional outcomes, disease activity, and intervention delivery). Surgical outcomes were the most common outcomes reported (n = 71 trials, 95.9%). The overall quality of the reported outcomes was poor across trials (median score: 2.0 [IQR = 0.00-3.75]). CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation RCTs display considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and low outcome reporting quality. The development of standardized core outcome sets may help improve article quality and enhance the clinical utility of prehabilitation following cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Jiang
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kilian G M Brown
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sascha Karunaratne
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula R Beckenkamp
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Ruby Cole
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown KGM, Pisaniello J, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Sutton PA, Hatcher S, Steffens D. Variation in outcome measurement and reporting in studies of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:272-280. [PMID: 38131647 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
AIM There is increasing research interest in pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting can prevent meaningful interpretation and valid synthesis of pooled data and meta-analyses. The aim of this study was to assess homogeneity in outcome measures in the current pelvic exenteration literature. METHOD MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched from 1990 to 25 April 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. All reported outcomes were extracted, merged with those of similar meaning and assigned a domain. RESULTS Of 4137 abstracts screened, 156 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2765 outcomes were reported, of which 17% were accompanied by a definition. There were 1157 unique outcomes, merged into 84 standardized outcomes and assigned one of seven domains. The most reported domains were complications (147 studies, 94%), survival (127, 81%) and surgical outcomes (123, 79%). Resection margins were reported in 122 studies (78%): the definition of a clear resection margin was not provided in 45 studies (37%), it was unclear in 11 studies (9%) and not specified beyond microscopically 'clear' or 'negative' in 31 (28%). Measurements of 2, 1, 0.5 mm and any healthy tissue were all used to define R0 margins. CONCLUSION There is significant heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting in the current pelvic exenteration literature, raising concerns about the validity of comparative or collaborative studies between centres and meta-analyses. Coordinated international collaboration is required to define core outcome sets and benchmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian G M Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jade Pisaniello
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A Sutton
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sophie Hatcher
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Axelsson A, Johansson M, Haglind E, Li Y, Nilsson PJ, Angenete E. Patient reported long-term side effects on bowel function and anal pain in anal cancer survivors - 3- and 6-year results from the Swedish national ANCA study. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:54-62. [PMID: 38010060 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM The primary therapeutic option for anal cancer treatment is chemoradiotherapy resulting in 80% survival. The aim of this study was to assess long-term bowel function impairment and anal pain at 3 and 6 years after anal cancer diagnosis, based on a hypothesis of an increase in impairment over time. A secondary aim was to investigate if chemoradiotherapy increased the risk for bowel impairment, compared to radiotherapy alone. METHOD The ANal CAncer study (ANCA) consists of a national Swedish cohort of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 2011-2013. Patients within the study were invited to respond to a study-specific questionnaire at 3- and 6-years after diagnosis. Descriptive analyses for the primary endpoint and ordinal logistic regressions for secondary endpoint were performed. RESULTS A total of 388 patients (84%) were included in the study. At 3 years of follow-up, 264 patients were alive. A total of 195 of these patients (74%) answered a study specific questionnaire, and at 6 years 154 patients (67%). Fifty-seven percent experienced bowel urgency at both 3 and 6 years. There was an increased risk for repeated bowel movement within 1 h (OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.08-5.61, p = 0.03]) at 3 years in patients who had been treated by chemoradiation compared to radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS Impairment in bowel function and anal pain after anal cancer treatment should be expected and remains after 6 years. This suggests that long-term follow-up may be necessary in some form after customary follow-up. The addition of chemotherapy increases long-term side effects of bowel function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Axelsson
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mia Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Haglind
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lefèvre AC, Serup-Hansen E, Storm KS, Wind KL, Kronborg C, Spindler KLG. One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1165-1177. [PMID: 36179989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. RESULTS Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cecilie Lefèvre
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Karen Lycke Wind
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamzeh H, Spencer S, Kelly C, Pilsworth S. Evaluation of outcome reporting in clinical trials of physiotherapy in bronchiectasis: The first stage of core outcome set development. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282393. [PMID: 36928192 PMCID: PMC10019700 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to explore outcomes currently reported in physiotherapy trials for bronchiectasis and investigate the level of consistency in outcome reporting. This mapping of outcomes will be used to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS) for physiotherapy research in bronchiectasis. Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and RCT protocols were reviewed and evaluated. We included trials with physiotherapy as the main intervention, including pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise prescription, airway clearance, positive expiratory pressure devices, breathing training, self-management plans, and home exercise program. Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) were searched from inception using a prespecified search strategy. Records including adult patients with bronchiectasis were included. Outcomes were listed verbatim and categorised into domains based on a pre-specified system, frequency of reporting and sources of variation were inspected. RESULTS Of 2158 abstracts screened, 37 trials (1202 participants) and 17 trial protocols were identified. Eighteen different physiotherapy techniques were investigated. A total of 331 outcomes were reported. No single outcome was reported by all trials. The most reported outcomes were lung function (27 trials, 50%), health related quality of life (26 trials, 48.1%), and dyspnoea (18 trials, 33.3%). A list of 104 unique outcomes covering 23 domains was created. Trials focus on physiological outcomes, mainly those related to respiratory system functions. Outcomes related to functioning and life impact are often neglected. CONCLUSION Outcome reporting in physiotherapy research for bronchiectasis was found to be inconsistent in terms of choosing and defining outcomes. Developing a core outcome set in this area of research is needed to facilitate aggregation of future trial results in systematic reviews that will in turn inform the strength of evidence for the effectiveness of physiotherapy. Outcome choice should include all stakeholders, including patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered in the PROSPERO registry under the number CRD42021266247.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayat Hamzeh
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Spencer
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
- Cardio-Respiratory Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Kelly
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
- Cardio-Respiratory Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Pilsworth
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dames NB, Keller DS. The lived experience. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:1613-1615. [PMID: 36111427 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola B Dames
- Association of Coloprotology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI), Patient Liaison Group (PLG), Glasgow/Oxford, UK
| | - Deborah S Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Monsrud AL, Avadhani V, Mosunjac MB, Flowers L, Krishnamurti U. Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression Is Associated With Poorer Survival in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:1094-1101. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0169-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Context.—
Upregulation of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), an immunoregulatory protein, is associated with an adverse outcome in several malignancies. Very few studies have evaluated PD-L1 expression in invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC).
Objective.—
To assess PD-L1 expression in patients with ASCC and correlate it with clinicopathologic factors and clinical outcomes.
Design.—
Fifty-one cases of ASCC were immunostained for PD-L1. PD-L1 expression by combined positive score and tumor proportion score was correlated with age, gender, HIV status, HIV viral load, CD4 count, stage, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors (2-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant).
Results.—
PD-L1 was positive in 24 of 51 cases (47%) by combined positive score and in 18 of 51 (35%) by tumor proportion score. The median cancer-specific survival and 5-year overall survival were significantly lower in PD-L1+ patients. Age, gender, HIV status, HIV viral load, stage, and cancer progression were not significantly different between the two groups. CD4 count of more than 200/μL was significantly higher in PD-L1+ patients. PD-L1+ status remained statistically significant for worse overall survival on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions.—
PD-L1+ status is an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in ASCC. This study highlights the potential of PD-L1 targeted therapy in better management of ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L. Monsrud
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Monsrud, Avadhani, Mosunjac, Krishnamurti), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Vaidehi Avadhani
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Monsrud, Avadhani, Mosunjac, Krishnamurti), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Marina B. Mosunjac
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Monsrud, Avadhani, Mosunjac, Krishnamurti), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa Flowers
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics (Flowers), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Uma Krishnamurti
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Monsrud, Avadhani, Mosunjac, Krishnamurti), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Krishnamurti is now with the Department of Pathology at Yale School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lefèvre AC, Pallisgaard N, Kronborg C, Wind KL, Krag SRP, Spindler KLG. The Clinical Value of Measuring Circulating HPV DNA during Chemo-Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102451. [PMID: 34070045 PMCID: PMC8158133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is investigated in various cancers. In squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) is found in around 90% of cases and here, plasma HPV (pHPV) can be used as ctDNA. Preliminary data have proved the ability to detect pHPV16 and -18 in SCCA. We have developed a highly sensitive method for measurement of six relevant pHPV subtypes, to investigate the elimination pattern of pHPV during chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for SCCA and its clinical value. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients treated at Aarhus University Hospital from 2016-2020 were included. P16 status in the primary biopsy was measured and 82% of patients had P16 positive tumor. Blood samples were collected prior to treatment (PT), mid treatment (MT), end of therapy (EOT), and during follow-up (FU). An in-house multiplex digital droplet PCR method measured pHPV subtypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 51, 58. RESULTS Samples from 88 patients were drawn PT (n = 73), MT (n = 72), EOT (n = 64) and during FU (n = 41). Plasma HPV was detectable in 52 patients and PT pHPV levels correlated to tumor stages. Three elimination patterns were observed during CRT with correlation to outcome: fast responders with no local or distant failures (0/12); slow responders with high risk of local failures (4/20), no distant failures; persistent molecular responders with high risk of distant failures (4/13), but no local failures, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION During CRT, pHPV can divide patients with SCCA into three groups with significantly different risk of failure. The use of pHPV can potentially assist in clinical treatment decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C. Lefèvre
- Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (A.C.L.); (K.L.W.)
| | - Niels Pallisgaard
- Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;
| | | | - Karen L. Wind
- Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (A.C.L.); (K.L.W.)
| | - Søren R. P. Krag
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark;
| | - Karen-Lise G. Spindler
- Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (A.C.L.); (K.L.W.)
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Farmer N, Hillier M, Kilby MD, Hodgetts-Morton V, Morris RK. Outcomes in intervention and management of multiple pregnancies trials: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 261:178-192. [PMID: 33964726 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Twin pregnancy has risks of adverse outcomes for mother and baby. Data synthesis is required to gain evidence to aid recommendations but may be hampered by variations in outcome reporting. STUDY DESIGN Systematically review outcomes reported in twin pregnancy trials (PROSPERO - CRD42019133805). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Cochrane library (inception-January 2019) for randomised control trials or their follow-up studies reporting prediction, prognosis, intervention or management outcomes in twin pregnancy. The study characteristics, outcomes definitions and measurements were extracted and descriptively analysed. RESULTS 49 RCTs and 8 follow-up studies evaluated 21 interventions, 1257 outcomes, categorised into 170 unique outcomes. 65 % of trials included all twin pregnancies, 12 % DCDA and 11 % MCDA only or MCMA and MCDA. Five (9 %) papers were prediction/ prognosis RCT's and 52 (91 %) related to an intervention. Of interventions, 40 (77 %) were medical, 34 (85 %) for preterm birth; 12 (23 %) surgical, 6 (50 %) related to TTTS interventions (83 % for monochrorionic studies). Commonest domains were: 'Neonatal' 77 %, 'Delivery' 70 % and 'Survival' 67 %. Least reported were longer term outcomes for 'Infant' or 'Parental'. CONCLUSIONS Twin pregnancy outcomes are diverse and complex. This is related to the need to address maternal, single and double fetal outcomes and different types of chorionicity. The lack of outcome standardisation in selection, definition and reporting hinders evidence synthesis and the selection of outcomes important to women and health care professionals thus limiting the effectiveness of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Farmer
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Mark D Kilby
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Victoria Hodgetts-Morton
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Katie Morris
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081902. [PMID: 33920873 PMCID: PMC8071256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment in anal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was proved to reduce severe, acute and late toxicities. Moreover, IMRT techniques allow for the planning and delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), with a differential dose per fraction given to selected sub-regions during the same treatment session. This boost modality provides the chance to employ a dose-painted approach with a reduction in overall treatment time that could result in a potential clinical advantage. Since a large variability in dose prescription to the primary tumor and elective or involved lymph nodes can be found in available guidelines and clinical practice, a multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and the impact of radiotherapy parameters on clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients treated with IMRT techniques within a national cohort. Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu M, Gao Y, Yuan Y, Shi S, Yang K, Lu C, Wu J, Zhang J, Tian J. Inconsistency and low transparency were found between core outcome set protocol and full text publication: a comparative study. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 131:59-69. [PMID: 33227446 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to assess inconsistencies between individual protocols and associated full-text publications in the development of core outcome sets (COSs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Protocols and subsequent full-text publications were retrieved by searching the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database from inception to October 1, 2019. We summarized changes in the general and methodological characteristics by comparing the protocols with the full-text publications and reported change as information frequency and proportion. RESULTS A total of 24 protocols and 32 corresponding full-text publications that encompassed 14 study topics were identified from databases. In the identified initial list of outcomes, five COSs (20.8%) changed the included study type, none of which explained the reasons for these changes. In addition, eight COSs showed inconsistencies between the protocols and full-text publications in the searched databases, of which, only two studies explained the reasons for these changes. Compared with the protocols, three COSs changed the number of Delphi rounds, eight COSs changed the participants (stakeholder groups), and three COSs changed the consensus definition of the Delphi survey. Only two COSs explained the reason for changing the number of Delphi rounds, and none of the studies explained why the participants changed. For the face-to-face consensus meeting, we found that nine COSs changed the participants and none explained the reasons for these changes. CONCLUSION Our study found many inconsistencies between protocols and the full-text publications concerning COS development. These inconsistencies related to the included study types, databases searched, Delphi surveys, and face-to-face consensus meetings. As it is necessary to publish protocols before developing COSs, transparency regarding any changes to the methods is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Liu
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Yuan Yuan
- Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Shuzhen Shi
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Kelu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Cuncun Lu
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Jiarui Wu
- Department of Clinical Chinese Pharmacy, School of Chinese Materia Medical, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100105, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China.
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Werner RN, Gaskins M, Dressler C, Nast A, Schaefer C, Aigner F, Siegel R. Measuring importance of outcomes to patients: a cross-sectional survey for the German anal cancer guideline. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 129:40-50. [PMID: 32987160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to generate evidence on patients' values and preferences to inform the development of the German national Evidence-based Anal Cancer Guideline. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We developed a list of health outcomes based on a systematic search. We then asked anal cancer patients and experts of the guideline development group in an online survey to (a) rate the relative importance of the outcomes in different clinical situations using a nine-point, three-category scale, and (b) select seven outcomes they considered most important for decision-making in each situation. RESULTS Participants rated almost half of the outcomes (45%) as critical for decision-making, and more than half (53%) as important. Only two outcomes (2%) were rated as low in importance. Agreement between expert and patient ratings was low to fair, and we found important discrepancies in how the relative importance of the outcomes was perceived. However, the rankings of outcomes were highly correlated. CONCLUSION Determining the relative importance placed by anal cancer patients on outcomes provided useful information for developing guideline recommendations. Our approach may be useful for guideline developers who aim to include the patient perspective. Moreover, our findings may help health professionals caring for anal cancer patients in joint decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo N Werner
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Venerology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Matthew Gaskins
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Venerology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Corinna Dressler
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Venerology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Nast
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Venerology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Corinna Schaefer
- German Agency for Quality in Medicine (AEZQ), Department of Evidence Based Medicine and Guidelines, Department of Patient Information, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Aigner
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital (Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder) Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Robert Siegel
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany; Department of Visceral, Vascular, and Transplantation Surgery, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lefèvre AC, Kronborg C, Sørensen BS, Krag SRP, Serup-Hansen E, Spindler KLG. Measurement of circulating free DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and relation to risk factors and recurrence. Radiother Oncol 2020; 150:211-216. [PMID: 32622778 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring circulating-free-deoxyribonucleic-acid (cfDNA) has created a new framework for personalized treatment in oncology. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between cfDNA and risk factors and outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). METHODS Patients treated with radiotherapy for localized SCCA were included in Aarhus, Denmark from 2016 to 2019. Serum samples from baseline, during and after therapy, were measured for the level of cfDNA in copies per mL by a direct fluorescent assay. RESULTS Eighty patients were included. Samples were available at baseline (n = 73) mid-therapy (n = 74), end-therapy (n = 67) and one-year follow-up (1Y) (n = 29). P16-positivity was found in 89% (n = 55). The median level of cfDNA was higher for P16 negative tumors (1.48) compared with the P16 positive tumors (0.90, P = 0.04). Data showed a correlation between baseline cfDNA levels and Gross Tumor Volume (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.01), and increasing levels with increasing T-stage (T1 = 0.80, T2 = 0.94, T3 = 1.11, T4 = 1.3). Higher cfDNA levels were observed in patients with poor performance status (P < 0.01). The cfDNA level decreased from baseline to mid-therapy (0.92-0.78, P < 0.01) and from baseline to 1Y (0.92-0.71, P < 0.01). Baseline levels for patients with treatment failure (n = 8) were above the 25th percentile (p = 0.05) which translates into difference in disease free survival. CONCLUSION Results indicate an association between baseline cfDNA levels and risk factors in SCCA and a low baseline level correlates to lower risk of treatment failure. Findings contribute with new knowledge of the biological role of cfDNA in SCCA and holds potential knowledge for personalized treatment of SCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review With advances in radiation therapy (RT) techniques for rectal and anal cancers allowing for the modulation of critical normal tissues, there has been an increased emphasis on improving the quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the impact of RT on QOL and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to better inform providers about the challenges of survivorship. Recent Findings Large systematic reviews, recent studies and long-term follow-up of pivotal clinical trials have shown that RT impacts QOL, particularly fecal continence and sexual function. Modern preoperative RT techniques allow for decreased dose to organs-at-risk will likely improve QOL. Summary RT, though critical in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer, has a profound impact on QOL for some patients. Recent studies have included PROs and validated QOL metrics to better inform providers and patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown PJ, Zhong J, Frood R, Currie S, Gilbert A, Appelt AL, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scarsbrook A. Prediction of outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma using radiomic feature analysis of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2790-2799. [PMID: 31482428 PMCID: PMC6879433 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04495-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is increasing, with curative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary treatment of non-metastatic disease. A significant proportion of patients have locoregional treatment failure (LRF), but distant relapse is uncommon. Accurate prognostication of progression-free survival (PFS) would help personalisation of CRT regimens. The study aim was to evaluate novel imaging pre-treatment features, to prognosticate for PFS in ASCC. METHODS Consecutive patients with ASCC treated with curative intent at a large tertiary referral centre who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT were included. Radiomic feature extraction was performed using LIFEx software on baseline FDG-PET/CT. Outcome data (PFS) was collated from electronic patient records. Elastic net regularisation and feature selection were used for logistic regression model generation on a randomly selected training cohort and applied to a validation cohort using TRIPOD guidelines. ROC-AUC analysis was used to compare performance of a regression model encompassing standard clinical prognostic factors (age, sex, tumour and nodal stage-model A), a radiomic feature model (model B) and a combined radiomic/clinical model (model C). RESULTS A total of 189 patients were included in the study, with 145 in the training cohort and 44 in the validation cohort. Median follow-up was 35.1 and 37. 9 months, respectively for each cohort, with 70.3% and 68.2% reaching this time-point with PFS. GLCM entropy (a measure of randomness of distribution of co-occurring pixel grey-levels), NGLDM busyness (a measure of spatial frequency of changes in intensity between nearby voxels of different grey-level), minimum CT value (lowest HU within the lesion) and SMTV (a standardized version of MTV) were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model, alongside tumour and nodal stage. AUCs for performance of model A (clinical), B (radiomic) and C (radiomic/clinical) were 0.6355, 0.7403, 0.7412 in the training cohort and 0.6024, 0.6595, 0.7381 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION Radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT in patients with ASCC may provide better PFS prognosis than conventional staging parameters. With external validation, this might be useful to help personalise CRT regimens in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - J Zhong
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - R Frood
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - S Currie
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Gilbert
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A L Appelt
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Scarsbrook
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Young AE, Brookes ST, Avery KN, Davies A, Metcalfe C, Blazeby JM. A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 115:14-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
20
|
Fish R, Sanders C, Adams R, Brewer J, Brookes ST, DeNardo J, Kochhar R, Saunders MP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Williamson PR, Renehan AG. A core outcome set for clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy interventions for anal cancer (CORMAC): a patient and health-care professional consensus. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:865-873. [PMID: 30507470 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30264-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, but variations in the reported outcomes have restricted between-study comparisons. Treatment-related morbidity is considerable; however, no trial has comprehensively quantified long-term side-effects or quality of life. Therefore, we established the first international health-care professional and patient consensus to develop a core outcome set, using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials method. We used the results from our previous systematic review and combined them in this Review with patient interviews to derive a comprehensive list of outcomes, followed by a two-round Delphi survey completed by 149 participants (55 patients and 94 health-care professionals) from 11 countries. The Delphi results were discussed at a consensus meeting of health-care professionals and patients. Agreement was reached on 19 outcomes across four domains: disease activity, survival, toxicity, and life impact. Implementation of the Core Outcome Research Measures in Anal Cancer (CORMAC) set in future trials will serve as a framework to achieve standardisation, facilitate selection of health-area-specific evaluation tools, reduce redundancy of outcome lists, allow between-study comparisons, and ultimately enhance the relevance of trial findings to health-care professionals, trialists, and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Fish
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Caroline Sanders
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Julie Brewer
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sara T Brookes
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jill DeNardo
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rohit Kochhar
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark P Saunders
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paula R Williamson
- Medical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre and National Institute for Health Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|