Persistent involvement of anterior mesorectal fascia in carcinoma rectum - extended resection of rectum vs total pelvic exenteration: results from a single-centre retrospective study

Abdominoperineal Resection for T4 Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy-Are the Outcomes Acceptable?

INTRODUCTION

There is no clear consensus on using the response MRI as opposed to the pretreatment MRI for surgical planning in cT4 low rectal cancer. The objective of this study is to determine the safety of using response MRI in surgical planning for T4 rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of abdominoperineal resections conducted at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients undergoing an abdominoperineal resection were divided into 2 groups: group A (clinical T3, mesorectal fascia positive) and group B (clinical T4), and propensity matching was used to account for uneven distribution of baseline characteristics. Primary outcome was the rate of pathological circumferential resection margin positivity. Secondary outcomes were survival outcomes and recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

There were 237 patients in group A and 127 in group B, in the unmatched cohort, with a significantly higher number of females (43.3% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.005) and anterior circumferential resection margin positivity (68.5% vs. 49%, p < 0.001), with a lower number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in group B (38.6% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.041). After propensity matching baseline characters were comparable. There was a higher percentage of extended-total mesorectal excisions in group B (58.5% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.004). The rate of pathological circumferential positivity was comparable in both groups (20/168 in group A {11.9%} vs. 13/107 in group B {12.1%}, p = 0.951) with no impact of group on circumferential resection margin positivity on univariate (OR 1.023, p = 0.951) or multivariate regression (OR 0.993, p = 0.987). Both the DFS (median DFS 39 months vs. 54 months, p = 0.970) and OS (3-year OS 72% vs. 67%, p = 0.798) were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

For T4 low rectal cancers, post-treatment MRI can be used for surgical planning without any detriment in pathological or long-term oncological outcomes.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-02028-3.

Outcomes of extended total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

Extended total mesorectal excision (eTME) is a complex procedure involving en bloc resection of the structures surrounding the various quadrants of the rectum. This study, presenting the largest series so far of patients undergoing eTME, aimed to assess the surgical and survival outcomes of patients following treatment with eTME and to compare these outcomes with historical data on pelvic exenteration.

METHOD

The study is a retrospective review of all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring an eTME (2014-2020). The database includes the demographic profile, operative details, histopathological features and follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty three patients who underwent eTME were analysed. The overall Clavien-Dindo complication rate of > IIIa was 21.1%. The anterior quadrant was the most common anatomical site resected (68.5%). The R1 resection rate was 10.4%. After a median follow-up of 28 months, there were 51 recurrences in the study and twenty two deaths were recorded. The local recurrence rate was 7.3% among the study population. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 66.7% and 80.4%, respectively, at 3 years. The majority of the recurrences were distant metastasis (84.3%). In univariate analysis, the quadrant involved did not affect survival. In multivariate analysis, signet ring histology, metastatic presentation, inadequate tumour response and R1 resection affected DFS.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence pattern, R1 resection rate and survival outcomes of patients in the present study were comparable with those for patients undergoing an exenteration. Therefore, eTME is probably a safe alternative to pelvic exenterations when R0 resection is achievable and when the procedure is performed in high-volume specialist tertiary care centres.

Fascial space priority approach for laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with intent to achieve a pathological R0 resection is now considered as the only chance of a long-term survival for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) invading into adjacent organs. Lately, laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) is performed and achieved in several specialized centers and showed a promising application prospect. Although this is universally realized by surgeons, there are only few specialized centers to perform this complex surgery, due to concerns about the high morbidity and mortality. The techniques associated need to be disclosed and facilitated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to introduce a fascial space priority approach for laparoscopic TPE step by step (with video).

METHODS

We describe here a fascial space priority approach for LTPE in highly selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The main principle of this approach is that all of the pelvic organs are considered as a whole, the non-vascular spaces surrounding it are separated in the first place, the vascular pedicle and nerve pedicle of pelvic organs can be isolated and then transected precisely. Meanwhile, the associated key landmarks of this approach are disclosed (see the video).

RESULTS

The ureterohypogastric nerve fascia (UHGNF) and the vesicohypogastric fascia (VHGF) are two vital embryological planes on the lateral compartment of pelvis. The spaces on either side of them together with the retrorectal space, the space of Retzius, are all non-vascular spaces, and dissection of these spaces in LTPE surgery can be achieved simply and practicably. The ureter, the umbilical artery, the arcus tendinous fasciae pelvis (ATFP), piriformis and the puboprostatic ligament (PPL) are all important landmarks during surgery. Step-by-step illustration with precise anatomical landmarks in the present video may lead to less intraoperative blood loss and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LTPE with fascial space priority approach might be a standard surgical procedure for total pelvic exenteration with clear anatomy and reduced blood loss.

State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers

Extended and beyond total mesorectal excisions (TME) for advanced and recurrent rectal cancers are increasingly performed with acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. These are undoubtedly due to better understanding of tumor biology and improved patient selection rather than surgical valor and technical refinements alone. In the present review, we attempt to present the current surgical standards for advanced and recurrent cancers requiring surgery outside the TME planes based on involved pelvic compartments. The available procedures, their indications, and extent of resection and reconstruction are highlighted. Emphasis is on formation of dedicated exenteration teams, structured training, and referral systems that increase hospital and surgeon volume to improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity. Areas of deficiencies in literature were recognized with regards to factors influencing recurrences, patient selection, and quality of life. Finally, the most appropriate preoperative therapy for these tumors is unclear in both the primary and recurrent settings.

Outcomes of exenteration in cT4 and fixed cT3 stage primary rectal adenocarcinoma: a subgroup analysis of consolidation chemotherapy following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the oncological outcomes and the prognostic factors following pelvic exenteration (PE) in cT4 and fixed cT3 stage primary rectal adenocarcinoma and to study the impact of consolidation chemotherapy following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of PE from 2013 to 2018.

RESULTS

Out of 2900 colorectal resections, there were 131 pelvic exenterations that were performed, and 100 of these patients had undergone exenteration for primary rectal adenocarcinoma. Of these 100 patients, there were 81 patients who had received NACRT followed by surgery, 50 of whom who had received consolidation chemotherapy and 31 who had undergone surgery without consolidation chemotherapy. R0 resection was achieved in 90% cases. At a median follow-up of 32 months, 2-year disease free survival was 61.8% and estimated 5-year overall survival was 62%. The incidence of distant metastases was 44% vs. 19% (p = 0.023), and the 2-year distant recurrence-free survival was 58% vs. 89% (p = 0.025), respectively, in the 'consolidation chemotherapy group' and the 'no chemotherapy group'. The poorly differentiated grade of tumours, presence of lympho-vascular-invasion, consolidation chemotherapy, and disease recurrence were all found to affect the survival.

CONCLUSION

PE with R0 resection achieves excellent survival rates in cT4 and fixed cT3 stage primary rectal adenocarcinoma. The distant recurrence rate may not be altered by consolidation chemotherapy in the subset of high-risk patients. However, further research on consolidation chemotherapy following NACRT in cT4 and fixed cT3 stage primary rectal adenocarcinoma will give a definite answer in the future.

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with en-bloc seminal vesicle and prostate resection for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) combined with en-bloc seminal vesicle resection (SVR) and partial prostate resection (PPR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Patients receiving TME combined with en-bloc SVR and PPR for LARC after CRT from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled retrospectively. Patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of six male patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, four patients proved to be T4b stage including three Denonvilliers fascia invasion and one seminal vesicle invasion. R0 resection was achieved in all patients. With a median follow-up time of 24 months, no local recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSION

It is safe and feasible to perform laparoscopic TME combined with en-bloc SVR and PPR in selected LARC patients after neoadjuvant CRT. It can provide a safe circumferential resection margin and R0 resection. More studies are warranted to improve the diagnostic accuracy for T4b stage after CRT and avoid unnecessary extended resection.