SPECC: concept, clinical relevance and application

Substratifying the risk of covert malignancy in significant rectal polyps: Outcomes from a specialist multidisciplinary team (MDT)

AIM

A treatment strategy for patients with a significant polyp or early colon cancer (SPECC) of the rectum presents a challenge due to the significant rate of covert malignancy and lack of standardized assessment. For this reason, NICE recommends multidisciplinary meetings to improve outcomes. The primary aim of the present study was to report the performance of our specialist early rectal cancer (SERC) multidisciplinary team (MDT) in correctly substratifying the risk of cancer and to discuss the limitations of staging investigations in those patients with "poor outcomes".

METHOD

This was a retrospective review of patients referred to our SERC MDT from 2014 to 2019. Lesions were assigned by the MDT to three pre-resection categories (low, intermediate, high) according to the risk of covert malignancy. Resection method and final histology were compared to the pre-resection categories.

RESULTS

Of 350 SPECC lesions, 174 were assessed as low-risk, 108 intermediate-risk and 68 high-risk. The cancer incidence was 4.8%, 8.3% and 53%, respectively (15.5% overall). Eight lesions were categorized as low-risk but following piecemeal resection were found to be malignant. Five lesions, three of which were categorized as high-risk, were ultimately benign following conventional surgery. One pT1sm1 cancer, removed by anterior resection, may have been treated by local excision.

CONCLUSION

A total of 83% of malignant polyps were triaged to an en bloc resection technique and surgical resection avoided for nearly all benign lesions. However, 12 patients from this cohort were deemed to have a poor outcome because of miscategorization. Further comparative research is needed to establish the optimum strategy for rectal SPECC lesion assessment.

ORIGINALITY STATEMENT

There is currently no consensus for staging significant polyps of the rectum. This paper reports the effectiveness of a specialist early rectal cancer MDT to correctly risk-stratify significant rectal polyps. It underscores the importance of accurate categorization for treatment decision-making, while acknowledging the limitations of current staging modalities.

Participants' experiences of the management of screen-detected complex polyps within a structured bowel cancer screening programme

Background

The Bowel Screening Wales complex polyp removal service was introduced to address variations in surgery rates for screen‐detected complex benign colorectal polyps, to improve the quality of the screening service and to make management of these polyps more equitable across Wales. Little is known about patient experiences and the potential impact on quality of life when undergoing complex polyp removal. This study is part of a wider research programme evaluating the decision‐making, pathways and outcomes from complex polyp removal.

Objective

This study aimed to understand experiences of having a complex polyp removed and how this may influence quality of life.

Design

Semi‐structured telephone interviews were conducted, and a thematic approach was used for data analysis.

Setting and Participants

All participants had a complex polyp removed after a positive stool test and review by Bowel Screening Wales' Network Multi‐Disciplinary Team.

Results

Twenty‐one participants were interviewed. Most participants had their complex polyps removed endoscopically and reported no or minor problems or negative outcomes following their procedure. For a small minority, worse problems (e.g., pain, bowel dysfunction) and negative outcomes (e.g., cancer) followed their procedures. Most participants felt supported and reassured throughout their procedures. Any physical and emotional changes to quality of life were mainly linked to procedure outcomes.

Discussion

Experiences of complex polyp removal were generally positive, with minimal changes in quality of life.

Conclusions

While most people had a positive experience of having a complex polyp removed, support initiatives, such as counselling or signposting to coping strategies, may be helpful to reduce any potential negative effects of procedures on quality of life.

Patient or Public Contribution

Four patient and public involvement partners provided feedback on participant materials.

Management of Significant Polyp and Early Colorectal Cancer Is Optimized by Implementation of a Dedicated Multidisciplinary Team Meeting: Lessons Learned From the United Kingdom National Program

BACKGROUND

The concept of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer encompasses complex polyps not amenable to routine snare polypectomy or where malignancy cannot be excluded. The assessment and management of these lesions is contentious and increasingly important due to the significant risk of over- or undertreatment.

OBJECTIVE

Following the recommendations of the Significant Polyps and Early Colorectal Cancer National Program, we implemented a dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting and analyzed the influence on patient outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected database of patients discussed at the dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a single tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with significant polyps and early colorectal cancer were identified either through the Bowel Cancer Screening Program or colonoscopy for symptomatic patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of patients who had organ preservation, and secondary treatment and recurrence rate served as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 135 patients discussed at the dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting were included, with a median age of 71 years. Median size of the lesions was 25 mm, and 39% were in the rectum. Patients were discussed either after the lesion was removed during the initial colonoscopy (n = 38), of whom 16 (42%) had unexpected cancer, or had no initial treatment with subsequent case review (n = 97). Of these 97 patients, 46 underwent endoscopic excision (26% cancer), 20 trans-anal excision (10% cancer), 23 primary surgical resection (35% cancer), and 8 had no treatment. In 104 (82%) patients, organ preservation was achieved. Secondary surgery was required in 7 of 104 (6.7%) patients after local excision due to radical treatment of high-risk T1 lesions, local recurrence, or patients' decisions. The cumulative hazard estimates for recurrence after a median follow-up of 18.5 months was less than 10% for both benign and malignant lesions.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its relatively small sample size and single-center setting.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting improved the management of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer, safely refining organ preservation for patients, with low recurrence rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B826.

MANEJO DE SPECC PLIPO COMPLEJO Y CNCER COLORRECTAL TEMPRANO ES OPTIMIZADO MEDIANTE LA IMPLEMENTACIN DE REUNIONES DE UN EQUIPO MULTIDISCIPLINARIO ESPECIALIZADOS LECCIONES APRENDIDAS DEL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DEL REINO UNIDO

ANTECEDENTES:El concepto de pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano abarca engloba pólipos avanzados que no es posible la reseccion endoscopica rutinaria, o aquellos en los que no se puede excluir malignidad. La evaluación y el manejo de estas lesiones es controversial y cada vez más importante debido al riesgo significativo de ser tratadas o no.OBJETIVO:Siguiendo las recomendaciones del Programa Nacional de Pólipos Complejos y Cáncer Colorrectal Temprano, implementamos reuniónes del equipo multidisciplinario especializado y analizamos el impacto en los resultados de los pacientes.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo sobre una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente de los pacientes discutidos en la reunión del equipo multidisciplinario especializado.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano identificado a través del Programa de detección de cáncer intestinal o colonoscopia para pacientes sintomáticos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Proporción de pacientes que tuvieron preservación de órganos, tratamiento secundario y tasa de recurrencia.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 135 pacientes discutidos en la reunión del equipo multidisciplinario especializado dedicada, con una media de edad de 71 años. El tamaño medio de las lesiones fue de 25 mm y el 39% estaban en el recto. Se discutio de los pacientes después de que se resecara la lesión durante la colonoscopia inicial [n = 38, de los cuales 16 (42%) tenían un cáncer imprevisto] o no recibieron tratamiento de inicio, con revisión posterior del caso (n = 97). De estos, 46/97 fueron sometidos a resección endoscópica (26% cáncer), 20/97 resección transanal (10% cáncer), 23/97 resección quirúrgica primaria (35% cáncer) y 8/97 no recibieron tratamiento. En 104 (82%) pacientes, se logró la preservación de órgano. Cirugía secundaria fue requeria en 7/104 (6,7%) pacientes después de la resección local debido a tratamiento radical de lesiones T1 de alto riesgo, recidiva local o decisión del paciente. Las estimaciones de riesgo acumulativo de recurrencia después de una media de seguimiento de 18,5 meses fue inferior al 10% tanto para las lesiones benignas como para las malignas.LIMITACIONES:Tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y entorno de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:La Reunion del equipo multidisciplinario especializado mejoró el manejo de los pólipos complejos y cáncer colorrectal temprano, refinando de manera segura la preservación de órganos para los pacientes, con bajas tasas de recurrencia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B826. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Concepts and prospects of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery

It is important that clinical radiologists understand and appreciate the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) options available to surgeons. Operative technologies are constantly evolving, and accurate, informed interpretation of clinical imaging is essential for optimum surgical management. Concurrent advancements in both MIS and radiological staging have certainly improved treatment decisions and outcomes. This article outlines the history, current concepts, evolving techniques, and future prospects of MIS as it pertains to colorectal cancer surgery.

The utility of preoperative radiological evaluation of early rectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The diagnostic role for preoperative imaging of clinically benign rectal adenomas is unclear. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative imaging in distinguishing benign adenomas from rectal cancer.

METHOD

A systematic search was performed for all studies published that correlated staging of clinically benign rectal adenomas with endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) or MRI and histology. Imaging was compared with postoperative histology and data on the numbers of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives were extracted. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs were calculated using a bivariate random effects model. The QUADAS2 tool was used to determine the methodological quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies describing 1511 patients were retrieved. A total of 1134 patients underwent local excision and 377 had a formal proctectomy. A benign rectal adenoma was diagnosed in 840 and 214 had a T1 rectal cancer. For confirming benign adenomas, the pooled sensitivity of ERUS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.89) and specificity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.93). For detecting occult T1 tumours, the pooled sensitivity of ERUS was 0.50 (95% CI 0.33-0.66) and specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.94). Quantitative analysis of MRI could not be performed due to insufficient studies.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the limited accuracy of preoperative ERUS in distinguishing benign adenomas from T1 rectal cancer. Preoperative imaging must be interpreted with caution to prevent over-staging and unnecessary proctectomy. We propose that clinically benign lesions may undergo local excision, with subsequent management based on final histology.