Endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistula: does flap configuration matter?

Anal Cryptoglandular Suppuration: Evidence-Based Management

Anal suppurative processes are commonly encountered in surgical practice. While the initial therapeutic intervention is philosophically straightforward (incision and drainage), drainage of the appropriate space and treatment of the subsequent fistula in ano require a thorough understanding of perianal anatomy and nuanced decision making. Balancing the risk of fecal incontinence with simple fistulotomy versus the higher risk of fistula recurrence with all sphincter-sparing fistula treatments can be a challenge for surgeons and patients alike.

The bared external anal sphincter (BEAS), a new technique for high horseshoe anal fistula: a hospital-based cohort study

The aim of this study was to introduce a new technique, the bared external anal sphincter technique, and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety for primary or recurrent high horseshoe anal fistula (HHAF). We used data from a tertiary referral hospital's prospective database of a hospital-based cohort. All the patients underwent the bared external anal sphincter procedure. The main outcomes were short-term clinical outcomes including the 6-month cure rate, Visual Analog Scale pain score (VAS-PS) and Cleveland Clinic Florida incontinence score (CCF-IS). The secondary outcomes included the Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire score (QoLAF-QS), Bristol stool chart and postoperative complications. A total of 48 HHAF patients (39 males) with a mean age of 34.2 years (SD 9.04; range, 21-54) were analyzed in this retrospective study. At the 6-month follow-up, the average VAS-PS and CCF-IS were 0.81 (SD 2.28; range, 0-10) and 1.29 (SD 2.87; range, 0-13), respectively. QoLAF-QS showed that the bared external anal sphincter procedure had no impact over their quality of life in 45 patients (93.75%), limited impact in 2 patients (4.16%), and moderate impact in one patient (2.08%). The Bristol stool scale showed that all patients had normal stool characteristics. The 6-month cure rate was 93.75%. Three patients (6.25%) experienced recurrent symptoms but recovered after surgical management. Urinary retention occurred in 1 case (2.78%). No other postoperative complications were reported. No patient had anal incontinence. The bared external anal sphincter procedure is a safe, effective and sphincter-sparing approach for patients with primary or recurrent HHAF in terms of short-term results.

Surgery of Simple and Complex Anal Fistulae in Adults: A Review of the Literature for Optimal Surgical Outcomes

Anal fistulas are common anorectal conditions, and surgery is the primary treatment option. In the last 20 years of literature, there exist a large number of surgical procedures, especially for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, as they present more recurrences and continence problems than simple anal fistulas. To date, there are no guidelines for choosing the best technique. We conducted a recent literature review, mainly the last 20 years, based on the PubMed and Google Scholar medical databases, with the goal of identifying the surgical procedures with the highest success rates, lowest recurrence rates, and best safety profiles. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, review articles, comparative studies, recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various surgical techniques, as well as the latest guidelines of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the German S3 guidelines on simple and complex fistulas were reviewed. According to the literature, there is no recommendation for the optimal surgical technique. The etiology, complexity, and many other factors affect the outcome. In simple intersphincteric anal fistulas, fistulotomy is the procedure of choice. In simple low transsphincteric fistulas, the patient's selection is crucial in order to perform a safe fistulotomy or another sphincter-saving technique. The healing rate in simple anal fistulas is higher than 95% with low recurrence and without significant postoperative complications. In complex anal fistulas, only sphincter-saving techniques should be used; the optimal outcomes are obtained by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) and rectal advancement flaps. Those techniques assure high healing rates of 60-90%. The novel technique of the transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) is under evaluation. The novel sphincter-saving techniques of fistula laser closure (FiLac) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are safe, with reported healing rates ranging from 65% to 90%. Surgeons should be familiar with all sphincter-saving techniques in order to face the variability of the fistulas-in-ano. Currently, there is no universally superior technique that can treat all fistulas.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistulous Tract vs Endorectal Advancement Flap for High-Type Fistula in Ano: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes and success rate of the endorectal advancement flap and ligation of intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) in high-type fistula in ano.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized control trial included patients with high-type fistula in ano of cryptoglandular origin. The primary endpoint was complete fistula healing at the end of 6 months. However, the patients were followed up for 2 years. Other parameters studied were perioperative complications, duration of surgery, postoperative pain, hospital stay in hours, continence, and quality of life at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were recruited (42 in each group). The healing rate in the LIFT arm was better than that in the endorectal advancement flap arm (76.2.% vs 54.7%, p = 0.039). Four patients in the endorectal advancement flap group and two in the LIFT group had flatus incontinence at the end of 6 months, but all were continent at 2 years. At the end of the first week, the Visual Analog Scale score and quality of life at 6 months were better in the LIFT arm (3.7 ± 1.16 vs 4.7 ± 0.81 and 0.7 vs 0.6, p < 0.05). The mean duration of surgery was significantly less in the LIFT group (46.43 ± 9.32 vs 89.29 ± 10.90 minutes). None had any postoperative complications, and >80% were discharged within 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter operative duration, better quality of life at 6 months, and higher healing rate make LIFT a superior treatment option for high fistula in ano. However, studies with a large sample size will be needed to verify these results.

The Value of Transrectal Ultrasound in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Complex Anal Fistula (CAF): Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

A case-control study was employed to retrospectively analyze the value of transrectal ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex anal fistula (CAF).

Methods

The clinical data of 128 patients with CAF treated in our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were examined by transrectal ultrasound and MRI with Hitachi HI Vision Ascendus ultrasound diagnostic apparatus and MRI. The general data of the patients (age, sex, course of disease, complications, and previous operation history) and ultrasonic image characteristics were recorded. The consistency of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess detected by ultrasound, MRI, and ultrasound combined with MRI were compared, and the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of ultrasound, MRI, and the combination of ultrasound and MRI (ultrasound+MRI) in the diagnosis of different Parks classification of anal fistula (AF) were compared.

Results

The ultrasound images of the rectal probe in typical cases were compared with the MRI images. The characteristics of the ultrasound images were as follows: the outer orifice of AF was a thin strip of mixed echo or low echo leading to the skin side, and the inner orifice showed local dilated low echo, mixed echo, or interruption of mucosal continuity. The following are the MRI image features: abnormal long bar signal shadow from the dorsal side of the end of the coccyx to the S5 plane, low signal on T1WI, high signal on T2WI, blurred boundary, uneven signal, bifurcation in the lower end of the tail for "Y" shape, one branch opening at the body surface at about 6 o'clock, the other walking horizontally, passing through the levator ani muscle to the right posterior position of the rectum at about 6:00 o'clock, and penetrating the inner mouth of the rectum at 6 o'clock. The detection of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess were compared by three examination methods. There was significant difference in the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/purulent cavity among the three methods (P < 0.05). The detection rates of internal mouth and branch/abscess cavity by ultrasound and MRI (94.77% and 94.94%) were higher than those by single ultrasound (75.16% and 79.78%) and MRI (81.05% and 83.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of ultrasound, MRI internal orifice, and branch/purulent cavity (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of supervisor and abscess among the three methods (P > 0.05). The results of operation included transsphincter type (n = 53), intersphincter type (n = 45), and superior sphincter type (n = 30). Analysis of transsphincter type AF detected by three methods: 42 cases of transsphincter type AF and 86 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound, 36 cases of transsphincter type AF and 92 cases of nontranssphincter type AF were detected by MRI, 57 cases of transsphincter type AF and 71 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound and MRI. The comparison of the efficacy of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF showed significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (96.23%) was higher than those of single ultrasound (67.92%) and MRI (64.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (P > 0.05). There were 41 cases of intersphincter type AF and 87 cases of nonsphincter type AF detected by ultrasound, 38 cases of intersphincter type AF and 90 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by MRI, and 45 cases of intersphincter type AF and 83 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. The sensitivity and accuracy of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy (100.00% and 100.00%) of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were higher than those of single ultrasound (66.67% and 79.69%) and MRI (71.11% and 85.16%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF (P > 0.05). The results of three methods were compared, including 24 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 89 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF, 21 cases of superior sphincter type AF, and 107 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by MRI and 93 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 128cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of superior sphincter AF (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The sphincter, anorectal, and surrounding tissues were clearly demonstrated by transrectal ultrasound. The internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, abscess, and the relationship between abscess and sphincter in the diagnosis of CAF were in good agreement with the surgical results. Ultrasound+MRI can take into account the advantages of ultrasound and MRI, make up for each other, and improve the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/abscess. It can improve the sensitivity of diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity and accuracy of intersphincter AF, which can provide intuitive and valuable imaging information for surgical intervention.