A systematic review of outcomes after salvage abdominoperineal resection for persistent or recurrent anal squamous cell cancer

Pelvic Exenteration for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Oncological, Morbidity, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Where adjacent pelvic viscera, soft tissues, and bone are involved, pelvic exenteration with a wide perineal excision may be required to ensure clear surgical margins and increase the likelihood of long-term survival.

OBJECTIVE

To report oncological, morbidity, and quality-of-life outcomes of pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma.

DESIGN

Cohort study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration center.

PATIENTS

Those who underwent pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma between 1994 and 2022.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Local recurrence-free and overall survival, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, R0 resection rate, and long-term quality-of-life outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 958 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration, 66 (6.9%) had anal squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) were male and the median age was 57 years (range, 31-79). Ten patients (15%) had primary anal squamous cell carcinoma, 49 (74%) had a recurrent tumor, and 7 (11%) had a re-recurrent tumor. Twenty-two patients (33%) and 16 patients (24%) had a major complication and unplanned return to the operating theater, respectively. Of the 62 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration with curative intent, 50 (81%) had R0 resection, and the 5-year overall and local recurrence-free survival rates were 41% and 37%, respectively. R0 resection was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival (50% vs 8%, p < 0.001). The mental health component scores and several individual quality-of-life domains presented improved trajectories postoperatively (all p values <0.05).

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the findings outside specialist pelvic exenteration centers may be limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity, long-term survival, and quality-of-life outcomes after pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma are comparable to published outcomes of pelvic exenteration for other tumor types.

EXENTERACIN PLVICA POR CARCINOMA EPIDERMOIDE DE ANO RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS, DE MORBILIDAD Y DE CALIDAD DE VIDA

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía de rescate es la única opción de tratamiento potencialmente curativa para el carcinoma de células escamosas del ano recurrente. Cuando están involucradas vísceras pélvicas, tejidos blandos y huesos adyacentes, puede ser necesaria una exenteración pélvica con una escisión perineal amplia para asegurar márgenes quirúrgicos claros y aumentar la probabilidad de supervivencia a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:Informar sobre los resultados oncológicos, de morbilidad y de calidad de vida de la exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes con análisis retrospectivo de datos recogidos prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Aquellos que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas entre 1994 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local, tasas de complicaciones intraoperatorias y posoperatorias, tasa de resección R0 y resultados de calidad de vida a largo plazo.RESULTADOS:De 958 pacientes que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica, 66 (6,9%) tenían carcinoma anal de células escamosas. 32 pacientes (48,5%) eran varones y la mediana de edad fue de 57 años (rango 31-79). 10 pacientes (15%) tenían carcinoma anal primario de células escamosas, 49 (74%) tenían un tumor recurrente y 7 (11%) tenían una segunda recurrencia. 22 (33%) y 16 pacientes (24%) tuvieron una complicación mayor y regreso no planificado al quirófano, respectivamente. De los 62 pacientes que se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica con intención curativa, 50 (81%) tuvieron una resección R0, las tasas de supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local a los 5 años fueron del 41% y el 37%, respectivamente. La resección R0 se asoció con una mayor supervivencia general a los 5 años (50% frente a 8%, p < 0,001). Las puntuaciones del componente de salud mental y varios dominios de calidad de vida individuales presentaron trayectorias mejoradas después de la operación (todos los valores de p < 0,05).LIMITACIONES:La generalización de los hallazgos fuera de los centros especializados en exenteración pélvica puede ser limitada.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de morbilidad, supervivencia a largo plazo y calidad de vida después de la EP para el carcinoma anal de células escamosas son comparables a los resultados publicados de la exenteración pélvica para otros tipos de tumores. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Risk factors and outcome following salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for anal cancer. 15-33% of patients will have persistent or recurrent disease after treatment requiring salvage surgery. Relapse after surgery, postoperative complications, and mortality as well as possible risk factors are not fully understood due to the rareness of the disease. The aim of the study was to report outcomes after salvage surgery as well as evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications, cancer relapse and survival.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from electronical patients charts and pathology reports from all patients undergoing salvage surgery from July 1st, 2011 to July 1st, 2021 at the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were included in the study. The 5-year overall survival was 61.8%. Relapse after surgery occurred in 36.7% of patients and was significantly associated with R1-resection (HR = 4.4) and preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 4.5). Negative prognostic factors for survival were found to be R1-resection (HR = 3.2), preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 2.9), and male gender (HR = 0.5). There was no association found between complications and survival (HR 1.2). None of the possible risk factors were associated with major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

An acceptable overall survival after surgery was found. Survival and relapse-free survival was negatively associated with R1 resections and positive preoperative lymph nodes. Complications did not influence long-term survival.

Survival outcomes following salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent and persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The primary treatment for locoregional failure following chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, it is necessary to distinguish between recurrent and persistent diseases because of their varied pathologies. We aimed to clarify the survival outcomes following salvage APR for recurrent and persistent diseases and investigate the significance of salvage APR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicentre retrospective cohort study used clinical data from 47 hospitals. All patients were diagnosed with SCCA and underwent definitive radiotherapy as the primary treatment between 1991 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the following cohorts: salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence.

RESULTS

Five-year OS of salvage APR for recurrence, salvage APR for persistence, non-salvage APR for recurrence, and non-salvage APR for persistence were 75% (46%-90%), 36% (21%-51%), 42% (21%-61%), and 47% (33%-60%), respectively. OS of salvage APR for the recurrent disease was significantly higher than that for persistent disease (p = 0.00597). For recurrent disease, OS following salvage APR was significantly higher than that following non-salvage APR (p = 0.0204); however, for persistent disease, there was no significant difference between salvage and non-salvage APR (p = 0.928).

CONCLUSION

Survival outcomes following salvage APR for persistent disease were significantly worse than that for recurrent disease. Salvage APR did not improve survival outcomes for persistent disease compared to non-salvage APR. These results will elicit a review of persistent disease treatment strategies.

Anal squamous cell carcinoma: standards of care, new data and ongoing clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current standards of care, discuss results of recent studies and present ongoing clinical trials for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last year, no practice changing studies have been reported in the setting of localised ASCC. A number of retrospective analyses, however, have provided practice-informing data, such as those confirming the negative impact of low compliance to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on patient outcomes. In contrast, and for the first time, randomized evidence has become available to inform the management of advanced tumours. The InterAACT trial represents a key milestone in the evidence-building process for this disease, establishing carboplatin plus paclitaxel as a new standard of care for treatment-naïve advanced ASCC patients. Furthermore, more data have accumulated about the value of triplet chemotherapy in the first-line setting and of immune checkpoint inhibitors (either as single agents or in combination with other agents) in the refractory setting.

SUMMARY

Recent findings have the potential to improve the treatment quality standards and overall outcome of patients with either localised or advanced ASCC. Results from ongoing clinical trials will hopefully provide useful insights into the management of this disease and further shape current treatment paradigms.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The number of anal cancer diagnoses has been rising steadily, so that the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Almost all anal cancers are induced by persistent infection with human papillomaviruses. Hitherto the care of patients with anal cancer has been heterogeneous and little experience exists with the primary management of anal cancer.

METHODS

The guideline was developed in accordance with the requirements of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. In line with the GRADE approach, the certainty of the evidence was assessed on the outcome level following a systematic literature search. Interdisciplinary working groups were set up to compile suggestions for recommendations, which were discussed and agreed upon in a formal consensus conference.

RESULTS

Ninety-three recommendations and statements were developed. No high-quality evidence was available to support recommendations for or against the treatment of stage I anal cancer with local excision alone as an alternative to chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard in the treatment of stages II–III. Among other aspects regarding the timing and extent of response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy, the guideline panel recommended against obtaining a biopsy in the event of complete clinical response. Owing to lack of confidence in the available evidence, only open recommendations were given for treatment of stage IV.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline provides a sound basis for optimizing the interdisciplinary, cross-sector care of anal cancer patients. Among other areas, gaps in research were identified with respect to the care of patients with early-stage or metastatic anal cancer. Approaches such as chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia require further investigation. The role for immunotherapy in the management of metastasized anal cancer has also been insufficiently explored to date.

Salvage surgery for locally recurrent anal cancer after intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Chemoradiation (CRT) with intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) has become the standard for anal cancer. In patients who fail this treatment modality, salvage surgery with abdominal perineal resection can result in long term cancer control. We aimed to evaluate a single centre's experience of salvage surgery for local recurrence since the introduction of IMRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent definitive CRT for anal carcinoma at a single tertiary referral center since IMRT became standard in 2009. Patients with recurrent or persistent disease after treatment who underwent salvage surgery were included. Details of CRT, salvage surgery and surgical complications, patterns of recurrence after surgery, and survival data were collected and described.

RESULTS

Between 2009-2018, 181 patients underwent definitive treatment using IMRT for anal carcinoma. Of 26 patients who had locoregional recurrent or persistent disease, 14 underwent salvage surgery. Nine had multi-visceral resection and 8 required autologous flap reconstruction. Twelve patients had resections with clear margins and 2 had microscopic positive margins. Twelve patients (86%) experienced post-operative complications, and eight (57%) had perineal wound complications. After salvage, four patients (29%) recurred locally. None of the 8 patients with rpT2 disease recurred. After salvage surgery, 5-year disease free survival was 68.4% and 5-year overall survival was 75%.

CONCLUSION

Following IMRT based chemoradiation, salvage surgery has high rates of surgical complications; however disease free and overall survival results are excellent particularly for small recurrences.

A Prospective Study of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Early Prognostic Biomarker in Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Anus

AIMS

The use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as a prognostic marker of treatment response would enable early individualisation of treatment. We aimed to quantify the changes in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ΔADC_mean) between a DW-MRI at diagnosis and on fraction 8-10 of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as a biomarker for cellularity, and correlate these with anal squamous cell carcinoma recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study recruited patients with localised anal cancer between October 2014 and November 2017. DW-MRI was carried out at diagnosis and after fraction 8-10 of radical CRT. A region of interest was delineated for all primary tumours and any lymph nodes >2 cm on high-resolution T₂-weighted images and propagated to the ADC map. Routine clinical follow-up was collected from Nation Health Service electronic systems.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 29 recruited patients underwent paired DW-MRI scans. Twenty-six regions of interest were delineated among the 23 evaluable patients. The median (range) tumour volume was 13.6 cm³ (2.8-84.9 cm³). Ten of 23 patients had lesions with ΔADC_mean ≤ 20%. With a median follow-up of 41.2 months, four patients either failed to have a complete response to CRT or subsequently relapsed. Three of four patients with disease relapse had lesions demonstrating ΔADC_mean <20%, the other patient with persistent disease had ΔADC_mean of 20.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a potential correlation between patients with ΔADC_mean <20% and disease relapse. Further investigation of the prognostic merit of DW-MRI change is needed in larger, prospective cohorts.

Association of Time Between Radiation and Salvage APR and Margin Status in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation

There is a controversy regarding the optimal time to assess anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) response to chemoradiation and when salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) should be offered. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with stage I-III anal SCC treated with chemoradiation in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). The time between radiation and APR was recorded. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to determine predictors of resection margin status and overall survival. The cohort included 23 050 patients, of whom 545 (2.4%) underwent salvage APR. The median (IQR) time between radiation and resection was 3.8 (2.4-5.5) months. The rate of positive margins was 19.0%. Positive margins were more common in male, non-white patients with larger tumors, pathologic upstaging of T stage, and ≥3 months between chemoradiation and resection (all P < .05). Observing for ≥3 months between chemoradiation and APR remained associated with positive margins, even after adjusting for pretreatment tumor size (odds ratio = 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.47). Our data, based on the largest published cohort of anal SCC patients treated with chemoradiation and subsequent APR, suggest that patients at high risk of local treatment failure, particularly non-white men with large tumors, may benefit from early interim restaging and earlier consideration of salvage surgery.

Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Use, Risk Factors, and Outcomes in a Canadian Population

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that 30% to 40% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus will require salvage abdominoperineal resection after chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the use, risk factors, and impact on survival of salvage abdominal perineal resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study.

SETTINGS

Patients treated in Ontario, Canada through a single-payer universal healthcare system, were included.

PATIENTS

Patients included all incident cases of squamous cell anal cancer who underwent curative intent radiotherapy from 2007 to 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk of salvage abdominoperineal resection, factors associated with salvage abdominoperineal resection, and survival were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 1125 patients were treated with curative intent radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the anus. Within this cohort, salvage surgery was performed in 8% (93/1125), whereas 14% (156/1125) required a permanent colostomy. In log-binomial regression, younger age was associated with salvage surgery, whereas sex, cancer stage, socioeconomic status, and HIV were not. There was a suggested lower risk of salvage surgery in those who completed chemoradiation (relative risk = 0.67 (95% CI, 0.43-1.03)). Crude 5-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% CI, 70%-76%) in those not requiring salvage surgery and 48% (95% CI, 37%-58%) in those who did. In Cox models, mortality was higher in patients requiring salvage surgery compared with those who did not (adjusted HR = 2.20 (95% CI, 1.65-2.94), whereas improved survival was seen in those who completed chemoradiation (HR = 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-0.82)) LIMITATIONS:: The study was limited by its potential residual confounding by indication for salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, contemporary cohort of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, the proportion of patients undergoing salvage surgery was considerably lower than previous reports. Younger age was associated with salvage surgery, and there was a suggestion of lower risk of salvage surgery with completion of chemoradiation. Patients requiring salvage surgery had poor 5-year overall survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B205. RAP DE RESCATE PARA EL CARCINOMA ANAL DE CéLULAS ESCAMOSAS: USO, FACTORES DE RIESGO Y RESULTADOS EN UNA POBLACIóN CANADIENSE: Estudios anteriores han reportado que 30-40% de los pacientes con carcinoma de células escamosas del ano requerirán una resección abdominoperineal de rescate después de la quimiorradioterapia.Identificar la utilización, los factores de riesgo y el impacto en la supervivencia de la resección abdominoperineal de rescate para el carcinoma de células escamosas del ano.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, basado en la población.Todos los casos incidentes de cáncer anal de células escamosas que se sometieron a radioterapia con fines curativos de 2007 a 2015.Pacientes tratados en Ontario, Canadá, un sistema de salud universal de un solo pagador.Riesgo de resección abdominoperineal de rescate, factores asociados con la resección abdominoperineal de rescate y la supervivencia.1125 pacientes fueron tratados con radioterapia de intención curativa para el cáncer de células escamosas del ano. Dentro de esta cohorte, la cirugía de rescate se realizó en el 8% (93/1125), mientras que el 14% (156/1125) requirió una colostomía permanente. En la regresión log-binomial, la edad más joven se asoció con la cirugía de rescate, mientras que el sexo, la etapa del cáncer, el estado socioeconómico y el VIH no. Se sugirió un menor riesgo de cirugía de rescate en aquellos que completaron la quimiorradiación (RR 0,67; IC del 95%: 0,43 a 1,03). La tasa de supervivencia global bruta a 5 años fue del 73% (IC del 95%: 70-76%) en aquellos que no requirieron cirugía de rescate y del 48% (IC del 95%: 37-58%) en los que sí lo requirieron. En los modelos de Cox, la mortalidad fue mayor en los pacientes que requirieron cirugía de rescate en comparación con aquellos que no lo requirieron (HR ajustado 2.20, IC 95%: 1.65 - 2.94), mientras que se observó una mejor supervivencia en aquellos que completaron la quimiorradiación (HR 0.65, IC 95% 0.42 - 0,82).Posible confusión residual por indicación de cirugía de rescate.En esta gran cohorte contemporánea de pacientes con carcinoma de células escamosas del ano, la proporción de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de rescate fue considerablemente menor que los informes anteriores. La edad más temprana se asoció con la cirugía de rescate, y se sugirió un menor riesgo de cirugía de rescate con la finalización de la quimiorradiación. Los pacientes que requirieron cirugía de rescate tuvieron una deficiente supervivencia general de 5 años. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B205. (Traducción-Dr Gonzalo Hagerman).