Natural orifice specimen extraction for high anterior resection - technical tips including an original and effective technique for atraumatic specimen extraction - a video vignette

Natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: technique, outcomes and role of inflammatory markers

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive colectomy is common for diverticular disease. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an innovative adjunct that avoids the morbidity of abdominal incisions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of NOSE in laparoscopic surgery for complications of diverticular disease, and assess the role of post-operative inflammatory markers.

METHODS

A multi-centre prospective study was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Consecutive patients who underwent emergency and elective NOSE colectomy for diverticular disease were included. Demographics, surgical techniques, post-operative complications and biochemical results were analysed.

RESULTS

NOSE colectomy was successful in 99.4% of patients (171/172), with a mean age of 59.9 years. Indications for surgery were phlegmon (35%), recurrent diverticulitis (27%), stricture (21%), fistulae (14%) and haemorrhage (2%). Mean length of stay was 5.7 days (SD 3.8), and anastomotic leak rate was 1.8%. Specimen longitudinal splitting increased operative time (254 vs. 220 min, p < 0.01) and length of stay (6.6 vs. 5.3 days, p = 0.02). Significantly higher inflammatory markers were observed in the longitudinal split group on post-operative days 2-4 without increased complication or anastomotic leak rates.

CONCLUSION

NOSE colectomy demonstrates excellent perioperative outcomes in this large series and is an effective approach for diverticular disease. Specimen debulking facilitates successful NOSE procedures, with expected increases in inflammatory markers which are not associated with higher complication rates.

Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) has shown benefits such as reduced pain, fewer wound complications, and improved cosmesis. In colorectal anastomosis during NOSE, double staple anastomosis (DSA) and triple stapled technique (TSA) are common. However, a novel single stapled anastomosis (SSA) technique, utilising two laparoscopically placed purse strings and only four 5 mm ports, has emerged. This study aims to compare the complications between single and double stapled anastomoses in NOSE LAR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of NOSE LAR data from 2011 to 2022 included patients. All patients received mechanical bowel preparation, colonoscopic instillation of betadine or chlorhexidine, and antibiotics. DSA was performed conventionally, while the SSA technique involved an additional rectal laparoscopic purse string. Fisher's exact test assessed anastomotic leak rates and the need for intraoperative revisions.

RESULTS

Analysis of 179 patients revealed 40 with SSA and 139 with DSA. Patient age ranged from 20 to 88 years, with a BMI between 22 and 46 kg/m2. Diverticulitis and malignant polyps, the most common indications. Operation duration was similar between groups (238 min in SSA, 234 min in DSA; P = 0.69). Intraoperative laparoscopic anastomotic redo was significantly higher in the SSA group (six patients) than the DSA group (five patients; P = <0.05). No anastomotic leaks occurred in the SSA group, while six occurred in the DSA group (P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in Length of Stay (LOS), (5 days in SSA versus 6 days in DSA group, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Single stapled anastomosis in NOSE LAR appears safe for benign conditions but is more likely to necessitate intraoperative redo compared to double stapled anastomosis.

Natural orifice specimen extraction for colorectal surgery: Early adoption in a Western population

AIM

Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) challenges the limits of minimally invasive colorectal surgery by exploiting a natural opening for specimen delivery. Technically challenging, it is less painful, requires smaller wounds and abolishes the possibility of incisional hernia. These advantages of NOSE are seen in the obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m² ). This audit aims to demonstrate the feasibility of NOSE colectomy in an Australian population.

METHOD

Prospective data collected from 2007 to the present were retrospectively analysed. Only patients with mucosally benign colorectal conditions were included: complex diverticulosis, post-malignant polypectomy and volvulus. Left sided mucosal malignancies were excluded. Study end-points included postoperative length of stay, anastomotic leak rate and wound complications.

RESULTS

In total, 159 patients underwent NOSE, mean age 59 years (19-88), mean BMI 28.2 kg/m² (17-45). Ten (6.2%) patients developed retroperitoneal small bowel herniation; seven required further surgery. There were five (3.1%) anastomotic leaks, seven (4.4%) postoperative ileus and three (1.9%) anastomotic bleeds. One (0.6%) patient had a superficial wound infection. There were no port site hernias. Patients with BMI <30 kg/m² (98 patients) and BMI >30 kg/m² (59 patients) were compared; there was no difference in anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.60), complication rate (P = 0.71) and length of stay (P = 0.63). However, duration of operation increased with BMI (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This large series of NOSE colectomy from Australia suggests that NOSE is comparable to conventional laparoscopic colectomy in terms of postoperative outcome. Given that obesity has not featured in the NOSE literature, our study suggests that NOSE, for benign disease, is safe in obese patients, without added morbidity.