Gluteal turnover flap for perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer - a video vignette

Perineal Wound Closure Using Gluteal Turnover Flap After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: The BIOPEX-2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Perineal wound complications are common following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer and might have substantial and long-lasting implications for patients' recovery.

Objective

To evaluate the superiority of gluteal turnover flap closure compared to primary closure in patients with rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The BIOPEX-2 study was an investigator-initiated, parallel-group, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted at 19 centers in the Netherlands and the UK between June 2019 and November 2023, including 12 months of follow-up. Data analysis was performed from October 2023 to December 2023. Independent perineal wound assessors were masked to the type of closure. Eligibility criteria were resection of rectal cancer by abdominoperineal resection, aged 18 years or older, and ability to complete follow-up. In modified intention-to-treat analyses, patients were assigned to either primary closure or gluteal turnover flap closure.

Intervention

Gluteal turnover flap closure started with a half-moon-shaped perineal skin island that was incised and deepithelialized. Subsequently, the subcutaneous fat was dissected toward the gluteal fascia, after which the dermis was sutured to the contralateral levator remnant, followed by midline closure.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was uncomplicated wound healing at 30 days postoperatively, defined as a Southampton wound score less than 2. Secondary outcomes included presacral abscess formation and wound-related readmissions.

Results

A total of 175 patients were randomized, but 7 did not undergo abdominoperineal resection and 3 withdrew consent. In the modified intention-to-treat analyzes, 86 patients were assigned to primary closure and 79 patients to gluteal turnover flap closure. Of these 165 patients, mean (SD) patient age was 67 (10) years, and 57 patients (34.5%) were female. Uncomplicated perineal wound healing was present in 49 of 82 patients (60%) after primary closure, which did not significantly differ from flap closure (42 of 76 patients [55%]). Presacral abscess developed significantly more often after primary closure than flap closure (19 of 86 patients [22%] vs 7 of 78 patients [9%]; P = .02), and more percutaneous presacral abscess drainage was performed in the control group (primary closure) (7 patients [8%] vs 1 patient [1%]; P = .04). Perineal wound-related readmission occurred in 18 patients (21%) after primary closure and in 10 patients (13%) after gluteal flap closure (P = .17).

Conclusion and Relevance

In this parallel-group, multicenter randomized clinical trial, gluteal turnover flap closure did not show superiority over primary closure in 30-day perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. However, flap closure significantly reduced presacral abscess formation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004650.

Gluteal Fasciocutaneous Flap Reconstruction After Salvage Surgery for Pelvic Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pelvic sepsis mostly originates from complicated pelvic surgery and failed interventions. This is a challenging condition that often requires extensive salvage surgery consisting of complete debridement with source control and filling of the dead space with well-vascularized tissue.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the outcomes of gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps for the treatment of secondary pelvic sepsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center cohort study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent salvage surgery for secondary pelvic sepsis between 2012 and 2020 using a gluteal flap were included in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of complete wound healing.

RESULTS

In total, 27 patients were included, of whom 22 underwent index rectal resection for cancer and 21 had undergone (chemo)radiotherapy. A median of 3 (interquartile range, 1-5) surgical and 1 (interquartile range, 1-4) radiological interventions preceded salvage surgery during a median period of 62 (interquartile range, 20-124) months. Salvage surgery included partial sacrectomy in 20 patients. The gluteal flap consisted of a V-Y flap in 16 patients, superior gluteal artery perforator flap in 8 patients, and a gluteal turnover flap in 3 patients. Median hospital stay was 9 (interquartile range, 6-18) days. During a median follow-up of 18 (interquartile range, 6-34) months, wound complications occurred in 41%, with a reintervention rate of 30%. The median time to wound healing was 69 (interquartile range, 33-154) days, with a complete healing rate of 89% at the end of follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and heterogeneous patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing major salvage surgery for chronic pelvic sepsis, the use of gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps is a promising solution because of the high success rate, limited risks, and relatively simple technique. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C160 .

RECONSTRUCCIN CON COLGAJO FASCIOCUTNEO GLTEO DESPUS DE UNA CIRUGA DE RESCATE POR SEPSIS PLVICA

ANTECEDENTES:La sepsis pélvica crónica esta causada principalmente por cirugías pélvicas complicadas e intervenciones fallidas. Esta es una condición desafiante que a menudo requiere una cirugía de rescate extensa que consiste en un desbridamiento completo controlando el orígen infeccioso y rellenando el espacio muerto con tejido bien vascularizado, como por ejemplo un colgajo de tejido autólogo. La pared abdominal (colgajo de recto abdominal) o la pierna (colgajo de gracilis) se utilizan principalmente como sitios donantes para esta indicación, mientras que los colgajos glúteos pueden ser alternativas atractivas.OBJETIVO:Describir los resultados de los colgajos fasciocutáneos glúteos en el tratamiento de la sepsis pélvica secundaria.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo en un solo centro.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos que se sometieron a cirugía de rescate por sepsis pélvica secundaria entre 2012 y 2020 utilizando un colgajo fasciocutáneo glúteo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El porcentaje de cicatrización completa de la herida.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 27 pacientes, de los cuales 22 fueron sometidos a resección rectal por cáncer indicada y 21 pacientes que habían recibido (quimio)radioterapia. Una mediana de tres (RIC 1-5) intervenciones quirúrgicas y una (RIC 1-4) intervenciones radiológicas precedieron a la cirugía de rescate durante una mediana de 62 (RIC 20-124) meses.La cirugía de rescate incluyó una resección parcial del sacro en 20 pacientes. El colgajo fasciocutáneo glúteo consistió en la confección de un colgajo en V-Y en 16 pacientes, un colgajo incluyendo la perforante de la arteria glútea superior en 8 y un colgajo de rotación de músculo glúteo en 3 pacientes.La mediana de estancia hospitalaria fue de nueve (RIC 6-18) días. Durante una mediana de seguimiento de 18 (IQR 6-34) meses, se produjeron complicaciones de la herida en el 41%, con una tasa de reintervención del 30%.La mediana de tiempo hasta la cicatrización de la herida fue de 69 (IQR 33-154) días con una tasa de cicatrización completa del 89 % al final del seguimiento cicatricial.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo y población heterogénea de pacientes.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes sometidos a cirugía mayor de rescate por sepsis pélvica crónica, el uso de colgajos fasciocutáneos glúteos es una solución prometedora debido a la alta tasa de éxito, los riesgos limitados y la técnica relativamente simple. Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C160 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach

BACKGROUND

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers, enabling a more radical approach than conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) with a potentially better oncological outcome. To date, no standard exists for reconstruction after extended or extralevator approaches of abdominoperineal (ELAPE) resection for lower gastrointestinal cancer or inflammatory tumors. In the recent literature, techniques with myocutaneous flaps, such as the VY gluteal flap, the pedicled gracilis flap, or the pedicled rectus abdominis flaps (VRAM) are primarily described. We propose a tailored concept with the use of bilateral adipo-fasciocutaneous inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) advancement flaps in VY fashion after ELAPE surgery procedures. This retrospective cohort study analyzes the feasibility of this concept and is, to our knowledge, one of the largest published series of IGAP flaps in the context of primary closure after ELAPE procedures.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort analysis, we evaluated all the consecutive patients with rectal resections from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021. All the patients with abdominoperineal resection were included in the study evaluation. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of plastic reconstruction and inpatient discharge.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 560 patients with rectal resections, 101 consecutive patients with ELAPE met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study evaluation. The primary direct defect closure was performed in 72 patients (71.3%). In 29 patients (28.7%), the defect was closed with primary unilateral or bilateral IGAP flaps in VY fashion. The patients' mean age was 59.4 years with a range of 25-85 years. In 84 patients, the indication of the operation was lower rectal cancer or anal cancer recurrence, and non-oncological resections were performed in 17 patients. Surgery was performed in a minimally invasive abdominal approach in combination with open perineal extralevatoric abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) and immediate IGAP flap reconstruction. The rate of perineal early complications after plastic reconstruction was 19.0%, which needed local revision due to local infection. All these interventions were conducted under general anesthesia (Clavien-Dindo IIIb). The mean length of the hospital stay was 14.4 days after ELAPE, ranging from 3 to 53 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Since radical resection with a broad margin is the standard choice in primary, sphincter-infiltrating rectal cancer and recurrent anal cancer surgery in combination with ELAPE, the choice technique for pelvic floor reconstruction is under debate and there is no consensus. Using IGAP flaps is a reliable, technical, easy, and safe option, especially in wider defects on the pelvic floor with minimal donor site morbidity and an acceptable complication (no flap necrosis) rate. The data for hernia incidence in the long term are not known.

Cumulative 5-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Biological Mesh With Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (BIOPEX-study)

OBJECTIVE

To determine long-term outcomes of a randomized trial (BIOPEX) comparing biological mesh and primary perineal closure in rectal cancer patients after extralevator abdominoperineal resection and preoperative radiotherapy, with a primary focus on symptomatic perineal hernia.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

BIOPEX is the only randomized trial in this field, which was negative on its primary endpoint (30-day wound healing).

METHODS

This was a posthoc secondary analysis of patients randomized in the BIOPEX trial to either biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropouts) or primary perineal closure (n = 54; 1 dropout). Patients were followed for 5 years. Actuarial 5-year probabilities were determined by the Kaplan-Meier statistic.

RESULTS

Actuarial 5-year symptomatic perineal hernia rates were 7% (95% CI, 0-30) after biological mesh closure versus 30% (95% CI, 10-49) after primary closure (P = 0.006). One patient (2%) in the biomesh group underwent elective perineal hernia repair, compared to 7 patients (13%) in the primary closure group (P = 0.062). Reoperations for small bowel obstruction were necessary in 1/48 patients (2%) and 5/53 patients (9%), respectively (P = 0.208). No significant differences were found for chronic perineal wound problems, locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and main domains of quality of life and functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic perineal hernia rate at 5-year follow-up after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer was significantly lower after biological mesh closure. Biological mesh closure did not improve quality of life or functional outcomes.

A comparative multicentre study evaluating gluteal turnover flap for wound closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to compare perineal wound healing between gluteal turnover flap and primary closure in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer with gluteal turnover flap in two university hospitals (2016–2021) were compared to a multicentre cohort of primary closure (2000–2017). The primary endpoint was uncomplicated perineal wound healing within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were long-term wound healing, related re-interventions, and perineal herniation. The perineal hernia rate was assessed using Kaplan Meier analysis.

Results

Twenty–five patients had a gluteal turnover flap and 194 had primary closure. The uncomplicated perineal wound-healing rate within 30 days was 68% (17/25) after gluteal turnover flap versus 64% (124/194) after primary closure, OR 2.246; 95% CI 0.734–6.876; p = 0.156 in multivariable analysis. No major wound complications requiring surgical re-intervention occurred after flap closure. Eighteen patients with gluteal turnover flap completed 12-month follow-up, and none of them had chronic perineal sinus, compared to 6% (11/173) after primary closure (p = 0.604). The symptomatic 18-month perineal hernia rate after flap closure was 0%, compared to 9% after primary closure (p = 0.184).

Conclusions

The uncomplicated perineal wound-healing rate after the gluteal turnover flap and primary closure after APR is similar, and no chronic perineal sinus or perineal hernia occurred after flap closure. Future studies have to confirm potential benefits of the gluteal turnover flap.

Optimizing omentoplasty for management of chronic pelvic sepsis by intra-operative fluorescence angiography: a comparative cohort study

AIM

Pelviperineal wound complications frequently occur after salvage surgery for chronic pelvic sepsis despite using an omentoplasty. Sufficient perfusion of the omentoplasty following mobilization is essential for proper healing. This study investigated the impact on short-term clinical outcomes of fluorescence angiography (FA) using indocyanine green for assessment of omental perfusion in patients undergoing salvage surgery.

METHOD

This was a comparative cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent combined abdominal and transanal minimally invasive salvage surgery with omentoplasty at a national referral centre for chronic pelvic sepsis between December 2014 and August 2019. The historical and interventional cohorts were defined based on the date of introduction of FA in April 2018. The primary outcome was pelviperineal non-healing, defined by the presence of any degree of pelviperineal infection at the final postoperative evaluation.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients underwent salvage surgery with omentoplasty for chronic pelvic sepsis, of whom 52 did not have FA and 36 did have FA. The underlying primary disease was Crohn's disease (n = 50) or rectal cancer (n = 38), with even distribution among the cohorts (P = 0.811). FA led to a change in management in 28/36 (78%) patients. After a median of 89 days, pelviperineal non-healing was observed in 22/52 (42%) patients in the cohort without FA and in 8/36 (22%) patients in the cohort with FA (P = 0.051). Omental necrosis was found during reoperation in 3/52 and 0/36 patients, respectively (P = 0.266).

CONCLUSION

After introduction of FA to assess perfusion of the omentoplasty, halving of the pelviperineal non-healing rate was observed in patients undergoing salvage surgery for chronic pelvic sepsis.

Perineal wound closure using gluteal turnover flap or primary closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (BIOPEX-2 study)

Background

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is associated with high morbidity of the perineal wound, and controversy exists about the optimal closure technique. Primary perineal wound closure is still the standard of care in the Netherlands. Biological mesh closure did not improve wound healing in our previous randomised controlled trial (BIOPEX-study). It is suggested, based on meta-analysis of cohort studies, that filling of the perineal defect with well-vascularised tissue improves perineal wound healing. A gluteal turnover flap seems to be a promising method for this purpose, and with the advantage of not having a donor site scar. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a gluteal turnover flap improves the uncomplicated perineal wound healing after APR for rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with primary or recurrent rectal cancer who are planned for APR will be considered eligible in this multicentre randomised controlled trial. Exclusion criteria are total exenteration, sacral resection above S4/S5, intersphincteric APR, biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases. A total of 160 patients will be randomised between gluteal turnover flap (experimental arm) and primary closure (control arm). The total follow-up duration is 12 months, and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for type of perineal wound closure. The primary outcome is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing on day 30, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than two. Secondary outcomes include time to perineal wound closure, incidence of perineal hernia, the number, duration and nature of the complications, re-interventions, quality of life and urogenital function.

Discussion

The uncomplicated perineal wound healing rate is expected to increase from 65 to 85% by using the gluteal turnover flap. With proven effectiveness, a quick implementation of this relatively simple surgical technique is expected to take place.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04004650 on July 2, 2019.

Further insights into the treatment of perineal hernia based on a the experience of a single tertiary centre

AIM

There is little evidence concerning the optimal surgical technique for the repair of perineal hernia. This study aimed to report on the evolution of a technique for repair of perineal hernia by analysing the experience in a tertiary referral centre.

METHOD

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision in a tertiary referral centre. The main study end-points were rate of recurrent perineal hernia, perineal wound complications and related re-intervention.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included: in 18 patients a biological mesh was used followed by 16 patients who underwent synthetic mesh repair. Postoperative perineal wound infection occurred in two patients (11%) after biological mesh repair compared with four (25%) after synthetic mesh repair (P = 0.387). None of the meshes were explanted. Recurrent perineal hernia following biological mesh was found in 7 of 18 patients (39%) after a median of 33 months. The recurrence rate with a synthetic mesh was 5 of 16 patients (31%) after a median of 17 months (P = 0.642). Re-repair was performed in four (22%) and two patients (13%), respectively (P = 0.660). Eight patients required a transposition flap reconstruction to close the perineum over the mesh, and no recurrent hernias were observed in this subgroup (P = 0.030). No mesh-related small bowel complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rates after perineal hernia repair following abdominoperineal excision were high, and did not seem to be related to the type of mesh. If a transposition flap was added to the mesh repair no recurrences were observed, but this finding needs confirmation in larger studies.