Use of the Martius advancement flap for low rectovaginal fistulas

Stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A comparison study with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair

BACKGROUND

As an innovative treatment, stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair (STR) for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) has demonstrated effectiveness in preliminary reports. This study aims to compare STR with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair (RAF), a widely utilized surgical procedure, for the surgical outcome of the low- and mid-level RVF.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with low- and mid-level RVF who underwent STR or RAF were included from both the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Xi'an Daxing Hospital. Among the 99 total patients, 77 underwent STR and 22 underwent RAF. Patient demographics, operative data, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Recurrence rate and associated risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among patients in terms of clinical characteristics like age, BMI, aetiology, and fistula features. During the follow-up period of 20 months (interquartile range 3.0-41.8 months), a total of 28 patients relapsed, with a significantly lower recurrence rate in the STR group (20.8 %) than in the RAF group (54.6 %) (P = 0.005). In the multivariate Cox analysis, STR was an independent protective factor against recurrence (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01). Logistic regression indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between these two procedures in terms of surgical complications (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.19-1.48, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

For low- and mid-level RVF, STR may be an alternative option for treatment modality that offers a lower recurrence rate, without observed disadvantage in terms of surgical complication rates.

Martius flaps for low rectovaginal fistulae: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal fistulae (RVF) are notoriously challenging to treat. Martius flap (MF) is a technique employed to manage RVF, among various others, with none being universally successful. We aimed to assess the outcomes of RVF managed with MF interposition.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching for all studies specifically reporting on the outcomes of MF for RVF was performed. The primary objective was the mean success rate, whilst secondary objectives included complications and recurrence. The MedCalc software (version 20.118) was used to conduct proportional meta-analyses of data. Weighted mean values with 95% CI are presented and stratified according to aetiology where possible.

RESULTS

Twelve non-randomized (11 retrospective, 1 prospective) studies, assessing 137 MF were included. The mean age of the study population was 42.4 (±15.7), years. There were 44 primary and 93 recurrent RVF. The weighted mean success rate for MF when performed for primary RVF was 91.4% (95% CI: 79.45-98.46; I2  = 32.1%; P = 0.183) and that for recurrent RVF was 77.5% (95% CI: 62.24-89.67; I2  = 58.1%; P = 0.008). The weighted mean complication rate was 29% (95% CI: 8.98-54.68; I2  = 85.4%; P < 0.0001) and the overall recurrence rate was 12.0% (95% CI: 5.03-21.93; I2  = 52.3%; P = 0.021). When purely radiotherapy-induced RVF were evaluated, the mean overall success rate was 94.6% (95% CI: 83.33-99.75; I2  = 0%; P = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

MF interposition appears to be more effective for primary than recurrent RVF. However, the poor quality of the data limits definitive conclusions being drawn and demands further assessment with randomized studies.

Modified Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Interposition for Rectovaginal Fistula

IMPORTANCE

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a challenging condition associated with recurrences and significant functional impairment.

OBJECTIVES

The internal pudendal artery perforator (IPAP) flap has become a viable option for reconstructing the vagina and perineal regions. This study aims to introduce a modified technique of IPAP flap interposition and evaluate its postoperative outcomes in the treatment of low RVF.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixteen patients with RVF who underwent modified IPAP flap interposition between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Recurrence rate, the satisfaction of vulvar appearance (Visual Analog Scale), and quality of sexual life (Female Sexual Function Index score) were followed up and analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients presented with low fistula with a mean diameter of 8.3 mm. The mean width and length of the IPAP flaps were 3.8 and 6.2 cm, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 14.1 months. All patients achieved successful healing without recurrence. High satisfaction was reported for the cosmetic effect of the vulva with a mean Visual Analog Scale score of 8.4. The proportion of female sexual disorder exhibited a statistically significant reduction, decreasing from 100% preoperatively to 38% after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified IPAP flap interposition is a reliable and safe option for repairing low RVF, with high success rates and minimal donor site morbidity. Moreover, this procedure provides a suitable volume flap and preserves the vaginal physiological environment, which benefits postoperative sexual function.

Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula

BACKGROUND

Surgical techniques for repair of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) have been continually developed, but the ideal procedure remains unclear. Endoscopic repair is a novel and minimally invasive technique for RVF repair with increasing reporting.

AIM

To review the current applications and preliminary outcomes of this technique for RVF repair, aiming to give surgeons an alternative in clinical practice.

METHODS

Available articles were searched according to the search strategy. And the sample size, fistula etiology, fistula type, endoscopic repair approaches, operative time and hospital stay, follow-up period, complication and life quality assessment were selected for recording and further analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles were eventually identified, involving 71 patients with RVFs who had undergone endoscopic repair. The principal causes of RVFs were surgery (n = 51, 71.8%), followed by obstetrics (n = 7, 9.8%), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5, 7.0%), congenital (n = 3, 4.2%), trauma (n = 2, 2.8%), radiation (n = 1, 1.4%), and in two patients, the cause was unclear. Most fistulas were in a mid or low position. Several endoscopic repair methods were included, namely transanal endoscopic microsurgery, endoscopic clipping, and endoscopic stenting. Most patients underwent > 1-year follow-up, and the success rate was 40%-93%, and all cases reported successful closure. Few complications were mentioned, while postoperative quality of life assessment was only mentioned in one study.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, endoscopic repair of RVF is novel, minimally invasive and promising with acceptable preliminary effectiveness. Given its unique advantages, endoscopic repair can be an alternative technique for surgeons.

Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

Gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) is an established surgical technique in the treatment of anorectal fistulas and fistulas to the vagina and the urinary system when previous closure options have failed. There is little evidence on the success rate of this procedure in the long term.

METHODS

This is a follow-up study on all patients undergoing GMT over a 10-year period at a tertiary referral center for complex fistulas. Postoperative function and quality of life were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (Wexner score, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score (FIQL), SF-12 and a brief questionnaire designed for this study). Sexual function was evaluated by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

Forty-seven gracilis muscle transpositions (GMT) in 46 patients were performed. Most treated patients had (neo-)-rectovaginal fistulas (n = 29). An overall fistula closure was achieved in 34 of 46 patients (74%): in 25 cases primarily by GMT (53%) and in nine patients with persistent or recurrent fistula by additional surgical procedures. A clinically apparent relapse occurred on average 276 days (median: 180 days) after GMT (mean follow-up 73.4 months).

CONCLUSION

GMT in our hands has a primary closure rate of 53%, and after further procedures, this rises to 74%. Fecal continence is impaired in patients having undergone GMT. The overall quality of life in patients after GMT is only slightly impaired, and sexual function is severely impaired in female patients.