Temporary faecal diversion in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: is there an impact on long-term surgical recurrence?

Postoperative Crohn's Disease Recurrence Risk and Optimal Biologic Timing After Temporary Diversion Following Ileocolic Resection

BACKGROUND

Postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) is common. While most patients undergo resection with undiverted anastomosis (UA), some individuals also have creation of an intended temporary diversion (ITD) with an ileostomy followed by ostomy takedown (OT) due to increased risk of anastomotic complications. We assessed the association of diversion with subsequent CD recurrence risk and the influence of biologic prophylaxis timing to prevent recurrence in this population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of CD patients who underwent ileocolic resection between 2009 and 2020 at a large quaternary health system. Patients were grouped by continuity status after index resection (primary anastomosis or ITD). The outcomes of the study were radiographic, endoscopic, and surgical recurrence as well as composite recurrence postoperatively (after OT in the ITD group). Propensity score-weighted matching was performed based on risk factors for diversion and recurrence. Multivariable regression and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for recurrence risk factors were used to assess association with outcomes. Subgroup analysis in the ITD group was performed to assess the impact of biologic timing relative to OT (no biologic, biologic before OT, after OT) on composite recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 793 CD patients were included (mean age 38 years, body mass index 23.7 kg/m2, 52% female, 23% active smoker, 50% penetrating disease). Primary anastomosis was performed in 67.5% (n = 535) and ITD in 32.5% (n = 258; 79% loop, 21% end) of patients. Diverted patients were more likely to have been males and to have had penetrating and perianal disease, prior biologic use, lower body mass index, and lower preoperative hemoglobin and albumin (all P < .01). After a median follow-up of 44 months, postoperative recurrence was identified in 83.3% patients (radiographic 40.4%, endoscopic 39.5%, surgical 13.3%). After propensity score matching and adjusting for recurrence risk factors, no significant differences were seen between continuity groups in radiographic (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.91) or endoscopic recurrence (aHR, 1.196; 95% CI, 0.84-1.73), but an increased risk of surgical recurrence was noted in the ITD group (aHR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02-2.54). Most (56.1%) ITD patients started biologic prophylaxis after OT, 11.4% before OT, and 32.4% had no postoperative biologic prophylaxis. Biologic prophylaxis in ITD was associated with younger age (P < .001), perianal disease (P = .04), and prior biologic use (P < .001) but not in recurrence (P = .12). Despite higher rates of objective disease activity identified before OT, biologic exposure before OT was not associated with a significant reduction in composite post-OT recurrence compared with starting a biologic after OT (52% vs 70.7%; P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Diversion of an ileocolic resection is not consistently associated with a risk of postoperative recurrence and should be performed when clinically appropriate. Patients requiring diversion at time of ileocolic resection are at high risk for recurrence, and biologic initiation prior to stoma reversal may be considered.

Ileocolic resection with temporary ileostomy for Crohn's disease: does it affect long-term disease recurrence compared with primary anastomosis?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess whether the risk of disease recurrence in Crohn's disease (CD) patients that undergone ileocolic resection (ICR) with temporary ileostomy and a later stoma reversal is different compared to patients that underwent a one-stage operation.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of all patients that underwent elective primary ICR for CD between 2010 and 2022 divided into: 2S-ICR group-patients who underwent two-stage ICR. 1S-ICR group-patients who underwent one-stage ICR.

RESULTS

The cohort included 191 patients (mean age 33.4, range 15-70), with 40 and 151 patients in the 2S-ICR and 1S-ICR groups, respectively. The 2S-ICR were more comorbid, with a lower mean BMI (18 vs. 21.3, P < 0.001), higher median ASA score (3 vs. 2, P = 0.036), higher percentage on pre-operative total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (62.5% vs. 24.5%, P < 0.001), and lower levels of pre-operative albumin (3.3 g/dL vs. 3.8 g/dL, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication rate (47.5% vs. 47.7% respectively, P = 1), nor in the rate of severe complications (17.5% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.6), but, the 2S-ICR had a longer post-operative length-of-stay (14 vs. 6 days, P < 0.001) and higher rates of 30-day readmission (30% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.017). After an overall median follow-up of 63 months, the groups showed similar rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage ICR with a temporary ileostomy does not change long-term CD recurrence rates compared with one-stage ICR.

Anastomotic Considerations in Crohn's Disease

A number of factors should be considered when performing an intestinal anastomosis in the setting of surgery for Crohn's disease. Preoperative risk factors, such as malnutrition, abdominal sepsis, and immunosuppressive medications, may increase the risk of postoperative anastomotic complications and alter surgical decision-making. The anatomical configuration and technique of constructing the anastomosis may have an impact on postoperative function and risk of recurrence, particularly in the setting of ileocolic resection, where the Kono-S anastomosis has gained popularity in recent years. There may be circumstances in which it may be more appropriate to perform an ostomy either without an anastomosis or to temporarily divert an anastomosis when the risk of anastomotic complications is felt to be high. In the setting of total abdominal colectomy or proctocolectomy for Crohn's colitis, restorative procedures may appropriate in lieu of a permanent stoma in certain scenarios.

Surgical Planning in Penetrating Abdominal Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is increasing globally, and the disease location and behavior are changing toward more colonic as well as inflammatory behavior. Surgery was previously mainly performed due to ileal/ileocaecal location and stricturing behavior, why many anticipate the surgical load to decrease. There are, however, the same time data showing an increasing complexity among patients at the time of surgery with an increasing number of patients with the abdominal perforating disease, induced by the disease itself, at the time of surgery and thus a more complex surgery as well as the post-operative outcome. The other major cause of abdominal penetrating CD is secondary to surgical complications, e.g., anastomotic dehiscence or inadvertent enterotomies. To improve the care for patients with penetrating abdominal CD in general, and in the peri-operative phase in particular, the use of multidisciplinary team discussions is essential. In this study, we will try to give an overview of penetrating abdominal CD today and how this situation may be handled. Proper surgical planning will decrease the risk of surgically induced penetrating disease and improve the outcome when penetrating disease is already established. It is important to evaluate patients prior to surgery and optimize them with enteral nutrition (or parenteral if enteral nutrition is ineffective) and treat abdominal sepsis with drainage and antibiotics.

Surgical features to reduce anastomotic recurrence of Crohn's disease that requires reoperation: a systematic review

Anastomotic recurrence after intestinal resection is one of the main embarrassing problems encountered during Crohn's disease (CD) management. This complication is often associated with an expected consequence, mainly a multiple intestinal resection. This systematic review evaluates published evidence on surgical features to reduce surgical recurrence after bowel resection and provide surgeons with recommendations based on published evidence. We conducted bibliographic research on September 05, 2020, through PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We retained meta-analysis, randomized clinical trials, and controlled clinical trials. The strength of clinical data and subsequent recommendations were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Fourteen articles were retained. Early resection reduces surgical relapse and the need for additional medical treatment. There was no difference between conventional and laparoscopic bowel resection. Mesenteric excision seems to reduce surgical recurrence. Stapled side-to-side anastomosis reduces surgical recurrence. However, no difference was observed between Kono-S anastomosis ensure at least similar anastomotic recurrence rate compared to conventional anastomosis. Surgical recurrence was reduced after bowel resection when compared to stricturoplasty. There was no difference between the one and two steps resection. Several surgical features have been investigated. Some of them were unanimously found to be effective in lengthening the disease-free relapse. However, others are still controversial.