Is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy sufficient in patients with advanced rectal malignancy and positive extra-mesorectal lateral lymph nodes?

Two-team lateral lymph node dissection assisted by the transanal approach for locally advanced lower rectal cancer: comparison with the conventional transabdominal approach

BACKGROUND

An optimal surgical approach to lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) remains controversial. With the recent popularity of transanal total mesorectal excision, a two-team procedure combining the transabdominal and transanal approaches was established as a novel approach to LLND. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of two-team LLND (2team-LLND) and compare its short-term outcomes with those of conventional transabdominal LLND (Conv-LLND).

METHODS

Between April 2013 and March 2020, 463 patients diagnosed with primary locally advanced rectal cancer underwent a transanal total mesorectal excision; among them, 93 patients who underwent bilateral prophylactic LLND were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Among these patients, 50 and 43 patients underwent Conv-LLND (the Conv-LLND group) and 2team-LLND (the 2team-LLND group), respectively. The short-term outcomes, including the operation time, blood loss volume, number of complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The intraoperative and postoperative complications in the 2team-LLND group were equivalent to those in the Conv-LLND group; furthermore, the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the 2team-LLND group was acceptably low (9%). Compared with the Conv-LLND group, the 2team-LLND group had a significantly shorter operation time (P = 0.003), lower median blood loss (P = 0.02), and higher number of harvested lateral lymph nodes (P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative and postoperative complications of 2team-LLND were comparable with those of Conv-LLND. Thus, 2team-LLND was safe and feasible for advanced lower rectal cancer. Moreover, it was superior to Conv-LLND in terms of the operation time, blood loss volume, and number of harvested lateral lymph nodes. Therefore, it can be a promising LLND approach.

Can patients with good tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy be exempted from lateral lymph node dissection?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection (LLND) can be exempted in patients with good tumor regression grading (TRG) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT)?

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT and total mesorectal resection plus selective LLND at our institution. The primary outcomes are the relationship between LLN metastasis (LLNM) and magnetic resonance imaging TRG (mrTRG) and the relationship between LLNM and pathological TRG (pTRG).

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were included, of which 24 patients (26.4%) had LLNM, 67 patients (73.6%) had no LLNM. There were significant differences of the maximum short-axis of LLN before and after nCRT, short-axis reduction rate of the LLN with maximum short-axis, length diameter reduction rate of primary tumor, mrTRG, and pTRG between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that mrTRG (P = 0.026) and pTRG (P = 0.013) were independent predictors for LLNM. The combination used by mrTRG and the maximum short-axis of LLNs ≥ 8 mm before nCRT and the maximum short-axis of LLN ≥ 5 mm after nCRT achieved specificity of 0.970, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.867, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.855. The same combination used by pTRG achieved the specificity of 0.970, PPV of 0.857 and NPV of 0.844.

CONCLUSION

The suspected positive LLNs tend to be sterilized by nCRT in patients who have a very good response to nCRT. It is rational to avoid LLND in patients whose primary tumor and LLNs both show good response to nCRT.

T1 rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma with bilateral enlarged lateral lymph nodes and unilateral metastasis: A case report

BACKGROUND

There are a few cases of lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis (LLNM) of T1 rectal cancer. Moreover, LLNM is easily missed, especially in patients with early-stage rectal cancer. To our knowledge, the possibility of bilateral LLNM before surgery has not been reported in previous studies.

CASE SUMMARY

A 36-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection at a local hospital owing to a clinical diagnosis of a rectal polyp. The pathology report showed a diagnosis of T1 rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma. She was considered to have bilateral LLNM after the examination at our hospital. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision plus bilateral LLN dissection was performed and the pathological outcomes indicated unilateral LLNM. The patient received long-course adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with no recurrence or metastasis observed during the 1-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

T1 rectal cancer could lead to LLNM and possibly, bilateral LLNM. Therefore, adequate clinical evaluation is essential for these patients.

The Addition of Preoperative Radiation Is Insufficient for Lateral Pelvic Control in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The local recurrence of rectal cancer has been improved by total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, in patients with low locally advanced rectal cancer, lateral pelvic recurrence remains to be addressed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in addressing lateral pelvic recurrence and which subgroup of patients might be optimal to receive lateral lymph node dissection.

DESIGN

The MRI/CT images were reassessed for lateral lymph node status. The lateral lymph nodes with short axis ≥5 mm and ≥4 mm were considered positive in pretreatment and restaging MRI/CT.

SETTING

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial (FOWARC, NCT01211210).

PATIENTS

A total of 495 patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the original trial. According to the excluding criteria, the finally included population consists of 253 patients; of these, 195 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 94 received chemotherapy alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the 5-year lateral pelvic recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone, patients receiving additional radiotherapy had a marginal significance of lower lateral pelvic recurrence rate (6.6% vs 13.0%; p = 0.051). In the subset with pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes, patients had a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 22.6% and 45.1% after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Of note, 34.9% of the pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes were persistent after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, culminating in a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 63.3%.

LIMITATIONS

This is a post hoc analysis, and only the patients from the leading center were included, which limited the sample size. In addition, the lateral lymph node dissection was not performed in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant regimens could not address lateral pelvic recurrence adequately. Some subgroups of patients might need additional dissection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613.

LA INCLUSION DE LA RADIOTERAPIA PREOPERATORIA ES INSUFICIIENTE EN EL CONTROL PLVICO LATERAL EN UN SUBGRUPO DE PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO INFERIOR LOCALMENTE AVANZADO UN ESTUDIO POSTHOC CONTROLADO Y RANDOMIZADO

ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia local del cancer de recto ha disminuido al efectuar una excision mesorrectal total seguida de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante. No obstante, en pacientes con cancer de tercio inferior de recto avanzado localmente, aún está por controlarse la recurrencia pélvicaOBJETIVOS:Determinar la eficacia de la radioterapia neoadyuvante en el control de la recurrencia pélvica lateral y en que subgrupo de pacientes sería conveniente efecutar una excisión lateral de las cadenas ganglionares.DISEÑO:Se reevaluaron las imágenes tomográficas y de resonancia magnética del status de las cadenas ganglionares linfáticas laterales. Los ganglios linfáticos laterales con un eje-corto > 5 mm y ≥ 4 mm se consideraron como positivos previo al tratamiento y reestadificados con RM y TAC respectivamente.ESCENARIO:Es un análisis post hoc de un studio prospectivo randomizado controlado (FOWARC, NCT01211210).PACIENTESSe incluyeron un total de 495 pacientes en estdio II o III con adenomcarcinoma rectal en el estudio original. De acuerdo a los criterios de exclusión, la población final incluida consistió en 253 pacientes; de estos, 195 recibieron quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y 94 quimioterapia sola.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El parámetro mas importante fue la tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral a cinco años.RESULTADOS:En comparación con los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia sola, aquellos que además fueron sometidos a radioterapia adicional presentaron un margen significativo de menor tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral (6.6% vs. 13.0%; p=0.051). En el grupo de pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos, los enfermos presentaron una tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral de 22.6% y 45.1% después de quimioradiaterapia neoadyuvante en comparación con quimioterapia sola respectivamente. Cabe mencionar que el 34.9% de los pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos antes del tratamiento persistieron después de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante, reportándose finalmente una recurrencia pélvica lateral de un 63.3%.LIMITACIONES:Se trata de un análisis posthoc y solo los pacientes del hospital fueron incluidos, lo que limita el tamaño de la muestra. Además, no se efectuó la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales en este grupo.CONCLUSIONES:La radioterapia en los esquemas de neoadyuvancia no logran controlar la recurrencia pélvica lateral en forma adecuada. Algunos subgrupos de pacientes podría requerir de disección adicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613.

Management of Clinically Involved Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Radiation Dose Escalation Study

Background

Patients with lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) metastasis are not effectively treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three neoadjuvant therapeutic regimens, namely, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy with a dose boost of LLNs, and to identify the optimal approach for treating LLNs metastasis of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 202 patients with baseline LLNs metastasis (short axis ≥5 mm) and treated with neoadjuvant treatment, followed by radical surgery from 2011 to 2019, were enrolled. The short axis of the LLNs on baseline and restaging MRI were recorded. Survival outcomes were compared.

Results

In the booster subgroup, shrinkage of LLNs was significantly greater than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy subgroups (P <0.001), without increasing radiation related side effects (P = 0.121). For patients with baseline LLNs of short axis ≥5 mm in the booster subgroup, the response rate (short axis <5 mm on restaging MRI) was 72.9%, significantly higher than patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy subgroup (48.9%, P = 0.007) and higher than for patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (65.0%), but there was no statistical difference (P = 0.411). The 3-year local recurrence and lateral local recurrence rates were both 2.3% in the dose booster group, which were lower than those of the other two subgroups (local recurrence: P <0.001; lateral local recurrence: P <0.001). The short axis of lateral lymph nodes (≥5 and <5 mm) on restaging MRI was an independent risk factor for prognosis (P <0.05).

Conclusion

Radiation dose boost is an effective way of increasing the response rate and decreasing recurrence rates. The restaging LLNs with short axis ≥5 mm is a predictor of poor prognosis.

Long-term Outcomes of Lower Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Preoperative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy

Objectives:

The standard strategy for advanced rectal cancer (RC) is preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT)/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries; however, the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy remains unclear. There is accumulating evidence that either SCRT/CRT or lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) alone may not be sufficient for local control of advanced RC. We herein retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated by SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND, particularly focusing on the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (LPNM).

Methods:

Patients diagnosed as having clinical Stage II and III lower RC who received SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND between 1999 and 2012 at our hospital were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs), surgery-related complications (SRC), and therapeutic effects were retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

Fifty cases (SCRT:25, CRT:25) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence (LR), AE, and SRC between the SCRT and CRT groups, although the pathological therapeutic effect was higher in the CRT group. The patients with LPNM showed significantly inferior 5-year OS and 5-year RFS than those without LPNM.

Conclusions:

There were no significant differences in OS, RFS, or LR between SCRT and CRT, although CRT had a significantly greater histological therapeutic effect. The prognosis of the pathological LPNM-positive cases was significantly poorer than that of pathological LPNM-negative cases.

Outcome of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with total mesorectal excision in treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard treatment of mid- and low-lying rectal cancer. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection has been suggested as an approach to decrease recurrence and improve survival. Our meta-analysis presented here aimed to review the current outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature search querying electronic databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed articles that reported the outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall and disease free-survival, and complications.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 29 studies of 10,646 patients. Of those patients, 39.4% underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operation time for the lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was significantly longer than total mesorectal excision alone (360 minutes versus 294.7 minutes, P = .02). Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was associated with higher odds of overall complications (odds ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.87, P < .001) and urinary dysfunction (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-3.67, P = .008) than total mesorectal excision alone. Both groups had similar rates of male sexual dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-2.79, P = .08), anastomotic leakage (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.93, P = .59), local recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.25, P = .79), distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.2, P = .72), overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.056, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.13, P = .13), and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.07, P = .37).

CONCLUSION

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was not associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rates or improvement in survival as compared with total mesorectal excision alone; however, LPLND was associated with longer operation time and increased complication rate.

Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management

BACKGROUND

The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm.

METHODS

A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature.

RESULTS

The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection.

CONCLUSION

Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.