1
|
Koneru S, Cornish J, Chapuis PH, Keshava A, Rickard MJFX, Ng KS. Low anterior resection syndrome phenotypes-Different symptom profiles for different patients. Colorectal Dis 2024. [PMID: 38803003 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
AIM Attention is increasingly being turned to functional outcomes as being central to colorectal cancer (CRC) survivorship. The current literature may underestimate the impact of evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction with bowel function after anterior resection (AR) for CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of post-AR symptoms of storage and evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHOD A cross-sectional study was performed at an Australian hospital of patients post-AR for CRC (2012-2021). The postoperative bowel function scores used were: low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), St Mark's incontinence, Cleveland Clinic constipation and Altomare obstructive defaecation syndrome scores. Eight 'storage' and 'evacuatory' dysfunction symptoms were derived. A seven-point Likert scale measured patient satisfaction. The SF36v2® measured HRQoL. Linear regression assessed the association between symptoms, patient satisfaction and HRQoL. RESULTS Overall, 248 patients participated (mean age 70.8 years, 57.3% male), comprising 103 with rectal cancer and 145 with sigmoid cancer. Of the symptoms that had a negative impact on patient satisfaction, six reflected evacuatory dysfunction, namely excessive straining (p < 0.001), one or more unsuccessful bowel movement attempt(s)/24 h (p < 0.001), anal/vaginal digitation (p = 0.005), regular enema use (p = 0.004), toilet revisiting (p = 0.004) and >10 min toileting (p = 0.004), and four reflected storage dysfunction, namely leaking flatus (p = 0.002), faecal urgency (p = 0.005), use of antidiarrhoeal medication (p = 0.001) and incontinence-related lifestyle alterations (p < 0.001). A total of 130 patients (53.5%) had 'no LARS', 56 (23.1%) had 'minor LARS' and 57 (23.4%) had 'major LARS'. Fifty-seven (44.5%) patients classified as having 'no LARS' had evacuatory dysfunction. CONCLUSION Postoperative storage and evacuatory dysfunction symptoms have an adverse impact on patient satisfaction and HRQoL post-AR. The importance of comprehensively documenting symptoms of evacuatory dysfunction is highlighted. Further research is required to develop a patient satisfaction-weighted LARS-specific HRQoL instrument.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sireesha Koneru
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie Cornish
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Pierre H Chapuis
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anil Keshava
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew J F X Rickard
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koneru S, Patton V, Ng KS. Quality of life in permanent ostomates - what really matters to them? ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38761003 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The impact of a permanent stoma, such as post-abdominoperineal resection (APR), on quality of life (QoL) is well-documented. While stoma-related QoL tools exist, their relationship with stoma satisfaction is unclear. This study aimed to identify which aspects of QoL were most associated with stoma satisfaction. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional study of consecutive patients who had an APR for rectal cancer at an Australian tertiary hospital (2012-2021), identified from a prospectively maintained database, was conducted. The Stoma-QoL questionnaire was used. Overall patient satisfaction with stoma function, and whether healthcare advice was sought for stoma dysfunction, were explored. Linear regression assessed the association between individual issues examined in the Stoma-QoL questionnaire and overall patient satisfaction with stoma function. RESULTS Overall, 64 patients (62.5% male, mean 68.1 years) participated. Stoma-QoL score was associated with stoma satisfaction (P < 0.05). QoL items impacting satisfaction were: needing to know nearest toilet location (P = 0.04), pouch smell concerns (P = 0.008), needing daytime rest (P = 0.02), clothing limitations (P = 0.02), sexual attractiveness concerns (P < 0.05), embarrassment (P < 0.05), difficulty hiding the pouch (P = 0.02), concerns about being burdensome (P = 0.04) and difficulty with interpersonal interaction (P = 0.03). Only 11 (17.2%) patients sought healthcare advice for stoma dysfunction. CONCLUSION While stoma-specific QoL is associated with stoma satisfaction, individual QoL aspects impact differently on satisfaction in permanent colostomy patients. These findings may help identify focus areas for peri-operative counselling for clinicians and stomal therapists, highlight the importance of tailored multidisciplinary care in ostomates and suggests that a stoma type-specific Stoma-QoL questionnaire is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sireesha Koneru
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vicki Patton
- Curtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koneru S, Builth-Snoad L, Rickard MJFX, Keshava A, Chapuis PH, Ng KS. Major low anterior resection syndrome has equivalent health-related quality of life implications as having a permanent colostomy. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 28:17. [PMID: 38099961 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02879-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature is inconclusive when comparing health-related quality of life following restorative anterior resection (AR) compared with abdominoperineal resection (APR). Consideration of functional outcomes may explain this inconsistency. The aim of this study was to compare health-related quality of life in patients post-anterior resection, stratified by low anterior resection syndrome score, and post-abdominoperineal resection patients. METHODS A cross-sectional study of consecutive patients post APR and AR for rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma at a tertiary centre in Sydney, Australia (Jan 2012- Dec 2021) was performed. HRQoL outcomes (SF36v2 physical [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS] scores) were compared between APR and AR patients, with subgroup analyses stratifying AR patients according to LARS score (no/minor/major). Age- and gender-adjusted comparisons were performed by linear regression. RESULTS Overall, 248 post-AR patients (57.3% male, mean age 70.8 years, SD 11.6) and 64 post-APR patients (62.5% male, mean age 68.1 years, SD 13.1) participated. When stratified by LARS, 'major LARS' had a similar negative effect on age-and sex-adjusted PCS scores as APR. 'No LARS' (p < 0.001) and 'minor LARS' (p < 0.001) patients had higher PCS scores compared to post-APR patients. 'Major LARS' had a similarly negative effect on MCS scores compared with post-APR patients. MCS scores were higher in 'no LARS' (p = 0.006) compared with APR patients. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative bowel dysfunction significantly impacts health-related quality of life. Patients with 'major LARS' have health-related quality of life as poor as those following APR. This requires consideration when counselling patients on postoperative health-related quality of life, especially where poor postoperative bowel function is anticipated following restorative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koneru
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L Builth-Snoad
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M J F X Rickard
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Keshava
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P H Chapuis
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K-S Ng
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Concord, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ng KS, Gladman MA. LARS: A review of therapeutic options and their efficacy. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2021.100849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
5
|
Verkuijl SJ, Jonker JE, Trzpis M, Burgerhof JGM, Broens PMA, Furnée EJB. Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:960-969. [PMID: 33277056 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As survival rates of colon cancer increase, knowledge about functional outcomes is becoming ever more important. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify functional outcomes after surgery for colon cancer. Secondly, we aimed to determine the effect of time to follow-up and type of colectomy on postoperative functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting bowel function following surgery for colon cancer. Outcome parameters were bowel function scores and/or prevalence of bowel symptoms. Additionally, the effect of time to follow-up and type of resection was analyzed. RESULTS In total 26 studies were included, describing bowel function between 3 to 178 months following right hemicolectomy (n = 4207), left hemicolectomy/sigmoid colon resection (n = 4211), and subtotal/total colectomy (n = 161). In 16 studies (61.5%) a bowel function score was used. Pooled prevalence for liquid and solid stool incontinence was 24.1% and 6.9%, respectively. The most prevalent constipation-associated symptoms were incomplete evacuation and obstructive, difficult emptying (33.3% and 31.4%, respectively). Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome was present in 21.1%. No differences between time to follow-up or type of colectomy were found. CONCLUSION Bowel function problems following surgery for colon cancer are common, show no improvement over time and do not depend on the type of colectomy. Apart from fecal incontinence, constipation-associated symptoms are also highly prevalent. Therefore, more attention should be paid to all possible aspects of bowel dysfunction following surgery for colon cancer and targeted treatment should commence promptly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne J Verkuijl
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Jara E Jonker
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monika Trzpis
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes G M Burgerhof
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul M A Broens
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Edgar J B Furnée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|