A tailored rhomboid mucocutaneous advancement flap to treat anal stenosis

Use of mesoglycan in the acute phase of hemorrhoidal disease (the CHORMES study): study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is associated with substantial economic burden and negative effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aCute HaemORrhoids treatment with MESoglycan (CHORMES) study aims to evaluate the effects of orally administered mesoglycan, a natural preparation of glycosaminoglycans with antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties, as an acute treatment in patients with HD.

METHODS

CHORMES is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial being conducted at two centers in Italy. Adults aged 18-75 years with Grade I-III HD according to Goligher classification or external thrombosed hemorrhoids, and a Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) of ≥ 5, will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to mesoglycan or placebo and will be treated for 40 days (two capsules for the first 5 days and one capsule for the subsequent 35 days twice daily [after breakfast and dinner], equivalent to 200 mg in the first 5 days and 100 mg subsequently). Concomitant use of analgesics is permitted in both treatment groups. The trial aims to enroll 50 patients, with 25 patients in each treatment group. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of mesoglycan in reducing symptoms of HD, assessed via change in HDSS from baseline (day 0) to day 40 in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary objectives include changes in HRQoL from baseline to day 40 using the Short Health Scale for Hemorrhoidal Disease, safety (adverse effects, physical assessments, vital signs and laboratory parameters in the safety population), fecal continence assessed using the Vaizey score, bleeding assessed using the Bleeding score, the amount and type of analgesic taken, and pain. Patient enrolment began on 11 December 2023, and trial completion is expected by December 2024.

DISCUSSION

The CHORMES trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesoglycan, in addition to its impact on HRQoL, analgesic use and pain, in patients with HD. The results of the trial will assist clinicians in determining the most effective treatment for patients with HD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06101992. Prospectively registered on 26 October 2023 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06101992 .

Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam for the treatment of mucocutaneous bridges and/or residual piles after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy

Injection sclerotherapy is an effective and safe treatment in selected cases. It might be used as the first treatment for I-III degree hemorrhoidal disease (HD), but also as a bridge therapy for more severe cases not amenable to invasive treatments. However, concerning the long-term recurrence rate, open excisional hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard in cases of III- and IV-degree HD. In this context, it is recommended to perform the excision of no more than three piles and to preserve the muco-cutaneous bridges to avoid post-operative anal stenosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical outcomes and efficacy of the combined treatment of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the use of ST on the remnant muco-cutaneous bridges/residual piles. This was a single-center retrospective study and a total of 18 patients with IV-degree HD, aged between 18 and 75 years with symptomatic HD according to the Goligher classification, were enrolled between January 2023 and June 2023 and their follow-up continued until October 2023 after reaching 3 months of follow-up. The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey Incontinence Score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence. A total of 77.8% (14/18) of the patients were symptom-free (hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) score = 0) after 3 months. Moreover, a statistically significant decrease in the median HDSS and short health scale for HD (SHS-HD) score was registered from 16 preoperatively (T0) to 2 at 3-month follow-up (T3). Neither post-operative bleeding nor any type of complications occurred. The use of sclerotherapy in combination with the traditional open excisional hemorrhoidectomy has shown promising results. Further structured studies are needed and greater dissemination and education of the general surgeon on the subject is necessary.

Clinical evidence and rationale of mesoglycan to treat chronic venous disease and hemorrhoidal disease: a narrative review

Chronic venous disease (CVD) and hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are among the most common vascular diseases in the world, with CVD affecting 22-41% of the population in Europe and HD having a point prevalence of 11-39%. The burden is substantial in terms of the effect of symptoms on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and direct/indirect medical costs. Treatment begins with lifestyle changes, compression in CVD and topical therapies in HD, and escalates as needed through oral therapies first and eventually to surgery for severe disease. CVD and HD share etiological features and pathological changes affecting the structure and function of the tissue extracellular matrix. Mesoglycan, a natural glycosaminoglycan (GAG) preparation composed primarily of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, has been demonstrated to positively impact the underlying causes of CVD and HD, regenerating the glycocalyx and restoring endothelial function, in addition to having antithrombotic, profibrinolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiedema and wound-healing effects. In clinical trials, oral mesoglycan reduced the severity of CVD signs and symptoms, improved HRQoL, and accelerated ulcer healing. In patients with HD, mesoglycan significantly reduced the severity of signs and symptoms and the risk of rectal bleeding. In patients undergoing excisional hemorrhoidectomy, adding mesoglycan to standard postoperative care reduced pain, improved HRQoL, reduced incidence of thrombosis, and facilitated an earlier return to normal activities/work, compared with standard postoperative care alone. The clinical effects of mesoglycan in patients with CVD or HD are consistent with the agent's known mechanisms of action.

Ten-year multicentric retrospective analysis regarding postoperative complications and impact of comorbidities in hemorrhoidal surgery with literature review

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is considered a low-severity pathology by both general population and physicians, but the lengthy conservative therapy and postoperative complications suggest otherwise.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of different treatment options, both conservative and surgical, in contrast with some preexisting comorbidities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, 10-yearlong study between January 2011 and December 2021 in two surgical centers, a private and a state-owned hospital. We compared the efficacy and safety of several treatment options, such as open hemorrhoidectomy, stapled hemorrhoidopexy, rubber band ligation and infrared coagulation in terms of complication rates and types and their correlation with different preexisting comorbidities such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), use of anticoagulant medication (AM) and liver cirrhosis. We also conducted a 20-years long PubMed research (1.263 articles) for relevant comparisons.

RESULTS

Our study recorded 10940 patients with HD, 10241 with conservative and 699 with surgical treatment. Out of these, the male-to-female ratio of 1.3, and a peak in age distribution between 59 and 68 years old (32% of patients). For the entire study, we recorded a 90% incidence of immediate pain, immediate bleeding in 1.5% (11 cases), delayed bleeding in 1.0% (7 cases), and 0.6% surgical site infections. Urinary retention was also present, with 0.2% of patients, anal stricture in 1% and fecal incontinence for 0.5% of patients (4 cases). We recorded no severe complications such as Fournier`s gangrene or rectovaginal perforations. IBD accounted for 6% of the patients, with ulcerative colitis in 12% and Chron`s disease in 10.5%. 6.6% of the patients had AM, determining 4% immediate and 2% delayed bleeding, in surgically treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study determined that most common complications (pain, urinary retention, bleeding, and stricture) are correlated with each surgical technique and pre-existing comorbidities.

Safety and efficacy of Levorag emulgel in the treatment of anal fissures using a validated scoring system

Introduction

Anal fissure is one of the most common anal disease characterized by intense anal pain, and deterioration of patients quality of life. Treatment is mainly based on the topical administration of calcium antagonist or nitric oxide ointments, and in cases refractory to medical treatment patients can undergo surgery. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Levorag emulgel in the treatment of acute and chronic fissures using of a validated scoring system.

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study was carried out on patients with anal fissures between February and May 2022. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using the REALISE score, a new validated scoring system that rates VAS for pain, NSAID use, pain duration, bleeding, and quality of life (QoL), recorded after 10, 20 and 30 days from the beginning of treatment.

Results

Forty patients (median age 46 years, IQR 29-57, 70% women) with acute (22, 55%) or chronic (18, 45%) anal fissures entered the study. The median anal pain score according to the VAS scale decreased significantly from 7 (IQR 4.7-8) at baseline to 1 (IQR 0-3.2, p = 0.05) after 20 days. At the 30-day proctological examination, 22 patients (61%) were pain free (median VAS of 0, IQR 0-1.2, p < 0.05). Pain duration after defecation measured according to the REALISE score, showed a significant decrease after 10 days, from a median value of 2 (IQR 1-4) to 1 (IQR 1-1.2) (p < 0.005). The median value of the REALISE score decreased significantly, from 15 (IQR 11-19.25) at first proctological evaluation to 4 (IQR 4-6, p = 0.139) after 30 days of treatment. At day 30, complete fissure healing was achieved in 30 patients (80%). The healing rate was 82% and 78% in patients with acute and chronic anal fissures, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of Levorag® Emulgel may represent a safe and effective non-invasive first line treatment in patients affected by acute or chronic anal fissure.

Anoplasty for anatomical anal stenosis: systematic review of complications and recurrences

AIM

The optimal surgical treatment for anatomical anal stenosis (AS) remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to determine the rates of complications and recurrence after anoplasty for anatomical AS and, wherever feasible, compare the outcomes for the various techniques.

METHOD

A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library of Systematic Review, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to May 2021. Studies that assessed the outcomes of anoplasty in adult patients with anatomical AS were selected. The primary outcomes were complications and recurrence. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

From the total of 2705 unique screened records, 151 were assessed for eligibility. Only 29 studies (two prospective) met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 556 patients [mean age 53 (18-83) years, 46% female]. Previous history of surgery for haemorrhoidal disease accounted for three quarters of cases. A total of 14 types of anoplasty were found, with the Y-V flap being the most performed technique [27% of cases (n = 149)]. Complications frequently occurred, with a pooled prevalence of 10.2% (95% CI 3.9%-24.1%) after Y-V flap and 11.5% (5.3%-23.0%) after rhomboid/diamond flap. Patients undergoing house flap achieved better results in terms of clinical improvement, satisfaction and quality of life compared with Y-V flap and rhomboid/diamond flap. When considering only studies with at least 12 months of follow-up, the pooled prevalence of recurrence was 4.7% (2.2%-9.8%), with significantly higher rates observed in the prospective versus retrospective series [pooled prevalence 18.9% (11.5%-29.5%) vs. 3.6% (1.7-7.8%), respectively; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Both complications and recurrence were significantly lower after house flap compared with rhomboid/diamond and Y-V flap. Better designed multicentre studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021239493.

New Techniques in Hemorrhoidal Disease but the Same Old Problem: Anal Stenosis

Anal stenosis, which develops as a result of aggressive excisional hemorrhoidectomy, especially with the stoutly use of advanced technologies (LigaSure^®, ultrasonic dissector, laser, etc.), has become common, causing significant deterioration in the patient’s quality of life. Although non-surgical treatment is effective for mild anal stenosis, surgical reconstruction is unavoidable for moderate to severe anal stenosis that causes distressing, severe anal pain, and inability to defecate. The problem in anal stenosis, unlike anal fissure, is that the skin does not stretch as a result of chronic fibrosis due to surgery. Therefore, the application of lateral internal sphincterotomy does not provide satisfactory results in the treatment of anal stenosis. Surgical treatment methods are based on the use of flaps of different shapes and sizes to reconstruct the anal caliber and flexibility. This article aims to summarize most-used surgical techniques for anal stenosis regarding functional and surgical outcomes.

Evolution of Surgical Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: An Historical Overview

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the symptomatic enlargement and/or distal displacement of the normal hemorrhoidal cushions and is one of the most frequent diseases in colorectal surgery. Several surgical or office-based therapies are currently available, with the aim of being a more tailored approach. This article aimed to elucidate the historical evolution of surgical therapy for HD from ancient times, highlighting the crucial steps, controversies, and pioneers in the field. In contrast with the previous literature on the topic that is often updated to the 1990s, with the introduction of stapled hemorrhoidopexy and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization, this article describes all new surgical and office-based treatments introduced in the first 20 years of the 2000s.