An audit of process and outcome for emergency colectomy in England and Wales

A call for clarity: a scoping review of predictors of poor outcome after emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rapidly progressing; however, many patients with the disease still require surgery. Often this is done as an emergency. Initiatives such as the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit have shown how evidence-based emergency surgery improves outcomes for the patient. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the current evidence base on risk stratification in emergency abdominal surgery for IBD.

METHODS

A literature search, abstract and full paper screening resulted in 17 articles representing 63 472 patients from seven countries.

RESULTS

It is likely that age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, comorbidity and organ dysfunction play a similar role in risk stratification in IBD patients as in other emergency abdominal surgery cohorts. However, the reporting of what is considered an IBD emergency is variable. Six studies include clear definitions of emergency in our study. The range of what is considered an emergency is within 12 h of admission to any time within an unplanned admission.

CONCLUSION

To have data driven, evidence-based emergency surgical practice in IBD we need consistency of reporting, including the definitions of emergency and urgency. Core descriptor sets in IBD would be valuable.

A contemporary series of surgical outcomes following subtotal colectomy and/or completion proctectomy for management of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The main indications for emergency subtotal colectomy (SC) include management of toxic colitis, refractory haemorrhage and/or perforation. Alternatively, elective surgery is performed for those refractory to medical therapy or with evidence of multifocal dysplasia. Overall, the annual incidence of SC has fallen since the introduction of biologic therapies and we aimed to review our current practices.

METHODS

A retrospective review of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between 2013 and 2020 was performed. Medical records, operative notes, discharge summaries, histopathology reports and other supporting documents were reviewed. Indication for surgery, management of the rectum (i.e. maintenance of rectal stump, progression to completion proctectomy or IPAA formation) associated morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification) and length of hospital stay were examined.

RESULTS

Fifty-six IBD patients underwent a subtotal colectomy. Twenty-five patients (UC 14, Crohn's 11) had an elective procedure, and 31 patients (UC 19 Crohn's 12) had an emergency/semi-urgent procedure. Interestingly, 80% (n = 25) of the emergency cohort and 68% (n = 17) of the elective cohort had a laparoscopic resection. Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo > 2) was higher among the emergency group (39% vs. 24%). Deep surgical site infection was the commonest morbidity (13%) in the emergency group, while superficial surgical site infection was commonest in the elective cohort (20%). Overall, there was no difference in surgical re-intervention rate (13% vs 12%), and there were no perioperative mortalities. Median post-operative length of stay was shorter in the elective cohort (9 versus 13 days).

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of IBD patients still require semi-urgent/emergency colectomy, which is associated with considerable length of stay and morbidity. The results of our study provide real-world outcomes to help counsel patients on expected outcomes.