Natural orifice specimen extraction for colorectal surgery: Early adoption in a Western population

Natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: technique, outcomes and role of inflammatory markers

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive colectomy is common for diverticular disease. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an innovative adjunct that avoids the morbidity of abdominal incisions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of NOSE in laparoscopic surgery for complications of diverticular disease, and assess the role of post-operative inflammatory markers.

METHODS

A multi-centre prospective study was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Consecutive patients who underwent emergency and elective NOSE colectomy for diverticular disease were included. Demographics, surgical techniques, post-operative complications and biochemical results were analysed.

RESULTS

NOSE colectomy was successful in 99.4% of patients (171/172), with a mean age of 59.9 years. Indications for surgery were phlegmon (35%), recurrent diverticulitis (27%), stricture (21%), fistulae (14%) and haemorrhage (2%). Mean length of stay was 5.7 days (SD 3.8), and anastomotic leak rate was 1.8%. Specimen longitudinal splitting increased operative time (254 vs. 220 min, p < 0.01) and length of stay (6.6 vs. 5.3 days, p = 0.02). Significantly higher inflammatory markers were observed in the longitudinal split group on post-operative days 2-4 without increased complication or anastomotic leak rates.

CONCLUSION

NOSE colectomy demonstrates excellent perioperative outcomes in this large series and is an effective approach for diverticular disease. Specimen debulking facilitates successful NOSE procedures, with expected increases in inflammatory markers which are not associated with higher complication rates.

Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) has shown benefits such as reduced pain, fewer wound complications, and improved cosmesis. In colorectal anastomosis during NOSE, double staple anastomosis (DSA) and triple stapled technique (TSA) are common. However, a novel single stapled anastomosis (SSA) technique, utilising two laparoscopically placed purse strings and only four 5 mm ports, has emerged. This study aims to compare the complications between single and double stapled anastomoses in NOSE LAR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of NOSE LAR data from 2011 to 2022 included patients. All patients received mechanical bowel preparation, colonoscopic instillation of betadine or chlorhexidine, and antibiotics. DSA was performed conventionally, while the SSA technique involved an additional rectal laparoscopic purse string. Fisher's exact test assessed anastomotic leak rates and the need for intraoperative revisions.

RESULTS

Analysis of 179 patients revealed 40 with SSA and 139 with DSA. Patient age ranged from 20 to 88 years, with a BMI between 22 and 46 kg/m2. Diverticulitis and malignant polyps, the most common indications. Operation duration was similar between groups (238 min in SSA, 234 min in DSA; P = 0.69). Intraoperative laparoscopic anastomotic redo was significantly higher in the SSA group (six patients) than the DSA group (five patients; P = <0.05). No anastomotic leaks occurred in the SSA group, while six occurred in the DSA group (P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in Length of Stay (LOS), (5 days in SSA versus 6 days in DSA group, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Single stapled anastomosis in NOSE LAR appears safe for benign conditions but is more likely to necessitate intraoperative redo compared to double stapled anastomosis.

Progress, challenges, and future perspectives of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review

With the continuous advancements in precision medicine and the relentless pursuit of minimally invasive techniques, Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) has emerged. Compared to traditional surgical methods, NOSES better embodies the principles of minimally invasive surgery, making scar-free operations possible. In recent years, with the progress of science and technology, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery has been widely applied in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Robotic surgical systems, with their clear surgical view and high operational precision, have shown significant advantages in the treatment process. To further improve the therapeutic outcomes for colorectal cancer patients, some scholars have attempted to combine robotic technology with NOSES. However, like traditional open surgery or laparoscopic surgery, the use of the robotic platform presents both advantages and limitations. Therefore, this study reviews the current research status, progress, and controversies regarding Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for colorectal cancer, aiming to provide clinicians with more options in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Robotic Sigmoidectomy With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction: A Single-Center Experience

Background Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) involves the removal of specimens through a naturally occurring orifice, such as the anus, rather than trans-abdominal extraction. NOSE procedures have been shown to significantly reduce postoperative complications and improve healing.  Objective The purpose of this case series is to report the outcomes of 27 patients undergoing sigmoidectomies through natural orifice specimen extraction. Materials and methods We carefully recorded demographic data on age and BMI, as well as operative data on surgical indication, and length of stay. We also collected data on postoperative complications, including infection, hernia, wound dehiscence, urinary tract infections (UTIs), or anastomotic leaks. Results Our patients were majority female (n = 21, 77.8%) with a median age of 53.5 (range: 25-79) and median BMI of 33.2 kg/m2 (range: 16.7 - 48.3 kg/m2). Thirteen patients (48.1%) were obese (BMI > 30.0 kg/m2). The majority of these patients underwent sigmoidectomies for benign conditions such as recurrent diverticulitis (n = 9, 33.3%), rectal prolapse (n = 8, 29.6%), perforated diverticulitis (n = 3, 11.1%), colovesical fistula (n = 3, 11.1%), and abdominal abscess (n = 3, 11.1%) (Table 1). One patient was receiving treatment for sigmoid cancer. The average estimated blood loss was 63.26 mL. The average hospital stay was 3.61 days. Three patients (11.1%) developed a fever postoperatively (temperature >= 100.4 F), which resolved the day after. One patient completed a post-operative hospital stay of 19 days for dialysis and rehab placement. No patients (0.0%) experienced any postoperative complications, including wound infection, hernia, dehiscence, UTIs, or anastomotic leakages. There was no postoperative mortality. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the practicality and safety of NOSE procedures for sigmoidectomies as an alternative to transabdominal approaches to treat benign colon diseases.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery With New Insights on Technique and Patient Selection

BACKGROUND

Following laparoscopic colorectal surgery, transabdominal specimen extraction requires a mini-laparotomy or Pfannenstiel incision, associated with increased postoperative pain and wound complications. The vagina has several unique properties that make natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) ideal. We report our experience with transvaginal NOSE for colorectal cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A transvaginal sizer allows the posterior vagina to be incised under tension. A transverse or cruciate incision is made, followed by the insertion of a double-ring wound protector. The external ring is opened against the perineum to shorten the length of the conduit for specimen delivery. Vaginotomy closure is performed via laparoscopy using a barbed suture.

RESULTS

Seventeen consecutive female patients underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery with attempted transvaginal NOSE. Median age and body mass index was 67 (range: 50 to 82) years and 26.5 (range: 19.7 to 35.8) kg/m 2 , respectively. Fourteen patients (82%) underwent left-sided resections and 3 (18%) underwent right-sided resections. Median operating time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay was 245 (range: 155 to 360) minutes, 30 (range: 10 to 500) mL, and 3 (range: 2 to 9) days, respectively. Transvaginal extraction was unsuccessful in 1 (6%) patient. Two (12%) patients experienced early postoperative morbidity, neither attributable to the extraction procedure. Median tumor circumferential diameter was 3.3 (range: 2.2 to 7.0) cm. Median follow-up duration was 17 (range: 8 to 27) months. There was no instance of sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal NOSE for colorectal cancer surgery is feasible and safe in selected patients. Overall specimen diameter, inclusive of tumor and mesentery, relative to pelvic outlet and conduit diameter is the most important consideration for transvaginal NOSE.

Development of artificial blood loss and duration of excision score to evaluate surgical difficulty of total laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Total laparoscopic anterior resection (tLAR) has been gradually applied in the treatment of rectal cancer (RC). This study aims to develop a scoring system to predict the surgical difficulty of tLAR.

METHODS

RC patients treated with tLAR were collected. The blood loss and duration of excision (BLADE) scoring system was built to assess the surgical difficulty by using restricted cubic spline regression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of the BLADE score on postoperative complications. The random forest (RF) algorithm was used to establish a preoperative predictive model for the BLADE score.

RESULTS

A total of 1,994 RC patients were randomly selected for the training set and the test set, and 325 RC patients were identified as the external validation set. The BLADE score, which was built based on the thresholds of blood loss (60 ml) and duration of surgical excision (165 min), was the most important risk factor for postoperative complications. The areas under the curve of the predictive RF model were 0.786 in the training set, 0.640 in the test set, and 0.665 in the external validation set.

CONCLUSION

This preoperative predictive model for the BLADE score presents clinical feasibility and reliability in identifying the candidates to receive tLAR and in making surgical plans for RC patients.

Application of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Urological Surgery

Background: To summarize and analyze the application of transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (TV-NOSES) in the operation of renal carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and bladder cancer. Methods: Fifty-seven female patients who underwent 3D laparoscopic radical surgery for urinary tumors and TV-NOSES were analyzed retrospectively. The basic clinical data, perioperative-related data, postoperative complications, and related indexes of postoperative functional evaluation were analyzed and evaluated. Results: All 57 operations were successfully performed according to the original plan. One patient developed mild vaginal infection after operation, which was cured after symptomatic treatment. The visual analog scale scores at 24 and 48 hours after operation were 2.5 (1-4) and 1.1 (0-2), respectively. Patient scar assessment questionnaire scores at 3 months after operation were 37.1 (32-48). Pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 scores at preoperative and postoperative 3 months were 5.9 (3-9) and 6.3 (3-9), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = .48). There was no significant difference in female sexual function index scores between preoperative and postoperative 3 months (P = .82). Conclusions: TV-NOSES in urological surgery is feasible and practical. In addition, this technique further reduces wound pain and wound-related complications without affecting postoperative sexual function and pelvic floor function. The successful development of this technique has laid a solid foundation for further clinical application and promotion. Clinical Trial Registration number: 22/141-3342.

Outcomes after natural orifice extraction vs conventional specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) via the anus or vagina replaces conventional transabdominal specimen retrieval via the transabdominal route through a limited mid-line laparotomy or Pfannenstiel incision. Reducing the number of laparoscopic ports further decreases operative abdominal wall trauma. These techniques reduce the surgical wound size as well as the risk of incision-related morbidity.

AIM

To compare short-term outcomes following 3-port NOSE surgery with a matched cohort of conventional non-NOSE colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective 3-port laparoscopic colorectal NOSE surgery between February to October 2021 were identified. Selection criteria for NOSE surgery was adapted from the 2019 International Consensus on Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for colorectal cancer. Patients with clinical T4 or N2 tumors on staging computed tomography were also excluded. The propensity score-matched cohort was identified amongst patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery from January 2019 to December 2020. Matching was performed in the ratio of 1:4 based on age, gender, type of resection, and p - tumor node metastasis staging.

RESULTS

Over the eight-month study duration, 14 consecutive cases (nine female, five male) of elective 3-port laparoscopic surgery with NOSE were performed for colorectal cancer. Median age and body mass index were 70 (range 43-82) years and 24.1 (range 20.0-31.7) kg/m2 respectively. Six patients underwent transanal NOSE and eight had transvaginal NOSE. Median operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative length of stay were 208 (range 165-365) min, 30 (range 10-150) mL and 3 (range 2-6) d respectively. Two (14%) suffered minor postoperative compilations not attributable to the NOSE procedure. Median follow-up duration was 12 (range 8-15) mo. No instances of mortality, local or distant disease recurrence were recorded in this cohort. Compared to the conventional surgery cohort of 56 patients, the 3-port NOSE cohort had significantly quicker mean return of bowel function (2.6 vs 1.2 d, P < 0.001), reduced postoperative pain and patient-controlled analgesia use, and decreased length of hospital stay (6.4 vs 3.4 d, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in surgical duration and perioperative complication rates between the NOSE and non-NOSE cohorts.

CONCLUSION

3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with NOSE is a feasible technique, augmenting the minimally invasive nature of surgery and producing good outcomes. Appropriate patient selection and expertise in conventional laparoscopy are required.

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study

Whether natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) could provide beneficial effects in treating elderly patients is still under debate. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of transanal NOSES with conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LA) in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A retrospective analysis from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Outcomes related to surgery, body image, quality of life, anal function and long-term survival were compared between the two groups with the propensity-score matching (PSM) method. After PSM, 78 patients were successfully compared. Patients with NOSES had faster gastrointestinal function recovery (P = 0.028), less postoperative complications (P = 0.025), lower pain scores on days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery (P < 0.001). The body image score (P < 0.001) and cosmetic score (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the NOSES group than the LA group at 1 month after surgery. Patients with NOSES posed better global health status (P < 0.001), role function (P = 0.009), emotional function (P = 0.011) and social function (P = 0.011) at 3 months after surgery. Moreover, NOSES showed non inferiority in anal function 6 months after surgery. No significant difference could be found regarding to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM). In elderly CRC patients, NOSES harbored favorable postoperative outcomes, excellent cosmetic properties and better quality of life. Besides, anal function and long-term outcomes of NOSES can be sure for elderly patients.