Ileo-rectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis-Long-term outcome, failure and risk of cancer at a tertiary centre

Ileorectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: what do surgeons and patients need to know? A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently the gold standard for restoration of gastrointestinal continuity after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the UK. However, with further experience of the risks relating to IPAA, the use of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is being revisited. Decisions regarding restorative surgery after colectomy are individual to every patient's circumstances, and this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to guide a full discussion of the risks and benefits of IRA.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted of papers published from 2000 onwards relating to IRA and ulcerative colitis, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The papers were reviewed by two independent surgeons for information it was felt that patients and surgeons would want to know about the operation (cancer risk, bowel function, sexual and urinary function, fecundity/fertility and postoperative complications).

RESULTS

Seventeen papers were identified for inclusion as they reported original data on one or more of the categories identified for discussion. The median ten-year cancer risk after IRA was 2.8% and the median failure rate at ten years was 21%. IRA was generally found to have lower postoperative complication rates and better bowel function than IPAA, with sexual function similar and fecundity not commented on in any paper.

CONCLUSIONS

For some patients, IRA can offer restorative surgery in the short or long term, with acceptable cancer risk, failure rate and postoperative complications, while avoiding the higher risks associated with IPAA.

The fate of the rectum in ulcerative colitis at index surgery and beyond-a contemporary cohort

PURPOSE

Proctectomy is frequently deferred at index colectomy for ulcerative colitis due to acuity or immunosuppressive treatments. The retained rectum remains symptomatic in over 50% with associated cancer risk. Management options include index or delayed proctectomy with or without restoration of continuity or surveillance. Comparative studies of perioperative outcomes and reasons for retaining the rectum are lacking.

METHODS

This 13-year retrospective cohort assesses the fate of the rectum in 168 ulcerative colitis patients by analysing index proctectomy, staged proctectomy and retained rectal remnant determinants and outcomes. The primary outcome was the fate of the rectum. Secondary analysis included perioperative morbidity, length of stay and decision-making determinants.

RESULTS

Proctectomy was performed in 69% of patients, with 16.1% at index surgery. Restorative surgery rate was 44%. Index proctectomy patients were older (54 vs 37 years, p < 0.01), more co-morbid (59.3% vs 38.2%, p = 0.04) and likely to have elective surgery (81.5% vs 21.3%, p < 0.01) or neoplasia (33.3% vs 1.1%, p < 0.01). Outcomes after staged proctectomy were comparable, with age influencing restoration of continuity (33.5 vs 46 years, p < 0.01). Younger patients were indecisive on proctectomy, while those opting for endoscopic surveillance were older (median 65 years, p < 0.01), had more complications (64.3%, p = 0.23) and prolonged hospitalisation (median 15 days, p = 0.02) at colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Index proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is infrequently performed. Perioperative outcomes of restorative and non-restorative staged proctectomy are comparable. Perioperative experience at colectomy may influence patient decisions regarding future management of their rectum.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.

Long-Term Surgical Outcomes and Pathological Analysis of Proctectomy Specimens after Subtotal Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Centre

Background: Reconstruction techniques after subtotal colectomy (STC) and end ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (UC), include ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and continent ileostomy. Aim: To assess surgical strategies and outcomes after subtotal colectomy for UC by calculating the proportions of patients who had further surgery 10 years post-STC and those who did not undergo surgery but who were under surveillance, and histological analysis of pathology specimens from STC and proctectomy. Methods: Patients who had STC for UC from 2002 to 2018 were identified. Variables of interest were extracted from electronic records. Survival analysis on reconstruction surgery was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Curves were censored for loss from follow-up and death. Subtotal colectomy and proctectomy specimens were assessed by a pathologist for acute inflammation at the distal resection margin and within the resected bowel, and for dysplasia or cancer. Results: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included. Eighty-nine (46.3%) underwent proctectomy: eight had panproctocolectomy; thirty had completion proctectomy and the remaining fifty-one of the eighty-nine patients (27%) had IPAA. One patient who did not undergo a proctectomy had an ileorectal anastomosis. Sixty-one (69%) proctectomy specimens had active inflammation, with 29 (48%) including the resection margins. Of the 103 patients who did not have completion surgery, 72 (69%) were under surveillance as of August 2021. No patients in this non-operative group had developed cancer of the residual rectum at follow up. Conclusions: At 10 years after STC for UC, eighty-nine (46.4%) patients had proctectomy, of which fifty-two had IPAA (27%). However, no inflammation was found in the proctectomy specimen in one third of these patients. Therefore, it is possible that IRA may still have a role in the occasional patient with UC.

Post-endoscopy colorectal cancer after colectomy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a population-based register study

OBJECTIVES

Long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) colitis is an indication for endoscopic surveillance. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), cancer detected after a negative colonoscopy, is a quality indicator for colonoscopy. In analogy with PCCRC, we aimed to assess postendoscopy CRC (PECRC) in individuals with IBD who had undergone colectomy.

METHODS

This register study included Swedish adults with an IBD diagnosis who had undergone colectomy and later were examined by either colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy during 2001-2012. The final study population had a CRC diagnosis within 36 months of the index examination. Poisson regression was used to assess the relative risks (RR) of PECRC.

RESULTS

A total of 33 individuals, 12 with an ileorectal anastomosis and 21 with a rectal remnant, had a CRC diagnosis within 36 months of the index endoscopy. Eleven cancers were detected as CRCs, and 22 (67%) were PECRCs. Compared with individuals aged >70 years, individuals aged <30 years had an RR of 3.1 (P = 0.054) and individuals aged 30-50 years had a RR of 2.6 (P = 0.030). A longer interval between colectomy and index endoscopy (>10 vs. <10 years) was associated with a lower risk of PCCRC (RR = 0.5; P = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the risk for Crohn's disease vs. ulcerative colitis, or between ileorectal anastomosis and rectal remnant risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous surveillance of IBD patients after colectomy is important. In the postcolectomy context, PECRC may be used as a quality indicator.