A phase III randomized trial evaluating the quality of life impact of a tailored versus systematic use of defunctioning ileostomy following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-GRECCAR 17 trial protocol

Development and validation of an anastomotic risk score for use in a randomized clinical trial on defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer

AIM

The selective use of defunctioning stomas in anterior resection for rectal cancer hinges on accurately predicting anastomotic leakage. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for use in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHOD

Colorectal Cancer Database (CRCBaSe) Sweden was used to identify patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer 2007-2021. Eligibility criteria mirrored the forthcoming SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA) trial, including patients <80 years of age and with American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status grade of

RESULTS

Of the 2727 eligible patients, 199 (7.3%) were registered with an anastomotic leakage. All models demonstrated similar performance, with prediction instability observed for risks exceeding 12.5%. The preferred model included three significant predictors: male sex (OR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.45-2.75), BMI >30 kg/m2 (OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21-2.74), and radiotherapy (OR 1.90; 95% CI: 1.35-2.69). The bootstrapped area under the curve (AUC) was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62-0.65), with a negative predictive value of 94.6% (95% CI: 93.7%-95.6%). For the validation cohort, the corresponding estimates were 0.66 (95% CI: 0.59-0.74) and 89.5% (95% CI: 86.2%-92.5%).

CONCLUSION

Accuracy of anastomotic leakage prediction using registry-based data is moderate; however, the model's ability to rule out a >10% risk is considered appropriate for trial use.

Collapse

Key Words

• anastomosis
• diverting stoma
• insufficiency
• leakage
• prediction
• total mesorectal excision

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Rectal Neoplasms/surgery
• Rectal Neoplasms/pathology
• Male
• Female
• Anastomotic Leak/etiology
• Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology
• Aged
• Middle Aged
• Risk Assessment/methods
• Proctectomy/adverse effects
• Proctectomy/methods
• Risk Factors
• Surgical Stomas/adverse effects
• Sweden/epidemiology
• Prospective Studies
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
• Aged, 80 and over
• Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants

• Vetenskapsrådet
• Cancerföreningen i Stockholm
• Astma- och Allergiförbundet
• Cancerfonden
• Vetenskapsrådet
• Astma‐ och Allergiförbundet
• Cancerfonden

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Martin Rutegård Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, SurgeryUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
Ida Hed Myrberg Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine SolnaKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
Caroline Nordenvall Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden Department of Pelvic CancerKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
Kalle Landerholm Department of SurgeryRyhov County HospitalJönköpingSweden Department of Biomedical and Clinical SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
Fredrik Jörgren Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
Peter Matthiessen Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
Jennifer Park Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska AcademyGothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
Josefin Segelman Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden Department of SurgeryErsta HospitalStockholmSweden
Pamela Buchwald Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
Jenny Häggström Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and StatisticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Collapse

SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA): Protocol for a prospective study with a nested randomized clinical trial investigating stoma-free survival without major LARS following total mesorectal excision

AIM

Accumulated data suggest that routine use of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer may cause kidney injury, bowel dysfunction and a higher risk of permanent stomas. We aim to study whether avoidance of a diverting stoma in selected patients is safe and reduces adverse consequences.

METHODS

SELSA is a multicentre international prospective observational study nesting an open-label randomized clinical trial. All patients with primary rectal cancer planned for low anterior resection are eligible. Patients operated with curative intent, aged <80 years, with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists' fitness grade I or II, and a low predicted risk of anastomotic leakage are eligible to 1:1 randomization between no defunctioning stoma (experimental arm) or a defunctioning stoma (control arm). The primary outcome is the composite measure of 2-year stoma-free survival without major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Secondary outcomes include anastomotic leakage, postoperative mortality, reinterventions, stoma-related complications, quality of life measures, LARS score, and permanent stoma rate. To be able to state superiority of any study arm regarding the main outcome, with 90% statistical power and assuming 25% attrition, we aim to enrol 212 patients. Patient inclusion will commence in the autumn of 2024.

CONCLUSION

The SELSA study is investigating a tailored approach to defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer in relation to the risk of anastomotic leakage. Our hypothesis is that long-term effects will favour the selective approach, enabling some patients to avoid a defunctioning stoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Swedish Ethical Review Authority approval (2023-04347-01, 2024-02418-02 and 2024-03622-02), Regional Ethics Committee Denmark (H-24014463), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06214988).

Protective defunctioning stoma in bowel segmental resection at the time of total hysterectomy for endometriosis: when less is more

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative complications in women undergoing total hysterectomy with segmental resection (TH-SR) for intestinal endometriosis with or without protective defunctioning stoma (PDS) confection.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study conducted at the Gynecologic department of University Hospital of Lille (France) from January 2008 to January 2022 in patients undergone TH-SR for bowel endometriosis.

RESULTS

100 women were considered for the analysis. PDS were performed in 56 women. The rate of rectal resections was significantly higher in the PDS group (p = 0.03). The mean operative time, AAGL scores and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the PDS group (p = 0.002). The rate of grade III complication according to Clavien-Dindo classification was higher in the PDS group (p = 0.03). Among digestive complications, one case of anastomosis leakage (1.8%) and one case of recto-vaginal fistula (2.3%) was recorded in the non-PDS group, 4 cases of anastomosis stenosis were recorded in the PDS group (7.1%). Persisting bladder atony requiring self-catheterization over one month was the most common disturb (4.6% in the non-PDS group and 7.1% in the PDS group, p = 0.58). The distance of digestive lesion from anal margin was the only risk factor for digestive complications, persistent bladder atony, Clavien-Dindo IIIA and IIIB complications at the multivariate analysis (p = 0.04 and p = 0.06 respectively).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of digestive complications in case of total hysterectomy and concomitant segmental resection when performing or not preventing stoma.

Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers

BACKGROUND

It is assumed that robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) may facilitate complex pelvic dissection for rectal cancer compared to the laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAR). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, short- and long-term oncologic, and functional outcomes between the RAS and LAR approaches.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2021, all rectal cancers operated on by (LAR) or (RAS) were retrospectively reviewed in two colorectal surgery centers.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included in the study, with 70% in the LAR group and 30% in the RAS group. The tumor location and stage were identical in both groups (not significant = NS). The overall postoperative mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups. (0% LAR; 0.5% RAS; NS). The postoperative morbidity was similar between the two groups (60% LAR vs 57% RAS; NS). The number of early surgical re-interventions within the first 30 days was similar (10% for the LAR group and 3% for the RAS group; NS). The rate of complete TME was similar (88% for the LAR group and 94% for the RAS group; NS). However, the rate of circumferential R1 was significantly higher in the LAR group (13%) compared to the RAS group (2%) (p = 0.009). The 3-year recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups (77% for both groups; NS). After a mean follow-up of three years, the incidence of anterior resection syndrome was significantly lower in the LAR group compared to the RAS group (54 vs 76%; p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a RAS was found to be reliable for oncologic outcomes and morbidity. However, the expected benefits for functional outcomes were not observed. Therefore, the added value of RAS for rectal cancer needs to be reassessed in light of new laparoscopic technologies and patient management options.

Surgeon assessment of significant rectal polyps using white light endoscopy alone and in comparison to fluorescence-augmented AI lesion classification

PURPOSE

Perioperative decision making for large (> 2 cm) rectal polyps with ambiguous features is complex. The most common intraprocedural assessment is clinician judgement alone while radiological and endoscopic biopsy can provide periprocedural detail. Fluorescence-augmented machine learning (FA-ML) methods may optimise local treatment strategy.

METHODS

Surgeons of varying grades, all performing colonoscopies independently, were asked to visually judge endoscopic videos of large benign and early-stage malignant (potentially suitable for local excision) rectal lesions on an interactive video platform (Mindstamp) with results compared with and between final pathology, radiology and a novel FA-ML classifier. Statistical analyses of data used Fleiss Multi-rater Kappa scoring, Spearman Coefficient and Frequency tables.

RESULTS

Thirty-two surgeons judged 14 ambiguous polyp videos (7 benign, 7 malignant). In all cancers, initial endoscopic biopsy had yielded false-negative results. Five of each lesion type had had a pre-excision MRI with a 60% false-positive malignancy prediction in benign lesions and a 60% over-staging and 40% equivocal rate in cancers. Average clinical visual cancer judgement accuracy was 49% (with only 'fair' inter-rater agreement), many reporting uncertainty and higher reported decision confidence did not correspond to higher accuracy. This compared to 86% ML accuracy. Size was misjudged visually by a mean of 20% with polyp size underestimated in 4/6 and overestimated in 2/6. Subjective narratives regarding decision-making requested for 7/14 lesions revealed wide rationale variation between participants.

CONCLUSION

Current available clinical means of ambiguous rectal lesion assessment is suboptimal with wide inter-observer variation. Fluorescence based AI augmentation may advance this field via objective, explainable ML methods.

Outcomes of Early Versus Standard Closure of Diverting Ileostomy After Proctectomy: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare outcomes of early and standard closure of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) after proctectomy and determine risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) and complications.

BACKGROUND

Formation of DLI has been a routine practice after proctectomy to decrease the incidence and potential adverse sequela of AL.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of early versus standard closure of DLI after proctectomy. Main outcome measures were postoperative complications, AL, ileus, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and hospital stay following DLI closure.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (932 patients; 57% male) were included. Early closure group included 474 patients and standard closure 458 patients. Early closure was associated with higher odds of AL [odds ratio (OR): 2.315, P =0.013] and similar odds of complications (OR: 1.103, P =0.667), ileus (OR: 1.307, P =0.438), surgical site infection (OR: 1.668, P =0.079), reoperation (OR: 1.896, P =0.062), and readmission (OR: 3.431, P =0.206). Hospital stay was similar (weighted mean difference: 1.054, P =0.237). Early closure had higher odds of AL than standard closure when early closure was done ≤2 weeks (OR: 2.12, P =0.047) but not within 3 to 4 weeks (OR: 2.98, P =0.107). Factors significantly associated with complications after early closure were diabetes mellitus, smoking, and closure of DLI ≤2 weeks, whereas factors associated with AL were ≥ American Society of Anesthesiologists II classification and diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Early closure of DLI after proctectomy has a higher risk of AL, particularly within 2 weeks of DLI formation. On the basis of this study, routine early ileostomy closure cannot be recommended.

Defunctioning stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer does not impact anastomotic leakage: a national population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anterior resection (AR) is considered the gold standard for curative cancer treatment in the middle and upper rectum. The goal of the sphincter-preserving procedure, such as AR, is vulnerable to anastomotic leak (AL) complications. Defunctioning stoma (DS) became the protective measure against AL. Often a defunctioning loop-ileostomy is used, which is associated with substantial morbidity. However, not much is known if the routine use of DS reduces the overall incidence of AL.

METHODS

Elective patients subjected to AR in 2007-2009 and 2016-18 were recruited from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry (SCRCR). Patient characteristics, including DS status and occurrence of AL, were analyzed. In addition, independent risk factors for AL were investigated by multivariable regression.

RESULTS

The statistical increase of DS from 71.6% in 2007-2009 to 76.7% in 2016-2018 did not impact the incidence of AL (9.2% and 8.2%), respectively. DLI was constructed in more than 35% of high-located tumors ≥ 11 cm from the anal verge. Multivariable analysis showed that male gender, ASA 3-4, BMI > 30 kg/m², and neoadjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for AL.

CONCLUSION

Routine DS did not decrease overall AL after AR. A selective decision algorithm for DS construction is needed to protect from AL and mitigate DS morbidities.