Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for evaluation of a randomized exercise training intervention following aortic valve replacement

Home-Based Rehabilitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (REHAB-TAVR): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit of early cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and short-term effects of a home-based exercise program, with or without cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI).

METHODS

We randomized 51 patients (mean age, 83.9 years; 19 women) to a home-based exercise program with CBI (Group A; n = 18) or without CBI (Group B; n = 15), or telephone-based education control (Group C; n = 18). The exercise program focusing on balance, flexibility, strength, and endurance began within 7 days post-discharge and was delivered once weekly by a physical therapist for 8 weeks. CBI included discussions on exercise benefits and barriers, goal setting, detailed exercise planning, and a weekly cash adherence incentive. The primary outcome was a disability score (range: 0-22; higher scores indicate greater disability) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (range: 0-12; higher scores indicate better function), self-efficacy, and outcome expectation scores. Feasibility outcomes included adherence and drop-out rates.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants (83.3%) in Group A, 10 (58.8%) in Group B, and 10 (52.6%) in Group C completed ≥ 5 of the eight assigned weekly sessions (p = 0.196). Two participants in each group were lost to follow-up. At 8 weeks, the home-based exercise groups (Group A and B combined) demonstrated lower disability scores (mean [SE]: 2.6 [0.3] vs. 4.5 [0.5]; p = 0.042) and higher SPPB scores (9.5 [0.6] vs. 6.5 [0.8]; p = 0.003) compared with the education group (Group C). Group A had lower disability scores than Group B (2.1 [0.4] vs. 3.4 [0.5]; p = 0.047), with no differences in self-efficacy and outcome expectation scores.

CONCLUSIONS

An early, home-based, multi-domain exercise program appears feasible and may prevent disability and improve physical function in older adults after TAVR. Adding CBI, including a modest cash incentive, showed trends toward improved adherence and reduced disability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02805309.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in aortic stenosis patients before and after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about how patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) perform on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is sparse. Since exercise testing in patients with symptomatic AS is not advised, submaximal parameters could be of special interest. We aimed to investigate maximal and submaximal physical capacity by CPET before and 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) in patients with severe AS.

METHODS

In this prospective longitudinal study, 30 adult patients (age 66±10 years) with severe AS referred for sAVR underwent maximal CPET (respiratory exchange ratio ≥1.05) on a bicycle ergometer before (PRE) and 1 year after (POST) sAVR. Normally distributed data are presented as mean (±SD) and non-normally distributed data are presented as median (IQR).

RESULTS

Median peak workload increased by 8% from 133 (55) watts at PRE to 144 (67) watts at POST (p<0.001). Median ventilatory threshold (VO2@VT) increased from 1216 (391) to 1328 (309) mL/min (p=0.001, n=28). Mean peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2) was not significantly different between PRE and POST; 1871±441 vs 1937±404 mL/min (p=0.08). The oxygen uptake efficacy slope (OUES) was significantly correlated to PeakVO2 at both PRE (r=0.889, p<0.05) and POST (r=0.888, p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Physical work capacity was improved 1 year following sAVR, in terms of higher median peak workload and VO2@VT. The strong correlation between the submaximal variable OUES and peakVO2 suggests that OUES might be a useful surrogate of peakVO2 in this group of patients where maximal exercise testing is not always recommended.

Effect of aortic valve replacement on myocardial perfusion and exercise capacity in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) leads to reverse cardiac remodeling in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this secondary pooled analysis was to assess the degree and determinants of changes in myocardial perfusion post AVR, and its link with exercise capacity, in patients with severe AS. A total of 68 patients underwent same-day echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with adenosine stress pre and 6-12 months post-AVR. Of these, 50 had matched perfusion data available (age 67 ± 8 years, 86% male, aortic valve peak velocity 4.38 ± 0.63 m/s, aortic valve area index 0.45 ± 0.13cm2/m2). A subgroup of 34 patients underwent a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to assess maximal exercise capacity (peak VO2). Baseline and post-AVR parameters were compared and linear regression was used to determine associations between baseline variables and change in myocardial perfusion and exercise capacity. Following AVR, stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) increased from 1.56 ± 0.52 mL/min/g to 1.80 ± 0.62 mL/min/g (p < 0.001), with a corresponding 15% increase in myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) (2.04 ± 0.57 to 2.34 ± 0.68; p = 0.004). Increasing severity of AS, presence of late gadolinium enhancement, lower baseline stress MBF and MPR were associated with a greater improvement in MPR post-AVR. On multivariable analysis low baseline MPR was independently associated with increased MPR post-AVR. There was no significant change in peak VO2 post-AVR, but a significant increase in exercise duration. Change in MPR was associated with change in peak VO2 post AVR (r = 0.346, p = 0.045). Those with the most impaired stress MBF and MPR at baseline demonstrate the greatest improvements in these parameters following AVR and the magnitude of change in MPR correlated with improvement in peak VO2, the gold standard measure of aerobic exercise capacity.

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new treatment method for aortic stenosis (AS) and has been demonstrated to be suitable for patients with varying risk levels. Indeed, among high-risk patients, TAVR outcomes are comparable to, or even better, than that of the traditional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) method. TAVR outcomes, with respect to post-surgical functional capacity and quality of life, have also been found to be improved, especially when combined with cardiac rehabilitation (CR). CR is a multidisciplinary system, which integrates cardiology with other medical disciplines, such as sports, nutritional, mind-body, and behavioral medicine. It entails the development of appropriate medication, exercise, and diet prescriptions, along with providing psychological support, ensuring the cessation of smoking, and developing risk factor management strategies for cardiovascular disease patients. However, even with CR being able to improve TAVR outcomes and reduce post-surgical mortality rates, it still has largely been underutilized in clinical settings. This article reviews the usage of CR during both pre-and postoperative periods for valvular diseases, and the factors involved in influencing subsequent patient prognoses, thereby providing a direction for subsequent research and clinical applications.

Exercise as the Key to Improve Cardiopulmonary Function in Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a type of cardiovascular disease with abnormal heart valve structure and/or function and a rapidly growing cause of global cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Physical inactivity is a problem for patients with VHD, especially after surgery. However, there is no data on the effects of exercise on VHD from large multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive analysis of small RCTs to evaluate the effects of exercise on cardiopulmonary function in patients with VHD and provide an evidence-based medicine basis for developing and guiding the clinical application of exercise in patients with VHD.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. We systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Science and Technology Journal Database [VIP], WanFang Database, and SinoMed [CBM]) for all studies on exercise and VHD from their inception to January 2023. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcomes were the six-minute walk test distance (6MWD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36).

Results

This systematic review included 22 RCTs with 1520 subjects (869 men and 651 women). The meta-analysis results showed that exercise significantly improved exercise capacity measured by the 6MWD (mean difference [MD] = 25.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.98-31.11, I 2 = 0%, p < 0.00001), LVEF (MD = 6.20, 95% CI = 4.76-7.65, I 2 = 66%, p < 0.00001), and quality of life measured by the SF-36 (physical function: MD = 3.42, 95% CI = 2.12-4.72, I 2 = 12%, p < 0.00001; mental health: MD = 3.86, 95% CI = 0.52-7.20, I 2 = 68%, p = 0.020; social function: MD = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.64-3.97, I 2 = 45%, p = 0.007; bodily pain: MD = 2.60, 95% CI = 0.83-4.37, I 2 = 22%, p = 0.004) in patients with VHD compared to healthy controls.

Conclusions

This study suggests that exercise can significantly improve cardiopulmonary function, enhance physical and social function, reduce bodily pain, and potentially improve mental health in patients with VHD, providing an evidence-based basis for better recovery in patients with VHD.

Prognostic Value of Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Backgrounds

The presence of impaired global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be a valuable bio-marker in the early diagnosis for left ventricle (LV) impairment, which would help scrutinize asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) patients with high risk of adverse outcomes, such as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods

The study was prospectively registered in PROPSERO (CRD 42021223472). Databases, such as Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and Scopus were searched for studies evaluating the impact of impaired GLS on MACE, all-cause mortality, and aortic valve replacement (AVR) in asymptomatic AS. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated with meta-analysis for binary variants. Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analyses were applied as needed to explore the heterogeneity.

Results

Eventually, a total of nine studies reporting 1,512 patients were enrolled. Compared with the normal GLS group, impaired GLS significantly increased MACE (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10–1.30, I² = 79%) with evident heterogeneity, all-cause mortality (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.24–1.63), and AVR (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.28). Subgroup analyses stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50% or LVEF without precise cut-off point found that compared with the normal GLS group, impaired GLS remarkably increased MACE both in two subgroups (LVEF > 50%: HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05–1.50; LVEF without cutpoint: HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.05–1.50). The results stratified by AS severity (mild/moderate and severe) or follow-up time resembled those stratified by LVEF. In addition, when subgroup analysis was stratified by mean aortic valve pressure gradient (MG ≥ 40 mm Hg and MG <40 mm Hg), compared with normal GLS, impaired GLS significantly increased MACE both in two subgroups (MG ≥ 40 mm Hg: HR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.64–7.09; MG below 40 mm Hg: HR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.87–5.38). Moreover, the effect sizes here were substantially higher than those in the former two stratified factors.

Conclusions

The presence of impaired GLS substantially worsens the outcomes for adverse cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with AS regardless of LVEF or AS severity or follow-up time or mean aortic valve pressure gradient, which highlights the importance of incorporating impaired GLS into risk algorithms in asymptomatic AS.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021223472).

Valvular Heart Disease in Athletes

Valvular heart disease is prevalent in older athletes with primarily degenerative valvular disorders and younger athletes with congenital or genetic syndromes. Limited data exist on the risks and benefits of exercise for athletes with underlying valvular disorders, so current guidelines are primarily based upon expert consensus. This review focuses on the current data, guideline recommendations, and emerging clinical conundrums for athletes with common valvular heart conditions including aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), mitral regurgitation (MR), mitral valve prolapse (MVP), and thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery

BACKGROUND

The impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following heart valve surgery is uncertain. We conducted an update of this systematic review and a meta-analysis to assess randomised controlled trial evidence for the use of exercise-based CR following heart valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of exercise-based CR compared with no exercise training in adults following heart valve surgery or repair, including both percutaneous and surgical procedures. We considered CR programmes consisting of exercise training with or without another intervention (such as an intervention with a psycho-educational component).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid); Embase (Ovid); the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCO); PsycINFO (Ovid); Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS; Bireme); and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) on the Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) on 10 January 2020. We searched for ongoing trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical-trials.com, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 15 May 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that compared exercise-based CR interventions with no exercise training. Trial participants comprised adults aged 18 years or older who had undergone heart valve surgery for heart valve disease (from any cause) and had received heart valve replacement or heart valve repair. Both percutaneous and surgical procedures were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data. We assessed the risk of systematic errors ('bias') by evaluating risk domains using the 'Risk of bias' (RoB2) tool. We assessed clinical and statistical heterogeneity. We performed meta-analyses using both fixed-effect and random-effects models. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence for primary outcomes (all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalisation, and health-related quality of life).

MAIN RESULTS

We included six trials with a total of 364 participants who have had open or percutaneous heart valve surgery. For this updated review, we identified four additional trials (216 participants). One trial had an overall low risk of bias, and we classified the remaining five trials as having some concerns. Follow-up ranged across included trials from 3 to 24 months. Based on data at longest follow-up, a total of nine participants died: 4 CR versus 5 control (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 2.68; 2 trials, 131 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low). No trials reported on cardiovascular mortality. One trial reported one cardiac-related hospitalisation in the CR group and none in the control group (RR 2.72, 95% CI 0.11 to 65.56; 1 trial, 122 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low). We are uncertain about health-related quality of life at completion of the intervention in CR compared to control (Short Form (SF)-12/36 mental component: mean difference (MD) 1.28, 95% CI -1.60 to 4.16; 2 trials, 150 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low; and SF-12/36 physical component: MD 2.99, 95% CI -5.24 to 11.21; 2 trials, 150 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low), or at longest follow-up (SF-12/36 mental component: MD -1.45, 95% CI -4.70 to 1.80; 2 trials, 139 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low; and SF-12/36 physical component: MD -0.87, 95% CI -3.57 to 1.83; 2 trials, 139 participants; GRADE quality of evidence very low).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to lack of evidence and the very low quality of available evidence, this updated review is uncertain about the impact of exercise-CR in this population in terms of mortality, hospitalisation, and health-related quality of life. High-quality (low risk of bias) evidence on the impact of CR is needed to inform clinical guidelines and routine practice.

The impact of additional resistance and balance training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in older patients after valve surgery or intervention: randomized control trial

Background

To evaluate the short- and mid-term effect of a specially tailored resistance and balance training provided in addition to usual cardiac rehabilitation (CR) care program in older patients after valve surgery/intervention.

Methods

Single-center (inpatient CR clinic in Lithuania) randomized controlled trial. Two hundred fifty-two patients were assessed for eligibility on the first day of admittance to CR early after (14.5 ± 5.9 days) valve surgery/intervention between January 2018 and November 2019. Participants were coded centrally in accordance with randomization 1:1 using a computerized list. Control group (CG) patients were provided with usual care phase-II-CR inpatient multidisciplinary CR program, while intervention group (IG) patients received additional resistance and balance training (3 d/wk). Patients participated in a 3-month follow-up. Main outcome measures were functional capacity (6 min walk test (6MWT, meters), cardiopulmonary exercise testing), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, score) and 5-m walk test (5MWT, meters/second)), strength (one repetition maximum test for leg press), physical frailty (SPPB, 5MWT).

Results

One hundred sixteen patients (76.1 ± 6.7 years, 50% male) who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were randomized to IG (n = 60) or CG (n = 56) and participated in CR (18.6 ± 2.7 days). As a result, 6MWT (IG 247 ± 94.1 vs. 348 ± 100.1, CG 232 ± 102.8 vs. 333 ± 120.7), SPPB (IG 8.31 ± 2.21 vs. 9.51 ± 2.24, CG 7.95 ± 2.01 vs. 9.08 ± 2.35), 5MWT (IG 0.847 ± 0.31 vs. 0.965 ± 0.3, CG 0.765 ± 0.24 vs 0.879 ± 0.29) all other outcome variables and physical frailty level improved significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups with no significant difference between groups. Improvements were sustained over the 3-month follow-up for 6MWT (IG 348 ± 113 vs. CG 332 ± 147.4), SPPB (IG 10.37 ± 1.59 vs CG 9.44 ± 2.34), 5MWT (IG 1.086 ± 0. 307 vs CG 1.123 ± 0.539) and other variables. Improvement in physical frailty level was significantly more pronounced in IG (p < 0.05) after the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Exercise-based CR improves functional and exercise capacity, physical performance, and muscular strength, and reduces physical frailty levels in patients after valve surgery/intervention in the short and medium terms. SPPB score and 5MWT were useful for physical frailty assessment, screening and evaluation of outcomes in a CR setting. Additional benefit from the resistance and balance training could not be confirmed.

Trial registration

NCT04234087, retrospectively registered 21 January 2020.

Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses

INTRODUCTION

The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered as the gold standard for clinical trials and researchers argue that the quality of RCT reports should be of the highest standards due to their clinical significance. To review the quality of reporting of the sample size calculation methods, and randomization procedures, and assess whether the statistical analyses correlate as reported in the trials' Evidence acquisition and Evidence synthesis sections in non-pharmacological, physiological rehabilitation RCT interventions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic electronic search was conducted in Cochrane Central from 1 January 2019 to 16 December 2019. Titles and abstracts were analyzed for inclusion independently by two authors, and disagreements were resolved by a third reader. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) assessed and reported a type of non-pharmacological rehabilitation RCT (e.g. physiotherapy); 2) randomized intervention to patients with a disease comparing to healthy or patients without intervention as the comparison group; 3) published in an indexed journal; and 4) original research, available full text, human study, published in 2019, and written in English. The following information was extracted from the included articles: journal impact factor (JIF), sample size calculation methods (SS), randomization procedure (RND), and statistical analyses (STAT) reported. Analyzing the full text, whether SS and RND were reported or not and whether the STAT correlated with the Methods and Results sections. The prevalence of each statistical method was derived from the Methods section of the report and compared if it was reported in the Results section. The continuous variable of JIF was tested for normality and used for independent t-test for equality of means between categories. In addition, using Downs and Black checklist the methodological quality of the articles was assessed and categorized to be poor, fair, good, and excellent based on the checklist's score. Finally, the association between the assessed quality (categorical variable) of the articles and the reporting variables (categorical variables) was analyzed utilizing the Pearson χ2.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

One hundred and nighty-four articles were retrieved from the systematic search out of which 99 (51%) were included for data extraction and further analyses. About one in five (20.2%) and two in five (37.4%) did not properly and adequately report the SS and RND while one in five (19.2%) there was at least one mismatch in STAT. The JIF was not significantly associated to the quality of reporting of SS (t=1.974, P=0.051), RND (t=0.309, P=0.758), and STAT (t=-0.275, P=0.784). This finding could indicate that the quality of the journal did not assure the quality of the reporting these methods. However, there was a significant association between the assessed quality of the article measured with the Down's and Black checklist and the reporting of SS (χ2=29.149, DF=2, P<0.0001), RND (χ2=55.079, df=2, P<0.0001) and STAT (χ2=25.778, df=2, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recent reporting quality of non-pharmacological rehabilitation RCTs was investigated. We found that the quality of the article but not the quality of the journal in which it is published in may be associated to the quality of reporting in sample size methods, randomization processes, and statistical analyses reporting. The quality of study reporting may be enhanced utilizing a guideline that addresses the required information in sample size calculation, randomization of individuals, and proper statistical analyses used and reported.

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Congenital heart disease (ConHD) affects approximately 1% of all live births. People with ConHD are living longer due to improved medical intervention and are at risk of developing non-communicable diseases. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is reduced in people with ConHD, who deteriorate faster compared to healthy people. CRF is known to be prognostic of future mortality and morbidity: it is therefore important to assess the evidence base on physical activity interventions in this population to inform decision making.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of all types of physical activity interventions versus standard care in individuals with congenital heart disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We undertook a systematic search on 23 September 2019 of the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, BIOSIS Citation Index, Web of Science Core Collection, LILACS and DARE. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and we reviewed the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared any type of physical activity intervention against a 'no physical activity' (usual care) control. We included all individuals with a diagnosis of congenital heart disease, regardless of age or previous medical interventions.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (CAW and CW) independently screened all the identified references for inclusion. We retrieved and read all full papers; and we contacted study authors if we needed any further information. The same two independent reviewers who extracted the data then processed the included papers, assessed their risk of bias using RoB 2 and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary outcomes were: maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) assessed by peak oxygen consumption; health-related quality of life (HRQoL) determined by a validated questionnaire; and device-worn 'objective' measures of physical activity.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 RCTs with 924 participants in the review. The median intervention length/follow-up length was 12 weeks (12 to 26 interquartile range (IQR)). There were five RCTs of children and adolescents (n = 500) and 10 adult RCTs (n = 424). We identified three types of intervention: physical activity promotion; exercise training; and inspiratory muscle training. We assessed the risk of bias of results for CRF as either being of some concern (n = 12) or at a high risk of bias (n = 2), due to a failure to blind intervention staff. One study did not report this outcome. Using the GRADE method, we assessed the certainty of evidence as moderate to very low across measured outcomes. When we pooled all types of interventions (physical activity promotion, exercise training and inspiratory muscle training), compared to a 'no exercise' control CRF may slightly increase, with a mean difference (MD) of 1.89 mL/kg^-1/min^-1 (95% CI -0.22 to 3.99; n = 732; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of physical activity and exercise interventions on HRQoL. There was a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.76 (95% CI -0.13 to 1.65; n = 163; very low certainty evidence) in HRQoL. However, we could pool only three studies in a meta-analysis, due to different ways of reporting. Only one study out of eight showed a positive effect on HRQoL. There may be a small improvement in mean daily physical activity (PA) (SMD 0.38, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.92; n = 328; low-certainty evidence), which equates to approximately an additional 10 minutes of physical activity daily (95% CI -2.50 to 22.20). Physical activity and exercise interventions likely result in an increase in submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness (MD 2.05, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.05; n = 179; moderate-certainty evidence). Physical activity and exercise interventions likely increase muscular strength (MD 17.13, 95% CI 3.45 to 30.81; n = 18; moderate-certainty evidence). Eleven studies (n = 501) reported on the outcome of adverse events (73% of total studies). Of the 11 studies, six studies reported zero adverse events. Five studies reported a total of 11 adverse events; 36% of adverse events were cardiac related (n = 4); there were, however, no serious adverse events related to the interventions or reported fatalities (moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported hospital admissions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review summarises the latest evidence on CRF, HRQoL and PA. Although there were only small improvements in CRF and PA, and small to no improvements in HRQoL, there were no reported serious adverse events related to the interventions. Although these data are promising, there is currently insufficient evidence to definitively determine the impact of physical activity interventions in ConHD. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials are therefore needed, utilising a longer duration of follow-up.

Myokines mediate the cross talk between skeletal muscle and other organs

Myokines are muscle-derived cytokines and chemokines that act extensively on organs and exert beneficial metabolic functions in the whole-body through specific signal networks. Myokines as mediators provide the conceptual basis for a whole new paradigm useful for understanding how skeletal muscle communicates with other organs. In this review, we summarize and discuss classes of myokines and their physiological functions in mediating the regulatory roles of skeletal muscle on other organs and the regulation of the whole-body energy metabolism. We review the mechanisms involved in the interaction between skeletal muscle and nonmuscle organs through myokines. Moreover, we clarify the connection between exercise, myokines and disease development, which may contribute to the understanding of a potential mechanism by which physical inactivity affects the process of metabolic diseases via myokines. Based on the current findings, myokines are important factors that mediate the effect of skeletal muscle on other organ functions and whole-body metabolism.