Measurement of eNO with portable analyser might improve the management of persistent cough at primary care practice in Japan

Evaluation and management of chronic cough in adults

Background: Chronic cough (CC), a cough that lasts > 8 weeks, has an overall prevalence of 5-11% in adults, peaking between 60 and 80 years of age. Of the 15% of patients who remain undiagnosed or refractory to treatment, two thirds are women. Objective: The objective was to present an updated evidence-based algorithmic approach for evaluating and managing CC, with emphasis on treatment modalities for refractory CC. Methods: A literature search was conducted of medical literature data bases for guidelines, position papers, systematic reviews, and clinical trials from January 2022 to June 2023, on the evaluation and management of CC. Results: The initial assessment should be limited to a detailed history, physical examination, chest radiograph, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophil count, and measurement of cough severity and quality of life by using validated instruments. The top diagnoses to consider are asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and upper airway cough syndrome. Additional studies are only obtained when red flags are present or the patient fails to respond after avoidance of high-risk factors, e.g., smoking and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 4-6 weeks of empiric treatment for the most likely respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases. When diagnostic tests and/or specific directed treatments fail to control CC, low-dose morphine (preferred), gabapentin, pregabalin, and/or cough control therapy are recommended. Non-narcotic purinergic 2×3 (P2×3) receptor antagonists, gafapixant and campilixant, are currently being studied for CC. Conclusion: For the evaluation and management of patients with CC, clinicians should use an algorithmic approach and identify "red flags," reduce high-risk factors, and use empiric treatment for the five top diagnoses before extensive diagnostic testing. Current treatment for refractory cough is limited to symptomatic management.

Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults. Endorsed by the French speaking society of respiratory diseases (Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française, SPLF), the Société Française d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Chirurgie de la Face et du Cou (SFORL), the Société Française de Phoniatrie et de Laryngologie (SFPL), the Société Nationale Française de Gastro-entérologie (SNFGE)

Patients with chronic cough experience a high alteration of quality of life. Moreover, chronic cough is a complex entity with numerous etiologies and treatments. In order to help clinicians involved in the management of patients with chronic cough, guidelines on chronic cough have been established by a group of French experts. These guidelines address the definitions of chronic cough and the initial management of patients with chronic cough. We present herein second-line tests that might be considered in patients with cough persistence despite initial management. Experts also propose a definition of unexplained or refractory chronic cough (URCC) in order to better identify patients whose cough persists despite optimal management. Finally, these guidelines address the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions useful in URCC. Thus, amitryptilline, pregabalin, gabapentin or morphine combined with speech and/or physical therapy are a mainstay of treatment strategies in URCC. Other treatment options, such as P2 × 3 antagonists, are being developed.

[Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults]

Patients with chronic cough experience major alteration in their quality of life. Given its numerous etiologies and treatments, this disease is a complex entity. To help clinicians involved in patient management of patients, guidelines have been issued by a group of French experts. They address definitions of chronic cough and initial management of patients with this pathology. We present herein the second-line tests that might be considered in patients whose coughing has persisted, notwithstanding initial management. The experts have also put forward a definition of unexplained or refractory chronic cough (URCC), the objective being to more precisely identify those patients whose cough persists despite optimal management. Lastly, these guidelines indicate the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions of use in URCC. Amitriptyline, pregabalin, gabapentin or morphine combined with speech and/or physical therapy are mainstays in treatment strategies. Other treatment options, such as P2X3 antagonists, are being developed and have generated high hopes among physicians and patients alike.

Performance of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in predicting response to inhaled corticosteroids in chronic cough: a meta-analysis

Background. Chronic cough is a disabling condition with a high proportion of diagnostic and therapeutic failures. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been considered a useful biomarker for predicting inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) response. We evaluated the relationship between FeNO and ICS response in chronic cough by performing a systematic review with meta-analysis.Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE databases were systematically searched. Differences were expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROCAUC) were estimated.Results. Nine articles on 740 chronic-cough patients showed that the response rate to ICS was 87.4% (95%CI: 83.8-91.0) in 317 patients with a high FeNO and 46.3% (95%CI: 41.6-51.0) in 423 controls, with an attributable proportion of 47.0% and a diagnostic OR of 9.1 (95%CI: 3.7-22.4, p < .001). The pooled estimate of diagnostic indexes resulted in a sensitivity of 68.5% (95%CI: 46.7-84.4) and specificity of 81.9% (95%CI: 63.0-92.3), with a HSROCAUC of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.64-0.90). In a realistic scenario with a pre-test probability set at 30%, based on a pooled PLR of 3.79 (95%CI: 1.24-7.47) and NLR of 0.38 (95%CI: 0.22-0.66), the post-test probability was 62% with a high FeNO and 14% if the test was negative. Subgroup analyses confirmed a better performance for the recommended FeNO cut-off greater than 25 ppb. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses showed no impact of major demographic and clinic variables on results.Conclusions. A high FeNO before starting ICS therapy may help identify chronic-cough patients responding to treatment, with a better performance ofhigher cut-off values. Further studies are needed to evaluate the real usefulness of this biomarker to guide cough therapy and optimise strategies in different healthcare settings (community, hospital, rehabilitation).Key messagesChronic cough is a disabling condition with a high proportion of diagnostic and therapeutic failures.Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may be a useful biomarker for identifying chronic cough patients who respond to steroid treatment.A FeNO cut-off lower than 25 ppb should be considered irrelevant for this clinical application.

ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children

These guidelines incorporate the recent advances in chronic cough pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. The concept of cough hypersensitivity has allowed an umbrella term that explains the exquisite sensitivity of patients to external stimuli such a cold air, perfumes, smoke and bleach. Thus, adults with chronic cough now have a firm physical explanation for their symptoms based on vagal afferent hypersensitivity. Different treatable traits exist with cough variant asthma (CVA)/eosinophilic bronchitis responding to anti-inflammatory treatment and non-acid reflux being treated with promotility agents rather the anti-acid drugs. An alternative antitussive strategy is to reduce hypersensitivity by neuromodulation. Low-dose morphine is highly effective in a subset of patients with cough resistant to other treatments. Gabapentin and pregabalin are also advocated, but in clinical experience they are limited by adverse events. Perhaps the most promising future developments in pharmacotherapy are drugs which tackle neuronal hypersensitivity by blocking excitability of afferent nerves by inhibiting targets such as the ATP receptor (P2X3). Finally, cough suppression therapy when performed by competent practitioners can be highly effective. Children are not small adults and a pursuit of an underlying cause for cough is advocated. Thus, in toddlers, inhalation of a foreign body is common. Persistent bacterial bronchitis is a common and previously unrecognised cause of wet cough in children. Antibiotics (drug, dose and duration need to be determined) can be curative. A paediatric-specific algorithm should be used.

Exhaled nitric oxide in chronic cough: A good tool in a multi-step approach

INTRODUCTION

The impact of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) on the management of chronic cough (CC) is still inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to assess whether FENO is a good tool to predict the response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with CC.

METHODS

Patients, referred for investigation of CC, had a FENO measurement determined as part of their first-line assessment. A methacholine test was performed as part of a second-line assessement. Patients were assigned to two groups according to their FENO values: a high FENO level group (Ⱕ25 ppb) and a normal FENO level group (<25 ppb).

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the study. High FENO levels were found in 25 patients (25%). The proportion of patients who responded to ICS was significantly greater in the high FENO group compared to the normal FENO level group (86.4% vs 46.3%, P<0.05). FENO is a good tool to predict ICS response in patients with high FENO levels but a response to ICS cannot be ruled out in patients with normal FENO levels. In patients with normal FENO values, a methacholine test could be an interesting tool for a second-line assessment. Among the 13 patients with a positive methacholine test result, 11 responded to ICS whilst 2 did not. Of the patients with a negative methacholine test result, 3 responded to ICS whilst 13 did not.

CONCLUSION

FENO may be a more reliable predictor of ICS response when used as part of a multi-step assessment procedure.

Association between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with subacute cough

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationships between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with subacute cough.

METHODS

Patients with subacute cough (n = 189) after upper respiratory tract infection were enrolled in this single-center prospective study, and were divided into low-FENO (<25 ppb) and high-FENO groups (≥25 ppb). Empirical therapies (without inhaled or systemic corticosteroids) were prescribed based on clinical experience and follow-up until the disease course reached 8 weeks. FENO values, cough symptom scores (CSS), and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores were obtained, analyzed, and compared between two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The low-FENO and high-FENO groups comprised 136 and 53 patients, respectively. The multiple regression analysis showed that blood eosinophil count and gender were independent factors for elevated FENO (β = 1.38, 0.25, respectively). LCQ scores, total CSS, and daytime CSS were comparable between the low-FENO and high-FENO groups. The nighttime CSS of the high-FENO group were significantly higher than that of the low-FENO group (P = .03). The CSS and LCQ score were improved in both groups but were comparable between groups after 10 days treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with subacute cough and high-FENO levels have more severe nocturnal cough than those of patients with low-FENO levels. However, FENO levels do not appear to correlate with the clinical outcomes or treatment response. The significance of FENO in the management of subacute cough needs to be further evaluated, at least in the current empirical treatment without corticosteroids.

Could Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Test be Useful in Predicting Inhaled Corticosteroid Responsiveness in Chronic Cough? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) is a safe and convenient test for assessing T_H2 airway inflammation, which is potentially useful in the management of patients with chronic cough.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current evidence on the diagnostic usefulness of Feno for predicting inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) responsiveness in patients with chronic cough.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify articles published in peer-reviewed journals up to February 2015, without language restriction. We included studies that reported the usefulness of Feno (index test) for predicting ICS responsiveness (reference standard) in patients with chronic cough (target condition). The data were extracted to construct a 2 × 2 accuracy table. Study quality was assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2.

RESULTS

We identified 5 original studies (2 prospective and 3 retrospective studies). We identified considerable heterogeneities in study design and outcome definitions, and thus were unable to perform a meta-analysis. The proportion of ICS responders ranged from 44% to 59%. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 53% to 90%, and from 63% to 97%, respectively. The reported area under the curve ranged from about 0.60 to 0.87; however, studies with a prospective design and a lower prevalence of asthma had lower area under the curve values. None measured placebo effects or objective cough frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find strong evidence to support the use of Feno tests for predicting ICS responsiveness in chronic cough. Further studies need to have a randomized, placebo-controlled design, and should use validated measurement tools for cough. Standardization would facilitate the development of clinical evidence.