Does the severity of interstitial lung disease affect the gains from pulmonary rehabilitation?

Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Implications of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

Patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) associate a large variety of comorbidities that have a significant impact on their clinical outcomes and survival. Among these comorbidities is neurological impairment. This review highlights what is known about the cognitive function, central nervous system (CNS), depression, and anxiety in patients with specific forms of fibrosing ILDs, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue diseases, etc. The most common pathogenic mechanisms for neurocognitive dysfunction as well as the screening methods and tools for their identification are also described in this review.

Self-management interventions for people with pulmonary fibrosis: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The most effective method for encouraging self-management in individuals with pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is unclear. This review aimed to identify common self-management components, the outcome measures used and the impact of these components in PF.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis using Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included those with educational, behavioural or support components aimed at facilitating self-management among adults with PF and employed quantitative and/or qualitative methods.

RESULTS

87 studies were included. Common self-management components included education (78%), managing physical symptoms (66%) and enhancing psychosocial wellbeing (54%). Components were predominantly delivered in a pulmonary rehabilitation setting (71%). No studies tested a PF-specific self-management package. Common outcome measures were 6-min walk distance (60%), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (37%) and the Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale (34%). Clinically significant improvements in these outcomes were seen in ≥50% of randomised controlled trials. Qualitative data highlighted the importance of healthcare professional and peer support and increased confidence in managing PF.

CONCLUSION

Self-management components are commonly incorporated into pulmonary rehabilitation programmes rather than being offered as standalone packages. Future research should focus on testing PF-specific self-management packages and employ standardised outcome assessments that include self-efficacy and health-related behaviours.

Mood disorder in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: response to pulmonary rehabilitation

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation improves mood disorder in COPD, but there are limited data in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The aims of this cohort study were to investigate whether pulmonary rehabilitation reduces mood disorder in IPF, and estimate the minimal important difference (MID) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Methods

HADS and core pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes were measured in 166 participants before and after an 8-week, in-person, outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MID of HADS-Anxiety (A) and HADS-Depression (D).

Results

Suggestive or probable anxiety and depression (HADS ≥8) were present in 35% and 37% of participants, respectively, at baseline, and this reduced significantly following pulmonary rehabilitation (post-pulmonary rehabilitation: HADS-A 23%, HADS-D 26%). Overall, there was a significant reduction in HADS-D (mean change -1.1, 95% CI -1.6- -0.5), but not HADS-A (-0.6, -1.3-0.15) with pulmonary rehabilitation. Subgroup analysis of those with HADS ≥8 revealed significant improvements in HADS domains (mean change: HADS-A -4.5, 95% CI -5.7- -3.4; median change: HADS-D -4.0, interquartile range -6.0- -1.0). The mean (range) MID estimates for HADS-A and HADS-D were -2 (-2.3- -1.7) and -1.2 (-1.9- -0.5), respectively.

Conclusion

In people with IPF and suggestive or probable mood disorder, pulmonary rehabilitation reduces anxiety and depression.

Rituximab for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) on lung function and the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) by meta-analysis.

METHODS

EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed and ClinicalKey were searched up to July 16, 2021. The lung function (forced vital capacity, FVC% predicted, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, DLCO% predicted) and prevalence of AEs of RTX in CTD-ILD were analyzed by meta-analysis, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to explore the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We identified 29 studies, including 827 CTD-ILD patients with a median age of 53.05 years. In observational studies, FVC% (mean difference - 1.24, 95% CI [-2.35, -0.12]; P = .030) and DLCO% (-7.71, [-11.79, -3.63]; P = .014) of CTD-ILD decreased significantly after RTX treatment. In randomized controlled trials, FVC% of CTD-ILD decreased after RTX treatment (-5.24, [-9.94, - 0.54]; P = .029), but the difference of DLCO% was not significant (1.15, [-4.33, 6.63]; P = .681). The prevalence of AEs, all-cause mortality and infections was 29.7% (95% CI [0.17, 0.42]), 11.6% (95% CI [0.08, 0.16]) and 20.9% (95% CI [0.15, 0.27]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX was associated with AEs such as decreased pulmonary function, all-cause mortality, and infections in CTD-ILD. Adverse reactions during and after RTX treatment should be carefully monitored. Further prospective studies are needed to compare RTX with other immunosuppressants, antifibrotic drugs or placebos, which can provide therapeutic approaches for CTD-ILD.

Management of Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose of Review

This review aims to collate current evidence on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of various connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) and present a contemporary framework for the management of such patients. It also seeks to summarize treatment outcomes including efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants, anti-fibrotics, and stem cell transplantation in CTD-ILD.

Recent Findings

Screening for ILD has been augmented by the use of artificial intelligence, ultra-low dose computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, and the use of chest ultrasound. Serum biomarkers have not found their way into clinical practice as yet. Identifying patients who need treatment and choosing the appropriate therapy is important to minimize the risk of therapy-related toxicity. The first-line drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD include mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for use in SSc-ILD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved tocilizumab subcutaneous injection for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in adult patients with SSc-ILD. Autologous stem cell transplantation may have a role in select cases of SSc-ILD.

Summary

CTD-ILD is a challenging area with diverse entities and variable outcomes. High-resolution CT is the investigative modality of choice. Treatment decisions need to be individualized and are based on patient symptoms, lung function, radiologic abnormalities, and the risk of disease progression. Precision medicine may play an important role in determining the optimal therapy for an individual patient in the future.

Management of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

The presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) negatively affects prognosis among patients with an underlying connective tissue disease (CTD). The initial approach to care should determine whether the CTD-ILD needs pharmacologic treatment or not. There is little direct evidence to guide who and how to treat. At present, any severe, active, and/or progressive ILD should be pharmacologically treated. Immunosuppressants and/or corticosteroids are the mainstay of pharmacologic therapy for all CTD-ILDs, whereas antifibrotics may be beneficial in some scenarios. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to management is also an important aspect of patient care.

Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evaluation and Management

Interstitial lung disease is common among patients with connective tissue disease and is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. Infection and drug toxicity must always be excluded as the cause of radiographic findings. Immunosuppression remains a mainstay of therapy despite few controlled trials supporting its use. When a decision regarding therapy initiation is made, considerations include an assessment of disease severity as well as a determination of the rate of progression. Because patients may have extrathoracic disease activity, a multidisciplinary approach is crucial and should include supportive and nonpharmacologic management strategies.