The impact of C4d and microvascular inflammation before we knew them

Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.

Associations of high anti-CMV IgG titer with renal function decline and allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

An anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody is produced after primary CMV infection and generally persists after the primary infection. However, it is not well-known about the relationship between anti-CMV IgG titer and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. We, therefore, aimed to explore the role of anti-CMV IgG titer on the risks of CMV disease development, allograft rejection, renal function decline, and mortality.

METHODS

In a hospital-based study, we identified 179 CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients between January 2013 and December 2017. These patients were divided into low and high anti-CMV IgG titer groups, respectively. The cutoff level of anti-CMV IgG titer was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The outcomes evaluated included CMV disease, decrease of ≥15% in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), biopsy-proven allograft rejection, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The high anti-CMV IgG titer group (≥846.2 AU/mL) exhibited a higher risk of CMV disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.77; 95% CI, 1.47-9.68; p = 0.006), eGFR decline ≥15% (aHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.19-3.35; p = 0.009), and renal allograft rejection (aHR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.11-7.87; p = 0.030) than the low titer group (<846.2 AU/mL).

CONCLUSION

In kidney transplant recipients, a high anti-CMV IgG titer was associated with higher risks for developing CMV disease, undergoing allograft rejection, and eGFR decline.

Donor-specific Antibody Surveillance and Graft Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) has been associated with rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation, and DSA screening is now recommended in all kidney transplant recipients. However, the clinical significance of dnDSA detected by screening patients with a stable creatinine remains unclear.

METHODS

One hundred three patients younger than 18years receiving a first, kidney alone transplant between December 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, underwent DSA screening every 3months for 2years posttransplant, with additional testing as clinically indicated. No treatment was given for DSAs in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection.

RESULTS

Twenty (19%) patients had dnDSA first detected on a screening test, and 13 (13%) patients had dnDSA first detected on a for-cause test. Mean follow-up time posttransplant was 4.4years. Screening-detected dnDSA was associated with an increased risk of rejection within 3years, microvascular inflammation, and C4d staining on a 2-year protocol biopsy. In a Cox proportional hazards regression, screening-detected dnDSA was not associated with time to 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-2.00; P=0.598) or graft loss. dnDSA first detected on for-cause testing was associated with a 2.8 times increased risk of decline in graft function (95% CI, 1.08-7.27; P=0.034) and a 7.34 times increased risk of graft loss (95% CI, 1.37-39.23 P=0.020) compared with those who did not develop dnDSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical setting in which dnDSA is first detected impacts the association between dnDSA and graft function. Further research is needed to clarify the role of dnDSA screening in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Clinical Significance of Revised Banff Criteria in the Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic criteria of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has been significantly changed since Banff 2013. The most important revision was adopting microvascular inflammation (MVI) as immunopathologic evidence for ABMR even in C4d-negative cases. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed previous allograft biopsy results and evaluated the impact of this change.

METHODS

We reviewed results of 536 renal allograft biopsies at Severance Hospital during 2011 to 2013, which were diagnosed according to the Banff 2009 criteria. All biopsy results were reassessed according to the Banff 2017 criteria.

RESULTS

According to the Banff 2009 criteria, antibody-mediated changes were observed in 48 cases out of the 536 allograft biopsies (9.0%). According to the Banff 2017 criteria, 28 additional cases (5.2%) were reclassified as antibody-mediated changes. Twenty-six of these cases were C4d-negative ABMR. The most frequent diagnostic finding in these cases was MVI comprising glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis. Donor-specific antibodies were investigated in 14 of these cases, which revealed positive results in 12 cases.

CONCLUSION

The incidence rate of ABMR has increased after the recent revision of the Banff criteria. The MVI in C4d-negative ABMR cases is the major cause for this increase.

Plasma C4d+ Endothelial Microvesicles Increase in Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of kidney allograft loss. Currently, AMR diagnosis relies on biopsy which is an invasive procedure. A noninvasive biomarker of acute AMR could lead to early diagnosis and treatment of this condition and improve allograft outcome. Microvesicles are membrane-bound vesicles released from the cell surface after injury. We hypothesized that because AMR is associated with allograft endothelial injury and C4d deposition, plasma microvesicles positive for endothelial (CD144) marker and C4d are increased in this condition.

METHODS

We studied microvesicle concentration in the plasma of 95 kidney transplant patients with allograft dysfunction and compared with 23 healthy volunteers. Biopsy diagnosis and scoring was performed using Banff classification.

RESULTS

In the 28 subjects with AMR, the density of C4d+/CD144+ microvesicles was on average 11-fold (P = 0.002) higher than transplant recipients with no AMR and 24-fold (P = 0.008) than healthy volunteers. Densities of C4d+ and C4d+/annexin V+ (C4d+/AVB+) microvesicles were also increased in AMR patients compared with no AMR and healthy subjects. C4d+/AVB+ microvesicles correlated with AMR biopsy severity. Nine patients with acute AMR that received treatment showed a mean 72% decrease (P = 0.01) in C4d+/CD144+ microvesicle concentration compared with pretreatment values.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of plasma C4d+ microvesicles provides information about presence of AMR, its severity and response to treatment in transplant patients.

The clinical implications of the unique glomerular complement deposition pattern in transplant glomerulopathy

The etiology and treatment of transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is not clear. TG is associated with donor-specific antibodies but the lack of C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries (ptc-C4d) in some cases has caused the role of complement in the pathogenesis of TG to be debated. There is however, little information on C4d deposition in the glomerulus itself. We retrieved random frozen sections from 25 cases with well-established TG by light microscopy (LM) and 25 cases without TG as controls and reviewed the LM and immunofluorescence (nine biopsies were excluded due to inadequate samples). Glomerular complement deposition was assessed in all included biopsies. Glomerular C3d and C4d deposition occurred in a distinct pattern in all TG biopsies: segmental or global double linear staining of the glomerular capillary wall in 23 (100%). This pattern was not present in any NON-TG biopsies. The distinct glomerular complement deposition patterns in all TG cases are suggestive that TG is a proximal complement-mediated process and therapies should focus on proximal complement inhibition.

Evaluation of Renal Allograft Biopsies for Graft Dysfunction and Relevance of C4d Staining in Antibody Mediated Rejection

INTRODUCTION

Biopsy remains gold standard for diagnosis of Graft Dysfunction (GD). It guides clinical management, provides valuable insights into pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury and is indispensable for distinguishing rejection from non- rejection causes of GD.

AIM

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the diverse histomorphological lesions in renal allograft biopsy (RAB). Further, we determined the frequency of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d positivity and its correlation with microvascular inflammation in Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study on RAB over a period of 2 months. Histopathological evaluation was undertaken as per revised Banff'13 schema. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect PTC C4d deposition.

RESULTS

Sixty five diagnostic biopsies were evaluated. Mean patient age was 34 years and males were predominant. The time interval between graft biopsy and transplantation ranged from 5 days to 8 years, with 52.3% biopsies belonging to period of ≤ 6 months post-transplant. Immune injuries were observed in 40 biopsies out of which AMR was observed in 35 biopsies. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI Toxicity) was the second commonest cause observed in 12 biopsies and other lesions including de novo glomerulopathies were observed in the remaining biopsies. The sensitivity of C4d in detecting acute AMR was 55% and chronic AMR was 23.5.

CONCLUSION

AMR and CNI Toxicity account for majority of graft dysfunction. C4d is not as sensitive a marker of AMR, as was initially thought. Higher proportion of moderate microvascular inflammation is found in diffuse C4d positive cases compared to focal C4d positive cases.

Glomerular inflammation correlates with endothelial injury and with IL-6 and IL-1β secretion in the peripheral blood

BACKGROUND

Transplant glomerulitis is an active form of glomerular injury associated with suboptimal graft outcome, inadequate histologic reproducibility, and poorly understood pathogenesis. Using a modified pathologic schema where glomerular inflammation is defined by the presence of five or more leukocytes per glomerulus, we sought to assess the reproducibility of transplant glomerulitis and to prospectively investigate the pathogenesis of glomerular inflammation.

METHODS

Our cohort includes 59 kidney transplant recipients who underwent 60 "for cause" allograft biopsies. In addition to light microscopy, the majority of the biopsies were assessed using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy studies. Biopsies were classified as noninflamed (n=21), inflamed (borderline changes or above) without glomerulitis (n=21), and transplant glomerulitis (n=18). Peripheral blood was collected on the day of biopsy and cytokines secreted by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were measured ex vivo.

RESULTS

Our modified schema had higher inter-observer agreement for detecting glomerulitis than that of the current Banff schema. Biopsies with glomerulitis showed ultrastructural signs of glomerular capillary wall remodeling. In contrast to other anatomic compartments, intraglomerular leukocytes in glomerulitis group consisted largely of monocytes. Patients with glomerulitis had high levels of IL-6 and IL-1β secreted by PBMCs. Furthermore, the percentage of inflamed glomeruli and the number of intraglomerular monocytes showed independent association with IL-6 and IL-1β levels, which tended to correlate with subsequent estimated glomerular filtration rate decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-observer reproducibility of transplant glomerulitis can be improved by using more stringent histologic criteria. Glomerular inflammation correlates with endothelial injury, monocyte influx, and IL-6 and IL-β secretion by circulating immune cells.

An updated Banff schema for diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To introduce the updated Banff schema for antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection and related revisions to definitions within this schema agreed upon during and immediately subsequent to the 2013 Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The original Banff schema for diagnosis of acute and chronic, active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal allografts, formulated at the 2001 and 2007 Banff Conferences, has been of great assistance to pathologists and clinicians faced with an increasing awareness of the role of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) in producing graft injury. This schema requires histologic (primarily microvascular inflammation and transplant glomerulopathy), immunohistologic (C4d in peritubular capillaries), and serologic (circulating DSA) evidence for a definitive diagnosis of ABMR. Still, like other Banff classifications, the 2001/2007 schema for renal ABMR is a working classification subject to revision based on new data. Increasing evidence for C4d-negative ABMR and antibody-mediated arterial lesions led to the development of a consensus at the 2013 Banff Conference for updating the schema to include these lesions. Definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis and chronic glomerulopathy were also revised to improve interobserver agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular, and serologic data.

SUMMARY

From a consensus reached at the 2013 Banff Conference, an updated schema for diagnosis of acute/active and chronic, active ABMR has been developed that accounts for recent data supporting the existence of C4d-negative ABMR and antibody-mediated intimal arteritis.

A systematic review of the role of C4d in the diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection

In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to re-evaluate the role of C4d in the diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection of kidney allografts. Electronic databases were searched until September 2013. Eligible studies allowed derivation of diagnostic tables for the performance of C4d by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry with comparison to histopathological features of acute antibody-mediated rejection and/or donor-specific antibody (DSA) assays. Of 3492 unique abstracts, 29 studies encompassing 3485 indication and 868 surveillance biopsies were identified. Assessment of C4d by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry exhibited slight to moderate agreement with glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, solid-phase DSA assays, DSA with glomerulitis, and DSA with peritubular capillaritis. The sensitivity and specificity of C4d varied as a function of C4d and comparator test thresholds. Prognostically, the presence of C4d was associated with inferior allograft survival compared with DSA or histopathology alone. Thus, our findings support the presence of complement-dependent and -independent phenotypes of acute antibody-mediated rejection. Whether the presence of C4d in combination with histopathology or DSA should be considered for the diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection warrants further study.