1
|
Attieh RM, Ibrahim RM, Ghali P, Keaveny A, Croome K, Hodge D, White L, Wadei HM. Improved outcomes of kidney after liver transplantation after the implementation of the safety net policy. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:582-594. [PMID: 38015446 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The number of kidney after liver transplants (KALT) increased after the implementation of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) safety net policy, but the effects of the policy on KALT outcomes remain unknown. Using the UNOS database, we identified KALT between 60 and 365 days from liver transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The main outcome was 1- and 3-year patient, liver, and kidney graft survival. Secondary outcomes included 6-month and 1-year acute rejection (AR) of liver and kidney, and 1-year kidney allograft function. Of the 256 KALT, 90 were pre-policy and 166 post-policy. Compared to pre-policy, post-policy 1- and 3-year liver graft survival was higher (54% and 54% vs. 86% and 81%, respectively, p <0.001), while 1- and 3-year kidney graft survival (99% and 75% vs. 92% and 79%, respectively, p =0.19), and 1- and 3-year patient survival (99% and 99% vs. 95% and 89%, respectively, p =0.11) were not significantly different. Subgroup analysis revealed similar trends in patients with and without renal failure at liver transplant. Liver AR at 6 months was lower post-policy (6.3% vs. 18.3%, p =0.006) but was similar (10.5% vs. 13%, p =0.63) at 1 year. Kidney AR was unchanged post-policy at 6 months and 1 year. Creatinine at 1 year did not differ post-policy versus pre-policy (1.4 vs. 1.3 mg/dL, p =0.07) despite a higher proportion of deceased donors, higher Kidney Donor Profile Index, and longer kidney cold ischemia time post-policy ( p <0.05 for all). This 3-year follow-up after the 2017 UNOS policy revision demonstrated that the safety net implementation has resulted in improved liver outcomes for patients who underwent KALT with no increased AR of the liver or the kidney allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Mary Attieh
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Glomerular Center at Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, New York, USA
| | - Ramez M Ibrahim
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Ghali
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Keaveny
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - David Hodge
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Launia White
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Hani M Wadei
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Furukawa K, Lee KW, Shimata K, Ito T, Toshima T, Akamatsu N, Hibi T, Hong SK, Kim JM, Hatano E, Yoshizumi T, Ikegmi T, Suh KS. Feasible living donor liver transplantation for patients on chronic hemodialysis: a multicenter study in East Asian countries. Surg Today 2024; 54:471-477. [PMID: 37742325 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02751-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSES End-stage liver and kidney disease is an indication for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. However, in countries where deceased donor transplantation is not well established, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a realistic option for patients on hemodialysis (HD). We investigated the outcomes of LDLT for patients on HD. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter survey of patients on chronic HD who underwent LDLT in East Asian countries. The characteristics of donors and recipients and the short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Between 2001 and 2021, 45 patients on HD underwent LDLT and 11 of these patients also underwent kidney transplantation (KT). The overall survival rate at 5 years of the 34 patients who underwent only LDLT was 44.5%. Multivariate analysis identified a low graft recipient weight ratio (< 1%) (p = 0.048) and long HD duration (≥ 10 years) (p = 0.046) as independent predictors of poor overall survival. The major complication was posttransplant bleeding, which occurred in12 patients (35%). CONCLUSION It is important to establish the indications for LDLT, taking into consideration graft size and HD duration in candidate patients on HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenei Furukawa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Keita Shimata
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Ito
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Toshima
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegmi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Attieh RM, Wadei HM. Acute Kidney Injury in Liver Cirrhosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2361. [PMID: 37510105 PMCID: PMC10377915 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in cirrhotic patients affecting almost 20% of these patients. While multiple etiologies can lead to AKI, pre-renal azotemia seems to be the most common cause of AKI. Irrespective of the cause, AKI is associated with worse survival with the poorest outcomes observed in those with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In recent years, new definitions, and classifications of AKI in cirrhosis have emerged. More knowledge has also become available regarding the benefits and drawbacks of albumin and terlipressin use in these patients. Diagnostic tools such as urinary biomarkers and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) became available and they will be used in the near future to differentiate between different causes of AKI and direct management of AKI in these patients. In this update, we will review these new classifications, treatment recommendations, and diagnostic tools for AKI in cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Mary Attieh
- Department of Transplant, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Hani M Wadei
- Department of Transplant, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nair G, Nair V. Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 2022; 26:313-322. [PMID: 35487613 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after liver transplantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This increase in mortality can be offset by performing a kidney transplant at the time of the liver transplant in select cases. Accordingly, Margreiter and colleague; s performed the first simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant in 1983. The number of SLK transplants has increased by more than 300% since then. In 1990%, 1.7% of all liver transplants in the United States were SLK transplants which increased to 9.9% by 2016. This steep increase was likely due to the implementation of the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system in 2002, which is heavily weighted by serum creatinine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Nair
- Division of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, 400 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
| | - Vinay Nair
- Division of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, 400 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Improvement of renal function prior to liver transplantation is not associated with better long-term renal outcome or survival. Ann Hepatol 2021; 26:100559. [PMID: 34656773 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Since MELD implementation renal impairment in liver transplant (LT) recipients has become of increasing importance. This is the first study evaluating the course of renal function immediately prior to LT as predictor for long-term renal and overall outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, 226 adults undergoing LT at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (2011-2015) were included. The impact of renal function over a period of 3 months prior to LT compared to renal function at the day of LT on long-term renal outcome and survival was assessed. RESULTS According to GFR at day of LT renal function improved (≥1 CKD stage) in 64 patients (28%), remained stable in 144 (64%) or deteriorated in 18 (8%). Improvement of renal function prior to LT did neither significantly affect 90-day (13% vs. 14%, p = 0.83), nor 5-year post-LT mortality (35% vs. 41%, p = 0.57). 50 patients (22%) with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) received terlipressin prior to LT, but only 18 (37%) showed prolonged stabilization of renal function (improvement ≥1 CKD stage). Response to terlipressin did neither improve 90-day (p=1), 5-year mortality (p = 0.52) nor long-term renal function (p = 0.843). Nevertheless, need for dialysis pre-LT (59% vs. 34%, p = 0.005) and post-LT (62% vs. 17%, p<0.001) was associated with increased 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS Improvement of renal function immediately prior to LT, either spontaneously or following terlipressin therapy, did neither ameliorate long-term renal outcome nor survival in LT recipients. Future studies need to clarify the impact of terlipressin in HRS on the transplant waiting time in LT candidates.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic renal disease: Challenges of interventional treatment. Surg Oncol 2020; 36:42-50. [PMID: 33307490 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, recognized as the fourth most common cause of cancer related death. Many risk factors, leading to liver cirrhosis and associated HCC, have been recognized, among them viral hepatitis infections play an important role worldwide. Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on maintenance dialysis, show a higher prevalence of viral hepatitis than the general population what increases the risk of HCC onset. In addition, renal dysfunction may have a negative prognostic impact on both immediate and long-term outcomes after malignancy treatment. Several interventional procedures for the treatment of HCC are currently available: thermal ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, liver surgery or even liver transplantation. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system provides an evidence-based treatment algorithm to address different categories of patients to the most-effective treatment in consideration of the extension of disease, liver function and performance status. Liver resection and transplantation are usually reserved to patients with early stage HCC and acceptable performance status, while the other treatments are more indicated in case of impaired liver function or locally advanced or unresectable tumors. However, there is no validated treatment algorithm for HCC in CKD patients, mainly due to the rarity of reports in this cohort of patients. Hereby we discuss the available evidences on interventional HCC treatments in CKD patients, and briefly report up-to-date pharmacological therapy for HCC patients affected by viral hepatitis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lunsford KE, Agopian VG, Yi SG, Nguyen DTM, Graviss EA, Harlander-Locke MP, Saharia A, Kaldas FM, Mobley CM, Zarrinpar A, Hobeika MJ, Veale JL, Podder H, Farmer DG, Knight RJ, Danovitch GM, Gritsch HA, Li XC, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW, Gaber AO. Delayed Implantation of Pumped Kidneys Decreases Renal Allograft Futility in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2020; 104:1591-1603. [PMID: 32732836 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) improves survival for liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction; however, the tenuous perioperative hemodynamic and metabolic milieu in high-acuity CLKT recipients increases delayed graft function and kidney allograft failure. We sought to analyze whether delayed KT through pumping would improve kidney outcomes following CLKT. METHODS A retrospective analysis (University of California Los Angeles [n = 145], Houston Methodist Hospital [n = 79]) was performed in all adults receiving CLKT at 2 high-volume transplant centers from February 2004 to January 2017, and recipients were analyzed for patient and allograft survival as well as renal outcomes following CLKT. RESULTS A total of 63 patients (28.1%) underwent delayed implantation of pumped kidneys during CLKT (dCLKT) and 161 patients (71.9%) received early implantation of nonpumped kidneys during CLKT (eCLKT). Most recipients were high-acuity with median biologic model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of, 35 for dCLKT and 34 for eCLKT (P = ns). Pretransplant, dCLKT had longer intensive care unit stay, were more often intubated, and had greater vasopressor use. Despite this, dCLKT exhibited improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and kidney survival (P = 0.02) and decreased length of stay (P = 0.001), kidney allograft failure (P = 0.012), and dialysis duration (P = 0.031). This reduced kidney allograft futility (death or continued need for hemodialysis within 3 mo posttransplant) for dCLKT (6.3%) compared with eCLKT (19.9%) (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS Delayed implantation of pumped kidneys is associated with improved patient and renal allograft survival and decreased hospital length of stay despite longer kidney cold ischemia. These data should inform the ethical debate as to the futility of performing CLKT in high-acuity recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keri E Lunsford
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Vatche G Agopian
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stephanie G Yi
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Duc T M Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX
| | - Michael P Harlander-Locke
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ashish Saharia
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Fady M Kaldas
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Constance M Mobley
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Mark J Hobeika
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey L Veale
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hemangshu Podder
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Richard J Knight
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Gabriel M Danovitch
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - H Albin Gritsch
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Xian C Li
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - R Mark Ghobrial
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ronald W Busuttil
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bittermann T, Hubbard RA, Lewis JD, Goldberg DS. The proportion of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Sodium score attributable to creatinine independently predicts post-transplant survival and renal complications. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13817. [PMID: 32027405 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The post-transplant outcomes of patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score primarily driven by renal dysfunction are poorly understood. This was a retrospective cohort study of liver transplant (LT) alone recipients between 2005 and 2017 using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. The proportion of MELD Sodium score attributable to creatinine ("KidneyMELD") was calculated: (9.57 × ln (creatinine) × 100)/(MELD-Na - 6.43). The association of KidneyMELD with (a) all-cause mortality and (b) estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.732 at 1-year post-LT were evaluated. Recipients with KidneyMELD ≥50% had a 52% higher risk of post-LT mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.52 vs KidneyMELD 0%, 95% CI: 1.36-1.69; P < .001). This risk was significantly greater for older patients, particularly when >50 years at LT (interaction P < .001). KidneyMELD ≥50% was also associated with an 11-fold increase in the odds of advanced renal dysfunction at 1-year post-LT (adjusted odds ratio 11.53 vs KidneyMELD 0%; 95% CI 8.9-14.93; P < .001). Recipients prioritized for LT primarily on the basis of renal dysfunction have marked post-LT mortality and morbidity independent of MELD Sodium score. The implications of these results in the context of the new UNOS "safety net" kidney transplant policy require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Bittermann
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca A Hubbard
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James D Lewis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David S Goldberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Renal damage after liver transplantation. Biosci Rep 2020; 40:221614. [PMID: 31851363 PMCID: PMC6944654 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20191187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients following liver transplantation are at risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of our study was to assess risk factors for the development of AKI and the impact of AKI on the outcome of patients after liver transplantation (OLT). Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 149 patients undergoing OLT from 1/2004 to 12/2007. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO definition representing the AKIN and the RIFLE classification, and according to the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results: According to the AKIN criteria alone 14 patients, according to the RIFLE criteria alone no patient and according to both definitions 30 patients developed AKI. RRT was required in 54 patients experiencing AKI, whereas 51 patients did not develop AKI. Pre OLT serum creatinine (SCr) significantly predicted the development of AKI requiring RRT, but not AKI without RRT requirement. Survival rate was significantly inferior after 28 days, one or three years in patients with AKI requiring RRT (70.4, 46.4, 44.4% vs. 100, 92.2, 90.2%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between patients experiencing AKI according to the RIFLE or AKIN criteria without RRT requirement and patients without AKI. Conclusion: Pre OLT renal dysfunction assessed by SCr was the most important risk factor predicting severe forms of AKI, but not milder forms of AKI. AKI requiring RRT had a detrimental impact on patients’ survival, whereas milder forms of AKI were not associated with a worse outcome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Irie T, Sugawara Y, Narita Y, Ibuki S, Shimata K, Yamamoto H, Hibi T. Single-center Experience of Living-donor Liver Transplantation in Patients Receiving Maintenance Renal Replacement Therapy. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1520-1521. [PMID: 31155186 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For most patients with liver failure receiving maintenance renal replacement therapy (RRT), treatment with living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) alone is indicated in Japan. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LDLT while receiving RRT in our hospital. RESULTS Three of the 5 patients who underwent LDLT while on RRT died during the first year after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The indications for liver transplantation in patients on RRT require careful examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Irie
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Y Sugawara
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
| | - Y Narita
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - S Ibuki
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - K Shimata
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - H Yamamoto
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - T Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Use of Donation After Circulatory Death Organs for Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplant: To DCD or Not to DCD? Transplantation 2019; 103:1159-1167. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
12
|
Korayem IM, Agopian VG, Lunsford KE, Gritsch HA, Veale JL, Lipshutz GS, Yersiz H, Serrone CL, Kaldas FM, Farmer DG, Bunnapradist S, Danovitch GM, Busuttil RW, Zarrinpar A. Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13569. [PMID: 31006141 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney delayed graft function (kDGF) remains a challenging problem following simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) with a reported incidence up to 40%. Given the scarcity of renal allografts, it is crucial to minimize the development of kDGF among SLKT recipients to improve patient and graft outcomes. We sought to assess the role of preoperative recipient and donor/graft factors on developing kDGF among recipients of SLKT. METHODS A retrospective review of 194 patients who received SLKT in the period from January 2004 to March 2017 in a single center was performed to assess the effect of preoperative factors on the development of kDGF. RESULTS Kidney delayed graft function was observed in 95 patients (49%). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor history of hypertension, cold static preservation of kidney grafts [versus using hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (HPMP)], donor final creatinine, physiologic MELD, and duration of delay of kidney transplantation after liver transplantation were significant independent predictors for kDGF. kDGF is associated with worse graft function and patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS Kidney delayed graft function has detrimental effects on graft function and graft survival. Understanding the risks and combining careful perioperative patient management, proper recipient selection and donor matching, and graft preservation using HPMP would decrease kDGF among SLKT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam M Korayem
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Vatche G Agopian
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Keri E Lunsford
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans A Gritsch
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeffrey L Veale
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gerald S Lipshutz
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hasan Yersiz
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Coney L Serrone
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Fady M Kaldas
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel M Danovitch
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ronald W Busuttil
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tinti F, Mitterhofer AP, Umbro I, Nightingale P, Inston N, Ghallab M, Ferguson J, Mirza DF, Ball S, Lipkin G, Muiesan P, Perera MTPR. Combined liver-kidney transplantation versus liver transplant alone based on KDIGO stratification of estimated glomerular filtration rate: data from the United Kingdom Transplant registry - a retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int 2019; 32:918-932. [PMID: 30793378 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Patient selection for combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is a current issue on the background of organ shortage. This study aimed to compare outcomes and post-transplant renal function for patients receiving CLKT and liver transplantation alone (LTA) based on native renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratification. Using the UK National transplant database (NHSBT) 6035 patients receiving a LTA (N = 5912; 98%) or CLKT (N = 123; 2%) [2001-2013] were analysed, and stratified by KDIGO stages of eGFR at transplant (eGFR group-strata). There was no difference in patient/graft survival between LTA and CLKT in eGFR group-strata (P > 0.05). Of 377 patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) at time of transplantation, 305 (81%) and 72 (19%) patients received LTA and CLKT respectively. A significantly greater proportion of CLKT patients had severe end-stage renal disease (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) at 1 year post-transplant compared to LTA (9.5% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.001). Patient and graft survival benefit for patients on RRT at transplantation was favouring CLKT versus LTA (P = 0.038 and P = 0.018, respectively) but the renal function of the long-term survivors was not superior following CLKT. The data does not support CLKT approach based on eGFR alone, and the advantage of CLKT appear to benefit only those who are on established RRT at the time of transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Tinti
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Nephrology Unit, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Paola Mitterhofer
- Nephrology Unit, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Umbro
- Nephrology Unit, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter Nightingale
- Medical Statistics Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicholas Inston
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mohammed Ghallab
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James Ferguson
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius F Mirza
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Ball
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Graham Lipkin
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Molnar MZ, Joglekar K, Jiang Y, Cholankeril G, Abdul MKM, Kedia S, Gonzalez HC, Ahmed A, Singal A, Bhamidimarri KR, Aithal GP, Duseja A, Wong VWS, Gulnare A, Puri P, Nair S, Eason JD, Satapathy SK. Association of Pretransplant Renal Function With Liver Graft and Patient Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:399-410. [PMID: 30369023 PMCID: PMC6709989 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is one of the top 3 indications for liver transplantation (LT) in Western countries. It is unknown whether renal dysfunction at the time of LT has any effect on post-LT outcomes in recipients with NASH. From the United Network for Organ Sharing-Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set, we identified 4088 NASH recipients who received deceased donor LT. We divided our recipients a priori into 3 categories: group 1 with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 at the time of LT and/or received dialysis within 2 weeks preceding LT (n = 937); group 2 with recipients who had eGFR ≥30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 and who did not receive renal replacement therapy prior to LT (n = 2812); and group 3 with recipients who underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (n = 339). We examined the association of pretransplant renal dysfunction with death with a functioning graft, all-cause mortality, and graft loss using competing risk regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The mean ± standard deviation age of the cohort at baseline was 58 ± 8 years, 55% were male, 80% were Caucasian, and average exception Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 24 ± 9. The median follow-up period was 5 years (median, 1816 days; interquartile range, 1090-2723 days). Compared with group 1 recipients, group 2 recipients had 19% reduced trend for risk for death with a functioning graft (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.02) and similar risk for graft loss (SHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.59-2.62), whereas group 3 recipients had similar risk for death with a functioning graft (SHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.96-1.57) and graft loss (SHR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02-1.37) using an adjusted competing risk regression model. In conclusion, recipients with preserved renal function before LT showed a trend toward lower risk of death with a functioning graft compared with SLKT recipients and those with pretransplant severe renal dysfunction in patients with NASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miklos Z Molnar
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.,Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.,Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kiran Joglekar
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Yu Jiang
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - George Cholankeril
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Satish Kedia
- School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Humberto C Gonzalez
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Aijaz Ahmed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Ashwani Singal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Guruprasad Padur Aithal
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Agayeva Gulnare
- Department of Internal Medicine, Grand Hospital, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Puneet Puri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Satheesh Nair
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - James D Eason
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baseline and Center-Level Variation in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Listing in the United States. Transplantation 2018; 102:609-615. [PMID: 29077659 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has implemented medical criteria to determine which candidates are most appropriate for simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation in comparison to liver-alone transplantation. We investigated prepolicy center-level variation among SLK listing practice, in light of such criteria. METHODS We identified 4736 SLK-eligible candidates after Share-35 in the United States. We calculated the proportion of candidates at each center who were listed for SLK transplantation within 6 months of eligibility. Multilevel logistic regression and parametric survival model was used to estimate the center-specific probability of SLK listing, adjusting for patient and center-level characteristics. RESULTS Among 4736 SLK-eligible candidates, 64.8% were listed for SLK within 6 months of eligibility. However, the percentage of SLK listing ranged from 0% to 100% across centers. African American race, male sex, transplant history, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with a higher likelihood of SLK listing. Conversely, older age was associated with a lower likelihood of SLK listing. After adjusting for candidate characteristics, the percentage of SLK listing still ranged from 3.8% to 80.2% across centers; this wide variation persisted even after further adjusting for center-level characteristics. CONCLUSIONS There was significant prepolicy center-level variation in SLK listing for SLK-eligible candidates. Implementation of standardized SLK listing practices may reduce center-level variation and equalize access for SLK candidates across the United States.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hussain SM, Sureshkumar KK. Refining the Role of Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2018; 6:289-295. [PMID: 30271741 PMCID: PMC6160299 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2017.00065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease score by Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) deceased donor liver allocation policy in 2002 has led to an increase in the number of simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplantation. Since kidney function recovery following liver transplantation is difficult to predict, allocation of the kidney for SLK transplantation thus far has not been based on much rationale and evidence. Lack of OPTN policy towards SLK organ allocation has resulted in great variations among transplant centers regarding SLK transplantation. Increasing use of kidneys towards SLK transplantation diverts deceased donor kidneys away from candidates awaiting kidney-alone transplantation. Recently OPTN/United Network of Organ Sharing has implemented medical eligibility criteria for adult SLK transplantation which also includes a concept of safety net. Implementation of the new policy is a move in a positive direction, providing consistency in our practice and evidence-based guidelines in selecting candidates for SLK transplantation. This policy needs to be monitored prospectively and modified based on new data that will emerge over time. This review outlines the literature on SLK transplantation and efforts towards developing rational policy on SLK organ allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kalathil K. Sureshkumar
- *Correspondence to: Kalathil K. Sureshkumar, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA. Tel: +1-412-359-3319, Fax: +1-412-359-4136, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aeder MI. Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Policy Update and the Challenges Ahead. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0190-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
18
|
Ekser B, Mangus RS, Kubal CA, Powelson JA, Fridell JA, Goggins WC. Excellent outcomes in combined liver-kidney transplantation: Impact of kidney donor profile index and delayed kidney transplantation. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:222-232. [PMID: 28926173 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The positive impact of delayed kidney transplantation (KT) on patient survival for combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) has already been demonstrated by our group. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the quality of the kidneys (based on kidney donor profile index [KDPI]) or the delayed approach KT contributes to improved patient survival. In total, 130 CLKTs were performed between 2002 and 2015, 69 with simultaneous KT (group S) and 61 with delayed KT (group D) (performed as a second operation with a mean cold ischemia time [CIT] of 50 ± 15 hours). All patients were categorized according to the KDPI score: 1%-33%, 34%-66%, and 67%-99%. Recipient and donor characteristics were comparable within groups S and D. Transplant outcomes were comparable within groups S and D, including liver and kidney CIT, warm ischemia time, and delayed graft function. Lower KDPI kidneys (<34%) were associated with increased patient survival in both groups. The combination of delayed KT and KDPI 1%-33% resulted in 100% patient survival at 3 years. These results support that delayed KT in CLKT improves patient survival. The combination of delayed KT and low KDPI offers excellent patient survival up to 3 years. Improved outcomes in the delayed KT group including high KDPI kidneys supports expansion of the donor pool with the use of more extended criteria donor and donation after circulatory death kidneys. Liver Transplantation 24 222-232 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Ekser
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Richard S Mangus
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Chandrashekhar A Kubal
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - John A Powelson
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jonathan A Fridell
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - William C Goggins
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yadav K, Serrano OK, Peterson KJ, Pruett TL, Kandaswamy R, Bangdiwala A, Ibrahim H, Israni A, Lake J, Chinnakotla S. The liver recipient with acute renal dysfunction: A single institution evaluation of the simultaneous liver-kidney transplant candidate. Clin Transplant 2017; 32. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Yadav
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Oscar K. Serrano
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Kent J. Peterson
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Timothy L. Pruett
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Ananta Bangdiwala
- Division of Biostatistics; School of Public Health; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Hassan Ibrahim
- Department of Medicine; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Ajay Israni
- Department of Medicine; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - John Lake
- Department of Medicine; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Singh N, Ahmadzadeh S, Shokouh-Amiri H, Qazi YA, Sequeira A, Samant H, McMillan R, Zibari GB. Kidney outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease receiving an orthotopic liver transplant alone. Clin Transplant 2017; 31. [PMID: 28504869 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant in patients with liver cirrhosis and nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. We report 14 liver cirrhotic patients who had persistently low MDRD-6 estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months and underwent either liver transplant alone (LTA; n=9) or simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT; n=5). Pretransplant, patients with LTA compared with SLKT had lower serum creatinine (2.5±0.73 vs 4.6±0.52 mg/dL, P=.001), higher MDRD-6 e-GFR (21.0±7.2 vs 10.3±2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P=.002), higher 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (34.2±8.8 vs 18.0±2.2 mL/min, P=.002), lower proteinuria (133.2±117.7 vs 663±268.2 mg/24 h, P=.0002), and relatively normal kidney biopsy and ultrasound findings. Post-LTA, the e-GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2 ) increased in all nine patients, with mean e-GFR at 1 month (49.8±8.4), 3 months (49.6±8.7), 6 months (49.8±8.1), 12 months (47.6±9.2), 24 months (47.9±9.1), and 36 months (45.1±7.3) significantly higher compared to pre-LTA e-GFR (P≤.005 at all time points). One patient developed end-stage renal disease 9 years post-LTA and another patient expired 7 years post-LTA. The low e-GFR alone in the absence of other markers or risk factors of CKD should not be an absolute criterion for SLKT in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Singh
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, LSUHSC-S, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Shahab Ahmadzadeh
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Hosein Shokouh-Amiri
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Yasir A Qazi
- Division of Nephrology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adrian Sequeira
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, LSUHSC-S, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Hrishikesh Samant
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, LSUHSC-S, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Robert McMillan
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Gazi B Zibari
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Avoiding Futility in Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation: Analysis of 331 Consecutive Patients Listed for Dual Organ Replacement. Ann Surg 2017; 265:1016-1024. [PMID: 27232249 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate outcomes and predictors of renal allograft futility (RAF-patient death or need for renal replacement therapy at 3 months) after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT). BACKGROUND Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) prioritization of liver recipients with renal dysfunction has significantly increased utilization of SLKT. Data on renal outcomes after SLKT in the highest MELD recipients are scarce, as are accurate predictors of recovery of native kidney function. Without well-established listing guidelines, SLKT potentially wastes renal allografts in both high-acuity liver recipients at risk for early mortality and recipients who may regain native kidney function. METHODS A retrospective single-center multivariate regression analysis was performed for adult patients undergoing SLKT (January 2004 to August 2014) to identify predictors of RAF. RESULTS Of 331 patients dual-listed for SLKT, 171 (52%) expired awaiting transplant, 145 (44%) underwent SLKT, and 15 (5%) underwent liver transplantation alone. After SLKT, 39% experienced delayed graft function and 20.7% had RAF. Compared with patients without RAF, RAF recipients had greater MELD scores, length of hospitalization, intraoperative base deficit, incidence of female donors, kidney and liver donor risk indices, kidney cold ischemia, and inferior overall survival. Multivariate predictors of RAF included pretransplant dialysis duration, kidney cold ischemia, kidney donor risk index, and recipient hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSIONS With 20% short-term loss of transplanted kidneys after SLKT, our data strongly suggest that renal transplantation should be deferred in liver recipients at high risk for RAF. Consideration for a kidney allocation variance to allow for delayed renal transplantation after liver transplantation may prevent loss of scarce renal allografts.
Collapse
|
22
|
Horvatits T, Pischke S, Proske VM, Fischer L, Scheidat S, Thaiss F, Fuhrmann V, Lohse AW, Nashan B, Sterneck M. Outcome and natural course of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with severely impaired kidney function prior to transplantation. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 6:104-111. [PMID: 29435320 DOI: 10.1177/2050640617707089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since introduction of the MELD score in the liver allograft allocation system, renal insufficiency has emerged as an increasing problem. Here we evaluated the course of kidney function in patients with advanced renal insufficiency prior to liver transplantation (LT). Methods A total of 254 patients undergoing LT at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (2011-2015) were screened for renal impairment (GFR < 30 ml/min) prior to LT in this observational study. Results Eighty (32%) patients (median 60 years; M/F: 48/32) had significant renal impairment prior to LT. Median follow-up post-LT was 619 days. Patient survival at 90 days, one year and two years was 76%, 66% and 64%, respectively. Need for dialysis postoperatively but not preoperatively was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Renal function improved in 75% of survivors, but 78% of patients had chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 at end of follow-up. Of eight (16%) survivors remaining on long-term dialysis, so far only four patients have received a kidney transplant. Conclusion Postoperative dialysis affected long-term mortality. In 75% of survivors renal function improved, but still the majority of patients had an impaired renal function (CKD stage 3-5) at end of follow-up. Future studies should elucidate the impact of kidney dysfunction and dialysis on recipients' long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Horvatits
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Pischke
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V M Proske
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Fischer
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Scheidat
- Transplant Outpatient Clinic, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - F Thaiss
- Transplant Outpatient Clinic, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Fuhrmann
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A W Lohse
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - B Nashan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Sterneck
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation Alone for Patients on Maintenance Renal Replacement Therapy in Japan: Results of a Nationwide Survey. Transplant Direct 2016; 2:e74. [PMID: 27500264 PMCID: PMC4946519 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation has been limited as a standard practice because of a severe shortage of deceased donors in Japan, living donor (LD) liver transplantation alone (LTA) is indicated in most recipients with maintenance renal replacement therapy (MRRT). METHODS A retrospective nationwide survey of LD LTA was performed for liver transplant patients on MRRT. The characteristics of donors and recipients, postoperative complications, survival rate, and causes of death were analyzed. RESULTS In the adult cases (n = 28), the overall survival rate at 1 year and 5 years were 66.1% and 57.3%, respectively. When compared with those adults without MRRT (n = 237), it was significantly worse. In the 7 pediatric cases, the overall survival rate at 1 and 5 years were both 83.3%. Three adult recipients died of nonaneurysm cerebral hemorrhage after 1 year and 1 adult recipient died of acute heart failure after 7 months. In adult recipients with MRRT, graft weight versus standard liver volume, and duration and blood loss in LTA surgery were associated with poor outcomes after LD LTA. Multivariate analysis revealed that MRRT was highest hazard ratio on patient survival after LD LTA. CONCLUSIONS Early post-LD LTA mortality was higher in patients with MRRT than in those without MRRT with characteristic causes. Smaller grafts for size and a complicated surgery were associated with poor outcome after LD LTA. Thus, LD LTA in adult patients on MRRT should be carefully treated with meticulous postoperative management and follow-up.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tanriover B, MacConmara MP, Parekh J, Arce C, Zhang S, Gao A, Mufti A, Levea SL, Sandikci B, Ayvaci MUS, Ariyamuthu VK, Hwang C, Mohan S, Mete M, Vazquez MA, Marrero JA. SIMULTANEOUS LIVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES WITH RENAL DYSFUNCTION: IMPORTANCE OF CREATININE LEVELS, DIALYSIS, AND ORGAN QUALITY IN SURVIVAL. Kidney Int Rep 2016; 1:221-229. [PMID: 27942610 PMCID: PMC5138564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2016.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The survival benefit from simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) over liver transplant alone (LTA) in recipients with moderate renal dysfunction is not well understood. Moreover, the impact of deceased donor organ quality in SLK survival has not been well described in the literature. Methods The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was studied for adult recipients receiving LTA (N = 2700) or SLK (N = 1361) with moderate renal insufficiency between 2003 and 2013. The study cohort was stratified into 4 groups based on serum creatinine (<2 mg/dl versus ≥2 mg/dl) and dialysis status at listing and transplant. The patients with end-stage renal disease and requiring acute dialysis more than 3 months before transplantation were excluded. A propensity score matching was performed in each stratified group to factor out imbalances between the SLK and LTA regarding covariate distribution and to reduce measured confounding. Donor quality was assessed with liver donor risk index. The primary outcome of interest was posttransplant mortality. Results In multivariable propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard models, SLK led to decrease in posttransplant mortality compared with LTA across all 4 groups, but only reached statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.96) in the recipients not exposed to dialysis and serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl at transplant (mortality incidence rate per patient-year 5.7% in SLK vs. 7.6% in LTA, P = 0.005). The decrease in mortality was observed among SLK recipients with better quality donors (liver donor risk index < 1.5). Discussion Exposure to pretransplantation dialysis and donor quality affected overall survival among SLK recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bekir Tanriover
- Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Justin Parekh
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Cristina Arce
- Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Song Zhang
- Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ang Gao
- Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arjmand Mufti
- Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Swee-Ling Levea
- Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Christine Hwang
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Mutlu Mete
- Department of Computer Science, Texas A&M, Commerce, TX
| | - Miguel A Vazquez
- Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jorge A Marrero
- Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Doyle MBM, Subramanian V, Vachharajani N, Maynard E, Shenoy S, Wellen JR, Lin Y, Chapman WC. Results of Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Review. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223:193-201. [PMID: 27103549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision for a simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) is fraught with controversy. The aim of this study was to compare SLKT with liver transplantation alone (LTA) in patients with pretransplantation renal failure. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review comparing patients undergoing SLKT and LTA (with renal failure) between January 2000 and December 2014 was performed. RESULTS Of 1,129 liver transplantations, 132 had renal failure pretransplantation; 52 had SLKT and 80 recipients had LTA. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and BMI were lower in the SLKT group (p = 0.001). Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation patients had better overall survival rates at 1 and 5 years compared with LTA (92.3% and 81.6% vs 73.3% and 64.3% respectively; p < 0.01). Graft survival was also superior in patients undergoing SLKT vs LTA. Six of 52 (11.5%) SLKT patients had final positive cross match, but only 1 of 52 (1.9%) kidney grafts was lost to rejection. In the SLKT group, 9 of 52 (17.3%) patients required dialysis post transplantation, but only 2 remained on dialysis beyond 30 days. All patients in the LTA group were on dialysis pretransplantation and significantly more patients (52 of 80 [65%]) required dialysis post LTA (p ≤ 0.0001); 31 of 80 (38.8%) were dialysis dependent for more than 30 days or died on dialysis within 30 days. Two LTA recipients were subsequently listed for kidney transplant. CONCLUSIONS Patients with end-stage liver disease on dialysis who undergo liver transplantation have significantly better survival when SLKT is performed. In selected patients, SLKT is an appropriate use of a scarce resource, but better prognostic indicators for selection of patients are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M B Majella Doyle
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
| | - Vijay Subramanian
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Erin Maynard
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Surendra Shenoy
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Jason R Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Yiing Lin
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation or liver transplantation alone for patients in need of liver transplantation with renal dysfunction. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21:194-200. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
27
|
Abstract
In 2014, simultaneous liver kidney transplants (SLK) accounted for 8.2 % of all liver transplants performed in the USA. Prior to introduction of the model of end stage liver disease (MELD) system, SLK accounted for 2.5 % in 2001 and only 1.7 % in 1990. Transplant centers have struggled to balance the moral and ethical aspects of SLK in the setting of organ scarcity with an algorithm that best qualifies patients for such treatment options. Few centers have even ventured into DCD territory for SLK. Advancement in immunosuppression protocols and treatment of HCV and HIV have impacted SLK over the years. Simulation modeling has allowed us to analyze the future impact of our decisions that are made today. All of these advancements have given, and will continue to give new perspectives to SLK. The purpose of this review article is to highlight these advances and bring to light the studies that have made this transplant option successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vichin Puri
- Methodist/University of Tennessee Transplant Institute, 1211 Union Ave. Suite 340, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
| | - James Eason
- Methodist/University of Tennessee Transplant Institute, 1211 Union Ave. Suite 340, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review and highlight recent literature regarding the medical management of adult patients undergoing liver transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS The addition of serum sodium concentration to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score more accurately predicts 90-day waitlist mortality. Predictors of waitlist mortality and posttransplant survival include lower albumin and the presence of ascites, varices, and encephalopathy, as well as more nontraditional predictors such as older age, obesity, frailty, and sarcopenia. Indications for liver transplantation are evolving with the advent of effective therapy for hepatitis C and the increased prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Disparities persist in the current allocation system, including geographic variation and MELD inflation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Share 35 allows for broader regional sharing of organs for patients with the highest need, without detrimental effects on waitlist mortality or survival. Everolimus is a recently approved option for posttransplant immunosuppression that spares renal function. SUMMARY The MELD score has enabled the liver transplant community to equitably allocate organs. Recent literature has focused on the limitations of the MELD score and the disparities inherent in the current system. The next steps for liver transplantation will be to develop strategies to further optimize waitlist prioritization and organ allocation.
Collapse
|