Low-dose methotrexate may preserve a stronger antileukemic effect than that of cyclosporine after modified donor lymphocyte infusion in unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT

Ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after modified donor lymphocyte infusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis and its impact on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in patients after modified donor lymphocyte infusion (mDLI).

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with relapsed leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) who received ruxolitinib prophylaxis between October 2018 and April 2020. The incidence of aGVHD, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were followed up for a median time of 8 months (range: 1-26 months). The incidence of aGVHD on Day 30 after mDLI was 41.2% and ranged from Grade 1 to 4; ten of 17 patients (58.8%) achieved a complete response (CR), and two (11.8%) had a partial response (PR). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation rate was 23.5%, and the median time from mDLI to CMV reactivation was 48.5 days. The mean DFS and OS after mDLI were 1.0 (95% CI 0.0-3.5) and 9.0 (95% CI 1.2-16.8) months, respectively. The causes of death for 10 patients were leukemia relapse (n = 5), aGVHD and septic shock (n = 3), intracranial lesion (n = 1), and COVID-19 (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

We reported encouraging results of ruxolitinib monotherapy in the prevention of aGVHD and maintenance of GVL for post-transplantation relapsed patients, even though being at high risk with poor initial prognosis.

Optimization of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for AML Relapse After Allo-HCT in the Era of New Drugs and Cell Engineering

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a key strategy for the treatment of AML relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and has been used for either prophylactic, pre-emptive, or therapeutic purposes. However, the prognosis of these patients remains dismal even after DLI infusion (2-year overall survival, ~25%), and the efficacy is achieved at the cost of toxicities such as graft-versus-host (GVH) disease. Attempts to optimize DLI efficacy and safety, such as dose/timing modification and the use of cytoreduction, before DLI have been performed previously. Recently, a great number of novel targeted and immunomodulatory agents have emerged. Some of them, such as hypomethylating agents, FLT3 and Bcl-2 inhibitors, have been used in combination with DLI, aiming to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Moreover, manipulation of the DLI graft through cell selection (e.g., donor NK cells) or cell engineering (donor CAR-T cells) has shown potentially superior anti-tumor effects but less GVH effect than conventional DLI in clinical trials. This review summarizes the recent advances on the use of DLI for the prophylaxis/treatment of AML relapse and discusses future strategies which may further improve the treatment efficacy.

Haploidentical stem cell transplant with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and mini-dose methotrexate in children

BACKGROUND

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) is an option for patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an effective method of graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and permits the use of T-cell replete grafts in settings were ex vivo manipulation is not feasible.

METHODS

A retrospective study among patients younger than 18 years, with a history of hematologic malignancies who underwent haplo-SCT between 2012 and 2016. All patients received a preparative regimen of fludarabine, busulfan, and 400 cGy total body irradiation or melphalan. Post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis consisted either of PTCy (50 mg/kg on Days + 3 and + 4) and cyclosporine (CSA) plus mycophenolate (MMF) (15 mg/kg/dose, thrice daily, per os), or mini-dose methotrexate (MTX; 5 mg/m² dose) on Days + 5, +7, +10, and + 15.

RESULTS

A total of 52 children were included, whose median age was 9 years (interquartile range, 4.9-14; range, 1.2-17 years), and 63% were males. The most common complications were cytomegalovirus reactivation (57%) and hemorrhagic cystitis (36%). The acute GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy, CSA, and mini-dose MTX in 42 (81%) patients, and 10 (19%) patients received PTCy, CSA, and MMF. The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD II-IV, acute GvHD III-IV, and chronic GvHD were 42%, 8.5%, and 19%, respectively. Grades I-IV acute GvHD occurred in 100% of the patients who received prophylaxis with CSA and MMF, and 62% who received CSA and mini-dose MTX (p = .055). The transplant-related mortality at 100 days was 18%. The 5-year overall and event-free survival were 59% and 57%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Haplo-SCT with PT/Cy can be an available, safe, and feasible option for children with hematologic malignancies; meanwhile, the use of mini-dose of MTX was associated with lower rates of acute GVHD. However, our results require further support from prospective randomized studies to improve the efficacy of this prophylactic strategy.

Clinical applications of donor lymphocyte infusion from an HLA-haploidentical donor: consensus recommendations from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Donor lymphocyte infusion has been used in the management of relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. It can eradicate minimal residual disease or be used to rescue a hematologic relapse, being able to induce durable remissions in a subset of patients. With the increased use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, there is renewed interest in the use of donor lymphocytes to either treat or prevent disease relapse post transplant. Published retrospective and small prospective studies have shown encouraging results with therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusion in different haploidentical transplantation platforms. In this consensus paper, finalized on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize the available evidence on the use of donor lymphocyte infusion from haploidentical donor, and provide recommendations on its therapeutic, pre-emptive and prophylactic use in clinical practice.

Full donor chimerism without graft-versus-host disease: the key factor for maximum benefit of pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusions (pDLI)

Compared to standard-conditioned regimens, reduced-intensity conditioning and T-cell depletion deliver lower transplant-related mortality and decreased graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. These advantages may however be mitigated by increased relapse rates and delays in achievement of full donor chimerism (FDC). Pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusions (pDLI) facilitate the conversion of mixed (MDC) to FDC. However, there is a lack of published data on the risk/benefit analysis of this intervention. We performed a retrospective analysis of 119 patients who received 276 pDLI doses for falling CD3 chimerism, CD3 < 50% or mixed XX/XY karyotype. 71/119(60%) Patients achieved FDC, with only one reverting to MDC. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse at 5 years was significantly lower in the FDC group (16.0 vs 41.4%, p < 0.001). Those patients who achieved FDC had improved EFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients with FDC who developed DLI-induced graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) showed a similar outcome to those with MDC. The majority of patients who receive pDLI convert to FDC and retain that status. Achievement of FDC after pDLI impacts on survival, and those patients who achieve FDC without GvHD, experience maximum clinical benefit. Strategies to minimise DLI-induced GvHD should be considered to maximise the therapeutic potential of this intervention.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after haploidentical versus matched-sibling PBSCT in very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) might be used prophylactically to reduce relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma without effective targeted therapy. To compare the safety and efficacy of prophylactic DLI for prevention of relapse after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donors (HID-SCT) and matched-sibling donors (MSD-SCT) in patients with very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of 21 HID-SCT and 13 MSD-SCT recipients, displaying similar baseline characteristics except for donor's gender distribution. Grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100-day post-DLI was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group (59.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.05). The grade 3-4 acute GVHD (17.5% vs. 7.7%), 1-year chronic GVHD (36.6% vs. 33.2%), and severe chronic GVHD (15.3% vs. 27.3%) were not statistically significant different between groups. One-year non-relapse mortality was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group with marginal significance (27.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.061). One-year relapse rate was not statistically significant different between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group (21.6% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.543). For HID-SCT recipients, 1-year relapse rate was lower in patients receiving prophylactic DLI than that in a control cohort of eight patients with same very high-risk features but not receiving prophylactic DLI (62.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.037). No statistically significant difference was observed in 1-year overall survival (OS, 55.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.325) and relapse-free survival (RFS, 50.1% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.419) rates between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group. In multivariate analyses, non-remission status prior to transplant, poor-risk gene mutations, and donor's age ≥ 48 years predicted a higher risk of relapse after DLI. Non-remission status prior to transplant predicted inferior OS and RFS. Patient's age ≥ 40 years also predicted an inferior OS. In conclusion, prophylactic DLI was very safe and efficient for reducing relapse in patients with very high-risk AML receiving MSD-SCT. In the recipients of HID-SCT, the application of prophylactic DLI could reduce the risk of relapse, although with a higher incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD than those of MSD-SCT.

Comparison of outcomes after donor lymphocyte infusion with or without prior chemotherapy for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) without chemotherapy was investigated and compared with that of chemotherapy prior to DLI (Chemo-DLI) in patients who were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We enrolled 115 consecutive patients who received either DLI (n = 20) or Chemo-DLI (n = 95) during the same period. For each DLI recipient, three recipients matched for age at the HSCT, underlying diseases, and the year of the HSCT were randomly selected from the Chemo-DLI cohort (n = 60). The 2-year cumulative incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable between the groups. Fifteen (75.0%) and 47 (78.3%) patients in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups turned MRD-negative, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality after intervention were 30.7 versus 39.6% (P = 0.582) and 10.3 versus 6.0% (P = 0.508) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. The 2-year probabilities of disease-free, overall, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival after preemptive intervention were 58.9 versus 54.3% (P = 0.862), 69.3 versus 78.1% (P = 0.361), and 44.4 versus 35.1% (P = 0.489) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the intervention method did not significantly influence the clinical outcomes. In summary, preemptive DLI alone may be effective for patients who are MRD-positive and may be a potential alternative for patients who refuse or are unable to receive Chemo-DLI after HSCT.

Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered the cornerstone in the treatment of several malignant and not malignant hematological diseases. However, relapse of hematological disease after allo-SCT is considered the most challenging point in the field. The risk can be reduced through optimal patients, donor and disease selection before allo-SCT, but harnessing donor immune system is an appealing way to treat or avoid disease relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a simple and effective therapy after allo-SCT. In this paper, the efficacy of DLI will be analyzed in different hematological diseases, focusing also on their therapeutic or pre-emptive use.

New strategies of DLI in the management of relapse of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

DLI is an effective strategy for patients with recurrent hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). DLI has been widely applied to boost the graft vs tumor (GVT) or GVL effects. However, given the potentially severe complications associated with conventional DLI and transient GVL effect, new strategies for DLI are emerging. In this review, we have discussed the recent important studies on DLI as a prophylactic or therapeutic modality for relapsed hematological disorders after allo-HSCT. The strategies to separate GVL from GVHD have also been discussed. Leukemia-targeting therapy and lymphodepletion combined with DLI, and prophylactic DLI after allo-HSCT are often employed for patients with high risk of relapse, which has been reviewed as well. In addition, we have also discussed the issues on DLI to be further addressed, such as the doses, timing and frequency of DLI in different clinical settings, leukemic antigen-specific DLI as well as how to augment GVL effect while attenuating GVHD.