Routine ultrasonography surveillance of native kidneys for renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplant candidates

Screening for renal cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: a single-centre retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) screening in renal transplant (RT) recipients.

DESIGN

Single-centre retrospective study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

1998 RT recipients who underwent RT at Memorial Hermann Hospital (MHH) Texas Medical Center (TMC) between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 were included and we identified 16 patients (0.8%) with RCC. An additional four patients with RCC who underwent RT elsewhere but received follow-up at MHH TMC were also included. Subject races included white (20%), black (50%), Hispanic (20%) and Asian (10%).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The RCC stage at diagnosis and outcomes were compared between patients who were screening versus those who were not.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 20 patients with post-RT RCC, 75% of whom were men. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years. RCC histologies included clear cell (75%), papillary (20%) and chromophobe (5%). Patients with post-RT RCC who had screening (n=12) underwent ultrasound or CT annually or every 2 years, whereas eight patients had no screening. All 12 patients who had screening had early-stage disease at diagnosis (stage I (n=11) or stage II (n=1)) and were cured by nephrectomy (n=10) or cryotherapy (n=2). In patients who had no screening, three (37.5%) had stage IV RCC at diagnosis and all of whom died of metastatic disease. There was a statistically significant difference in RCC-specific survival in patients who were screened (p=0.01) compared with those who were not screened.

CONCLUSION

All RT recipients who had RCC diagnosed based on screening had early-stage disease and there were no RCC-related deaths. Screening is an effective intervention in RT recipients to reduce RCC-related mortality.

Renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients: incidence, trends, clinical management & outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence, characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among a large, single-centre cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study looking at KTR transplanted between January 2000-December 2017 (n = 2443) with ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Simultaneous kidney/pancreas transplants were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to determine the incidence of RCC. Characteristics and management of RCC were examined using descriptive statistics. Risk factors and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The incidence of RCC among our cohort was 0.32 per 100 person-years, 2.1% of all KTRs. Almost half (47.1%) of cases occurred within 4 years post-transplant. The majority of cases were T1a (86.3%), clear-cell (45.1%), and in the native kidney (80.4%). KTR diagnosed with RCC had a twofold higher incidence of other malignancies versus KTR without RCC. Overall mortality, but not cancer-specific mortality, at 2- and 5-years post-transplant was threefold higher among KTR with RCC than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of RCC among our KTR was slightly higher than the general population; majority of cases occur in the native kidneys and are low stage, low grade. Indolent histologic variants were more common than the general population. KTR with RCC had a higher incidence of other malignancies. Overall, but not cancer-specific, mortality was higher among KTRs diagnosed with RCC.

Increased risk for renal cell carcinoma in end stage renal disease - a population-based case-control study

PURPOSE

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a known risk factor for the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This case-control study was performed to assess the risk in a nationwide cohort and evaluate tumor characteristics and survival in the ESRD-RCC population.

METHODS

In this study, 9,299 patients with RCC identified in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register from 2005 until 2014 and 93,895 matched controls were linked to the Swedish Renal Registry and the National Patient Register. ESRD was defined as chronic kidney disease stage 5, kidney transplantation or kidney dialysis 0-40 years before the diagnosis of RCC.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients with ESRD and subsequent RCC were identified and compared with 9,087 patients with RCC. There was a 4.5-times increased risk for RCC among ESRD patients (95% CI = 3.6-5.6; p < 0.001) compared to matched controls. Longer time with ESRD increased the risk of RCC (ESRD > 9 years, OR = 10.2, 95% CI = 7.0-14.8). The ESRD-RCC patients were younger (p = 0.002), had smaller tumors (p < 0.001) and had lower tumor stage (p = 0.045). The incidence of papillary and chromophobe RCC was higher and clear cell RCC lower among the ESRD patients (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 50% in ESRD-RCC patients and 63% in RCC-only patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

More than 9 years with ESRD increased the risk of developing RCC 10-times compared to individuals without ESRD and the tumors showed a different histopathological pattern. Despite a less advanced tumor stage at diagnosis, the overall survival in ESRD-RCC patients was lower compared to patients with RCC-only.

Simultaneous Living Donor Kidney Transplant and Laparoscopic Native Nephrectomy: An Approach to Kidney Transplant Candidates with Suspected Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Introduction: Kidney transplant candidates are occasionally found during the pre-transplant evaluation to have a suspicious mass in a native kidney. Further work-up and management of such a mass may delay transplantation for several months, which may create logistic barriers to transplant, particularly if there are timing constraints of the donor. In this study, we report our experience with simultaneous living donor kidney transplant and laparoscopic native nephrectomy, where the indication for nephrectomy was a suspicious lesion. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent simultaneous kidney transplant and native nephrectomy using prospectively collected data. We analyzed relevant patient characteristics, surgical details, pathologic results, and long-term follow-up. Results: We identified 16 patients who underwent simultaneous living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic native nephrectomy at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Ten (62.5%) patients were found to have renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) on the final pathology. No patients had recurrent RCC, at a median follow-up of 4 years. Conclusion: For patients who are planning to undergo a living donor kidney transplant and are found to have a small mass that is suspicious for RCC, a simultaneous living donor kidney transplant and laparoscopic native nephrectomy is a possible approach in selected patients.

Renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients: descriptive analysis and overview of a major German transplant center

Aim: Elevated risk of malignancy-related death after renal transplantation is reported and renal malignancy was ranked as the third most frequent site of malignancy-related death. However, there is a lack of data characterizing renal cell carcinoma associated with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantation. Patients & methods: We retrospectively identified 5250 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the Hannover Medical School since 1970. Results: 124 patients with renal cell carcinoma (incidence 2.36%) were identified. Among all patients, metastatic recurrence was noted in 4.8%. In multivariate analysis, tumor stage and hemoglobin were identified as independent prognostic markers of OS, while tumor grading was predictive for disease recurrence. Conclusion: Apart from showing the prognostic value of tumor staging and hemoglobin, our data suggest that a risk adapted approach for early transplantation is feasible.

Effect of the Need for Preoperative Dialysis on Perioperative Outcomes on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether patients requiring dialysis are a higher risk surgical population and would experience more perioperative adverse events even when undergoing a perceived less invasive operation as a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). LRN is generally a well-tolerated surgical procedure with minimal morbidity and mortality. Prior to transplantation, dialysis patients will often have to undergo a LRN to remove a native kidney with a suspicious mass.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent a LRN between 2011 and 2016 were included. Patients were stratified by the need for preoperative dialysis 2 weeks prior to surgery, and perioperative outcomes were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between the need for preoperative dialysis and perioperative risk.

RESULTS

There were 8315 patients included in this analysis of which 445 (5.4%) patients required preoperative dialysis. Patients who required preoperative dialysis had more minor (P <.0001) and major (P = .0025) complications, a higher rate of return to the operating room (P = .002), and a longer length of stay (P <.0001) than those patients not requiring preoperative dialysis. In a multivariate analysis, the need for preoperative dialysis was independently associated with adverse perioperative outcomes (OR= 1.45, CI = 1.08-1.95, P = .015).

CONCLUSION

Patients requiring preoperative dialysis were more likely to experience a perioperative complication and have a longer length of stay. For LRNs performed prior to transplantation, further risk stratification is needed, and treatment sequencing may need to be reconsidered.

Special Considerations in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

Universally accepted as the treatment of choice for children needing renal replacement therapy, kidney transplantation affords children the opportunity for an improved quality of life over dialysis therapy. Immunologic and surgical advances over the last 15 years have improved the pediatric patient and kidney graft survival. Unique to pediatrics, congenital genitourinary anomalies are the most common primary diseases leading to kidney failure, many with urological issues. Early urological evaluation for post-transplant bladder dysfunction and emphasis on immunization adherence are the mainstays of pediatric pretransplant and post-transplant evaluations. A child's height can be challenging, sometimes requiring an intra-abdominally placed graft, particularly if the patient is <20 kg. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens are similar to adult kidney graft recipients, although distinctive pharmacokinetics may change dosing intervals in children from twice a day to thrice a day. Viral infections and secondary malignancies are problematic for children relative to adults. Current trends to reduce/remove corticosteroid therapy from post-transplant protocols have produced improved linear growth with less steroid toxicity; although these studies are still ongoing, graft function and survival are considered acceptable. Finally, all children with a kidney transplant need a smooth transition to adult clinics. Future research in pertinent psychosocial aspects and continued technological advances will only serve to optimize the transition process. Although some aspects of kidney transplantation are similar in children and adults, for instance immunosuppression and immunosuppressive regimens, and rejection mechanisms and their diagnosis using the Banff criteria, there are important differences this review will focus on and which continue to drive innovation.