1
|
Bang JB, Oh C, Kim YS, Kim SH, Yu HC, Kim C, Ju MK, So BJ, Lee SH, Han SY, Jung CW, Kim JK, Ahn HJ, Lee SH, Jeon JY. Safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal after 6 months posttransplant in de novo kidney transplantation: A 1‐year prospective cohort study. Immun Inflamm Dis 2022; 10:e576. [PMID: 34913271 PMCID: PMC8926512 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This prospective multicenter study aimed at investigating the safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal (SW) therapy in kidney transplant recipients with tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil‐based immunosuppression. Methods We analyzed 179 recipients who received kidney transplantation from March 2016 and September 2018. In 179 recipients, 114 patients maintained an immunosuppressive regimen including steroids (steroid continuation [SC] group). The remaining 65 patients were determined to withdraw steroid therapy after 6 months posttransplant (SW group). Metabolic parameters and graft functions of the two groups were evaluated. Results The estimated glomerular filtration rates at 12 months posttransplant were 67.29 ± 20.29 ml/min/1.73 m2 in SC group and 73.72 ± 17.57 ml/min/1.73 m2 in SW group (p < .001). The acute rejection occurred to four recipients in the SC group (3.5%) and no acute rejection occurred to SW group recipients during the 6–2 months posttransplant period. Oral glucose tolerance tests revealed that recipients in the SW group were more improved in glucose metabolism than the SC group during 6–12 months posttransplant. In addition, cholesterol levels and blood pressure decreased after the withdrawal of steroids in the SW group. Conclusion In conclusion, a 6‐month withdrawal of steroids in recipients with low immunological risk and stable graft function can be safely conducted and result in improvement of metabolic profiles. Stable recipients without biopsy‐proven acute rejection and proteinuria can safely withdraw from steroids out of a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen 6‐months posttransplant. A long‐term follow‐up study is needed to verify our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun B. Bang
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Chang‐Kwon Oh
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Yu S. Kim
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Research Institute for Transplantation Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Sung H. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Wonju South Korea
| | - Hee C. Yu
- Department of Surgery Jeonbuk National University College of Medicine Jeonju South Korea
| | - Chan‐Duck Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Kyungpook National University Hospital Daegu South Korea
| | - Man Ki Ju
- Department of Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Byung J. So
- Department of Surgery Wonkwang University Hospital Iksan South Korea
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine Kyung Hee University Seoul South Korea
| | - Sang Y. Han
- Department of Internal Medicine Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Goyang South Korea
| | - Cheol W. Jung
- Department of Surgery Korea University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Joong K. Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine Bong Seng Memorial Hospital Busan South Korea
| | - Hyung J. Ahn
- Department of Surgery Kyung Hee University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Su H. Lee
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Ja Y. Jeon
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Protocol Biopsies on de novo Renal-Transplants at 3 Months after Surgery: Impact on 5-Year Transplant Survival. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163635. [PMID: 34441931 PMCID: PMC8397165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In many centers, a protocol kidney biopsy (PKB) is performed at 3 months post-transplantation (M3), without a demonstrated benefit on death-censored graft survival (DCGS). In this study, we compared DCGS between kidney transplant recipients undergoing a PKB or without such biopsy while accounting for the obvious indication bias. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2007 and 2013, we compared DCGS with respect to the availability and features of a PKB. We built a propensity score (PS) to account for PKB indication likelihood and adjusted the DCGS analysis on PKB availability and the PS. Results: A total of 615 patients were included: 333 had a PKB, 282 did not. In bivariate Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, adjusting for the availability of a PKB and for the PS, a PKB was associated with a better 5-year DCGS independently of the PS (p < 0.001). Among the PKB+ patients, 87 recipients (26%) had IF/TA > 0. Patients with an IF/TA score of 3 had the worst survival. A total of 144 patients (44%) showed cv lesions. Patients with cv2 and cv3 lesions had the worst 5-year DCGS. Conclusions: A M3 PKB was associated with improved graft survival independently of potential confounders. These results could be explained by the early treatment of subclinical immunological events. It could be due to better management of the immunosuppressive regimen.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cun H, Hönger G, Kleiser M, Amico P, Wehmeier C, Steiger J, Dickenmann M, Schaub S. Screening strategy for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or "one size fits all"? Clin Transplant 2020; 35:e14170. [PMID: 33247476 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Screening for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single-center, cross-sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post-transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post-transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post-transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49-67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age-adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasret Cun
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostic and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Kleiser
- HLA-Diagnostic and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostic and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Steiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostic and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|