Prevalence and Patient-Level Correlates of Intentional Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication After Heart-Transplantation-Findings From the International BRIGHT Study

After heart transplantation (HTx), non-adherence to immunosuppressants (IS) is associated with poor outcomes; however, intentional non-adherence (INA) is poorly understood regarding its international variability in prevalence, contributing factors and impact on outcomes. We investigated (1) the prevalence and international variability of INA, (2) patient-level correlates of INA, and (3) relation of INA with clinical outcomes. Secondary analysis of data from the BRIGHT study-an international multi-center, cross-sectional survey examining multi-level factors of adherence in 1,397 adult HTx recipients. INA during the implementation phase, i.e., drug holiday and dose alteration, was measured using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale© (BAASIS©). Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed with data retrieved through patient interview, patient self-report and in clinical records. INA prevalence was 3.3% (n = 46/1,397)-drug holidays: 1.7% (n = 24); dose alteration: 1.4% (n = 20); both: 0.1% (n = 2). University-level education (OR = 2.46, CI = 1.04-5.83), insurance not covering IS costs (OR = 2.21, CI = 1.01-4.87) and barriers (OR = 4.90, CI = 2.73-8.80) were significantly associated with INA; however, clinical outcomes were not. Compared to other single-center studies, this sample's INA prevalence was low. More than accessibility or financial concerns, our analyses identified patient-level barriers as INA drivers. Addressing patients' IS-related barriers, should decrease INA.

Behavioural and psychological patterns of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective study

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive lung condition. Currently, care models predominantly focus on acute medical and pharmacological needs. As a step towards holistic care, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the psychological and behavioural needs of IPF patients treated with pirfenidone from diagnosis until two years of follow-up.

Methods

The following variables were selected from the literature on patients’ needs and the COM-B model, a theoretical model explaining behaviour: medication adherence, barriers to adherence, importance and intentions of medication adherence, anxiety, depression, health literacy, knowledge, reported side effects, adherence to sun protection recommendations, alcohol use, physical activity, quality of life and health status. Linear and generalised linear models for longitudinal data were used to evaluate the evolution since treatment initiation.

Results

We included 66 outpatients: 72.7% men, mean age of 70.3 years (range 50–87), predicted mean forced vital capacity of 85.8% (SD 17.4) and predicted mean diffusing capacity for monoxide of 56.9% (SD 15.7). The participants placed considerable importance on following the treatment recommendations. We noticed difficulties regarding health literacy, alcohol use, pirfenidone adherence (decline over time) and adherence to sun protection recommendations (early in follow-up care). There were low levels of physical activity (no effect of time), high body mass indices (decline over time) and moderate levels of depression and anxiety.

Conclusion

When providing care to IPF patients, behavioural issues, health literacy and psychological well-being should be taken into consideration. There is a need to further explore interventions and care models to tackle these difficulties.

Trial registration This study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identifier NCT03567785) on May 9th, 2018

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02041-6.

Influence on kinesiophobia by disability, physical, and behavioural variables after a heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

From clinical experience, kinesiophobia represents a barrier to being physically active after a heart transplantation (HTx), but studies in this field are lacking. Identifying the factors associated with kinesiophobia is essential to determine preventive interventions to avoid negative consequences for health.

AIMS

To study the influence of disability, physical, and behavioural variables on kinesiophobia in patients with an HTx.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients with an HTx [51 women; mean age 56 (SD 12.1) years] were recruited at an outpatient clinic. These patients were asked to fill in questionnaires measuring kinesiophobia, self-reported physical activity (PA), exercise self-efficacy, motivation for PA, and disability. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the statistical prediction of kinesiophobia as a dependent variable, with the questionnaires, gender and education as independent variables.

RESULTS

The independent variables explained 70% of the variance in kinesiophobia. The prediction model was significant (F = 32.1, P < 0.001). The time from transplantation (standardised coefficient, beta; -0.17), the total exercise self-efficacy (-0.16), extrinsic motivation (-0.23), and the disability total score (0.63) were significant predictors of kinesiophobia, while the independent variables of gender, education, intrinsic motivation, and the PA total score were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that a short time from transplantation, low self-efficacy, low extrinsic motivation, and a high level of disability explained high levels of kinesiophobia in patients after an HTx. These results suggest that an increased awareness of the biopsychosocial health perspective is essential in order to maximising patient outcomes after an HTx.

From Nonadherence to Adherence

Medication nonadherence (MNA) after solid organ transplantation is highly prevalent and associated with (late) (sub)clinical acute rejection, graft dysfunction and graft loss, development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, and antibody-mediated rejection. MNA is predominantly unintentional and originates from barriers to adherence that are often multifactorial and complex. Tools to establish an early diagnosis of MNA include incorporation of MNA as a vital sign in daily clinical practice, self-reporting using validated questionnaires, calculating intrapatient variability in drug exposure and applying electronic monitoring, and recent audio and video technologies such as in home telemonitoring. MNA is a modifiable risk factor after organ transplantation, and treatment is most effective if a multimodal approach is used. Management of MNA comprises education (cognitive) and counseling (behavioral) that require the involvement of a trained multidisciplinary team [ideally physician, nurse (specialist), social worker, transplant coordinator, psychologist, clinical pharmacist], electronic reminder and support systems (eg, Medication Event Monitoring System, smartphone), and different types of novel mobile health applications as well as simplification of the medication dosing regimen. Future studies that evaluate novel therapeutic approaches for MNA should assure the use of reliable MNA measures, focus on multimodal individualized therapy for enriched nonadherent target populations (eg, adolescents), and incorporate clinically relevant endpoints. Costs, time, and personnel investments should be taken into account when assessing scalability and cost-effectiveness of novel therapeutic strategies. This review provides suggestions how different types of transplant centers can set up a dedicated MNA program according to available resources to define and achieve realistic clinical goals in managing MNA.

Prospective single-centre clinical observational study on electronically monitored medication non-adherence, its psychosocial risk factors and lifestyle behaviours after heart transplantation: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

In heart transplant recipients (HTRs), non-adherence (NA) to immunosuppressive (IS) medication and to recommended lifestyle behaviours are a common phenomenon and associated with higher risk of allograft rejection, organ loss and mortality. Risk factors for NA are highly diverse and still insufficiently researched. Precise measures of NA and an accurate understanding of its aetiology are of undisputable importance to detect patients at risk and intervene accordingly. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy and concordance of different measures for NA as well as to determine potential risk factors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre prospective observational trial. HTRs who are at least aged 18 are no less than 6 months post-transplant and receive tacrolimus (Prograf or Advagraf), cyclosporine (Sandimmun) or everolimus (Certican) as their prescribed IS medication are eligible for participation. We only include patients during the phase of medication implementation. At study enrolment, we assess depression, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, social support, attachment, experiences and attitudes towards IS medication, emotional responses after transplantation, satisfaction with information about IS medication and perceptions and beliefs about medications. We further ask patients to rate their lifestyle behaviours concerning alcohol, smoking, diet, physical activity, sun protection and appointment keeping via questionnaires. Three different measurement methods for NA are applied at T0: self-reports, physician's estimates and IS trough levels. NA is monitored prospectively using an electronic multicompartment pillbox (MEMS, VAICA) over a 3-month period. Meanwhile, participants receive phone calls every second week to obtain additional self-reports, resulting in a total of seven measurement points.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Erlangen (Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nürnberg). Written informed consent is attained from all participants. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00020496.

Management of diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Diabetes is a common feature in cirrhotic individuals both before and after liver transplantation and negatively affects prognosis. Certain aetiological agents of chronic liver disease and loss of liver function per se favour the occurrence of pre-transplant diabetes in susceptible individuals, whereas immunosuppressant treatment, changes in lifestyle habits, and donor- and procedure-related factors contribute to diabetes development/persistence after transplantation. Challenges in the management of pre-transplant diabetes include the profound nutritional alterations characterizing cirrhotic individuals and the limitations to the use of drugs with liver metabolism. Special issues in the management of post-transplant diabetes include the diabetogenic potential of immunosuppressant drugs and the increased cardiovascular risk characterizing solid organ transplant survivors. Overall, the pharmacological management of cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation is complicated by the lack of specific guidelines reflecting the paucity of data on the impact of glycaemic control and the safety and efficacy of anti-hyperglycaemic agents in these individuals.