Hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant: Donation after cardiac death donor vs donation after brain death donor grafts

Safety and Effectiveness of Early Primary Stent Placement for Hepatic Artery Stenosis in Liver Transplant Recipients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of early primary stent placement (within 30 days of liver transplantation) for hepatic artery stenosis (HAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent liver transplantation between February 2001 and February 2024 were evaluated for HAS. Patients who underwent primary stent placement were selected and stratified based on the time from anastomosis to intervention. Early intervention was defined as primary stent placement within 30 days of surgical anastomosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for primary patency.

RESULTS

HAS occurred in 83 of 779 (11%) patients (median age, 55 years; interquartile range, 48-63 years; 27 [48%] women), with 56 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Stent placement was performed within 0-6 days of the anastomosis in 11 (20%), 7-14 days in 11 (20%), 15-30 days in 7 (12%), 31-70 days in 9 (16%), and >70 days in 18 (32%) patients. Technical success was 100%. Primary patency rates were 89%, 87%, and 87% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Primary assisted patency rates were 100% at 1, 3, and 5 years. Early interventions at 0-6 days, 7-14 days, and 15-30 days showed primary patency rates of 100%, 90%, and 86%, respectively, at 1 year (P = .58). There was no difference in primary patency between the early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) cohorts (P = .88). There was 1 Grade 4 adverse event. There were no cases of anastomotic rupture, hepatic artery dissection, or graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic artery stent placement within 30 days of liver transplantation is safe and technically successful with excellent long-term primary patency.

Risk factors and management of hepatic artery stenosis post liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic Artery Stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation (LT), if untreated, can lead to hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) that carries significant morbidity.

AIMS

To identify risk factors associated with HAS and determine if endovascular therapy (EVT) reduces the occurrence of HAT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adult LT patients between 2013 and 2018. The primary outcome was development of HAT, and secondary outcomes included graft failure and mortality. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds ratio of developing HAS. Outcomes between intervention types were compared with Fisher's-exact test.

RESULTS

The odds of HAS doubled in DCD-donor recipients (OR=2.27; P = 0.04) and transplants requiring vascular reconstruction for donor arterial variation (OR=2.19, P = 0.046). Of the 63 identified HAS patients, 44 underwent EVT, 7 with angioplasty alone, 37 combined with stenting. HAT was not significantly different in those who underwent angioplasty with or without stenting than conservative treatment (P = 0.71). However, compared to patients without HAS, patients with HAS had higher odds of biliary stricture and decreased graft and overall patient survival (log-rank P < 0.001 & P = 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HAS is significantly higher in DCD-graft recipients. EVT was not associated with reduction in HAT progression. HAS has poor graft and overall survival.

Impact of Microsurgical Anastomosis of Hepatic Artery on Arterial Complications and Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

Hepatic artery (HA) complications after liver transplant (LT) can lead to biliary complications, graft failure, and mortality. Although microsurgery has been established to improve anastomotic outcomes, it prolongs surgical time and has not reached widespread adoption at all transplant centers. We investigated the incidences of arterial, biliary complications and outcomes after using microsurgery to anastomose HA during LT. Retrospective cohort of consecutive LT performed from 2006 to 2018 was reviewed for operative details and postoperative outcomes. Cox-regression models were used to investigate the relationship between variables and outcomes. Eighty (62.5%) LTs (Group 1) were performed without and compared with 48 (Group 2) with microsurgical anastomosis of HA. Both groups were comparable in terms of arterial and biliary anastomoses performed. Incidence of early HA thrombosis was similar (6.2% vs 2.1%, P = .28). Group 2 had lower incidence of short- and long-term arterial complications, especially amongst living donor liver transplantations (LDLT) (5.3% vs 35.0%, P = .022). On multivariate analysis, microsurgery was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.71) of, and LDLT had higher risk (HR 4.23, 95% CI 1.46-12.27) of arterial complications. Biliary complications were associated with LDLT (HR 3.91, 95% CI 1.30-11.71) and dual biliary anastomoses (HR 5.26, 95% CI 1.15-24.08) but not with occurrence of HA complications. Worse patient survival was associated with the occurrence of any HA complication (HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.78-9.48). Hepatic arterial complications can be reduced using microsurgical techniques for the anastomosis, resulting in improved patient survival outcomes after liver transplantation.

The devil is in the detail: current management of perioperative surgical complications after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in the field, perioperative morbidity is common after liver transplantation. This review examines the current literature to provide up-to-date management of common surgical complications associated with liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research focuses on problems with anastomoses of the vena cava, portal vein, hepatic artery, and bile ducts. Interventional endoscopic and radiological techniques are used more frequently to avoid reoperation.

SUMMARY

Advances in the management of perioperative surgical complications have focused on minimally invasive measures that successfully treat technical problems with implantation of liver allografts from both living and deceased donors.