Delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction and renal outcomes in liver transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction

Optimization and Protection of Kidney Health in Liver Transplant Recipients: Intra- and Postoperative Approaches

Postoperative acute kidney injury after liver transplant (LT) has long-term implications for kidney health. LT recipients are at risk of acute kidney injury due to a number of factors related to the donor liver, intraoperative factors including surgical technique, as well as recipient factors, such as pre-LT kidney function and postoperative complications. This review discusses these factors in detail and their impact on posttransplant kidney function. Long-term risk factors such as calcineurin inhibitors have also been discussed. Additionally, the impact of liver allocation policies on pre- and post-LT kidney health is discussed.

Evaluation of Single Versus Two-Dose Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Live-Donor Liver Transplant

BACKGROUND

Basiliximab is a high-cost induction agent typically given as two doses in liver transplant recipients. This study evaluated renal outcomes in live-donor liver transplant recipients (LDLTRs) with stable renal function at the time of transplant receiving one versus two doses of basiliximab.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 231 adult LDLTR with a serum creatinine (SCr) <1.5 mg/dL on post-transplant Day 5. The primary endpoint was a change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 between the groups. Secondary endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), liver rejection, and culture-positive infections within 3 and 6 months of transplant. Basiliximab-related cost savings were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Median change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 was no different between the single-dose or two-dose groups (0.1 [IQR: -0.1-0.3] vs. 0.2 [IQR: -0.1-0.4], p = 0.08). Incidence of AKI was 56.9% in the two-dose group versus 39.0% in the single-dose group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in bacterial (p = 0.40), fungal (p = 0.59), or viral (p = 0.78) infections. Acute cellular rejection through 6 months post-transplant was noted in 9.7% of patients receiving two doses and 6.3% in the single-dose arm (p = 0.42). Basiliximab-related cost savings in the single-dose arm was ∼$697 863.72 over 159 transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose basiliximab appears to be safe and effective in place of two doses in LDLTR with stable renal function on post-transplant Day 5. Utilization of a single basiliximab dose significantly reduced medication-related costs.

Management of long-term complications from immunosuppression

This review discusses long-term complications from immunosuppressants after liver transplantation and the management of these complications. Common complications of calcineurin inhibitors include nephrotoxicity and metabolic diseases. Nephrotoxicity can be managed by targeting a lower drug level and/or adding an immunosuppressant of a different class. Metabolic disorders can be managed by treating the underlying condition and targeting a lower drug level. Gastrointestinal adverse effects and myelosuppression are common complications of antimetabolites that are initially managed with dose reduction or discontinuation if adverse events persist. Mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors are associated with myelosuppression, proteinuria, impaired wound healing, and stomatitis, which may require dose reduction or discontinuation. Induction agents and agents used for steroid-refractory rejection or antibody-mediated rejection are reviewed. Other rare complications of immunosuppressants are discussed as well.

Post Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction-Evaluation, Management and Immunosuppressive Practice

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective and lifesaving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Significant improvement in intermediate and long-term survival has been possible due to advancements in immunosuppressive therapy, perioperative care, and surgical techniques. Despite these advances, metabolic complications, including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, and renal dysfunction, are challenging issues after LT. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) after LT are common and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of kidney injury after LT is challenging, and no technique has yet proven effective in prediction of renal dysfunction. The methods for assessing renal function range from formulas that predict glomerular filtration rate to non-invasive biomarkers. The universal adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease has a direct impact on the incidence of peri-transplant AKI and development of CKD in the long-term. Post-LT renal dysfunction is multifactorial and is usually a result of pre-transplantation comorbidities, occurrence of renal dysfunction on the waiting list, perioperative events, and post-transplant nephrotoxic immunosuppressive medication use. Early identification of patients at risk for renal dysfunction and adoption of preventive measures are crucial in the pre-transplant period. No data are currently available to suggest a surgical technique that reliably demonstrates renal protection. Nephroprotective strategies during LT follow accepted surgical practice guidelines, such as maintenance of intravascular volume and mean arterial pressure. The management of kidney disease following LT is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine is significantly elevated, few interventions impact the course of progression. Early nephroprotective measures are strongly advised and they mostly center on delaying the administration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) during the initial postoperative period, lowering CNI dosage and combining CNI with mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. The reasons for renal failure following LT, the techniques used to diagnose it, and the therapies designed to preserve renal function both immediately and late after LT are all critically evaluated in this review.

Current Use of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

Since the first successful liver transplant in 1967, immunosuppression has allowed liver transplantation to become the standard treatment of end-stage liver disease. Over the decades, the rates of rejection have decreased, and patient survival outcomes have significantly improved in large part due to the introduction and advancements of immunosuppression medications. However, the adverse effects associated with long-term immunosuppression have created new challenges facing liver transplantation and added significantly to posttransplantation morbidity. This review presents the data and rationale for immunosuppression approaches, addresses the main controversies related to immunosuppression in liver transplantation, and explores some of the newer advancements in immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients

Introduction: Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. Program evaluation aims: To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. Results: Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N  =  86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N  =  158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, P < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (P < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; P < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; P  =  .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.

Anti-thymocyte globulin induction with delayed introduction of tacrolimus preserves renal function in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC)-mediated renal disease occurs in up to 70% of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients. The safety and efficacy of renal-sparing immunosuppression using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and delayed TAC administration has not been studied in children. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ATG induction on preserving renal function in children within the first year (Y1) post-LT in a single-center retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Children under age 18 years of who received isolated LT from 2008 to 2020 with a GFR < 70 received renal-sparing (RS) protocol consisting of ATG with methylprednisolone (MP), delayed TAC administration, lower initial TAC trough goals, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The RS group was matched 1:2 by age and LT indication with standard immunosuppression (SI) group. Changes in renal function as well as adverse events within Y1 post-LT were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-four pediatric patients were included in the analysis, of which 13 received RS. As expected, the RS group had significantly lower mean TAC trough levels at 30 days (10.3 vs. 13.2, p = .001) post-LT. Renal function was significantly preserved at 6 (-0.26 vs. 0.21, p = .004) and 12 months (-0.33 vs. 0.11, p = .003) post-LT in the RS versus SI group as measured by mean change in serum creatinine, with similar trends observed in eGFR and cystatin C. ACR, sepsis, viremia, graft loss and mortality occurred at similar rates in both RS and SI groups.

CONCLUSION

Induction immunosuppression with ATG and delayed TAC administration in children with renal impairment is safe and effectively preserves renal function during Y1 post-LT.

Renal function after liver transplantation: Real-world experience with basiliximab induction and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Routine use of delayed reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor treatment with induction immunosuppression in liver transplantation to minimize post-operative kidney injury is still scarce.

AIM

To evaluate real-world experience of basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, kidney function was evaluated pre- and postoperatively by measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Adult patients undergoing liver transplantation between 2000 and 2017 were divided into a conventional treatment group (immediate-introduction of tacrolimus, target trough levels 10-15 ng/mL, and corticosteroids, n = 203) and a revised treatment group (basiliximab induction, reduced-dose tacrolimus, target through levels 5-8 ng/mL, delayed until day three, and mycophenolate mofetil 2000 mg/day, n = 343).

RESULTS

Mean mGFR was similar between groups at wait-listing (85.3 vs 84.1 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.60), but higher in the revised treatment group at 3 (56.8 vs 63.4 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.004) and 12 months post-transplant (60.9 vs 69.7 ml/min/1.73m², p<0.001); this difference remained after correcting for multiple confounders and was independent of pre-transplant mGFR. In the revised treatment group, biopsy proven acute rejection rate was lower (38% vs. 21%, p<0.001), and graft-survival better (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus is associated with less kidney injury when compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, without increased risk of rejection, graft loss or death.

Peritransplant Renal Dysfunction in Liver Transplant Candidates

Renal function is intricately tied to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and overall prognosis among patients with cirrhosis. The estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and etiology of renal impairment are even more magnified among cirrhotic patients in the period surrounding liver transplantation. Novel biomarkers including cystatin C and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin have been demonstrated to more accurately assess renal dysfunction and aid in the diagnosis of competing etiologies. Accurately identifying the severity and chronicity of renal dysfunction among transplant candidates is an imperative component with respect to stratifying patients toward simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation versus liver transplantation alone.

[Kidney failure after liver transplantation]

One third of cirrhotic patients present impaired kidney function. It has multifactorial causes and has a harmful effect on patients' morbi-mortality before and after liver transplant. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation and liver-transplant recipients are at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Causes for renal dysfunction can be divided in three groups: preoperative, peroperative and postoperative factors. To date, there is no consensus for the modality of evaluation the risk for chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, and for its prevention. In the present review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease to determine a risk stratification for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this setting, and highlight the indications of combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Prognostic Impact of Early Recovering Acute Kidney Injury Following Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT), but the specific impact of rapidly resolving AKI is not elucidated. This study investigates the factors associated with early recovery from AKI and its association with post-LT outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 441 liver transplant recipients with end-stage liver disease without pretransplant renal impairment. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria and early renal recovery by its disappearance within 7 d post-LT.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients (32%) developed a post-LT AKI, of whom 99 (69%) recovered early and 45 (31%) did not. Factors associated with early recovery were Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage 1 (odds ratio [OR],14.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.59-40.22; P < 0.0001), minimum prothrombin time >50 % (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.67-13.46; P = 0.003) and aspartate aminotransferase peak value <1000 U/L (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.64-10.75; P = 0.002) within 48 h post-LT. Patients with early recovery had a renal prognosis similar to that of patients without AKI with no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between day 7 and 1 y. Their relative risk of developing chronic kidney disease was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.55-1.41; P = 0.6) with survival identical to patients without AKI and better than patients without early recovery (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with post-LT AKI recover early and have a similar renal prognosis and survival to those without post-LT AKI. Factors associated with early renal recovery are related to the stage of AKI, the extent of liver injury, and the early graft function. Patients at risk of not recovering may benefit the most from perioperative protective strategies, particularly those aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors.

CKD in Recipients of Nonkidney Solid Organ Transplants: A Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) after solid organ transplant is a common clinical presentation, affecting 10% to 20% of liver, heart and lung transplant recipients and accounting for approximately 5% of the kidney transplant waiting list. The causes of CKD are different for different types of transplants and are not all, or even predominantly, due to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, with significant heterogeneity particularly in liver transplant recipients. Many solid organ transplant recipients with advanced CKD benefit from kidney transplantation, but have a higher rate of death while waitlisted and higher mortality following transplant than the general kidney failure population. Recent organ allocation policies and proposals have attempted to address the appropriate identification and prioritization of candidates in need of a kidney transplant, either simultaneous with or following non-kidney transplant. Future research should focus on predictive factors for individuals identified at high risk for progression to kidney failure and death, and strategies to preserve kidney function and minimize the CKD burden in this unique patient population.

Kidney Failure after Liver Transplantation

One-third of patients with cirrhosis present kidney failure (AKI and CKD). It has multifactorial causes and a harmful effect on morbidity and mortality before and after liver transplantation. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation, and liver transplant recipients are at a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. The causes of renal dysfunction can be divided into three groups: pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative factors. To date, there is no consensus on the modality to evaluate the risk of chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, or for its prevention. In this narrative review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease in order to establish a risk categorization for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this context, and highlight the indications of combined liver–kidney transplantation.

Basiliximab Induction with Delayed Calcineurin Inhibitors for High-Risk Lung Transplant Candidates

PURPOSE

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use has improved lung transplantation outcomes. However, significant perioperative complications in patients receiving CNI can deteriorate the early course of lung transplantation. To date, there is no consensus regarding the optimal agent for the induction regimen after lung transplantation. We aimed to determine the efficacy of basiliximab induction with delayed CNI initiation in the prevention of acute complications without compromising immunosuppression in high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 236 patients at a single lung transplant center were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-one patients (17.4%) received basiliximab induction, and 195 patients (82.6%) received a routine triple-drug regimen without induction. The primary endpoint was postoperative acute kidney injury with several other postoperative outcomes as secondary end-points.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the induction group had a higher proportion of patients who were admitted before transplantation (95.1% vs. 47.7%, p<0.001) and received intensive unit care (90.2% vs. 33.8%, p<0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (87.8% vs. 20.0%, p<0.001) compared to the non-induction group. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of acute rejection between groups (p=0.657), although lower incidence of postoperative complications, including acute kidney injuries or culture-proven infections, were observed in the induction group. However, the differences were not statistically significant. A subgroup analysis of high-risk and preoperative ECMO support groups showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction with delayed CNI initiation for high-risk patients might decrease the incidence of perioperative complications, including acute renal failure, without increasing the risk of acute rejection.

Immunosuppression trends in solid organ transplantation: The future of individualization, monitoring, and management

Immunosuppression regimens used in solid organ transplant have evolved significantly over the past 70 years in the United States. Early immunosuppression and targets for allograft success were measured by incidence and severity of allograft rejection and 1-year patient survival. The limited number of agents, infancy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching techniques and lack of understanding of immunoreactivity limited the early development of effective regimens. The 1980s and 1990s saw incredible advancements in these areas, with acute rejection rates halving in a short span of time. However, the constant struggle to achieve the optimal balance between under- and overimmunosuppression is weaved throughout the history of transplant immunosuppression. The aim of this paper is to discuss the different eras of immunosuppression and highlight the important milestones that were achieved while also discussing this in the context of rational agent selection and regimen design. This discussion sets the stage for how we can achieve optimal long-term outcomes during the next era of immunosuppression, which will move from universal protocols to patient-specific optimization.

Toward Curative Immunomodulation Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. HBV surface antigen loss is considered a functional cure and is an ideal goal for antiviral therapy. However, current treatment regimens, including nucleos(t)ide analogues or interferons monotherapy and combination therapy, rarely achieve this goal in chronic hepatitis B patients. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), as well as many direct antiviral drugs in ongoing development, are able to inhibit HBV replication and gene expression, but it is hard to achieve immune control and prevent recurrence after therapy cessation. Host immunity, especially HBV-specific T cell response, is proven to play a critical role in control or clearance of HBV infection. Considering HBV chronically infected patients display varying degrees of dysfunction regarding their immune system, novel approaches to enhancing antiviral immune responses are necessary in order to combine with current antiviral agents. In this Review, we focus on the role of innate and adaptive immune responses in HBV immunopathogenesis and discuss attractive strategies or drugs that aim to activate or rebuild antiviral immunity to achieve the goal of an HBV functional cure.