|
1
|
Drachenberg CB, Buettner-Herold M, Aguiar PV, Horsfield C, Mikhailov AV, Papadimitriou JC, Seshan SV, Perosa M, Boggi U, Uva P, Rickels M, Grzyb K, Arend L, Cuatrecasas M, Toniolo MF, Farris AB, Renaudin K, Zhang L, Roufousse C, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Kandaswamy R, White S, Burke G, Cantarovich D, Parsons RF, Cooper M, Kudva YC, Kukla A, Haririan A, Parajuli S, Merino-Torres JF, Argente-Pla M, Meier R, Dunn T, Ugarte R, Rao JS, Vistoli F, Stratta R, Odorico J. Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:362-379. [PMID: 37871799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maike Buettner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexei V Mikhailov
- Department of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Division of Renal Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcelo Perosa
- Beneficência Portuguesa and Bandeirantes Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Pablo Uva
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Krzyztof Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Arend
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lizhi Zhang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Candice Roufousse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Nephrology/Medicine, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Rainer Gruessner
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - George Burke
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Argente-Pla
- University Hospital La Fe, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raphael Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Richard Ugarte
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Sushil Rao
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hussein A, Karydis N, Gill-Barman B, Callaghan C. Incidental appendicectomy in pancreas transplantation: A single-center study. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15166. [PMID: 37848266 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendicitis in pancreatic transplant recipients can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Incidental appendicectomy (IA) during pancreas transplantation obviates the risk of appendicitis but potentially at the cost of increased operating time or early post-operative complications. This study reviewed the value of IA at a single center. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a pancreas transplant in our unit from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2020, with end of follow-up on May 21st, 2023; recipients were grouped by whether or not an IA was performed during pancreas transplantation. Donor, recipient, operative, and graft outcomes were compared between the two groups. Post-transplant complications related to appendiceal pathology (or IA) were recorded and classified. RESULTS Two hundred forty-three patients underwent a pancreas transplant; 227 (93%) patients had an appendix in situ at transplantation, and of these 53 (23%) underwent an IA and 174 (77%) did not. There were no statistically significant differences in operative time (p = .06) or hospital stay (p = .50) between the two groups. In the IA cohort, there were no Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications relating to the appendicectomy. In those that did not undergo an IA, two patients (1%) subsequently required appendicectomy due to appendicitis. Comparison of pancreatic graft survival showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .44). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that IA is effective at reducing risks of post-transplant appendiceal complications without significantly prolonging inpatient stay or impairing graft survival. These data support the consideration of undertaking an IA for all patients undergoing a pancreas transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliyah Hussein
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Surgery, Renal Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Greece
| | - Baljit Gill-Barman
- Department of Histopathology, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|