Sufficient hepatic artery flow compensates for poor portal vein flow after liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis

Outcomes of Arterial Embolization vs Covered Stents for Delayed Massive Hemorrhage After Pancreatic or Biliary Surgery

BACKGROUND

Covered stent placement (CSP) is gaining popularity for the management of delayed massive hemorrhage (DMH) after pancreatic or biliary surgery. However, early studies have produced conflicting results regarding the potential advantages of the procedure. We aimed to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of arterial embolization (AE) and CSP for DMH.

METHODS

We analyzed data for patients who underwent AE or CSP as an endovascular treatment (EVT) for DMH from the common hepatic artery (CHA) and its distal arteries between January 2009 and December 2019. We evaluated the major hepatic complications, in-hospital mortality, and 1-year mortality associated with the procedures, according to age, sex, reintervention, arterial variant, interval between surgery and EVT, and portal vein stenosis.

RESULTS

All hemorrhages were treated using AE (n = 50) or CSP (n = 20). CSP was associated with no in-hospital mortality (32% vs. 0%, p = 0.003), and lower incidences of major hepatic complications (44% vs. 10%, p = 0.011) and 1-year mortality (54% vs. 25%, p = 0.035) compared with AE, respectively. There was no significant difference in technical success and reintervention rates. Compared with AE, the risk-adjusted odds ratios for CSP (95% confidence intervals) for major hepatic complications and 1-year mortality were 0.06 (0.01-0.39) and 0.19 (0.05-0.71), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CSP is superior to AE regarding major hepatic complications and in-hospital- and 1-year mortality in patients with DMH from hepatic arteries.

Adaptation of lenvatinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the adaptation of lenvatinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHOD

Fifty-three patients with HCC were treated with lenvatinib. Before and after treatment blood sampling, patients were examined by computed tomography and ultrasonography. In patients with portal trunk invasion (Vp4), the analysis focused on the degree of occlusion due to the tumor in the portal trunk. In patients without major PVTT {ie, invasion of the primary branch of the portal vein [Vp3] or Vp4}, portal blood flow volume was measured by Doppler analysis; however, Doppler analysis is difficult to perform in patients with major PVTT, so the time from administration of the contrast agent to when it reached the primary branch of the portal vein (portal vein arrival time) was evaluated with the contrast agent Sonazoid.

RESULTS

Patients with Vp4 had a significantly worse prognosis than patients with Vp3 and a significant increase in Child-Pugh score at 2 months. Patients with major PVTT had a poor prognosis if the degree of occlusion of the portal trunk was 70% or more. In patients without major PVTT, portal blood flow was significantly decreased after administration of lenvatinib; and in patients with major PVTT, the hepatic artery and portal vein arrival times were significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib treatment should be avoided in patients with Vp4 with a high degree of portal trunk occlusion because of concerns about decreased portal blood flow.

Does graft hemodynamics affect the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation?

Although experimental studies have reported that hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury promotes tumor growth and metastases, the impact of graft hemodynamics on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. To investigate the association between graft hemodynamics and HCC recurrence after LT, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 279 patients who underwent LT for HCC. Graft hemodynamics including portal vein flow (PVF), hepatic artery flow (HAF), and total hepatic flow (THF) was analyzed as a predictor of HCC recurrence, using competing risk regression analyses. The cutoff values of PVF, HAF, and THF were set at the lower quartile of distribution. A cumulative recurrence curve demonstrated that low THF (<1511 mL/min, P = .005) was significantly associated with increased recurrence, whereas neither low PVF (<1230 mL/min, P = .150) nor low HAF (<164 mL/min, P = .110) was significant. On multivariate analysis, outside Milan criteria (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] = 3.742; P < .001), microvascular invasion (SHR = 3.698; P < .001), and low THF (SHR = 2.359; P = .010) were independently associated with increased HCC recurrence. In conclusion, our findings suggest that graft hemodynamics may play an important role in HCC recurrence after LT.